
Talonavicular osteoarthritis is a moderately common condition to be seen and treated by foot and ankle surgeons. It has many aetiologies including being the sequelae of trauma as in this case.
Painful degenerative or post-inflammatory changes at the talonavicular joint are the principle indications for talo-navicular arthrodesis. The procedure may also be used to reduce deformity in severe tibialis posterior tendonosis where a medialising calcaneal osteotomy and tendon transfer are not considered robust enough, for example in an older person with poor collagen or in those with severe deformity but without subtalar arthrosis.
Union rates and clinical outcomes reported are good for isolated talonavicular fusions (see ref Diezi et al below)
I not infrequently will take iliac crest bone graft to augment my fusion. This is because this joint tolerates bone defects poorly because of the poor blood supply to both the talus and the navicular bones. In this case I prepared the crest for harvest but did not need to use it. I prefer iliac crest bone graft to that from the calcaneus or the proximal tibia in light of its greater osteoblast and precursor cell count though I am aware that it has a higher reported complication rate (see reference Chiodo et al. below)
Non operative treatments involve the use of accommodative semi-rigid orthoses, activity modification and analgesia. When this conservative approach fails operative intervention should be considered.

INDICATIONS
This 56 year old man has a many year history of pain limiting function, following a navicular injury when he fell from a bicycle 15 years previously. The exact nature of this injury is unclear. Clinically there is visible bony swelling (Osteophyte) at the dorsolateral aspect of the talo-navicular joint(TNJ).Rotation and palpation at the TNJ exacerbates pain. His plain radiographs clearly showed advanced osteoarthritis well localised to this joint. For talo-navicular fusions there are a variety of approaches available and I use either a medial approach with a utility medial incision but in this case because of the dorso-lateral bony swelling I have used a dorsal approach enabling good access to this area without potentially damaging the tibialis anterior tendon.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Pain is usually well localised to the dorsomedial transverse tarsal joint. The pain can also be distributed laterally as it was in this case. Swelling may also be a feature.
IMAGING
Plain antero-posterior and lateral weight bearing radiographs of both the foot and the ankle show the changes of joint space narrowing, cysts and peri-articular sclerosis. There may be lateral peri-talar subluxation present especially in the late stage flat foot secondary to tibialis posterior tendonosis.
Often I use localising image guided joint injections (with radio-opaque die in order to ensure only the TNJ is targeted as unusual joint communications may be present) to ensure that the joint itself is the source of pain and not for example medial ankle impingement.
CT scanning is useful especially if I am concerned about adjacent joint disease. If the vascularity of the navicular itself is in question for example in Kohler’s Disease of if there is Muller Weiss disease, when the dorsolateral corner of the navicular may be extruded, then MRI scanning may be a useful adjunct.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
The TNJ arthrodesis may be combined with a calcaneocuboid joint (CCJ) fusion for severe rotatory deformity often present in neuromuscular diseases. This arthrodesis may of course also be part of a traditional triple fusion (TNJ, subtalar and CCJ fusions). More recently many of us favour a medial “dipple” fusion in which the TNJ and subtalar joints only are fused from an extended medial approach.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Supportive footwear with an accommodative orthosis is the mainstay of non-operative care in conjunction with activity modification and regular analgesia.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Sepsis or a history of joint sepsis is in my hands an absolute contraindication to an instrumented fusion of this joint. Avascular changes if extensive will make operative intervention more controversial.

The patient is positioned supine with an appropriate tourniquet applied to the thigh. I like to have the opportunity to use iliac crest bone graft as mentioned earlier. In order to raise the iliac crest away from surrounding fat, I use a novel patient positioning device which has a ratchet to allow the tilt to be adjusted before and during the case. The iliac crest is prepared in case a graft is needed and if so I use a precision bone graft harvesting kit. I will use graft if either there are defects in the fusion site once the bone surfaces are prepared or if I have pre or intra-operative concerns regarding the vascularity of either of the bones being prepared.

The patient is non-weight bearing for 2 weeks and thromboprophylaxis is given for 6 weeks. We use a Factor Xa inhibitor – oral Rivaroxaban.
The back slab is changed to a light touch weight bearing synthetic cast at 2 weeks and kept for a further 4 weeks
At 6 weeks check radiographs are taken and if satisfactory the patient is mobilised fully weight bearing in a removable boot with physiotherapy exercises to maintain motion in the ankle and subtalar joints.
A final set of radiographs at 12 weeks is used to confirm union which should also be checked clinically and the patient then allowed to mobilise on freely.
Union rates are more than 95% in my experience with this technique both as isolated fusions and when part of a triple fusion.

- Histological Differences in Iliac and Tibial Bone Graft, Foot and Ankle International May1, 2010: Chiodo CP, Hahne J and Wilson MG.
These authors studied the laboratory characteristics of graft from the iliac crest and compared it to that from the proximal tibia. They found the trabecular structure similar but the stem cell counts very different. They suggested clinical trials were needed to see if this made a clinical difference to fusion rates. - Diezi C, Favre P, Vienne P. Primary isolated subtalar arthrodesis: outcome after 2 to 5 years followup. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29:1195–1202. FAI.2008.1195
A clinical outcome study of isolated talo-navicular fusions demonstrated good to excellent results following talonavicular fusion with patient satisfaction rates above 90 % - Biomechanical comparison of screw versus plate/screw construct for talonavicular fusion. Jarrell SE, 3rd, Owen JR, Wayne JS, Adelaar RS. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:150–156
This paper compared the biomechanical properties of screw versus combined plate and screw fixation for talo-navicular fusion. Their results indicated a superiority of the plate over the sole use of screws. This finding has been echoed by other groups - Arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint using angle-stable mini-plates: a prospective study Lechler P, Graf S, Kock FX, Schaumburger J, Grifka J and Hanel M. Int Orthop; 2012 Dec; 36(12): 2491–2494.
A clinical review of 30 talo-navicular fusion supporting the use of locking plates. They had union in 26 cases and found that disease aetiology did not affect outcome in terms of non union rates but that clinical scores were lower in post traumatic cases and those with a neurological disease.
Histological Differences in Iliac and Tibial Bone Graft, Foot and Ankle International May1, 2010: Chiodo CP, Hahne J and Wilson MG.
Reference
- orthoracle.com




































