
Learn the ACL reconstruction with 6 strand hamstring allograft and Smith and Nephew Endobutton and RCI screw surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the ACL reconstruction with 6 strand hamstring allograft and Smith and Nephew Endobutton and RCI screw surgical procedure.
Have you ever wondered if you really need a tourniquet for ACL reconstruction surgery?
Alternatively, have you thought there may be a better way than ‘wasting’ the hamstring tails that are excised in a standard 4 strand semi-tendonosus and gracilis construct after tibial interference screw fixation?
If the answer to either of these questions is ‘yes’ then you should read on as in this technique I will describe my technique for reconstruction of a ruptured ACL with a 6 strand hamstring graft without a tourniquet. By using a 6 strand technique the cross-sectional diameter of the resultant graft is increased with a corresponding increase in absolute strength and thus load to failure limits as well. The absence of a tourniquet is a personal choice, but on systematic review and metanalysis (Kuo 2017) there are no downsides to not using a tourniquet and potentially benefits with reduced reduction in thigh girth and less bleeding post-operatively in the knee. Extrapolating from the arthroplasty world with no tourniquet there are also likely to benefits of reduced VTE risk by performing ACLR without tourniquet. There is no doubt that by increasing the strand numbers the graft diameter increases and this concept has been around since the mid 2000s (Krishna 2018 and Brown 2018).
For fixation in this case I am using the Smith & Nephew Endobutton (suspensory femoral fixation) and a Smith & Nephew metal RCI interference screw on the tibia. The RCI is a blunt threaded, 2mm cannulated metal screw which has a very long track record. The metal screws are easy to insert and remove and this is why I prefer a metal screw; the reason to remove a screw at a future date would either be for symptomatic tenderness on the anterior tibia or at revision if the graft ruptured. The endobutton is a 4mm x 12mm titanium button with 4 holes predrilled. The endobutton can be purchased separately eg for meniscal root repair, but it is usually supplied with a continuous loop of polyester around the central two holes. This allows a gentle loop through which the hamstring tendons are placed. In the two outer holes the endobutton comes pre-loaded with Ultrabraid (White) and Ethibond (Green) to provide a very strong pull and easier identification of the separate ends of the button to aid toggling on the lateral femoral wall.
ACL injuries are unfortunately a common injury in sporting trauma, often associated with injuries to the menisci and sometimes other ligaments. Chondral injuries less commonly occur at the time of injury, but left untreated ACL deficient knees will acquire meniscal or chondral injuries at a rate of 0.6 – 1% per month (Brambilla et al 2015). The chondral injuries are thought to occur as secondary damage when the knee has episodes of instability. Thus by 4 years (a 48% chance) approaching a one in two chance of meniscal or chondral injury which is known have significant long-term degenerative consequences on the knee.
The decision on whether to reconstruct an ACL rupture needs to be tailored to the patient, based on their future planned activity and their age (and thus their risk of subsequent secondary injury) or resultant instability after a trial of non-operative management. This is elegantly described in the Panther group output statement in 2020 by Diermeier; in young patients wanting to return to direction change activity then early ACLR reconstruction is advised, whereas those patients with no direction change may be treated non-operatively. If there is subjective instability after non-operative maximisation then ACLR is also indicated.
Readers will also find of interest the following associated OrthOracle operative techniques:
Anatomic ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons ( Linvatec graft tensioner)
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a double-stranded hamstring graft
Patella tendon harvest for ACL reconstruction
Lemaire lateral extra-articular tenodesis for anterolateral rotational knee instability
Meniscal repair using Smith and Nephew fast-fix 360 system and knee arthroscopy
Arthroscopic lateral meniscal repair with fibrin clot and bone marrow aspirate -Smith and Nephew Fast Fix 360 system.
Brambilla L, Pulici L, Carimati G, Quaglia A, Prospero E, Bait C, Morenghi E, Portinaro N, Denti M, Volpi P. Prevalence of Associated Lesions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Correlation With Surgical Timing and With Patient Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2966-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546515608483. Epub 2015 Oct 15. PMID: 26473010.
Brown CH Jr. Editorial Commentary: How to Increase Hamstring Tendon Graft Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2641-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.014. PMID: 30173804.
Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Engebretsen L, Lynch AD, Ayeni OR, Paterno MV, Xerogeanes JW, Fu FH, Karlsson J, Musahl V, Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Rauer T, Meredith SJ; Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group. Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Aug;28(8):2390-2402. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06012-6. Epub 2020 May 9. Erratum in: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Sep 25;: PMID: 32388664; PMCID: PMC7524809.
Krishna L, Panjwani T, Mok YR, Lin Wong FK, Singh A, Toh SJ. Use of the 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Technique in Increasing Graft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2633-2640. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 May 24. PMID: 29804953.
Kuo LT, Yu PA, Chen CL, Hsu WH, Chi CC. Tourniquet use in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 22;18(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1722-y. PMID: 28830402; PMCID: PMC5567632.

INDICATIONS
Isolated ACL rupture with repairable meniscus tear
Young patients with ACL tears that wish to return to direction change sport or employment which needs knee stability – for example police, fire, military, building site workers (construction or engineers), farmers, roofers etc.
ACL rupture combined with multi-ligament injury being managed surgically.
Persistent instability in a non-operatively managed ACL deficient patient
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
History
There is usually a clear cut history of a traumatic event in ACL injury. In this particular case there was a background of a football injury 3 years ago, without ever being able to return to football because of fear of giving way. There was then a traumatic fall down stairs with intermittent locking since the second event.
Usually the patient has a healthy knee prior to the event and they are involved in a sudden weight bearing direction change which is usually non-contact. During the event the patient frequently hears a loud ‘crack’ in the knee and is immediately aware of a significant injury. Sometimes patients describe this by holding up their two fists and showing movement between them – representing the femur and the tibia moving apart. The patient is then usually non-weight bearing and the knee becomes effused early, 75% will have an effusion within the first hour. The patient usually describes the pain as ‘excruciating’ and there is a usually certain visceral nausea associated with an ACL injury.
Sub-acutely patients with ACL injury complain of instability and then pain and swelling for a few days after the episode of ‘giving way’. Patients routinely avoid direction change activity as they know that their knee is not stable.
Sometimes well-muscled and well-conditioned patients can cope with isolated ACL injure, and after rehabilitation return to sport and then suffer another injury. During the second injury there is usually damage to the meniscus and sometimes the chondral surface, +/- other ligaments.
Locking (an inability to fully extend the knee) may be present particularly in recurrent injury.
Examination
Weight bearing status depends on the chronicity and associated injuries. Acutely most patients will struggle to fully weight bear.
Look for previous portals, the presence of swelling and bare in mind that when squatting the patient usually will be able to get lower on the non-injured side. There is normally a large knee effusion, but most commonly a moderate effusion detected on sweep testing by the time the patient is seen. The anterolateral side of the joint line around Gerdy’s tubercle is often tender. This represents strain of the anterolateral ligament or avulsion from the tibia.
Ligament examination:
A full ligament assessment must be made of the ACL, PCL, MCL, LCL and posterolateral corner.
Quads Active Test – thigh supported over the hand or arm of the examiner and ask the patient to extend their knee. Watch for movement of the tibia anteriorly as the Quads pull. The ACL deficient side moves more that the ACL intact side as the ACL resists the anterior translation of the proximal tibia and the force is then transmitted to extension of the leg distally.
Lachman: 30 degree knee flexion and anterior movement of the relaxed tibia. Look for side-side difference and the absence or presence of an endpoint.
Pivot Shift: This looks for the translation of the lateral tibia from reduced to subluxed (Pivot Jerk Test) or subluxed anteriorly to reduced (pivot shift). This relies on 3 forces – extension, valgus and internal rotation. However for the junior examiner this is ‘impossible’ as the patient will not relax and it should not be attempted. As experience increases this is the most valuable test. Remember to elevate the bed height so that the examiner does not flex the patient’s hip much (thus tightening hamstrings). Similarly ensure that the patient is recumbent – one pillow should suffice.
Anterior Drawer: The commonest taught test, performed with the knee flexed to 90 degrees and the hamstrings relaxed. Look for the relationship between the proximal tibia and the femoral condyles, like assessing a loss of step-off in a PCL deficient knee, this allows a degree of objectivity of the amount of movement during anterior translation.
The accepted specificity and sensitivities of these tests are:
Lachman – specificity 95% sensitivity 80-99%
Anterior drawer – specificity 75-95%; specificity 22-41% – risk of false positive
Pivot shift – specificity 98%; sensitivity 84-98.4% (35% in the awake patient) However this increases in experienced hands.
