///

Revision total knee replacement- First stage of Implantcast MUTARS MK EPR using reinforced static antibiotic cement spacer

Learn the Revision total knee replacement: First stage of Implantcast MUTARS MK EPR using reinforced static antibiotic cement spacer surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Revision total knee replacement: First stage of Implantcast MUTARS MK EPR using reinforced static antibiotic cement spacer surgical procedure.
Increasing numbers of primary and revision knee replacements inevitably lead to more prosthetic joint infections (PJI) presenting to specialist PJI multi-disciplinary teams. Infection is a devastating complication of total joint arthroplasty and the most common cause for early failure of joint replacements and most common cause for failure of revision knee replacements at any time. That PJI is associated with higher mortality (than some common malignancies) has been widely reported; five year survival after PJI is 78% compared to 90% in patients undergoing aseptic revision arthroplasty (Matar H, et al. Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Significantly Higher Mortality Than Aseptic Revisions: Long-Term Single-Center Study (1254 Patients). Journal of Arthroplasty 2021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.068).
The treatment of prosthetic joint infection typically requires surgery involving explant of the infected prosthesis, radical debridement and then either immediate reimplantation or use of an antibiotic loaded cement spacer and delayed reimplantation i.e. a two-stage revision, as in this case. Alternative strategies include debridement and implant retention with modular exchange (indicated in acute PJI) and single-stage revision (considered in infected primary arthroplasty implants, sensitive organisms and without soft-tissue defects requiring plastic surgery). There is endless debate about selecting the correct option for each case, the decision is multi-factorial and probably best decided in specialist PJI MDTs.
Infected revision knee replacements are increasing in prevalence due to the increasing numbers of revision joint replacements being performed for septic and aseptic indications such that a 7.5-fold increase in re-revision knee replacements due to infection that has been experienced in the UK since 2005 (Lenguerrand et al. Description of the rates, trends and surgical burden associated with revision for prosthetic joint infection following primary and revision knee replacements in England and Wales: an analysis of the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014056). Dependent upon the type of host status, repeat two-stage revision for re-infected knee replacements has proven to be possible, although in immunocompromised hosts with poor soft-tissues, amputation should be considered. These limb-salvage procedures are challenging for numerous reasons including segmental bone loss, poor residual bone stock, poor soft-tissues and (usually) medically compromised patients. The outcomes of repeat two-stage revision are not widely described; our hospital data estimates that failure due to recurrent infection after 2 years is 50%, compared to 10% in primary two-stage revisions of infected primary knee replacements, although with repeated surgery the limb-salvage rate exceeds 95%. Failure to control PJI leads to further surgery, antibiotic suppression or amputation.
Here I present a challenging case of PJI in a previously revised TKR with expected segmental femoral and meta-epiphyseal tibial bone loss necessitating an extended tibial osteotomy to explant the infected prosthesis and resection of the distal femur. I demonstrate a technique using overlapping Kuntscher nails (slotted intramedullary nails, first used in WWII) to reinforce static antibiotic loaded cement spacers to stabilise the knee and deliver local antibiotics to the joint cavity, which is a cost-effective method for temporary static spacers with segmental bone loss.
OrthOracle readers will also find the following techniques of interest:
Revision total Knee replacement: Second-stage with distal femoral EPR (Implantcast MUTARS MK) and EPORE collar and tibial cone
Revision Total Knee Replacement: Second stage using PFC / MBT with metaphyseal sleeve and stem (Depuy)
Revision total Knee Replacement- Legion Rotating Hinge Knee ( Smith and Nephew)
Revision total Knee Replacement: Legion CCK (Smith and Nephew)
Revision Total Knee Replacement: First stage for acute Prosthetic Joint Infection (Zimmer-Biomet articulating spacer)

