
Learn the Total knee replacement: First stage revision with a hinged spacer and tibial tubercle osteotomy surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Total knee replacement: First stage revision with a hinged spacer and tibial tubercle osteotomy surgical procedure.
Revision knee surgery for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is becoming an increasing burden on the health service. Historically there has been wide variation in surgical practice and this has led to the proposed introduction of knee revision networks, led by the BOA and BASK in conjunction with the NHS. The surgery itself can be challenging and the best results are seen when the surgery is performed by experienced knee surgeons who regularly treat infection.
All patients should be managed within an MDT environment. Experienced orthopaedic surgeons and infectious disease specialists should be present and there should be access to plastic surgeons, pharmacists and rehabilitation teams.
There is no one diagnostic test for PJI and the diagnosis can sometimes be difficult to make. The International Consensus Meeting (Parvizi 2013) define a PJI when:
There are two positive periprosthetic cultures with phenotypically identical organisms
There is a sinus tract communicating with the joint
Three of the following six criteria exist:
Elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) AND erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)
A single positive culture
Elevated synovial fluid white blood cell (WBC) count
++ change on leukocyte esterase test strip
Elevated synovial fluid polymorphonuclear neutrophil percentage (PMN%)
Positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue
In my practice there is no role for arthroscopic intervention or a simple washout as a definitive procedure. Its only use is when a patient is septic and it is a temporising measure. A DAIR (debridement and implant retention) procedure is useful in cases of early or acute infection with a well fixed implant – the earlier the better, ideally within 4 weeks. In chronic infections or where the implant is loose revision surgery is needed (if surgery has been decided upon). The choice between single and two stage surgery should be made by the MDT and based on a number of factors. If there is adequate soft tissue coverage, a known sensitive organism and a good host, then single stage revision surgery is appropriate. In cases with resistant or multiple organisms, fungal infection, soft tissue defects that preclude primary closure, an immunocompromised host or where previous revision surgery has failed, a two stage procedure is indicated. The concurrent antibiotic choice and duration should be determined by the MDT and discussed with the patient.
The patient described in this case had deteriorating pain and function with positive cultures and a raised CRP. The decision for a further two stage procedure was straight forward as she had a resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus, previously had a failed two stage revision for infection and was unwilling to accept the idea of an amputation.
The case uses the Stryker Stanmore Implants Worldwide (SIW) short distal femoral replacement with a fixed hinge. The implant is very easy to use, requires only a few trays with minimal instrumentation and it is fully modular in case the intra-operative plan changes. There are two sizes of knee – standard and small. The tibia comes with either a short 140mm or long 180mm stem with both sizes. A fixed hinge, metal backed rotating hinge and polyethylene rotating hinge are available. 5mm is the minimum resection for the fixed hinge, 8mm for the polyethylene rotating hinge and 11mm for the metal backed rotating hinge. Augments are available from 5 to 20mm for both the tibia and femur.
The fixed hinge is not commonly used. I use it here simply as an articulating spacer as it is cheaper than the rotating hinge version. At the second stage a rotating hinge version will be used.
OrthOracle readers will also find the following operative techniques of interest:
Revision total Knee replacement: Second-stage with distal femoral EPR (Implantcast MUTARS MK) and EPORE collar and tibial cone
Revision Total Knee Replacement: Second stage using PFC / MBT with metaphyseal sleeve and stem (Depuy)
Revision total Knee Replacement- Legion Rotating Hinge Knee ( Smith and Nephew)
Revision total Knee Replacement: Legion CCK (Smith and Nephew)
Revision Total Knee Replacement: First stage for acute Prosthetic Joint Infection (Zimmer-Biomet articulating spacer)

INDICATIONS
Two stage revision surgery is indicated where a periprosthetic knee joint infection has been diagnosed and DAIR, single stage surgery and chronic suppression are not suitable alternatives. Generally this includes:
Patients with systemic manifestations of infection (sepsis);
Clinical signs of infection but no organism has been identified;
Preoperative cultures identifying antibiotic-resistant and/or fungal organisms;
Inadequate or poor soft tissue coverage necessitating plastic surgery.
The presence of a sinus tract does not necessitate a two stage procedure. If it can be excised and closed primarily then a single stage procedure is feasible providing the patient fulfils the other criteria.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients with PJI present with pain at rest and at night, pain exacerbated with weight bearing, stiffness, swelling, heat, redness, restriction and can feel generally unwell, although systemic sepsis is very unusual and should prompt systemic investigations including echocardiograms and possibly CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis for other foci of infection.
Examination should detail and document previous scars (including old sinus tracts, check the popliteal fossa), swelling of the joint and sometimes of the limb distally, limited range of motion, instability or telescoping if the prosthesis is loose and sites of pain. To complete the examination, the distal neurovascular status should be documented, the joint above and below examined and neurological status confirmed. Consider the presence of other joint arthroplasties (particularly above the knee if a distal femoral endoprosthesis is required), other joint degeneration including shoulder arthropathy for the use of crutches and rehabilitation.
IMAGING and INVESTIGATIONS
Plain radiographs (AP, lateral and skyline view) of the affected joint are mandatory.
Long leg radiographs may be needed if there are extra-articular deformities, replacements above or below the knee or the patient has had previous surgery.
Bloods tests should include FBC, U+Es, CRP, ESR and Albumin. Anaemia should be corrected pre-operatively with oral supplements, diabetic control and renal function optimised and dietary supplements are advocated pre and peri-operatively.
Biopsy of the joint with cultures and white cell count analysis. This is image guided and performed by the radiologists aseptically. At least three samples are preferable.
A bone scan is usually not usually helpful.
A CT SPECT may be helpful in excluding infection but it is not needed to confirm it
An MRI scan may identify areas of osteomyelitis or soft tissue collections and can help plan surgery but again it is not routine, nor diagnostic on its own.
All patients need discussing in the infection MDT meeting with representation from orthopaedics, infectious diseases and plastics when needed.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Above knee amputation if the soft tissues and the host are of such poor quality that wound healing is unlikely to occur, even with plastics input.
Arthrodesis if the extensor mechanism is compromised and the patient would prefer a fused knee rather than an amputation.
As mentioned earlier the ideal candidate for a single stage revision would have a known infecting organism and sensitivities, which do not include multidrug resistant organisms, without soft-tissue compromise, a sinus or systemic sepsis. Indications for debridement and implant retention include the same ideal clinical scenario in PJI presenting within 4 weeks of onset of symptoms.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Antibiotic suppression if the joint is unsalvageable or the patient is not willing to have further surgery. A biopsy is still needed to direct the antimicrobial treatment.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Significant morbidity precluding surgery
Active infection (UTI, chest infection, infected ulcers) all need treating first. In chronic leg ulcer cases this may not be possible.

