
Learn the Ankle fracture: Arthrex tightrope for acute syndesmotic injury and Stryker Variax plate for fibula fracture surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Ankle fracture: Arthrex tightrope for acute syndesmotic injury and Stryker Variax plate for fibula fracture surgical procedure.
The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis is a unique syndesmotic joint, powerfully bound by a variety of ligaments to maintain the integrity of the ankle mortise. The distal anatomy of the two bones are created in such a way that the medial surface of the distal fibula fits into a groove on the lateral surface of the distal tibia called the incisura fibularis which offers the bony stability to this joint. The anterior part of this joint is stabilised by the Anterior Inferior Distal Tibio-Fibular ligament (AITFL), the posterior aspect by the Posterior Inferior Distal Tibio-Fibular ligament (PITFL) and the transverse Tibio-Fibular ligament. Directly between the contiguous surfaces of the tibia and fibula is the interosseous ligament which extends throughout the length of the fibula.
The PITFL is by far the strongest ligament in this complex and is the least likely to be ruptured. Once ruptured however it is most likely to be associated with severe rotational or dislocating injuries of the ankle and associated ankle instability.
The syndesmotic ligaments stabilise the fibula with respect to both talus and tibia, whilst allowing a degree of rotation of the fibula, required in particular during full ankle dorsiflexion when the widest portion of the talus comes into the mortise. As with any ligament injury the key point is not solely whether these ligaments have been injured, but rather their stability in determining the need for treatment. If instability is not addressed, high contact pressures at the joints surface ensue and early degenerative change occurs in most patients.
Traditional fixation of unstable syndesmotic injuries has been with two parallel, non-compressive, small fragment screws placed across the ankle at the level of the tibial incisura. Such fixation also requires a decision as to whether the screws need to be removed and furthermore, the optimal timing for such removal.
The use of a Arthrex tightrope implant, is far more physiological in terms of the way the syndesmosis is held, allowing more normal movement at the ankle mortise. It is a simple and ingenious implant that has proved its worth not only in syndesmotic ankle reconstruction but also in the shoulder and forefoot. It consists of two metal buttons that rest on the respective bony surfaces to be approximated, and a robust four stranded Fibrewire suture construct which links these buttons. The design allows easy apposition of the buttons towards each other by the effective “slip-knot” set up of the suture strands.
Readers will also find of use the following OrthOracle techniques:
Internal fixation of ankle fracture : Fibula pro-tibia fixation technique with Stryker Variax plate.
Internal fixation of medial malleolar ankle fracture with ASNIS screws
Lateral malleolar fixation using Acumed Fibula Rod System
Postero-lateral plating of pronation-external rotation ankle fracture (posterior malleolar fixation)
Fusion of the syndesmosis for isolated distal tibio-fibular arthritis

INDICATIONS
Weber B & C ankle fractures: The most common clinical scenario requiring acute syndesmotic fixation is in conjunction with an ankle fracture. Instability can be unpredictable prior to surgery and diastasis of the ankle mortise should be looked for routinely intra-operatively with these injuries.
Maisonneuve fracture: These injuries are a trap for the unwary, with significant medial ankle soft tissue ankle disruption and a proximally located fibula neck fracture, which won’t be visualised on a standard screening ankle X-ray. The proximal fracture is a marker indicating extensive disruption of the interosseous membrane along most of its length, and itself can be left.
Isolated soft tissue (syndesmotic and deltoid) injury: Pure soft tissue injuries without fracture can disrupt ankle stability enough to produce widening of the mortise. These present with significant injury mechanisms and extensive initial bruising but normal X-rays, that fail to settle. A high index of suspicion is required to pick these up early, rather than a year down the line with arthritic change.