Indications
Indications for a two-stage revision arthroplasty in my practice would include the presence of a multi-drug resistant organism, the presence of a fungal organism, the presence of a sinus and/or soft-tissue defects requiring plastic surgery and culture negative PJI. There is huge debate about whether to do single or two-stage revision procedures, but it comes down to the surgeons preference given the combined host, soft-tissue and microbiological factors for each individual case, but pre-operative discussion in a specialist MDT is advocated to help rationalise such recommendations.
Intra-operatively the the AORI classification (Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instructional Course Lectures. 1999 ;48:167-175) can be used to classify the bone loss of the (F) femur and (T) tibia:
F1: No bone defects
F2A: Unicondylar bone loss
F2B: Bicondylar bone loss
F3: Bone defect involving one or both condyles
T1: No bone defects
T2A: Unicondylar bone loss
T2B: Bicondylar bone defect
T3: Bone defects with extension below the fibula head.
Symptoms and Examination
Patients with PJI present with pain at rest and at night, pain exacerbated with weight bearing, stiffness, swelling, heat, redness, restriction and can feel generally unwell, although systemic sepsis is very unusual and should prompt systemic investigations including echocardiograms and possibly CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis for other foci of infection.
Examination should detail and document previous scars (including old sinus tracts, check the popliteal fossa!), swelling of the joint and sometimes of the limb distally, limited range of motion, instability or telescoping if the prosthesis is loose and sites of pain. To complete the examination, the distal neurovascular status should be documented, the joint above and below examined and neurological status confirmed. Consider the presence of other joint arthroplasties (particularly above the knee if a distal femoral endoprosthesis is required), other joint degeneration including shoulder arthropathy for the use of crutches and rehabilitation.
Imaging
Dedicated x-rays of the knee are required (including skyline patella views), but when planning a revision knee replacement, and in particular revision to an endoprosthetic replacement, I prefer a standing long-leg alignment view AP and laterals for alignment and to prepare for unexpected extra-articular deformities including bowing of the tibia or femur and narrow medullary canals. CT, as in this case, is useful to confirm healing of previous osteotomies used at the first-stage to explant prostheses or to plan custom implants.
Alternative Operative Treatment
The alternative to a two-stage procedure would be to do a single-stage revision, which I would term a two-in-one stage revision, whereby the first half of the operation you explant and debride, lavage and then pause, re-prep with clean drapes and fresh surgical instruments and then proceed to the second part of the operation to reimplant a prosthesis.
Arguably, the same protocol should apply for debridement and implant retention (DAIR) procedures: Chung et al. reported superior infection eradication with a two-stage DAIR and modular exchange in hip and knee prostheses for infection (Chung AS, et al. Two-Stage Debridement With Prosthesis Retention for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections,
The Journal of Arthroplasty 2019:34(6);1207-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.013).
Non-Operative Management
In some cases, one might consider long-term antibiotics suppression having aspirated the joint and confirmed the microbiological sensitivities of the infected organism, however we know that antibiotics suppression is associated with toxicity from the antibiotics, such as nausea, diarrhoea and malaise; consequently suppression fails in about a quarter of patients or due to progressive loosening and symptoms from the infected joint.
Contraindications
Contraindications of surgery are any medical co-morbidities that would prevent anaesthesia for a major surgical procedure.

AP radiograph prior to the first-stage revision of an infected revision hinged knee prosthesis with gross metaphyseal femoral bone loss, impending fracture and lysis of the proximal tibia.
Pre-operative aspiration had identified staph.epidermidis species which was sensitive to a variety of antibiotics. After MDT discussion, the decision was taken to offer staged revision because this was a re-revision for recurrent PJI and because of the expected challenges in explanting the trial prosthesis.
It was also felt that the residual bone stock of the distal femoral metaphysis was inadequate and that the second stage reconstruction would involve a distal femoral endoprosthesis.

The limb is isolated after a tourniquet is applied and two-stage skin preparation is commenced using alcoholic chlorhexidine.

After applying a ‘bowel bag’, used in general sugery, to the foot, the isolated limb is covered with Ioban incisional drapes as shown. Routine props for knee revision arthroplasty are placed lateral to the thigh and to rest the foot distally.

