
Learn the Revision Total Knee Replacement: First stage for acute Prosthetic Joint Infection (Zimmer-Biomet articulating spacer) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Revision Total Knee Replacement: First stage for acute Prosthetic Joint Infection (Zimmer-Biomet articulating spacer) surgical procedure.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of prosthetic joint replacement, accounting for 22.5% of 60,671 of revision total knee arthroplasties performed in the UK between 2003-2017.[i]
Surgical management involves identification of the infecting pathogens and optimisation of the host prior to major surgery, which may involve debridement and implant retention, or a single or two-staged revision procedure. Staged revision surgery remains the gold standard of care. At the first stage the prosthetic components are explanted and the involved soft-tissues are radically debrided. The joint is temporarily stabilised with either an articulating cement spacer, as in this case, or non-articulating spacer for approximately 3 months. At the second stage, following repeat debridement, the joint is reconstructed.
The articulating spacer (StageOne Cement Spacer Molds, Zimmer Biomet) permit the delivery of local antibiotics after the initial explantation and debridement whilst preserving some joint motion thus improving patient function and satisfaction between stages and preserving soft-tissue planes for the second stage.
[i] National Joint Registry: National Joint Registry for England and Wales, 14th annual report 2017. http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2014th%20Annual%20Report%202017.pdf

Indications:
Although contentious in the scientific literature, the indications for a two stage revision in our centre include:
Patients with systemic manifestations of infection (sepsis);
Clinical signs of infection but no organism has been identified;
Preoperative cultures identifying antibiotic-resistant and/or fungal organisms;
Presence of a sinus tract;
Inadequate or poor soft tissue coverage necessitating plastic surgery.
In this case, the patient was transferred from a medical HDU with Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) endocarditis requiring intravenous antibiotics to control features of systemic sepsis, thus the indications for staged revision were met.
Investigations:
Radiographs of the infected knee are required including AP,Lateral and Skyline views plus long leg alignment view (AP both limbs: hip/knee/ankle). Revision of the implant requires a complete radiographic assessment of the limb in particular looking for extra-articular deformities and any distant occult bony pathologies.
Bloods tests should include FBC, U+Es, CRP, ESR and Albumin. Anaemia should be corrected pre-operatively with oral supplements, diabetic control and renal function optimised and dietary supplements are advocated pre and peri-operatively.
In all cases where peri-prosthetic joint infection is contemplated, aspiration to identify the causative organisms and sensitivities should be performed in theatre when not taking antibiotics. Our protocol involves alcoholic skin preparation, local anaesthetic infiltration to skin (e.g. 1% lignocaine 5ml), a single pass into joint with an appropriate needle, fluid aspirated and sent for culture in aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures bottles. Leucocyte esterase strip testing is also advocated (https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/0301-620x.97b9.34910). The results are discussed in our Bone Infection Service MDT with Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Orthopaedic representation.
Operatives Alternatives:
As mentioned earlier the ideal candidate for a single stage revision would have known infecting organisms and sensitivities, which do not include multidrug resistant organisms, without soft-tissue compromise, a sinus or systemic sepsis. Indications for debridement and implant retention include the same ideal clinical scenario in PJI presenting within 3 weeks of onset of symptoms.
Non-operative alternatives & Contraindications:
Antibiotic suppression may be contemplated in patients felt to be medically unfit and unsuitable for major revision surgery. This will still mandate aspiration for culture and sensitivity to guide selection of suitable antimicrobials.


Distal neurovascular observation in recovery
VTE prophylaxis: low molecular weight heparin sub-cut once daily for two weeks and above the knee thromboembolic stockings for six weeks and foot pumps until mobile.
Empirical intravenous Vancomycin and Meropenem. Await tissue cultures at 48 hours. Stop Meropenem if no gram negative organisms after 48 hours. Continue intravenous Vancomycin with dose monitoring until bone infection service MDT review of soft tissue cultures after 7 & 14 days.
Removal of clips at 14 days.
Outpatient clinic in six weeks.
Routine AP lateral X-rays of the knee.
Mobilise touch weight bearing until review of X-rays and then weight bearing within the limits of pain.
Full range of motion permitted without restriction.
Nutritional supplementation orally.

MRSA infections are associated with greater economic cost to the healthcare economy and is a poor prognostic sign for eradication of PJI :
(Parvizi J, Pawasarat, IM, et al. Periprosthetic Joint Infection: The Economic Impact of Methicillin-Resistant Infections. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(6):103-107, Sadique, H, Evans S, Parry M et al L).
Multidrug-resistant bacteria; an independent predictor of failure in periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J, 98-B(SUPP 23),11. https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/abs/10.1302/1358-992x.98bsupp_23.ebjis2016-011).
Articulating spacers permit the delivery of local antibiotics after the initial explantation and debridement whilst preserving some joint motion thus improving patient function and satisfaction between stages and preserving soft-tissue planes for the second stage (https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.0820807).
There is limited and conflicting evidence that the use of articulating rather than non-articulating spacers improves the range of motion after the second stage procedure (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2989090/, https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11999-011-2095-4) but not reports that we are aware of have reported a reduced incidence of PJI eradication.
Systematic reviews comparing knee spacers uphold the view that eradication rates are the same but improved knee flexion post-second stage may be permitted with articulating spacers (http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.845.3065&rep=rep1&type=pdf, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540313005597, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540313006177).
Reference
- orthoracle.com











































