
Learn the Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a double-stranded hamstring graft surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a double-stranded hamstring graft surgical procedure.
An ACL reconstruction is indicated to eliminate the pivot shift experienced as the knee dislocates during direction change, be it day to day or during sport. The operation is not intended, or indeed able, to eliminate pain, swelling or stiffness. This must be made clear to the patient for appropriate counselling.
Timing of the reconstruction is also important. A painful, stiff knee is often best suited to a pre-operative period of high quality physiotherapy as there is a risk of persistent pain and stiffness even after a “successful” ACL reconstruction. There is evidence to show that there is an increased risk of arthrofibrosis if surgery is performed between 2-6 weeks post injury.
The technique described is an arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using ipsilateral hamstrings (double-stranded semitendinosus and gracilis).

INDICATIONS:
It is vital to establish that the patient is suffering from true instability secondary to an ACL rupture. To turn this on its head, a successful ACL reconstruction is aiming to eliminate the pivot shift experienced as the knee dislocates during direction change, be it day to day or during sport. The operation is not intended, or indeed able, to eliminate pain, swelling or stiffness. This must be made clear to the patient for appropriate counselling.
Timing is also important. A painful, stiff knee is often best suited to a pre-operative period of high quality physiotherapy as there is a risk of persistent pain and stiffness even after a “successful” ACL reconstruction. There is evidence to show that there is an increased risk of arthrofibrosis if surgery is performed between 2-6 weeks post injury.
SYMPTOMS & ASSESSMENT:
Instability on direction change (pivoting) is the overriding symptom. The patient may develop swelling and pain post-dislocation.
Symptoms of locking and pain may be attributable to concurrent injuries such as meniscal tears and bone oedema.
Thorough knee assessment is vital. In excess of 60% of knees will have a concurrent knee injury. Multi-ligament injuries must be carefully assessed. Neurovascular injury must be ruled out.
ACL specific tests:
Lachman – specificity 95% sensitivity 80-99% – test of choice
Anterior drawer – specificity 75-95%; specificity 22-41% – risk of false positive
Pivot shift – specificity 98%; sensitivity 84-98.4% (35% in the awake patient)
INVESTIGATION:
X-ray: I would strongly advocate an x-ray for an acutely injured knee to rule out fracture. Furthermore a Segund fracture, a tiny bone fragment visible adjacent to the lateral joint line, is pathognomonic of an ACL injury
MRI: this is the investigation of choice for ligament injury in the knee, not least to look for concurrent injuries which are drowned out by the “noise” of an ACL injury. A reparable meniscal tear or a multiligamentous injury may influence the decision for early surgical intervention.
OPERATIVE ALTERNATIVES:
Combined ligament reconstructions
Meniscal surgery
Extra-articular ligament reconstruction (e.g. Mackintosh) especially in the revision setting
NON-OPERATIVE ALTERNATIVES:
Physiotherapy – this is a vital tool for the management of an ACL deficient knee. A successful regime post injury can avoid surgery. Pre-habilitating a painful stiff swollen knee is imperative before considering reconstruction.
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
Active infection
No demonstrable functional instability
Relative contraindications:
pain
stiffness
significant OA

High thigh tourniquet
Pre-operative antibiotics (be aware of patient allergies)
Side-support
Foot plate / sandbag
Arthroscopy stack
Shaved operative site
“Plan B” options:
consider preparation of contralateral leg for hamstring harvest
patellar tendon harvest equipment
supporting implants eg xtendobutton for inadvertent blow out of lateral femoral cortex; small fragment screws and washers or bone staples for secondary tibial fixation

The patient is prescribed compression stockings until fully weight bearing. Skin staples are removed at 14 days post-op.
There are a large number of ACL rehabilitation programmes available all with the aim of returning the patient to full function and to achieve the best possible outcome with a knee stable enough to allow them to return to pre-injury levels of sport. Any perceived instability has a significantly debilitating affect of their outcome. The operation is only the beginning.
It is my preference to brace knees post reconstruction for 4 weeks. I will increase this to 6 weeks if there has been a combined meniscal repair. I will exclude multiligament protocols from this discussion. I also keep my patients non-weight bearing for 2 weeks and avoiding significant cyclical loading of the knee for 6 weeks. I believe that it is very unusual for young fit patients with hamstring grafts not to achieve full range of motion, including extension, even when taking the first 4-6 weeks slowly. This is an observation I made with those patients who I braced for their meniscal repairs. In fact anecdotally I felt that this group had firmly negative lachmans at 6 months more consistently compared to those who were not braced.
The two weeks of non-weight bearing and 6 weeks of deliberate cyclical loading avoidance helps the soft-tissues settle and good biological fixation of the graft to the bony tunnels. It enforces the overzealous patient and physio to slow down early on!
The aims of a good rehabilitation programme include:
swelling and pain control
range of movement recovery
gait retraining
balanced strength recovery
proprioception
plyometry
speed of acceleration and deceleration
agility
sports specific retraining
psychological support
I would encourage a good relationship with your rehabilitation team and regular review of patients. Never force a patient to return to full sport if they themselves do not feel ready. This can range form 6 months to 18 months so do not force the issue. Having a significant knee injury can be very psychologically damaging and returning to that setting can take time. If there is a reluctance the surgeon must establish whether there is still some subtle instability in the knee. There are some good online psychological testing questionnaires available online and these can be helpful when formulating a return to sport protocol.

There has always been a healthy debate about the optimum graft for ACL reconstruction. The options include:
autologous hamstring graft – ispilateral / contralateral / double-stranded or more
autologous patellar tendon graft
autologous quadriceps tendon graft
allografts
synthetic grafts
Multiple publications have lauded the benefits of each option. Historically synthetic graft have performed badly and fallen out of favour. Allograft survivorship has shown a significant correlation to the sterilisation technique employed, with irradiated grafts performing poorly against bio-cleansed grafts. The morbidity of patellar tendon harvest is outweighed by its bone-to-bone tunnel fixation and stiffness. Hamstring grafts have lower morbidity but possibly rely more heavily on biological fixation of a soft tissue scaffold to a bony interface. There continues to be a lot of healthy debate in this area. The essential choice a surgeon must make is to excel at a chosen technique or two. Take a healthy interest in rehabilitation and have a strong dialogue with the rehabilitation team.
The integrity of the menisci at the time of ACL reconstruction appears to be very important in reducing knee laxity and decreasing the risk of graft failure. A paper from 2015 showed that ACL reconstruction survivorship at 2 years with intact menisci to be 94.5%, often quoted as the success rate of the procedure. However with either medial or lateral meniscal deficiency this dropped to 69%. Therefore without intact meniscii the patient’s potential failure rate increases by 4.9 times compared to intact or repaired meniscii. Meniscal integrity predicts laxity of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Robb C, Kempshall P, Getgood A, Standell H, Sprowson A, Thompson P, Spalding T. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Dec;23(12):3683-90.
It stands to reason therefore that a surgeon who undertakes ACL reconstruction should be accomplished in repairing menisci whenever possible.
Reference
- orthoracle.com


















