Skin incision with the knee flexed along the previous incision.It is important to use previous incisions as much as possible to minimise the risk of skin necrosis.
As with all revision arthroplasty, extending the previous incisions longitudinally helps to identify the tissue layers for dissection.

Using McIndoe’s dissecting scissors and/or diathermy, full thickness skin flaps are elevated above the capsular layer of the knee joint.This is to minimise the risk of skin necrosis, which in multiply revised joints is often a well defined, but thin, layer of tissue, as this photograph highlights.

Prior to the arthrotomy, aspirate the joint for the first of five microbiological samples submitted to the laboratory.The fluid is placed into blood culture bottles for culture and sensitivities. The other four microbiology samples are all representative tissue samples from the joint and femoral/tibial medullary cavities later in the procedure.
The needle is often useful to define the medial border of the patella, which often broadens and flattens in previously revised cases with unresurfaced patellae, making identification of the medial parapatellar arthrotomy challenging.

The arthrotomy is performed using the previous arthrotomy, most likely medially, but always useful to check the pre-operative deformity and/or operation notes to be sure.I would always ensure that sufficient soft-tissue is left around the patella to ensure a sound closure at the end of the procedure.

Immediate appearances are of grossly infected polyethylene debris lining the joint with staining of the tissues. All of this tissue will need to be physically removed to optimise our chances of PJI eradication.

Part of the polyethylene patella button was free floating in the supra-patellar pouch and removed.

Using Lane’s soft-tissue holding forceps for traction and McIndoe’s dissecting scissors, identify the correct layer for a complete synovectomy of the supra-patellar pouch and medial and lateral gutters.Remove all the tissue contaminated by the infection down to the quadriceps tendon and muscles and bone. Any residual infectious material could lead to recurrent PJI, which in this context has a high risk of amputation.

Once the layer is identified, with appropriate counter traction using Kocher’s forceps and a nibbler, monopoly diathermy can be used to develop this plane leaving healthy bleeding tissue on the side of the Lane’s soft-tissue holding forceps.
A radical debridement is thought to be key to eradicating PJI; a controlled but complete, rather than cautious approach to the debridement is required.

Continue the anterior synovectomy around the patella, which has the residual patella button still attached.
The patella is a good place to help identify the correct plane for debridement to avoid over resecting tissue from the patella and quadriceps tendons by identifying the level of the previous patella resurfacing osteotomy.

Having cleared the tissue around the patella, the plane of dissection flows into the lateral gutter. As more and more dissection occurs the patella will become easier to evert, maximising access to the joint. This is why doing the synovectomy first is advantageous.

With the knee now flexed, the anterior synovectomy can flow distally via the medial and lateral gutters down to the tibia.
I find using the heavy nibblers to grasp the tissue being excised maintains sufficient tension to almost peel this layer off the femur and capsule, using the diathermy just to keep it flowing.

We have now cleared the synovectomy over the medial femoral condyle (MFC) to the medial proximal tibia, where there is gross (O) osteolysis, shown by the fibrinous “creamy cheese” material where the proximal tibia previously existed.
All of the tissue from the ‘effective joint space’ requires radical excision. Thankfully the bone looks a little more supportive at the tibial tubercle.

Having cleared the anterior part of the joint this single piece of tissue is excised and sent for histopathology and microbiology to confirm the presence of infection and the causative organisms and their sensitivities.

Explant the polyethylene using a screwdriver to back out the screw that locks the poly into the tibial prosthesis.

Once the screw has been removed, the polyethylene prosthesis is easily lifted out of the wound.

Explant the femoral prosthesis.We now have complete exposure of the femoral prosthesis having cleared the (M) medial and (L) lateral gutters of the thick infected synovium and removing the polyethylene.
A (H) Heygroves bone holding forceps is used to grasp the femur proximally in preparation for the inevitable transfemoral osteotomy because the bone quality is so poor.

As the X-rays indicated, the femoral prosthesis is so loose that it was simply lifted out by hand revealing gross femoral bone loss (F).