Chronic syndesmotic widening: At what point syndesmotic reconstruction should be abandoned and fusion instead should be adopted, assuming there is neither ankle nor isolated distal tibio-fibular articulation arthritis, is not well defined. As long as aggressive soft tissue preparation is undertaken to encourage appropriate re-scarring of the soft tissue envelope I would undertake joint preserving surgery in the absence of arthritic change. Stabilisation with tendon autograft or allograft strips is a recognised intervention, but generous use of enough Tightropes across enough of the interface has its attractions also. Patients need detailed discussion about the chance of subsequent fusion surgery and also careful monitoring of the state of their mortise following surgery.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
The anterior part of the distal tibio-fibular joint is covered by cartilage for a small part behind which lies the syndesmotic recess and a fat pad. There is a small amount of movement afforded by this joint which includes about 2-3 degrees of external rotation of the fibula relative to the tibia. This occurs with widening of the syndesmosis by about 1 mm in maximal dorsiflexion of the ankle to allow the broadest part of the talar dome excursion through the mortise and is essential for normal ankle movement. The function of the mortise is mainly to stabilise the ankle, keeping the talus congruous with its articulating osseous partners in all normal “physiological” positions and permitting full and stable movement with low joint contact pressure.
Thus the syndesmosis is a pivotal structure in maintaining the anatomy and physiological function of the ankle. The syndesmotic ligaments are injured in rotational and translational injuries of the ankle. Approximately 10% of ankle sprains are associated with syndesmotic injury and symptoms from this so called ‘high ankle sprain’ can persist for several months after injury.
The syndesmosis is disrupted often in conjunction with the medial deltoid ligament in over 50% of supination external rotation and almost all pronation external rotation/abduction injuries. Such disruption allows more than the required physiological shift of the talus within the ankle. 1 mm of talar shift decreases tibiotalar contact area by about 40 % and significantly increases the contact pressures at the articular surfaces which can lead to early onset arthrosis.
These injuries may present acutely in the context of a fracture or severe ankle injury, more indolently as a severe sprain that has failed to settle or at a later stage with frank arthritic change of the ankle as a result of these situations being sub-optimally managed (or not presenting)
In the acute situation medially located ankle bruising should be looked for(indicating potential deltoid disruption if present) as well as proximal fibula neck tenderness (indicating the possible presence of a Maisonneuve fracture, exiting through the proximal fibula ).
If presenting later, or the patient is tolerant of more comprehensive examination, the fibular translation test and Cotton tests compare syndesmotic stability to the normal side and are considered positive if a difference is present, associated with pain on testing. The fibular translation test is done by translating the fibula anteriorly and posteriorly with the tibia stabilised. The ‘Cotton’ test is performed by translating the talus medio-laterally with the ankle in a neutral.
IMAGING
Plain X-ray imaging:
The historical mainstay of imaging for suspected syndesmotic instability has been the mortise view of the ankle, taken with 15 degrees of internal rotation and a well coned view. I find there is significant variability in terms of what the rotational position of the ankle needs to be to achieve this view. I tend to use 3 views, neutral rotation, 10 degrees of internal rotation and 20 degrees also. If one has the time to directly screen the joint (as when on-table) then an accurate assessment can always be made. I also make a note intra-operatively of the rotational position required to achieve the projection so that it is more easily replicated post-operatively.
There are several specific areas to look at on plain X-ray in assessing whether there may be any syndesmotic instability. These are a decreased tibio-fibular overlap(measured at the point of maximum overlap), increased medial clear space and increased tibio-fibular clear space(measured 1cm above the joint line). I mention these only really for sake of completeness rather than practical use. Little value in recalling the “normal Values” of these measurements. Look in general to these areas and if in doubt, perform a CT.
Stress testing is performed in external rotation and abduction, but requires a comfortable patient. It is routinely performed during operative fixation of ankle fractures.
CT
A CT is the most definitive way of identifying whether the ankle mortise has been disrupted, in particular the axial and coronal views. Though far less effected by the rotational position of the ankle in terms of the image produced, rotational position can still effect the appearance of mortis symmetry. This is overcome by reformatting in the appropriate plane.
