
Learn the Total Knee replacement: Mako Triathlon robotic assisted cruciate retaining TKR (STRYKER) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Total Knee replacement: Mako Triathlon robotic assisted cruciate retaining TKR (STRYKER) surgical procedure.
The Triathlon knee system from Stryker is a popular total knee replacement. It is an ODEP (Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel) 10A rated (10 year survivorship with a maximum of 7% revision rate) prostheses with good results in the National Joint Registry of England and Wales and has a failure rate of only 3.22% at ten years.
The philosophy of the Triathlon is that is has a single radius of curvature which increases the range of motion of the knee replacement. A single radius implant may lead to improved extension and therefore less quadriceps force when extending the knee. A single radius knee design may also improve the ligamentous balance of the collaterals throughout the full range of motion of the knee system. The polyethylene used in the TKR is from the X3 Stryker modern polyethylene range. The Triathlon knee replacement also has shortened and flared posterior condyles designed to allow a potential 150 degrees of flexion.
The Mako robotic system is an image guided, active, haptic feedback system. It is based on high resolution CT scans to map the anatomy of the knee and lower resolution images of the limb to measure alignment. This has potential advantages of accuracy but does require more planning and forethought. It is active in the sense that there is a robotic arm that moves into the plane of cuts to be performed. More passive systems like the Smith and Nephew Navio are simply active when in the right field and off when they are not. The Mako provides boundaries which allow for protection of soft tissues such as the patella tendon and (in cruciate retaining cases) the posterior cruciate ligament. Their haptic feedback system stops the blade from cutting if any part of the cutting teeth stray outside of the boundaries. The final part of the system is interactive planning and analytics to allow for assessments of implant size and position as well as soft tissue tension.
Stryker govern the use of the system and it is only compatible with their approved implants. It is only available to surgeons who have been trained on an approved Stryker course and is always done with a Makoplasty Technician present in theatre. You should spend time with your technician so they understand how you work and the philosophies you use in knee reconstruction. It doesn’t take long to get used to each other and learn each other’s ways. I strongly recommend spending time going through cases preoperatively and postoperatively with each other to start with. You will find different subtle changes which can help to streamline the process and save quite a lot of time. As you develop, most surgeons find the cases will take less than 20 percent longer than conventional techniques, within around 20 cases.
Using a robotic system like this is more expensive, time consuming and there is as always learning curve. In order to be worthwhile, the surgeon must believe that the increased accuracy of ligament tension and bone cuts provide an improvement in function, longevity or both.
The Mako system provides the most information and input of any robotic knee system and is the only robot advanced enough to remove the need for cutting blocks. However, it is the bulkiest and requires the most pre-operative imaging as well as a dedicated technician. If you enjoy control and freedom, the Navio system may be more to your liking. If you want masses of information and are willing to be part of a team with robot, technician and surgeon working together, the Mako system will be rewarding.
Readers will also find of interest the following techniques, and should in particular read the standard Triathlon operation technique before the Mako assisted technique detailed here:
Total knee replacement-Triathlon (Stryker) posterior stabilised knee.
Total Knee replacement: MAKO robotic triathlon cruciate substituting knee replacement
Stryker MAKO Express Workflow total hip replacement (using Accolade II and Tritanium implants)

INDICATIONS
Total knee arthroplasty is indicated in patients with a combination of clinical and radiological arthritis of the knee.
Conservative options, including analgesia, walking aids or injections may well have been tried and failed. Symptoms should be severe enough to limit daily activities and may include rest and/or night pains. Caution is necessary if the symptoms are severe with only mild arthritis changes. If this is the case conservative options should be highlighted.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Tibia-femoral wear typically causes activity-related pain with increasing pain on longer walks. Patella-femoral symptoms include pain on stair descent, pain rising from a chair and intolerance of squatting. In the earlier phases, pain is typically ameliorated by analgesia or NSAIDs. Pain is often generalised around the knee but tenderness tends to correlate with the sites of greatest wear. Stiffness, loss of extension and varus/valgus deformity should be accurately noted. All four major ligaments should be individually examined for integrity. The hip above should be examined as hip pathology can cause or contribute to knee pains.
IMAGING
Anteroposterior weightbearing, lateral and skyline views of the knee are required for all TKRs. The mako protocol involves a pre-operative CT scan. This must be done on a validated machine (validation is done by Stryker scanning) and is a 1mm, fine slice protocol.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Osteotomy and uni compartment replacement options can be used in isolated compartmental arthritis.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
NSAIDs, injections and quads strengthening physiotherapy have roles in early arthritis, patients with high risk comorbidities or those who wish to avoid surgery.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Active joint infection, lack of radiological arthritis, collateral ligament insufficiency