There are various classifications for categorising femoral bone loss.
I prefer the AORI classification (Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instructional Course Lectures. 1999 ;48:167-175), as is simple and logical.
This would be a F3 using Engh’s classification as there is an uncontained defect requiring endoprosthetic replacement: http://eknygos.lsmuni.lt/springer/238/116-132.pdf.

In order to resect the distal femur it is necessary to release the gastrocnemius origins off the posterior femur to skeletonise the bone prior to osteotomy.Using a bone hook placed into an osteolytic defect laterally to elevate the femur, cautery is use to develop the subperiosteal plane and divide the muscle origins off the posterior femur. At this point the popliteal artery, vein and tibial nerve are deep to the plane of dissection, so care must be taken at this stage.

As the femur is elevated out of the wound, the dissection of the posterior femur is made easier and safer as the popliteal vein, artery and tibial nerve lie deep to the femur in the popliteal fossa: at the level of the knee joint the artery lies closest to our plane and slightly more medial than the vein and lastly the most superficial and lateral tibial nerve. Far laterally lies the peroneal nerve (although at this point should be deep to the biceps femoris tendon).

The posterior dissection and gastrocnemius release off the distal femur proceeds to the level of the pre-operatively planned osteotomyThis is above the level of the previous femoral stem where the bone appears more normal.
The proximal femur is held with the Heygroves bone folding forceps and a 1.27mm oscillating saw blade used to divide the femur.
To protect the neuromuscular structures beneath, a large (L) Langenbach’s retractor is placed underneath the femur from the opposite side to the surgeon, as shown, because at this level the vessels exiting the adductor canal lie posteromedial to the femoral shaft, beneath the adductor magnus tendon. The contents of the adductor canal (Hunter’s canal/subsartorial canal)) include the femoral artery, femoral vein, nerve to the vastus medialis and the saphenous nerve. The femoral vessels become the popliteal vessels as they exit the canal and lie in the popliteal fossa of the posterior distal thigh. The saphenous nerve arises from the femoral nerve (L3,4) and once it reaches the posterior thigh becomes subcutaneous by piercing the fascia between the sartorius and gracilis tendons and runs with the great saphenous vein behind the medial border of the tibia to the foot and ankle.

The resected distal femur is removed from the wound and can be sent for histology or microbiology if required.

Posterior synovectomy is completed using cautery down to the posterior tibial plateau.Having removed the distal femur, the huge exposure to the wound permits completion of the synovectomy posteriorly.
Again, maintain tension using the nibblers, diathermy is used to resect the layer of infected synovial tissue.
At this stage the popliteal artery is the closest neurvascular structure centrally, then the popliteal vein, then the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa. Consequently, great care is taken to do this thoroughly and radically without damaging these structures. Usually the layer is identifiable from the edges of the previous anterior synovectomy, but it can be challenging after segmental bone resection to appreciate exactly the relations of critical structures once the bone landmarks have been excised.

As before, the tissue being excised is retracted out of the wound anteriorly, to permit access to the (PT) posterior tibia.
As the posterior synovectomy travels proximally to distally, flexing the ‘knee’ helps the surgeon to get underneath the thick synovium and hopefully keeps the vessels out of danger, as they remain below the level of the tibial metaphysis, immediately posterior and slightly medial to the centre of the tibial plateau.

The posterior synovectomy is completed, and as this photograph highlights, once the synovectomy is complete and the knee is flexed, we have circumferential exposure of the proximal tibia.

Explant the proximal tibial prosthesis using osteotomes and revision arthroplasty hand instruments.I would start by identifying the prosthesis – cement interface and attempt to disrupt this using osteotomes. Because of the loss of the distal femur, the assistant apples counter resistance to blows from the (O) osteotome.
I normally start in the centre aiming for the central tibial stem. By using the prosthesis-cement interface rather than the cement – bone interface, in theory one avoids damaging the residual bone. In this case though the medial bone loss is severe already due to the polyethylene debris induced osteolysis and infection.

Once the plane between the prosthesis and cement has been established, circumferentially complete the cement disruption, here using the excellent exposure following removal of the distal femur to attack the posterior tibial interface using a broad flat (O) osteotome and (M) mallet.

