
Learn the Ankle and Subtalar (Double) Fusion using OrthoSolutions Oxbridge nail surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Ankle and Subtalar (Double) Fusion using OrthoSolutions Oxbridge nail surgical procedure.
One technique for double fusion of the ankle and subtalar joint is to use fixation with an intramedullary nail such as the OrthoSolutions Oxbridge Nail.
This is a method applicable when both the ankle and subtalar joints are to be fused, which achieves rigid fixation, even in cases of bone loss.
Particular advantages of the Orthosolutions Oxbridge nail are a well designed entry jig to assist centring the initial guide-wire , numerous distal screw option to secure the nail into Calcaneus and Talus coupled with a simple & accurate outrigger to allow lateral , medial and posterior positioning ,multiple synchronous external compression options , a “Mis-a-nail” jig to allow easy placement of a supplementary large screw to improve rotational stability and axial compression for the difficult reconstruction cases and a single, simple tray of instrumentation.
The Oxbridge nail can also be used in conjunction with the custom manufactured 4Web talar replacement for cases of avascular necrosis of the talus https://www.orthoracle.com/library/ttc-double-fusion-using-4web-custom-talar-replacement-and-oxbridge-nail-orthosolutions/
The Wright Valour Nailing system is also detailed on the platform https://www.orthoracle.com/library/tibio-talo-calcaneal-ttc-double-fusion-with-wright-valor-nail/
Irrespective of the means of fixation of the ankle and subtalar joints the principles and techniques involved in fixation of both ankle and subtalar joints are similar. Other forms of fixation of a double fusion include external frames, large fragment screws or plating systems such as the laterally applied Zimmer Ankle-fix https://www.orthoracle.com/library/tibio-talo-calcaneal-ttc-double-fusion-using-zimmer-ankle-fix-plus-plate/
the Integra Advansys plate https://www.orthoracle.com/library/tibio-talo-calcaneal-ttc-double-fusion-using-integra-advansys-plate/
or the posteriorly applied Wright Ortholoc plate https://www.orthoracle.com/library/talectomy-and-tibio-calcaneal-fusion-using-wright-ortholoc-posterior-ttc-fusion-plate/

INDICATIONS:
Combined severe Ankle & Subtalar osteoarthritis: This may be with or without deformity. In the presence of deformity it is key to identify accurately where the deformity lies so it can be fully corrected. This is best defined with CT or MRI.
Revision Ankle Fusion: When bone loss (especially talar loss) will compromise fixation at revision fusion, rigidity can be achieved at the cost of losing subtalar motion.
Severe deformity –especially with bone loss – may best be treated by the solid, rigid fixation of an intramedullary nail.
In cases of failed ankle replacement with bone loss or with concomitant subtalar arthrodesis, surgery may include double fusion with autologous bone graft or allograft.
In trauma , acute arthrodesis with double fusion is used to treat comminuted fractures, especially when early mobilisation is benefical.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION:
Most patients with severe ankle & subtalar arthritis localise the pain well to the joints. Severe arthritis of the ankle and subtalar jointarthritis progress from early activity /start up pain which eases off through to progressively more disabling and continual weight bearing pain and on occasion as far as pain at night or at rest. A less common symptom which can co-exist with pain is that of ankle and hindfoot instability.
Many patients will either have a history of a significant injury (such as a previous ankle or Talar fracture), chronic deformity (for example Cavo-varus), severe generalised arthritis, past ankle instability or failed ankle replacement. With arthritis of both ankle and subtalar joints without any of these, the possibility of an inflammatory arthropathy should be considered.
On examination swelling and tenderness localised to the ankle and hindfoot is common. Range of movement is often reduced and may be painful.
It is important that at the end of the operation, the foot should be positioned below and square to the leg, and be plantigrade (as well as slightly externally rotated). So any deformity should be noted. Varus is most common and valgus and equinus less common. The key issues with any deformity are A:Whether it is passively correctable (or not) and B.:Being sure of its anatomical location(s). Fixed deformity must be identified so that releases or additional bony resections can be performed to achieve correction. Only deformity at the ankle and hindfoot will be corrected during the main procedure, so if there are residual deformities in the remainder of the leg or foot they must be identified before surgery, and procedures carried out at the same time to achieve the desired position.
The rest of the lower limbs alignment should not be forgotten. In general correction of deformity should start proximally and proceed distally. A varus and arthritic knee should be corrected and replaced before the ankle is fused .
A vascular examination must be made and if abnormal dealt with appropriately.
INVESTIGATION:
Plain X-Ray: This is the initial imaging for most patients with ankle and subtalar arthritis of any degree. Though the ankle is relatively well visualised (and the films should be taken weight-bearing) the subtalar and midfoot joints aren’t so well shown , in particular in the presence of associated deformity.
CT scan. This is better in defining whether significant arthritic change existat the subtalar joint . It should be performed in cases where bone loss (including large cysts)may be seen on the plain films, and if there is any uncertainty as to whether the intramedullary canal is patent and of sufficient diameter (eg some post-fracture cases, and in the presence of small stature ) .
MRI scan: An MRI is more sensitive for early degenerative change but will be degraded by any internal fixation . Some surgeons prefer MRI to CT in assessing a joint pre-fusion and this is acceptable as long as no metalwork is in situ..
ALTERNATE OPERATIVE TREATMENT:
Before commencing a nailing procedure for a double fusion it is wise always to have a back-up plan and alternate form of fixation available which one is used to – at least when starting to do this type of surgery. For a nailing to succeed the Calcaneus must have been placed operatively beneath the Tibia (to allow a straight line of approach for reaming and nail insertion) , any existing fixation that interferes with nail placement must be removable, and the intramedullary dimensions of the Tibia in particular need to be adequate (or be reemable to adequate dimensions) to accept the nail, so occasionally a nail cannot be used. This should usually be determined by investigation prior to surgery.
Alternate forms of fixation are a combination of large fragment screws ,compressive plates designed for the operation (or condylar blade plates) or external fixation, preferably with bilateral or ring fixation.
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
There are few absolute contraindications to this operation, but deep or superficial infection or poor skin condition should make the clinician consider other methods – especially external fixation.