The appropriately consented patient is taken to theatre. Under anaesthesia (GA, spinal or a combination), the patient is placed in the supine position. The skin is shaved immediately prior to draping if necessary. I prefer to use a tourniquet though this can be omitted, particularly if they have peripheral vascular disease or the body habitus won’t accommodate one. A bolster is placed on the side of the patient’s thigh to rest against the tourniquet laterally.
The foot is stabilised on a rolled bolster distally so that the leg rests in a naturally flexed position of around 90 degrees. In stiff knees this may be difficult to achieve and the bolster may have to be positioned at whatever flexed position is achievable. This may need to be moved or an extra sandbag used during the procedure as more flexion becomes possible. IV antibiotics should have been prescribed and will be administered later in the procedure after surgical samples have been taken. IV tranexamic acid is also used. 2% Chlorhexidine prep or povidone iodine is used to prepare the skin. I also use an iodine impregnated adhesive skin protector after marking the old incisions and any extensions of them I intend to make.

The drain should be removed at 24 hours.
Weight-bearing can commence on the day of surgery and is not normally restricted. If there are concerns over bone quality it may need to be limited. If the soft tissues are satisfactory and the osteotomy securely fixed there is no restriction on range of movement. Indeed the advantage of an articulating spacer is that the knee is less stiff at the second stage.
The bulky bandages are reduced at 48 hours and a simple adhesive dressing left in situ.
Follow up of the wound is performed at 2 weeks in primary or secondary care settings as appropriate.
The patient is reviewed at 6 weeks by both the surgical team and infectious disease team. Antibiotics continue for a specified amount of time (6 weeks to 3 months depending on the organism). It is our practice to then re-discuss all planned second stage implantations at an MDT after an antibiotic holiday and re-checking of inflammatory markers. The second stage is often in the region of 3-6 months after the first.

The SMILES (Stanmore Modular Individualised Lower Extremity System) knee was first used in 1991. It was initially a custom made implant but is now off the shelf. It is a hinged knee replacement and used most often as a salvage prosthesis in cases of infection with significant bone or soft tissue loss.
Further Reading:
The SMILES prosthesis in salvage revision knee surgery. Back, D. L.; David, L.; Hilton, A.; Blunn, G.; Briggs, T. W. R.; Cannon, S. R. Knee, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 40-44.
Early results demonstrated improvement in both the Knee Society knee and function scores and range of movement. This short-term clinical and radiographic review has demonstrated encouraging results in the use of a custom-made second generation rotating hinge component when used in revision knee surgery.
Developing a strategy to treat established infection in total knee replacement. A review of the latest evidence and clinical practice. I. S. Vanhegan, R. Morgan-Jones, D. S. Barrett, F. S. Haddad.
This review summarises the opinions and conclusions reached from a symposium on infected total knee replacement (TKR) held at the British Association of Surgery of the Knee (BASK) annual meeting in 2011. The use of a single-stage revision is gaining popularity and the authors advocate its use in certain patients where the causative organism is known, no sinuses are present, the patient is not immunocompromised, and there is no radiological evidence of component loosening or osteitis
The Knee. Volume 27. Issue 6 December 2020. Highlights section on the investigation and management of periprosthetic joint infection in the knee. A BASK Surgical practice guideline.
Gehrke et al (Gehrke T , Zahar A , Kendoff D . One-stage exchange: it all began here. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B(11):77–83) suggest single-stage exchange should not be considered in any of the following situations:
Failure of ⩾ two previous one-staged procedures.
Infection spreading to the neurovascular bundle.
Unclear pre-operative bacterial specification.
Non-availability of appropriate antibiotics.
High antibiotic resistance.
Sinus tract with unclear bacterial specification.
In either single or two stage revision surgery an eradication rate of 85% can be achieved in specialist centres. This decreases rapidly after the first failure – in a multiply revised knee with an endoprosthesis the success rate may only be in the region of 50%.
Reference
- orthoracle.com






























