Record the findings using the following accepted grading conventions:
A or Grade 0 = Normal
B or Grade I = Slight Laxity, minimal translation, firm endpoint
C or Grade II = Moderate Laxity, moderate translation, firm or soft endpoint.
D or Grade III = Severe Laxity, no end-point, soft end-point
Remember that meniscal tears are common with ACL pathology. It is said that meniscal tears or chondral damage occurs at a rate of 1% of ACL-deficient patients per month
Meniscal tests such as the McMurray and Thessaly may be appropriate, though often in the acute setting the knee is too painful for these/
The McMurray test involves palpation of the joint line during passive flexion/extension of the knee joint with alternating internal and external rotation – a positive test equates to a palpable click on the joint line during the McMurray combined movement, usually with the medial joint on internal rotation and the lateral joint on external rotation.
The Thessaly test is a variation of the McMurray but with the patient weight-bearing through the injured knee; the patient should be supported ( I ask the patient to support their weight on the back of a chair) and then squat to 30 degrees and rotated externally (lateral meniscal provocation with a positive test if painful on the lateral joint line) or internally rotated ( medial meniscal provocation with a positive test if there is medial joint line pain).
IMAGING
In the acute setting with a history of trauma simple AP and lateral Radiographs should be performed to rule out fractures. In non-acute cases there may be a role for alignment views (for example if repair or root repair is being considered) or there is concern over significant varus with a combined Posterolateral Corner Injury
MRI however is by far the most important investigation to confirm the rupture of the ACL and to assess presence, site and morphology of any concomitant meniscal or chondral injury.
When learning to interpret MRI scans it is important to trace the ACL on both coronal, saggital and Axial scans – by having all three open together it is possible to build up a 3D picture of the ACL.
Perhaps the easiest scan slice to interpret is the Saggital T2 MRI – look for the presence of non-contiguous bone bruising showing where the posterolateral tibial plateau contacted the central lateral femoral condyle at the time of injury. There may be an associated chondral injury, subchondral fracture or just bone bruising in the knee at these sites. Look also for the ACL angle – typically the ACL should be at approximately 60 degrees to the tibia and in ACL deficiency the ACL will ‘fall down’ the PCL and sit at approximately 40 degrees.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
There is no alternative operative management if the decision to reconstruct the ACL has been made but there are different techniques of performing ACL reconstruction – most notably with the graft choice.
Graft Choice
Allograft: This should be reserved for multi-ligament reconstructions or cases of revision ACL where there are no suitable autografts available. Similarly if a patient is hypermobile and has ruptured a graft with good tunnel placement then an alternative donor tissue may be sensible. Allograft tissue may be all soft tissue eg Semitendonosus grafts, part bony eg TendoAchilles or quads tendon, or bone – tendon – bone such as a patella tendon allograft.
Autograft: The vast majority of cases should use the patient’s own tissue in order to reduce revision rates, reducing cost and reducing infections. The options are Hamstrings, Patella Tendon or Quadriceps tendon. All three are good grafts.There has been a lot in the literature comparing hamstrings against patella tendon (bone-tendon-bone or BTB) . From Magnussens’s systematic review in 2015 re-rupture rates at 10 years minimum range from 3.2% to 11.1% for the ipsilateral reconstructed side, but with a mean of 12.5% (ranging from 0.6% to 22.7%). In summary there is a slightly greater rate of re-rupture on the ipsilateral knee by using a hamstring graft, but if a BTB graft is used whilst the ipsilateral rupture rate is reduced, there is an increase in contra-lateral rupture rates.
Additional Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis (LEAT)
Historically there were many different methods to stabilise the unstable knee with ACL deficiency by using extra-articular methods. More recently the addition of these techniques in addition to an anatomic intra-articular ACL reconstruction has taken off. This led to a multicentre RCT – the Stability study
The Stability Study has really confirmed the benefit of LEAT at 2 years compared to isolated ACLR. The re-rupture rate at 2 years was 11% for the ACLR group and 4% for the ACLR and LEAT group.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
In older patients this is the main treatment initially as the balance of risk to their menisci and chondral surfaces due to recurrent instability is less than the time-off work, time for rehab and surgical risks. There are very few young patients I would treat non-operatively.