The following equipment is needed – in addition to a large basic orthopaedic set.
OrthoSolutions Oxbridge Nail Set
Orthosolutions ‘disposable set” (contains drills, exchange tube etc), nails, screws, end caps.
Power saw / drill/reamer (all large)
Intramedullary reaming set to match 2mm reaming wire (both supplied by OrthoSolutions).
Image Intensifier.
Facilities to apply a post-operative cast.
You also must have at least one assistant, and in order to keep tourniquet times acceptable, either the theatre nurse or the assistant should be trained to assemble the nail whilst the sugeon prepares the ankle and subtalar joint.
The patient is placed in a semilateral position, supported by sandbags or props.
Check that the foot and lower leg are clear of any xray opaque part of the table.
Position the patient well uop the table if possible, so that the foot is not at the end of the table (this means if you accidently drop a unique instrument it will be fall within the sterile field on the table – not onto the floor)
A tourniquet is applied (but must not be kept inflated for significantly more than 2 hrs without release)
Elevate the foot by resting the calf on a large bowl (this helps control rotation of the leg, allows good access to the heel, and stops the heel from being pushed forward relative to the tibia, which may occur if the weight of the leg rests on the heel)
Antibiotics should be administered prior to inflating the tourniquet.

The leg should be kept elevated and regular observations of perfusion (and possible compartment syndrome)made for 24-48hrs. the cast should be released to skin if the patient complains of pain unrelieved by analgesia or if capillary return is impaired.
The weight bearing status of the patient will depend on the structural integrity of the operation and the presence of neuropathy.
Patients with no bone graft , or structural bone graft and no neuropathy or diabetes may start to weight bear as pain permits after the wounds have healed at 2 weeks, and are usually placed in a below knee walking boot to facilitate this. This should be retained for 8 weeks, and then if pain is minimal, a simple stirrup brace used as long as the patient needs for confidence and pain relief.
Patients with non-structural graft, or those with diabetes or neuropathy should remain non weight bearing for at least 8 weeks, then progress to weight bearing over a further 8 weeks, before using a stirrup brace providing xrays are satisfactory.
Xrays should be taken at 8, 16, 24 weeks.
Patients should be warned in advance that a broken screw does not represent failure of the operation, as single screw failure is not uncommon.
By 24 weeks the patient should usually be weight bearing without pain (although it takes up to 18 months for fatigue, aching, start-up pain etc to settle) At this stage (6 months from surgery) they should be reviewed by an orthotist to asess whether the patient would be aided by a rocker or other orthotic..
If the patient is not making satisfactory progress a CT scan should be performed. This is more accurate than plain xray at showing delayed/non-union, but may give false readings before 6 months after surgery.

Thomas AE et al – Foot and Ankle surgery 2015 21(3) 202-205
59 procedures in 58 patients.93% achieved union at an average of 4.17 months and 84% of patients were satisfied with clinical outcome at average 9 months.
Chou et al – Foot Ankle Int 2000 21(10) 804-808
55 patients with 56 ankles – from several centres. They reported a fusion rate of 48 ex 56,(85%)but noted that although patient satisfaction was high (48 ex 55), residual limp and some pain was common.The majority required shoe or orthotic modification.
Reference
- orthoracle.com




























































