
Learn the Unicompartmental Knee replacement: Persona Partial Knee Replacement (Zimmer-Biomet) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Unicompartmental Knee replacement: Persona Partial Knee Replacement (Zimmer-Biomet) surgical procedure.
This is the case of a 77 year old man who had exceeded the benefits of non-operative treatment including analgesia and physiotherapy. He did not wish to use an offloader brace.
My practice is to use a fixed bearing partial knee replacement for all lateral unicompartmentals and medial unis where the patient is over the age of 65 or there is concern over the ACL integrity.
The Persona Partial Knee (PPK) is a minimally invasive replacement of one compartment of the knee joint with fixed bearing modular cemented components. It is produced (and in the UK marketed) by Zimmer Biomet. The PPK is a new design which is currently available to use through Beyond Compliance whilst it enters the marketplace. The PPK combines many positive features of previous fixed bearing UKR’s including those that achieved good 10 and 20 year survival. In addition there have been developments with better polyethylene wear properties by using Vivacit-E Polyethylene which is actively stabilized with Vitamin-E. By using large databases of patient morphotypes the shape of the PPK has been modified to represent the very best fit possible.
As a surgeon with a background and current practice still using mobile uncemented Oxford implants as well, this system provides a very simple yet appropriate transition to the fixed UKR design using a resection rather than a milling technique.
This case was performed as an overnight stay.

INDICATIONS
Anteromedial arthritis of the knee, usually in the presence of a functioning anterior cruciate ligament.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Symptoms:
Localised pain in the anteromedial knee – often the patient is able to locate the site of pain with one finger on the medial side of the knee
Stiffness
Varus change in leg alignment
Examination:
Tendereness in the anteromedial knee around the tibiofemoral joint line
Pain on loading in varus at 20-30 degrees of flexion.
No pain in the lateral joint on valgus loading – sometimes there may be exacerbation of the medial pain on valgus loading.
Intact ACL – extended indication proponents would debate this. For example if a patient was not functionally unstable even in the presence of ACL damage, use of a fixed bearing medial partial knee replacement (PKR) may still be appropriate. However the classical indication is an intact ACL
IMAGING
Radiographs – 4 views for all patients.
AP weight bearing – ideally long leg alignment views
Weight-bearing lateral
Skyline patella view
Rosenburg (PA flexion at 45) – this really stresses the lateral tibio-femoral compartment. If there is any suggestion of lateral wear then a stress XR should be performed with values to check the state of the Lateral TF joint under increased load.
Stress radiographs – only in selected cases
In the absence of full thickness disease on plain AP a varus stress view can be performed to try and elucidate a full thickness arthritis.
Valgus stress XRays should be performed to ensure that the lateral joint is in good condition, where there is any clinical doubt such as if the Rosenburg shows some lateral joint reduction or osteophytes
MRI
Only selected patients are sent for an MRI; I would use MRI for those patients whose radiography suggests no full thickness disease, but clinically the patient is behaving as a failed joint with arthritis. There is good evidence not to proceed to arthroplasty until there is full thickness disease even if this is on MRI. Whilst MRI is the most objective modality of imaging the chondral surfaces (& excluding degenerative change of note), the sensitivity of this for chondral defects depends on the strength of the magnet and sequencing protocol; 1.5T is the current standard, but this is by no means perfect and all my cases are warned of the small chance of intra-operative conversion to a TKR. MRI does allow assessment of intra-osseous bone marrow lesions which are markers of increased bone turnover.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Osteotomy – if the long-leg alignment deviation is due to an extra-articular deformity then a realignment procedure can be performed in any age, although classically this is preferred for younger patients with optimal bone stock.
Total Knee Replacement – if surgeons do not offer partial knee replacement then a TKR is still a valid treatment for anteromedial arthritis of the knee.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Lifestyle modifications
Analgesia
Bracing – medial offloader braces which push the knee into valgus.