In middle aged patients there needs to be a discussion and a shared decision – some will want early surgery and some will favour physiotherapy first and only adding in a reconstruction if there is residual instability which impacts in their lives.
Analgesia, crutches, braces and physiotherapy.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Degenerative disease of the knee.
Active infection in the knee or at other sites in the body.
A patient who is unfit for anaesthetic
Ref:
Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Engebretsen L, Lynch AD, Ayeni OR, Paterno MV, Xerogeanes JW, Fu FH, Karlsson J, Musahl V, Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Rauer T, Meredith SJ; Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group. Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Aug;28(8):2390-2402. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06012-6. Epub 2020 May 9. Erratum in: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Sep 25;: PMID: 32388664; PMCID: PMC7524809.

Pre-operative antibiotics
Side-support
Foot plate / sandbag
Arthroscopy stack
Shaved operative site
“Plan B” options:
consider preparation of contralateral leg for hamstring harvest
patellar tendon harvest equipment
supporting implants eg xtendobutton for inadvertent blow out of lateral femoral cortex; small fragment screws and washers or bone staples for secondary tibial fixation

We use two protocols in Bristol:
Early Accelerated
Slow stream ACL Rehabilitation.
The decision as to which pathway I follow depends on the patient (eg under 20 year olds or hypermobility) as well as the operative procedures (additional meniscal repairs requiring a period of reduced weight bearing such as Root Tears or Radial Meniscal Tears).
Early Accelerated Pathway
Daycase
Full Weight Bear
Crepe bandage reduced prior to discharge and single tubigrip applied
Crutches for balance – usually only for 1-2 weeks
Physiotherapy on the day, but mostly for safety reasons to allow mobility. Planning of future physiotherapy from 1-2 weeks.
Patient removes their own dressings at 2 weeks – any concerns they should phone the surgical team back and request review – this is very rare.
Outpatient Review – 6-8 weeks with Xray to document implants and tunnels
Slow Stream Rehabilitation
Brace 0-90 4 weeks – this may be modified to a lower flexion angle in meniscal repair cases
Crutches Touch Weight Bearing for 2 weeks
Physiotherapy starts at the same 1-2 week time interval, but is on a slower rehabilitation schedule to reduce graft loading.
Patient removes their own dressings at 2 weeks – any concerns they should phone the surgical team back and request review – this is very rare.
Outpatient Review – 6-8 weeks with Xray to document implants and tunnels

The aim of ACL reconstruction is to restore knee function to full activity. In reality though this is a multifactorial goal. For example patients may decide not to return to their pre-injury level for work/family/age reasons. However the aim should be full function.
Time scales for return to functions vary depending on philosophy. This is a guide:
First 1-2 weeks – normal weight bearing
2-4 weeks for driving (unless left leg and automatic car then this is much earlier)
4-6 weeks – quiet knee with minimal effusion and near full range.
6 weeks – the weakest time point of the graft! From this time there will start to be a slow increase in strength up to 2 years.
3 months – light sport activity under physio guidance. Cylcic loading can now start.
6 months – sports-specific training starts. Some authors allow return to sport. Injury prevention work for both knees
9 -12 months – Increasing sports activity. I prefer to aim for around 12 months for return to competitive sport. The graft continues tom improve in the 2nd year and re-rupture rates will diminish after 24 months, but the 12-24 month improvement is small, compared to the 9-12 month reduction in re-rupture rates and therfore I suggest around 12 months as long as the patient has ‘Knee Confidence’
Regarding re-rupture rates these vary – I have quoted two long-term papers for hamstring and BTB use below, although from Magnussens’s systematic review in 2015 re-rupture rates at 10 years minimum range from 3.2% to 11.1% for the ipsilateral reconstructed side, but with a mean of 12.5% (ranging from 0.6% to 22.7%). In summary there is a slightly greater rate of re-rupture on the ipsilateral knee by using a hamstring graft, but if a BTB graft is used whilst the ipsilateral rupture rate is reduced, there is an increase in contra-lateral rupture rates.
For all UK ligament surgeons, the National Ligament Registry (www.uknlr.co.uk) is an excellent way to assess personal results and then comparing yourself to the National Cohort. I strongly encourage use of this – Please take my lead and encourage others to use of this.
References:
The National Ligament Registry (www.uknlr.co.uk)
Amis AA, Jakob RP. Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6 Suppl 1:S2-12. doi: 10.1007/s001670050215. PMID: 9608456.