Once the prosthesis – cement interface has circumferentially been disrupted (indicated here by the gap now visible beneath the tibial tray, we might attempt tibial explant using an instrument we call a ‘coal chisel’ but is effectively a large punch for impacting prostheses.

On this occasion I have been exceptionally lucky and the tibial prosthesis lifts out of the tibia with ease.

Remove the cement from the proximal tibia.To complete the radical debridement, all implanted material exposed to the PJI, including the cement must be removed.
I start by using the deficient medial proximal tibial metaphysis to remove the cement beneath the tibial tray using osteotomes and nibblers.

A Cobb elevator is used to lift the cement off the residual bone without causing further bone loss or damage.

Cement splitters are used to remove the cement that is fixed to the residual host bone. This requires controlled aggression and patience. Always give the cement space to fracture into, use single sharp blows rather than repetitive banging, and never twist well fixed cement for fear of fracturing the host bone! The hand cement instruments used mostly include the cement splitters (in three different sizes), cement gouges and chisels, the cement grasping forceps and the retrograde cement chisels (‘back-scratchers’) found on any revision arthroplasty set.

Having removed the last of the cement in the proximal tibia it’s obvious there is severe bone loss on the medial proximal tibia.This would be a T3 using Engh’s classification as there is an uncontained defect.
This will need a cone and long-stem fixation at the time of reconstruction which I record on the operation note to remind me when planning the second stage
Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instructional Course Lectures. 1999 ;48:167-175

Viewed from the front, the medial bone loss is evident, but the (TT) tibial tubercle remains intact with an intact extensor mechanism attached.

Debride the femoral canal using hand revision instruments.Although the distal femoral resection removed most of the foreign material on the femoral side of the joint, there remains some residual medullary cement which requires extraction.
Options include cement reamers, ultrasonic cement extractors or hand held instruments.
If the bone – cement interface is poor then rapid progress can be made using hand instruments without damaging the residual femoral cortices. Here shown is a cement splitter for disrupting the bone – cement interface, using the same careful and patient techniques.

Tibial tubercle osteotomy is prepared to facilitate tibial cement extraction. Despite removing the proximal cement from the tibia, distally the cement is well integrated, so the decision was taken to do a tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) to provide access to the medullary canal for cement removal. Indications for a tibial tubercle osteotomy in revision knee arthroplasty include: to provide access to the joint e.g. stiffness, explanting the prosthesis and/or cement, proximalising the tuberosity for patella baja, and medialising the tuberosity for patella instability.
To begin this, the skin incision is extended along the medial border of the tibia as shown. I prefer the incision distally to stay medially in case a medial gastrocnemius flap is ever needed in the future for soft-tissue reconstruction. A nice description of this technique can be found here: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1471-2474-9-98

The tibial tubercle osteotomy is marked. I’ve reinserted the tibial prosthesis to appreciate the line of the tibial stem, running in the mid-point of the tibial shaft.
The middle of the tibia, stem is the target for the longitudinal osteotomy.

Drill holes along the marked tibial osteotomy, prior to starting, to prevent propagation of fractures. The holes are drilled approximately 2-3 cm apart, aiming for the tibial prosthesis stem using a 2.5mm cortical drill. Having the prosthesis in-situ gives the surgeon audible feedback when the drill hits the metal implant.

Complete the tibial tubercle osteotomy using multiple broad flat osteotomes. Again ensuring that these are aiming in the direction of the tibial prosthesis stem, sharp blows facilitate completion of the osteotomy between the pre-drilled holes.

Insert three of the broadest flat osteotomes on the set through the osteotomy towards the medullary cavity, tapping each sequentially so that the stress is distributed along the length of the osteotomy so the tubercle remains in one piece.

Lever open the osteotomy using multiple osteotomes.Once all the osteotomes have reached the cavity left by the prosthesis stem, gently elevate them all together. The osteotomy hinges upon the periosteum and fascia of the anterolateral tibia and anterolateral tibial compartment to ensure preserved vascularity to the tibial tubercle for later healing.