MRI
This will allow direct visualisation of the ligamentous aspect of the injury, as well as associated chondral and occult bony injuries. Though MRI has almost 100% specificity in all cases of syndesmotic injury and allows classification of the grade of the injury it does not give any direct indication of stability of the injuries identified, which is the key point.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Screw fixation: The traditional fixation has been two small fragment screws, either in isolation or on occasion placed through a short fibular plate. The argument for removing syndesmotic screws is that if left they hinder ankle dorsiflexion by limitation of fibula external rotation. In the majority of patients if left screws will, of their own accord, break and then no longer potentially limit ankle movement themselves The debate that exists is around whether to remove at 12 weeks or not to remove at all these days, rather than considering earlier removal, given logically a higher risk of re-widening of the ankle mortise with earlier removal.
There is some CT study evidence that suboptimal reduction of the fibula within the incisura is not uncommon using screw fixation and their removal allows the fibula to settle back into better alignment spontaneously.

The patient is positioned supine on the operating table and may require a sandbag under either buttock so that the foot points vertically towards the ceiling. Fluoroscopy should be available with an image intensifier and a trained radiographer.
Appropriate antibiotics are administered and a thigh tourniquet and exclusion drape are applied.
The limb is prepared with Chlorhexidine from toes to tourniquet.

The patient is placed in a below the knee back slab for the first two weeks after surgery.
At two weeks, the wounds are inspected and re-dressed and a complete, lightweight below-the-knee cast is applied for a further four weeks.
Weight bearing is not permitted for the first six weeks after surgery to lessen the risk of non-union.
In my practice, Rivaroxaban is prescribed for this duration to prevent thrombo-embolic events.
At six weeks, the patient can commence weight bearing in normal shoes and may require physiotherapy input to improve ankle range of motion.
I tend to follow up syndesmotic instability cases both clinically and with X-rays at both 3 and 6 months post fixation.

Does the Arthrex TightRope Provide Maintenance of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis? A 2-year Follow-Up of 64 TightRopes in 37 Patients
Journal of foot and ankle surgery. 2013. Sep-Oct 2013;52(5):563-7.
Does the Arthrex TightRope Provide Maintenance of the Distal Tibiofibular Syndesmosis? A 2-year Follow-Up of 64 TightRopes in 37 Patients
Journal of foot and ankle surgery. 2013. Sep-Oct 2013;52(5):563-7.
Ryan Rigby, James Cottom
The short answer is yes and just over 5% of buttons required removal due to local irritation from the suture knots.
Intra-operative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures.
The Journal of Orthopaedic trauma. 2005 Oct;19(9):604-9.
Richard J Jenkinson et al
Thirty-eight patients with external rotation ankle fractures were studied prospectively to assess the reliability of using fracture pattern and pre-operative X-rays to determine syndesmotic instability, compared to intra-operative stress-testing.
Syndesmotic instability that was not expected based on fracture type or pre-operative imaging was revealed in broadly 30-60% of patients depending upon fracture type, assessed by on table stress X-rays.
Overtightening of the ankle syndesmosis: Is it really possible?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2001. No 4. 489-492
Tornetta P, Spoo J, Lee C.
A cadaveric study where 19 ankles had the tibio-fibular articulation compressed with screw fixation, applied in maximal plantarflexion
The range of motion was documented radiographically with bone markers and X-ray, both pre and post fixation, and no reduction found following compressive screw fixation.
Intra-operative Diagnosis of Syndesmosis Injuries in External Rotation Ankle Fractures.
Thirty-eight patients with external rotation ankle fractures were studied prospectively to assess the reliability of using fracture pattern and pre-operative X-rays to determine syndesmotic instability, compared to intra-operative stress-testing.
Syndesmotic instability that was not expected based on fracture type or pre-operative imaging was revealed in broadly 30-60% of patients depending upon fracture type, assessed by on table stress X-rays.
Overtightening of the ankle syndesmosis: Is it really possible?
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2001. No 4. 489-492
Tornetta P, Spoo J, Lee C.
A cadaveric study where 19 ankles had the tibio-fibular articulation compressed with screw fixation, applied in maximal plantarflexion
The range of motion was documented radiographically with bone markers and X-ray, both pre and post fixation, and no reduction found following compressive screw fixation.
Reference
- orthoracle.com













































