Brambilla L, Pulici L, Carimati G, Quaglia A, Prospero E, Bait C, Morenghi E, Portinaro N, Denti M, Volpi P. Prevalence of Associated Lesions in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Correlation With Surgical Timing and With Patient Age, Sex, and Body Mass Index. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Dec;43(12):2966-73. doi: 10.1177/0363546515608483. Epub 2015 Oct 15. PMID: 26473010.
Brown CH Jr. Editorial Commentary: How to Increase Hamstring Tendon Graft Size for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2641-2646. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.06.014. PMID: 30173804.
Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, Engebretsen L, Lynch AD, Ayeni OR, Paterno MV, Xerogeanes JW, Fu FH, Karlsson J, Musahl V, Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Rauer T, Meredith SJ; Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group. Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Aug;28(8):2390-2402. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06012-6. Epub 2020 May 9. Erratum in: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Sep 25;: PMID: 32388664; PMCID: PMC7524809.
Getgood AMJ, Bryant DM, Litchfield R, Heard M, McCormack RG, Rezansoff A, Peterson D, Bardana D, MacDonald PB, Verdonk PCM, Spalding T; STABILITY Study Group, Willits K, Birmingham T, Hewison C, Wanlin S, Firth A, Pinto R, Martindale A, O’Neill L, Jennings M, Daniluk M, Boyer D, Zomar M, Moon K, Pritchett R, Payne K, Fan B, Mohan B, Buchko GM, Hiemstra LA, Kerslake S, Tynedal J, Stranges G, Mcrae S, Gullett L, Brown H, Legary A, Longo A, Christian M, Ferguson C, Mohtadi N, Barber R, Chan D, Campbell C, Garven A, Pulsifer K, Mayer M, Simunovic N, Duong A, Robinson D, Levy D, Skelly M, Shanmugaraj A, Howells F, Tough M, Spalding T, Thompson P, Metcalfe A, Asplin L, Dube A, Clarkson L, Brown J, Bolsover A, Bradshaw C, Belgrove L, Millan F, Turner S, Verdugo S, Lowe J, Dunne D, McGowan K, Suddens CM, Declercq G, Vuylsteke K, Van Haver M. Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Reduces Failure of Hamstring Tendon Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 2-Year Outcomes From the STABILITY Study Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):285-297. doi: 10.1177/0363546519896333. Epub 2020 Jan 15. PMID: 31940222.
Krishna L, Panjwani T, Mok YR, Lin Wong FK, Singh A, Toh SJ. Use of the 5-Strand Hamstring Autograft Technique in Increasing Graft Size in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2633-2640. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.03.026. Epub 2018 May 24. PMID: 29804953.
Kuo LT, Yu PA, Chen CL, Hsu WH, Chi CC. Tourniquet use in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 22;18(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1722-y. PMID: 28830402; PMCID: PMC5567632.
Magnussen RA, Meschbach NT, Kaeding CC, Wright RW, Spindler KP. ACL Graft and Contralateral ACL Tear Risk within Ten Years Following Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev. 2015 Jan 20;3(1):01874474-201501000-00002. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.N.00052. PMID: 27501023.
Murray JR, Lindh AM, Hogan NA, Trezies AJ, Hutchinson JW, Parish E, Read JW, Cross MV. Does anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction lead to degenerative disease?: Thirteen-year results after bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):404-13. doi: 10.1177/0363546511428580. Epub 2011 Nov 23. PMID: 22116668.
Robinson J, Inderhaug E, Harlem T, Spalding T, Brown CH Jr. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Placement: An Analysis of the Intended Versus Achieved Position for 221 International High-Volume ACL Surgeons. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;48(5):1088-1099. doi: 10.1177/0363546520906158. Epub 2020 Mar 17. PMID: 32182091.
Salmon LJ, Russell VJ, Refshauge K, Kader D, Connolly C, Linklater J, Pinczewski LA. Long-term outcome of endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: minimum 13-year review. Am J Sports Med. 2006 May;34(5):721-32. doi: 10.1177/0363546505282626. Epub 2006 Jan 6. PMID: 16399931.
Reference
- orthoracle.com

















































