Gentle retraction of the osteotomy exposes the medullary cement of the meta-diaphysis (C) for extraction under direct vision.

Tibial cement extraction using hand instruments. The vision and access permitted through the osteotomy permits complete cement extraction along the meta-diaphysis.

Perforate the cement pedestal distally at the isthmus using an ultrasonic probe. The OSCAR (Orthopaedic System for Cemented Arthroplasty Revision, Orthofix) has single use probes receiving ultrasound waves at greater than 16Hz from the handset. It is used to melt the polymethylmethacrelate cement and pierce through the cement pedestal and cement restrictor in the tibial canal distal to the osteotomy.

A flexible canal probe is used to confirm that the host medullary canal has been reached distally after perforating through the cement pedestal using the OSCAR probe, as the temporary spacer will need to be reinforced distal to the isthmus.

Ream the tibial canal at the isthmus using cement reamers. To increase the diameter of the Kuntcher nail (implanted to reinforce the spacer), the isthmus is sequentially expanded using cement reamers until cortical “chatter” is experienced.

Explant the residual patella button prosthesis using the oscillating saw.If the residual patella bone is thin then attempting to remove well fixed polyethylene patella implants risks fracturing and fragmenting the bone with hand instruments.
I prefer to use the oscillating saw to to cut through the pegs by sawing between the prosthesis – cement interface.

Once the three pegs have been divided it should be possible to lift off the patella button without bone loss. This reveals the residual cement and gross osteolysis.

Using a curette, the osteolytic bone is carefully removed and then a high speed burr is used to remove and residual cement in a controlled fashion to avoid fracturing the patella.

After debridement, bleeding host patella bone has been exposed, and unfortunately this patella will be unreconstructable at the second stage due to the poor residual bone stock.

Thorough lavage of all canals and cavities is performed prior to insertion of the cement spacer.Typically during the entire case we would use a 3 litre bag of warmed NaCL 0.9%.

Insert the femoral and tibial Kuntscher nails to reinforce the static antibiotic loaded cement spacer.Usually I would use a Kuntscher nail the same or 1mm smaller diameter than the last canal reamer used using the canal preparation stage. These were the original stainless steel slotted nails first used by Gerhard Kuntcher during WWII for stabilising fractures in German soldiers (before osteosynthesis gained general approval). Alternatives include contemporary titanium medullary nails used in modern practice or carbon-fibre rods used in external fixators, but these Kuntcher nails are cheap and disposable and come in a range of lengths (10cm to 20cm) and diameters (9mm to 16mm).

These Kuntscher nails must be inserted proximally in the femur and distally in the tibia sufficiently to afford stability.
As a rule of thumb if you have a 10cm segmental bone defect you need the total length of reinforcement to be double i.e. 20cm. This means you need at least 5cm of Kuntscher nail in the femur and 5cm of nail in the tibia and 10 cm of nail between the bone ends = 20m total.
However, where you have a tibial osteotomy, the length of the osteotomy should be considered to be included in the segmental defect; thus a 10cm segmental loss plus the 10cm osteotomy becomes 20cm. Therefore you need additional Kuntscher nail reinforcement totalling 10cm in the femur and tibia (distal to the end of the osteotomy).

Once the nails are inserted into the femoral and tibial canals I tap them gently with a mallet to embed them and then use the Frosch bone holding clamp to grab the two nails together.
As Kuntscher nails are slotted, it is advised to ‘slot’ the nails into each other for additional stability. Once clamped you should be able to lift the leg without a ‘lag’ just using the Frosch clamp.

