
Learn the Total Knee replacement: Zimmer Biomet Nexgen rotating hinge replacement surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Total Knee replacement: Zimmer Biomet Nexgen rotating hinge replacement surgical procedure.
Learn the Rotating Hinge Total Knee Replacement- Nexgen Rotating Hinge (RH) Knee (Zimmer) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of this RH knee for medial collateral ligament deficiency with valgus deformity.
The NexGen RH Knee features a bone conserving modular hinge design that addresses key issues related to many conventional rotating hinge knee designs. The hinge system utilizes the same stems, cones, patellas, and both Trabecular Metal™ and Precoat augments as the NexGen LCCK Constrained Knee System. Bone cuts for the RH Knee system are similar to those of the LCCK system. This feature allows bone conservation as well as easy intra-operative conversions from LCCK.
In many conventional rotating hinge knee designs, the hinge mechanism bears the majority of the compressive load until full extension is achieved. Designs that have the centre of rotation located posteriorly can cause “booking” of the joint, which may result in stress on the cement interfaces or accelerated polyethylene bearing wear in the hinge.
The NexGen RH Knee addresses these concerns as the RH Knee femoral component and articular surfaces are designed to maintain centralized contact throughout ROM (from -3° of hyperextension to 120°) resulting in 95% condylar loading through the tibial condyles.
This is the case of a 91 year old lady who had developed tricompartmental osteoarthritis and medial collateral ligament deficiency leading to valgus deformity. In such case a surgeon may choose to use an implant with less constraint such as a posterior stabilised design, however these can still develop instability and require revision to a hinged knee.
In this technique I will focus on the arthroplasty technique using the Nexgen RH Knee.
The important points to assess preoperatively include attention to instability symptoms in the history and evidence of valgus deformity clinically and radiographically in the coronal plane. Examination often reveals frank medial collateral ligament deficiency and therefore in this situation the surgeon should have a low threshold for proceeding to full constraint with a rotating hinge design.
OrthOracle readers will also find the following techniques of interest:
Revision total Knee Replacement- Legion Rotating Hinge Knee ( Smith and Nephew)
Revision total Knee Replacement: Legion CCK (Smith and Nephew)
Total knee replacement Genesis 2 (PS) with bi-convex patella (Smith and Nephew)
Total knee replacement: Vanguard XP cruciate retaining (Zimmer-Biomet)
Total Knee replacement: Vanguard 360 knee replacement (Zimmer-Biomet)

INDICATIONS
The main indication for a rotating hinge knee replacement as a primary implant is end stage osteoarthritis with medial collateral ligament deficiency and valgus deformity.
A further indication is in the trauma setting where an older patient has a comminuted intra-articular fracture, usually involving the tibial plateau(s) which is deemed not suitable for reconstruction.
Finally deformity and pain due to rheumatoid arthritis is another indication although this situation is thankfully becoming rare due to effective early disease control via systemic medication.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients with osteoarthritis along with valgus deformity and MCL incompetency will typically be in constant pain made worse by activity and they may have night pain that keeps them awake. The patient may have recurrent knee effusions. Patients may complain of instability- describing the knee giving way and causing them to stumble and they may have had several falls due to this.
On examination the findings are often obvious valgus deformity which can be exaggerated on passive flexion and valgus stress on the knee. Placing valgus stress on the knee is important to test the competency of the MCL. The valgus deformity may be unimpressive but if the MCL is incompetent then this is an indication for a hinged knee replacement. It is also important to document whether a fixed flexion deformity is present or not. In this case it was not present, however is it was, then the standard distal femoral resection of 10mm would be increased to 12mm along with release of the posterior capsule.
IMAGING
Standard AP and lateral radiographs may be sufficient, however a skyline view of the patella may demonstrate hypoplasia of the lateral femoral condyle and long leg radiographs may be useful to assess the degree of deformity in the coronal plane.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
In younger patients with valgus deformity and medial collateral ligament deficiency, osteotomy and ligament reconstruction can be considered. In older patients, a posterior stabilised implant with a substantially sized post can be used but failures of these with instability have certainly be documented.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Once osteoarthritis is established treatment is limited to conservative measures or joint replacement depending on the patient’s level of symptoms. A hinged knee brace may help and indeed during the coronavirus pandemic several patients at our centre had reasonable symptom control using these while awaiting routine elective surgery to resume.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Active infection such as a symptomatic UTI, open skin ulcers or upper respiratory tract infection, is a significant contra-indication to knee arthroplasty.
Some disease – modifying immunosuppressants should be stopped for 1 dosing cycle. In general it is the Biological agents which need stopping whereas Methotrexate and Sulphasalazine may be continued.