The mako robot requires a ‘makoplasty technician’ to operate the robot for the surgeon. They should be present before anaesthesia. The technique allows for a virtual run-through do be performed pre-operatively. This allows the surgeon to confirm the position aimed for and for the scrub team to check availability of predicted implants sizes. When you start, spend 10 minutes per case looking at this. Look at the shape match of the implants against the bone and the angles you are aiming for. It will allow you to build up a view of the intricacies of the system and its potential foibles.
It is a great system but it can tend to push towards normalised values with aggressive bone cuts. Severe varus, valgus or fixed flexion can be difficult and requires a lot more attention. It is best to set up fairly conservative cuts and accept that release or recuts may be needed. In particular, it takes little account of large osteophytes. If there are vast posterior osteophytes, aim for a much smaller extension gap, remove the osteophytes and measure afterwards.
For your first few cases, I recommend you, the Stryker arthroplasty rep, the Makoplasty technician and the scrub nurse check that all of the extra kit is available.
In particular, check for:
The mako knee array and balancing kit
The mako power and attachment kit (‘the saw’) and the MICS sawblades
The vizadisc checkpoints and bone pins to attach them
The bone checkpoints
The appropriately consented patient is taken to theatre. Tell them that there will be 2 small incisions over the mid tibia so they are not surprised when they awaken. Under anaesthesia (GA, spinal or combination), the patient is placed in the supine position. The skin is shaved immediately prior to draping if required. I prefer tourniquet control though this can be omitted. I don’t use a tourniquet in patients with peripheral vascular disease. A bolster is placed on the side of the patient’s thigh to rest against the tourniquet laterally. In very large patients, put this on quite loosely – this helps whine trying to capture hip movement and can be advanced later.
The foot is stabilised on a rolled bolster distally so that the leg rests in a naturally flexed position of around 90o. IV antibiotics half an hour before incision, IV tranexamic acid is also used. 2% Chlorhexidine prep or povidone iodine is used to prepare the skin.I also use an iodine impregnated adhesive skin protector

If a drain is used, it should be removed the following morning. Reinfusion drains are preferred.
We are currently moving to topical tranexamic acid and removing drains from the standard protocol. Antibiotics and thromboprohylaxis should follow local and national guidelines.
Check anteroposterior and lateral radiographs should be performed before the patient leaves hospital.
There is no set ‘day of discharge’: day case and 24 hour stay TKR is possible in a number of patients but those with associated medical or social problems may take a while longer.
Full weightbearing is permitted from the day of surgery – ideally mobilising on the day of surgery with assistance.
The bulky bandages are reduced at 48 hours and a simple adhesive dressing left in situ.
Follow up of the wound is performed at 2 weeks in primary or secondary care settings as appropriate.
You should review the patient at around 6 weeks after surgery to assess stability, range, wound healing and check for any signs of infection or clot.

The evidence in favour of robotic arm surgery is building in terms of relatively low learning curve and improved accuracy of placement. As always, the translation of this into clinical superiority in function or survivorship is an altogether harder point to prove.
A recent meta analysis showed improved PROMS scores and improved accuracy of component positions.
(Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zhang et al. Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy 2021)
There are a number of single surgeon series suggesting superiority but most are directly linked to surgeons who work very closely with Stryker. Kayani et al 2018 compared 40 robotic with non-robotic cases and demonstrated less pain, less swelling, quicker recovery and a greater early ROM in the robotic group.
The time to perform the surgery is an often quoted factor – there is evidence of reduction in time with experience and workflow optimisation (Robotic arm assisted total knee arthroplasty workflow optimisation, operative times and learning curve. Grau eat al. Arthroplasty today 2019). It is possible to perform the procedure in under 60 mins consistently.
The RACER study is recruiting in mid 2021 and is designed to be a true blinded, randomised trial of mako robotic versus manual total knee replacement. Those of us contributing to the study hope that this will provide genuine evidence as to whether it is a superior technique or not.
Reference
- orthoracle.com


















































