Close the tibial tubercle osteotomy over the Kunscher nail.Using iso-elastic Supercables (Kinamed), I close the tibial tubercle osteotomy by drilling holes using a 2.5mm drill on either side of the osteotomy and passing the cables through the holes and tensioning until bone apposition occurs.
Distally this can be augmented with firewire sutures passed through the cortices on either side of the osteotomy (via holes made with the drill or bone awl).
Alternative methods for closing the tibial tubercle osteotomy include ethibond sutures and partially threaded screws with washers, although some authors prefer not to fix the osteotomy at the first-stage surgery and ‘fix’ the osteotomy at the second stage: https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/55076540/59_Tibial_tubercle_osteotomy_in_revision_knee_arthroplasty.pdf?1511319942=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DTibial_Tubercle_Osteotomy_in_Revision_Kn.pdf&Expires=1624202773&Signature=QTCh8mT8wWTH8zerqnzmx1DvA0tP2p~DHYAOjL3DsJwH8trQDdgPTp5O45GVFijcfGvq1ARIV6AH2weWYNWlGmSiMAwRUg1-DWixdz449MjLIlylfC6JfxNRqjER9wjMpW7JNEipqhJf07npy5Yd4EQlOdSW8b~hdhmpNPLAOfSzERC3dGL-jHX6XaU7Mv1XSk4glGkiNh21nmGFHeVj11RlIvq4amNu1ubKDgazbs316clxj~tyHGMMbayptoQRfjDZVUUIqw3T5zqCpLrWZvXBj1YlmfKj74XTwjovrrZDkmegX7OD-DgZodaM4fBBMv0wId8AXvUdv0-DFga~Bw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA

Prior to adding the antibiotic loaded cement, the segmental defect is stabilised and the osteotomy closed.

Prepare the antibiotic loaded cement spacer.Palacos G high viscosity cement is prepared routinely with additional antibiotics added as required which are determined by the pre-operative MDT discussions with infectious diseases and microbiology colleagues.
In this case I used additional vancomycin (2 grams per 40 gram cement mix) as the organism was sensitive to vancomycin. Pump the cement onto the nails whilst the assistant maintain length and rotation of the limb (hopefully alignment is already controlled by the Kuntscher nails). The additional antibiotics means the cement will set slowly, so be patient.

Once the cement has covered the nails and ends of the femur and tibia a tube of cement covering the nails should be established. To increase the surface area for antibiotic delivery the wait for the cement to cure can be filled by using forceps to make imprints in the cement surface as shown.

Additional local antibiotic delivery can be enhanced using Stimulan beads.Calcium sulphate beads (Stimulan, Biocomposites) with additional vancomycin (2 grams per mix) are mixed and set and added to the effective joint space for additional delivery of antibiotics to the joint. The theoretical risk of this is that they cause a greater joint effusion, so a ‘watertight’ closure will be mandatory.

I use a looped 1.0 PDS monofilament suture to close the arthrotomy from distal to proximal in all joints. This is particularly in infected revisions, for a watertight closure of the arthrotomy.
Ensure you bury the knot proximally to avoid local tissue irritation from the knot.

Skin closure using skin clips.

Wound coverage using a vacuum assisted dressing. Although the scientific evidence is equivocal, all high-risk wounds receive incisional vacuum dressings. High-risk in my practice includes previous radiotherapy, infection including PJI, malnutrition, any muscle flap and multiple operations through the same incision as in this case.

AP radiograph of a static reinforced distal femoral spacer showing the medullary Küntscher nails.
These are overlapping at the site of the excised distal femur (A) wrapped in antibiotic loaded cement with skin clips from the previous closure and evidence of a (S) super-cable clip closing the proximal extended tibial osteotomy used for explant at the first-stage.
The patient also has a splint on shown on his radiograph.

VTE prophylaxis: 28 days clean plus thromboelastic stockings for 6 weeks and foot pumps whilst an inpatient when in bed.
IV Vancomycin and Meropenem. Stop Meropenem if no gram negatives on 48 hour tissue culture and continue Vancomycin until MDT decide on oral switch antibiotics.
X-rays whole left leg AP-lateral when possible
Protected weight bearing using frame/crutches until 2 week check X-ray
Vacuum dressing off day seven
Clip removal 14 days
Dietician review and oral supplements

