
Learn the Supracondylar fracture of the humerus: MUA and K-wiring of Flexion pattern fracture surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Supracondylar fracture of the humerus: MUA and K-wiring of Flexion pattern fracture surgical procedure.
Supracondylar fracture of the distal humerus is the commonest elbow injury in children. Extension fractures with posterior displacement of the distal fragment are the most frequent. Flexion injuries with anterior displacement of the distal fragment account for approximately 2-3% of all supracondylar fractures. They are generally the result of falls onto the olecranon process (extension injuries occur secondary to fall onto outstretched hand). It is important not to miss these injuries since management is often different to the more common extension variety. Flexion type injuries typically occur in slightly older children (5-8 years compared to 2-4 years).
Injuries to the brachial artery and median and radial nerves are much more common in extension in extension supracondylar fractures (neurovascular structures are anterior and therefore stretched as the fracture extends) than the flexion type. The commonest nerve injury in flexion type injuries is the ulnar nerve, occurring in 10-20% of cases.
Closed reduction and percutaneous K wire stabilisation should be attempted as the ideal treatment. However, achieving and maintaining adequate reduction of the fracture by closed means is difficult and open reduction is required much more frequently than for extension type injuries.
Outcomes are good providing adequate reduction can be achieved. Non union and long term stiffness are very rare.
Readers will also find of interest the following OrthOracle techniques:
Fixation of distal third humeral shaft fracture using Synthes LCP extra-articular distal humeral plate
Open Reduction and Internal fixation of proximal humeral physeal fracture using Synthes Philos plate
Internal Fixation of Olecranon fracture using Synthes LCP Olecranon plate
Suture tension-band fixation of olecranon fracture using Arthrex Fibretape sutures

INDICATIONS
Undisplaced supracondylar fractures are managed in a cast with the elbow flexed just below 90 degrees.
Displaced flexion supracondylar fractures require reduction. The majority will then be stabilised with percutaneous K wires.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
A thorough neurovascular assessment is mandatory. However, this can be difficult in young children. The radial artery should be felt. Absence of radial pulse is reasonably common in grade III extension supracondylar fractures. The collateral circulation around the elbow is excellent and in most cases the hand will be well perfused, the “pulseless pink hand”. Management of the pulseless pink hand is controversial but is generally agreed that hand function will not be compromised even if the pulse does not return post reduction of fracture. In flexion injuries vascular injury is extremely uncommon. There are no reported cases in the literature. Most neurovascular injuries are due to traction. In extension injuries the median and radial nerves and the brachial artery are at risk of being stretched since they are in front of the elbow. The ulnar nerve is behind the elbow and therefore stretched in flexion injuries. The close proximity of the ulnar nerve to the medial column and medial epicondyle does put it at risk of entrapment in flexion type injuries.
In the case of median and radial nerve deficits it is reasonable to manage expectantly and observe over a few weeks. Most cases are neurapraxias and will resolve. Whilst ulnar nerve injuries are also frequently neurapraxia, care should be taken to ensure that the nerve is not trapped at the fracture site. This can be done through a small medial incision.
IMAGING
Anteroposterior and lateral plain radiographs are mandatory to make the correct diagnosis.
The Gartland classification is applied to extension supracondylar fractures but can also be applied to the flexion pattern.
Gartland I – undisplaced
Gartland II – single cortex (anterior or posterior) intact
Gartland III – completely displaced.
Grade IV was aded later. This describes a supracondylar fracture that is completely displaced but with both anterior and posterior instability (denoting that both the anterior and posterior periosteum have torn.
When assessing the radiograph look to see whether the distal fragment has moved laterally or medially. This may help in determining the best approach if open reduction is required.This is especially in the case of extension supracondylar fracture where posterolateral displacement increases risk of damage to the median nerve and brachial artery.
When assessing the adequacy of reduction the lateral view is important. On the lateral radiograph the anterior humeral line is extended down the proximal humerus and should intersect the middle 1/3 of the capitellum. Failure to intersect any part of the capitellum suggests unsatisfactory reduction.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Most surgeons elect to operate on these fractures with the patient in a supine position. Surgery with the patient prone has been described with the arm allowed to hang free over the edge of the operating table with the elbow flexed (Sharafi 2018).
If closed reduction of the fracture is not possible open reduction is indicated. A medial incision allows access to the medial column and also exploration of the ulnar nerve. A lateral incision may also be necessary. Direct anterior approaches should be avoided.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Grade I or undisplaced fractures can be managed in a cast. By definition these injuries are indistinguishable from extension injuries and are treated in the same manner. Grade II injuries are reduced by extending the elbow and in theory can be managed in a straight arm cast. This is quite uncomfortable for patients and controlling rotation in a straight arm cast can be difficult. In practice most grade II fractures and all grade III will require K wires stabilisation.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
There are no contra indications to attempted closed reduction and percutaneous pin stabilisation. Surgeons should be cautious is the presence of ulnar nerve injury since the nerve may be entrapped at the fracture site.

Surgery s performed under general anaesthetic. The consent process should explain that whilst closed reduction and percutaneous stabilisation with K wires is the preferred method, it is possible that open reduction will be required. This would involve medial and possibly also lateral incisions.The patient is placed supine. A tourniquet is mandatory in case open surgery is necessary.

Patients will generally be able to be discharged home the same day as the surgery. Check neurovascular status prior to discharge. A broad arm sling allows the arm to be rested. Clinic review at 1 week. If necessary backstab cast can be reinforced.
Fractures will be stable at 3-4 weeks. K wires are generally removed in clinic at this stage and the arm mobilised. Physiotherapy is not required and can result in rebound stiffness. Parents are warned that whilst a functional range of movement rapidly returns, full range of movement may take 6-8 weeks post removal of cast and wires.
Contact sports should not resume until 6 weeks post injury.

Bone healing is reliable is both flexion and extension supracondylar fractures. There are no reported cases of non union in the published literature. The published literature regarding flexion supracondylar fractures is sparse. However, complications do seem to be more prevalent than for extension fractures. Malunion is more common which may be a reflection of the fact that reduction and stabilisation is more difficult.
Open reduction is necessary for approximately 1/4 of flexion supracondylar fractures. The more displaced the initial fracture the more likely open reduction will be necessary. Flynn (2017) found that associated ulnar nerve deficit at presentation was strongly associated with need for open reduction. Approximately 10-20% of flexion type supracondylar fractures have coexisting ulnar nerve deficit.
Flynn K, Shah A, Brusalis C et al. Flexion type supracondylar humeral fractures. Ulnar Nerve injury increases risk of open reduction. Journal Bone Joint Surg. 2017; 99(17): 1485-1487.
Kuoppala E, Parviainen R, Pokka T et al. Low incidence of flexion type supracondylar humerus fractures but high rate of complications. Acta Orthopaedic 2016;87(4): 406-411.
Babal JC, Mehlman CT, and Klein G. Nerve injuries associated with pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta- analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2010; 30: 253–263.
Babal JC, Mehlman CT, and Klein G. Nerve injuries associated with pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a meta- analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 2010; 30: 253–263.
Sharafi M, Presedo A, Rabie H, Nabian MH. Flexion-Type Supracondylar Humerus Fracture: A Review on Reduction Techniques. J Orthop Spine Trauma. 2018 September; 4(3): 54-8.
Sharma A. The flexion type supracondylar humeral fracture in children. A review. Journal Bone Joint Surg. 2019; 7(4): p e6.
Reference
- orthoracle.com










































