
Learn the Lapidus(1st MTC) fusion using the Paragon 28 Phantom intra-medullary nail system surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Lapidus(1st MTC) fusion using the Paragon 28 Phantom intra-medullary nail system surgical procedure.
A Lapidus fusion may be performed to treat medial column pain due to arthritis, medial column instability and also for hallux valgus deformity, especially in severe deformities and revision cases.
As with other MIS procedures, it avoids soft tissue disruption, with the perceived advantages of rapid and reliable union. Additionally, it has biomechanical advantages over traditional plate and screws in terms of the compression that can be generated and a higher load to failure. Typically non union is one of the most frequent and significant complications of the Lapidus fusion, reaching up to 10% in the classic publications. These implant advantages, inherent in a nail, therefore offer the potential for reducing one of the most significant complications of this highly effective operation.
In the last few years, with the advent of a variety of new surgical procedures and implants, these reported non-union rates have already dropped to approximately half of their previous levels .
Taking in consideration the limited soft tissue damage and implant biomechanical properties, one of the objectives of this technique is trying improve outcomes even more, allowing faster recovering.
The Paragon 28 Phantom intra-medullary nailing system is a unique solution for fixation of the first TMT joint and provides the surgeon with a good range of sizes to allow close matching of a patients anatomy as well as a compression system that allows excellent on-table compressive performance.
It should be appreciated that an MIS Lapidus fusion is an advanced procedure and should only be undertaken by surgeons who are experienced with both hallux valgus surgery and MIS procedures. It allows one to deal with, and stably fix, multi-planar metatarsal deformity and prepare articular surfaces in a percutaneous manner, which avoids excessive soft tissue stripping and allows faster recovery of the soft tissue envelope.
Readers will also find of interest Mark Davis technique Lapidus fusion using the I.O. Fix implant (Extremity Medical)
and also Mark Herrons technique Basal osteotomy for Hallux Valgus using Arthrex Low Profile Locking Proximal Opening Wedge Osteotomy Plate

INDICATIONS
Painful 1st TMT joint arthritis/Instability: Isolated arthritis secondary to trauma or inflammatory disease. Most common setting associated with severe hallux valgus and joint instability, which can be visualized by increased sagittal movement and/or a plantar gap on standing x-rays and a Weight Bearing CT-scan.
Severe hallux valgus deformity: This is the most common indication, after failure of conservative management. When hallux valgus deformity is present, it is important to define the exact location of all deformity. There is frequently the need for supplementary procedures such as an Akin osteotomy or lesser toe correction.
The Lapidus fusion can therefore be used to stabilise the 1st MTC and potentially improve the medial longitudinal arch profile, reduce the 1/2 inter-metatarsal angle as part of hallux valgus correction and treat an arthritic 1st MTC joint.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Before surgery the patient should be examined standing, walking and on the couch. Important to note MTP range of movement, pain with movement, severity of the deformity along with associated deformity on hindfoot (i.e flat foot), midfoot (i.e supination) and forefoot (i.e lesser toe deformity/instability). Instability on TMT joint can be evaluated comparing sagittal movement between both feet at TMT joint.
Check the state of the surrounding skin and any sensory or motor loss in the foot as well as vascular status.
IMAGING
Weight bearing bilateral AP & Lateral X-rays should be taken, and if needed CT (preferably a weight bearing CT-Scan) to assess surrounding joints or any complex deformity. It is also important to asses the presence of any plantar gap at the TMT joint that could indicate TMT joint instability.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE INTERVENTIONS
The main alternatives to consider when treating severe hallux valgus deformity are MTP Fusion, basal osteotomy or 1st TMT Fusion(the Lapidus procedure).
I normally reserve MTP Fusion for arthritic MTP joint, recurrences or older patients with long standing MTP subluxation. I prefer to “protect movement” at MTP joint and focus on the origin of the deformity for severe cases, the TMT joint.
Many basal osteotomies of the first metatarsal have been described and used but no one single osteotomy technique has gained universal popularity, probably as a result of technical difficulties performing them, the limitation to the degree of deformity correction and the limitations of fixation techniques. In addition, they fail to address any pathology arising from the 1st TMTJ.
ALTERNATIVES TO OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Accommodative insoles/width box shoes in hallux valgus deformity, pain medication or injection in arthritic joint.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Active infection, severe comorbidities that precludes surgery, poor vascular status.

The following special equipment is required:
A MIS screwdriver and burr
Paragon28 phantom intramedullary nail system
C-Arm
The operation may be performed under regional or general anaesthesia, using a thigh tourniquet
Antibiotic prophylaxis is administered according to local protocols.
The patient is positioned in supine position with the foot just at the end of the operating table, with a firm support under the calf, so that foot lies in a higher level than the contralateral foot to better visualize the lateral X-ray.
Check that the position does not result in the foot being over any radio-opaque bar on the table, and adjust to avoid this. If needed, use a sandbag under the hip – to avoid the leg falling into external rotation.

Patient is able to wear weight as tolerated since day after operation with use of a rigid sole shoe. We check for wound complications at 1 week and then new clinical evaluation at 3 weeks to take sutures out, evaluate surgical wound and weight bearing x rays. After 3-week evaluation, physiotherapy is initiated along with use of comfortable shoes as tolerated.
CT-scan imaging is taken at 3 month from surgery to check for adequate fusion.

We are currently evaluating results for the Lapidus fusion with this technique and have had these results accepted for publication.
Minimally invasive technique with intramedullary nail for treatment of severe hallux valgus: clinical results and surgical technique. J Foot Ankle. 2020;14(1): Chaparro F, Cárdenas PA, Butteri A, Pellegrini MJ, Carcuro G, Ortiz C.
So far we have good radiographic correction and fusion rates (comparable to an open Lapidus fashion) and no complications recorded at 6 month follow up. To our knowledge, there is no other published clinical series evaluating this technique. Longer clinical series and further follow up is needed in order to better evaluate results and possible complications.
Modified Lapidus procedure for the treatment of hypermobile Hallux Valgus. Foot & Ankle International. 2000.816-821.
P.A.Bednarz , A.Manoli.
31 feet followed up over average of 46 months
Average 10 degrees improvement of inter-metatarsal angle
Full recovery fairly slow with 8 average months until full sporting activity or equivalent was possible.
5 recurrent deformities (almost 20%).
The Lapidus procedure as salvage after failed surgical treatment of Hallux Valgus. J Bone Joint Surg. 85-A. 2003. 60-5. Coetzee CC, Kuskowski MK.
24 persons , 26 Feet. All Hypermobile Hallux Valgus recurrences. Hallux Valgus angle improved from 37 degrees to 17 and Inter-metatarsal angle from 18 to 8.6 degrees. 77% Very Satisfied, 4% Satisfied. No recurrences but 3 non-unions.
Barp EA, Erickson JG, Smith HL, Almeida K, Millonig K. Evaluation of fixation techniques for metatarsocuneiform arthrodesis. J Foot Ankle Surgery 56(3): 468-473, 2017.
This single surgeon retrospective review was designed to see which fixation method appeared superior for a Lapidus procedure. The overall non-union rate was less than 7% with fewer being symptomatic but the crossed screw technique had a higher non-union rate compared to a plate and screw construct.
Reference
- orthoracle.com