Injection therapy – steroid for inflammation, or viscosupplementation.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Absolute
Active infection
Active inflammatory arthritis in the same joint
Untreated ligament laxity
Significant loss of range of movement particularly extension
Relative
Inflammatory arthritis in other joints
ACL damage

Two main operative setups are used for partial knee replacement;
Leg holder – the operative thigh is held on or in a leg holder such that the knee can flex freely and hang dependently under gravity. The surgeon may sit or stand. If a sitting style is chosen consider a surgical stool whose height may be altered with a foot pedal intra-operatively by the surgeon
As a standard TKR position with side support and foot roll. Surgeon standing
Tourniquet
Where a surgeon chooses to use a tourniquet this should be applied at the start of the operation high on the thigh before skin preparation.
My personal choice is to avoid the tourniquet and so attention must be paid to haemostasis during the procedure.
Drugs
Intravenous prophylactic antibiotics should be administered early (30-45 minutes) to achieve adequate tissue concentrations at the time of ‘knife to skin’.
Intravenous tranexamic acid on induction – 1000mg.
If the wound is oozing then this induction dose can be repeated on closure.

Standard care postoperatively
Antibiotics: 24 hours prophylaxis – we use Flucloxacillin 1000mg x 3 postoperatively, in addition to the induction Flucloxacillin and Gentamycin on induction
Hospital Stay: increasingly this is being performed as overnight stay or day case surgery.
Weight Bearing: full weight bear as soon as possible.
Bloods: Full blood count, Urea, Electrolytes and Creatinine
Radiograph: Anteroposterior and lateral XR
Dressing: Bulky wool compression bandage reduced at 24 hours and occlusive dressing left in situ for 2 weeks, ideally undisturbed from theatre, but changed on the rare occasions that the wound leaks.
Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Aspirin 150mg for 6 weeks orally for standard risk. Patients with previous VTE receive 10 days of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in addition to their Aspirin. Patients on prophylactic long term anticoagulants including NOACs should simply return to their normal medication on day 2, using LMWH at prophylactic dose on day 1.
Follow-up – depending on the patient’s functional ability we usually ask them to remove their own dressing at 2 weeks, but where this is impractical we review in our outpatient department at 2 weeks. Subsequent review is scheduled as: 6-8 weeks, 12 months, 2 years, 7, 10,13 years continuing every 3 years as per UK National Guidance
Variance – Any concerns with the wound should trigger a review by the treating surgical team and must not be managed in the community.

It is interesting to note that the according to the National Joint Registry’s 2017 report the recorded use of fixed bearing insert prostheses has grown since the registry’s inception in 2003 against the mobile-bearing prostheses (In 2003 fixed-bearing vs mobile bearing: 17.5% vs 81.25%; in 2017 fixed vs mobile: 44.6% vs 55.4%).
Revision rates amongst UKRs remains relatively high compared to primary total knee replacements. Many reasons for this have been postulated. There is a perception that revising a UKR is a simpler procedure than revision of a total knee replacement, which may lower a surgeon’s threshold to proceed. It should be appreciated however that the patient reported outcomes (PROMs) for revised UKRs, including those revised to a primary total knee prosthesis, mirror the PROMs of full revision TKRs. While this fact should not prevent a surgeon from revising a failing UKR it should influence their original decision about using a UKR as a “stop gap” procedure in younger patients.
Partial knee replacement is simply a treatment for selective arthritis irrespective of age and should not be used as a ‘stop-gap’ treatment trying to delay an inevitable primary TKR. In addition the risks of partial knee replacement are significantly lower than those of TKR with respect to rates of VTE, infection and medical complications. Two independent landmark papers published in the Lancet demonstrated a significantly lower mortality in patients treated with partial knee replacement compared to those receiving TKR.
The “bottom line” figure for 10 year survivorship of a UKR for a 65-year old patient is 90% (or a 1% failure per year.) This compares to around 95-97% for a total knee replacement. The probability of revision for a 55 year old and younger male and female with a UKR is in the order of 18-19% at ten years which compares to 8-9% for total knee replacement. There is no significant variability across genders. A surgeon’s reluctance to perform arthroplasty in younger patients is understandable when taking into account these comparable data.