A suitably anaesthetised patient is positioned on the operating table in the anaesthetic room. We use both spinal with or without sedation or general anaesthetic depending upon patient and anaesthetist preference. An adductor canal nerve block is often used; this does not prevent the use of local infiltration techniques, but the dose calculations need to be worked out to prevent exceeding the total local anaesthetic doses for the patient. Cefuroxime 1.5g i.v. and Tranexamic acid 1g i.v. are administered. While to patient is in the anaesthetic room, a tourniquet is placed high on the thigh and a suitable exclusion drape applied to prevent seepage of preparation liquid under the tourniquet. A side support and a large sandbag is used to rest the foot on when the knee is flexed to 90 degrees or more. I use a 2% Chlorhexidine spray in the anaesthetic room on the whole of the exposed leg and then leave it to evaporate.
The table is then brought through into the operating room and carefully placed within the laminar flow. The aim is to have the knee as central but also ensuring all of the operative trays can be setup within the laminar flow area. Formal surgical preparation with Alcoholic Betadine is then used followed by standard limb exclusion draping, ensuring that hyperflexion of the knee would be possible without pulling the drapes up from the floor.

Full weight bearing as soon as possible
2x further doses of i.v. Cefuroxime 750mg
Foot pumps as an in patient
Low Molecular Weight Heparin for 10 days.
Plain radiographs usually day 1 post-operatively
Reduce the bandage at 24 hours, but leave the surgical wound dressing untouched if still dry for 2 weeks.
Discharge home once safe – usually 2-4 days
The patient simply removes the dressing at 2 weeks with back up from the district nurse if there are any concerns
Review in the out-patient department at 6 weeks to ensure that the patient is achieving a good range of movement (0-90 degrees), then 12 months if all well.

Here are a few papers that will provide a starting point and some information that will give you a “ballpark” overview. We strongly suggest that you search out & read the full text versions.
Mid-term results of rotating hinge knee prostheses. Rajgopal A, Vasdev A, Chidgupkar AS, Dahiya V, Tyagi VC. Acta Orthop Belg. 2012 Feb;78(1):61-7.
This paper reports the results of 46 rotating hinge knee replacements in complex primary and revision situations. The clinical outcomes were satisfactory at the average follow-up which was 62 months.
Good mid-term outcome of the rotating hinge knee in primary total knee arthroplasty – Results of a single center cohort of 106 knees with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Hintze JV, Niemeläinen M, Sintonen H, Nieminen J, Eskelinen A. Knee. 2021 Jan;28:273-281.
This more recent paper reports on 106 rotating hinge knees implanted as the primary prosthesis. The 10 year survival of the implants was 91.6%, with no radiographic evidence of loosening in the unrevised group.
Incidence and Risk Factors for Peripheral Nerve Injury After 383,000 Total Knee Arthroplasties Using a New York State Database (SPARCS). Christ AB, Chiu YF, Joseph A, Westrich GH, Lyman S. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Oct;34(10):2473-2478.
There is a concern regarding injury to the common peroneal nerve following correction of severe valgus deformity during primary arthroplasty. This paper identifies the risk factors associated with nerve injury from a database with a huge number of patients. It confirms that valgus deformity statistically significantly increases the risk of injury. Pre-existing spinal conditions was also a significant risk factor. The presence of both increased the risk even further. Therefore when assessing a patient with valgus deformity, it is important to identify the presence of any spinal condition and explain the additional risk of nerve injury to the patient.
Reference
- orthoracle.com



























































































