The outcomes for revision knee replacements for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) are well established, although the debate about single versus two-stage revision continues. The decision about indications for single-stage revision is predicated by the host, soft-tissue and microbiological factors. Historically culture-negative PJI cases would have been an indication for a two-stage revision in our centre, although recent literature has cast doubt on that strategy; van den Kieboom et al. recently reported no difference in the outcomes of single versus two-stage revisions in chronic culture-negative PJIs (van den Kieboom et al. One-stage revision is as effective as two-stage revision for chronic culture-negative periprosthetic joint infection after total hip and knee arthroplasty a retrospective cohort study. Bone Joint Journal 2021 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-1480.R2).
Macpherson et al. were the first authors to report outcomes for revision knee surgery for infection and relate their successes and failures to the medical comorbidities of the patient. In their series of 50 cases, complication rates were strongly related to poor medical condition and poor soft-tissue condition; this led to their staging system for host, infection and soft-tissue status, later adopted by the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) (McPherson, EJ et al. Periprosthetic Total Hip Infection, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2002; 403: 8-15).
Fehring et al. retrospectively reviewed 45 re-revision knee replacements with PJI stratified by MSIS staging system for host, infection type and extremity status and concluded that all MSIS host C3 (two or more: age >80 years, alcoholism, chronic respiratory, inflammatory or real disease, immunosuppression, malignancy, etc) were associated with failure to eradicate infection such that alternative management strategies should be considered (Fehring K et al. Repeat Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Knee Infection Is Dependent on Host Grade, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: January 4, 2017 – Volume 99 – Issue 1 – p 19-24 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00075)
Vadiee et al. in a similar study, stratified re-revision knee replacement patients according to the MSIS classification and unsurprisingly found a higher incidence of failure in those patients with poor general health based on the MSIS score, inadequate soft-tissue envelope and resistant bacteria (Vadiee I, Backstein DJ.
The Effectiveness of Repeat Two-Stage Revision for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection,
The Journal of Arthroplasty 2019: 34(2); 369-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.021).
Kim et al. reported 78% and 75% infection ‘control’ after second and third-time two-stage revision surgery for PJI in the long-term after mean 15 and 7 years respectively (Kim, YH, et al. Long-term result of a second or third two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty for infected total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty 3, 8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-020-00062-4). These results are remarkable, considering our experience of re-revision knee replacements undergoing second two-stage revision for PJI with a 50% eradication rate after two-years!
The non-PJI related complications off revision surgery are frequently under-reported in the literature; in a very open paper Hartzler et al. described the medical and surgical complications of two-stage revision hip and knee arthroplasties for PJI. Their study highlighted that half of all patients experience a complication, that the mortality was 18% at almost 4 years, and that 7% of patients failed to progress to the second stage due to death or medical complications. These issues need to be factored into both patient counselling and literature reporting (Hartzler MA, et al. Complications in the treatment of prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(6 Supple A):145–150).
Lastly, just to instigate further debate, the role of two-stage revision in complex reconstructions for PJI has been challenged: Jeffrey et al. defined complex revision knee reconstructions as the presence of more than one of the following: metaphyseal cones/sleeves, distal femoral replacement, periprosthetic fracture instrumentation, or fully cemented stems measuring >75 mm. They compared the outcomes of 87 patients undergoing two-stage revision versus DAIR and concluded that DAIR with chronic antibiotic suppression was as effective as two-stage revision to prevent re-operation for infection and was more effective in terms of maintaining function ( Jeffrey BJ. et al. Irrigation and Debridement with Chronic Antibiotic Suppression Is as Effective as 2-Stage Exchange in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty with Extensive Instrumentation, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery: January 6, 2021 – Volume 103 – Issue 1 – p 53-63 doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00240).
According to Divano et al., clinical studies of porous tibial cones have shown a low rate of aseptic loosening, intraoperative fractures, infection rate and a lower failure rate than the previous treatment methods. Mean aseptic loosening of the tibial cones and mean intraoperative cone-related fracture rates are 0.84 and 0.89%, respectively (Divano, S, et al. Porous metal cones: gold standard for massive bone loss in complex revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of current literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 851–863 (2018) doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2936-7).


Reference

  • orthoracle.com
Dark mode powered by Night Eye