However fixed bearing unicompartmental with the Miller-Galante produced 98% survivorship at 10 years and 90% at 20 years.
Complication rates and mortality rates favour UKR over TKR. Furthermore the improved, or more physiological, function attained due to sparing of the cruciate ligaments leads to higher early PROMs results.
Careful patient selection and good surgical execution with the surgeon’s preferred implant can lead to excellent results from unicompartmental knee replacement. Furthermore careful follow-up and auditing of results can improve vigilance especially for failing knees. A paper produced with reference to the New Zealand Joint Registry, which collects Oxford Knee Scores as part of the audit, demonstrated a strong correlation between low 6-month Oxford Score and early (<2 year) revision for UKR.
National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 14th Annual Report. http://www.njrreports.org.uk
14th Annual Report is available to download. The revision rates of fixed and mobile bearing UKRs is shown on page 121 (Fig 3.19 (c)).
Survival and functional outcome after revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee replacement: the New Zealand National Joint Registry.Pearse AJ, Hooper GJ, Rothwell A, Frampton C.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Apr;92(4):508-12
Analysis of the revision rates and PROM scores of patients who had undergone revision of UKR to total knee replacement should significantly poorer results that patients with primary TKR. This suggested that the practice of using a UKR as a “stop-gap” procedure in younger patients was ill-advised.
Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):793-801.
Early (6-month) Oxford knee score was higher for unicompartmental knee replacement over total knee replacement. This paper also found that overall complications and re-admission rates were lower for UKR.
Long-term Survivorship and Failure Modes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Foran, JR. et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan; 471(1): 102–108.
Analysis of the revision rates and PROM scores of patients who had undergone revision of UKR to total knee replacement should significantly poorer results that patients with primary TKR. This suggested that the practice of using a UKR as a “stop-gap” procedure in younger patients was ill-advised.
Patient-reported outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A, Murray DW. Bone Joint J. 2015 Jun;97-B(6):793-801.
Early (6-month) Oxford knee score was higher for unicompartmental knee replacement over total knee replacement. This paper also found that overall complications and re-admission rates were lower for UKR.
Long-term Survivorship and Failure Modes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Foran, JR. et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan; 471(1): 102–108.
An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry A. G. Rothwell, G. J. Hooper, A. Hobbs, C. M. Frampton. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:413-18.
Whilst demonstrating that low Oxford hip and knee scores at 6-months correlated well with early revision this paper’s strongest demonstration of a relationship was with a Oxford score of <27 (poor) being associated with a 27% risk of UKR revision within 6-months.
Fixed- versus mobile-bearing UKA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Peersman G, Stuyts B, Vandenlangenbergh T, Cartier P, Fennema P.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Nov;23(11):3296-305.
Meta-analysis of 9463 knees (44 papers) showed comparable revision rates for fixed bearing UKR and mobile bearing UKR, 0.9 and 1.51 per 100 component years respectively.
Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H, Murray DW. Lancet. 2014 Oct 18;384(9952):1437-45.
45-day mortality after 467,779 knee replacements for osteoarthritis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: an observational study. Hunt LP, Ben-Shlomo Y, Clark EM, Dieppe P, Judge A, MacGregor AJ, Tobias JH, Vernon K, Blom AW; National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet. 2014 Oct 18;384(9952):1429-36.
Outcomes of a Fixed-Bearing, Medial, Cemented Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty Design: Survival Analysis and Functional Score of 460 Cases. Winnock de Grave P1, Barbier J1, Luyckx T1, Ryckaert A1, Gunst P1, Van den Daelen L1. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr 24. pii: S0883-5403(18)30392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.031.
Reference
- orthoracle.com































































