
Learn the Distal femoral Giant cell tumour of bone: intra-lesional curettage and stabilisation surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Distal femoral Giant cell tumour of bone: intra-lesional curettage and stabilisation surgical procedure.
Giant cell tumour of bone is a rare, benign primary bone tumour arising in the meta-epiphyseal region of bones in young adults.This tumour classically arises in the meta-epiphyseal region as a radiolucent lesion most commonly affecting the distal femur, proximal tibia, proximal humerus and distal radius.
Surgical treatment involves intralesional curettage with or without internal fixation or en-bloc resection and limb-salvage reconstruction. The decision on the type of surgical treatment to undertake in a patient with GCTB depends on a variety of factors including the Campanacci staging at diagnosis, articular involvement and anatomical location.
Denosumab has recently played a role in the management of GCTB but the optimal use of denosomab has yet to be identified. Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody to RANK ligand recommended as the first option in inoperable or metastatic GCTB. Denosumab has also been used pre-operatively to downstage tumours with large soft tissue extension to allow for less morbid surgery.

INDICATIONS
Giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a benign but aggressive skeletal neoplasm that is often seen in young adults and may rarely present with pulmonary metastases. This tumour classically arises in the meta-epiphyseal region as a radiolucent lesion most commonly affecting the distal femur, proximal tibia, proximal humerus and distal radius. Soft tissue extension may be found at diagnosis in 25% – 29% of the cases (https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michiel_Van_de_Sande/publication/230748239_Giant_Cell_Tumor_With_Pathologic_Fracture_Should_We_Curette_or_Resect/links/0912f50a65b9986187000000.pdf), and in 15 to 25% of the patients pathological fractures are identified at diagnosis.
Giant cell tumor of bone contains histiocytic cells, multinucleated giant cells, and neoplastic mono-nuclear stromal cells. Overexpression of receptor activator nuclear factor kappa-B ligand by stromal cells promotes the recruitment of multinucleated osteoclast-like giant cells responsible for the osteolysis seen in GCTB.
The decision on the type of surgical treatment to undertake in a patient with GCTB depends on a variety of factors including the Campanacci staging at diagnosis, articular involvement and anatomical location. The Campanacci classification describes completely intraosseous tumours (Stage 1), tumours demonstrating cortical erosion without destruction (Stage 2) and those with cortical destruction and with a soft tissue extension (Stage 3) (Campanacci M, Baldini N, Boriani S, Sudanese A. Giant cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1987;69:106–114). The majority of GCTs are stage 2 or 3 at presentation.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients present with pain and swelling and upto 25% of presentations may have pathological fractures. Examination may reveal localised pain and swelling with limitation of the adjacent joint. Neurovascular examination is usually normal.
IMAGING
Plain radiography classically demonstrates an eccentric, expansile, lobulated lytic lesion with a narrow zone of transition. Tumours have extended into the soft tissues at presentation and a soft-tissue mass, sometimes covered by a thin layer of sclerosis, can be seen on X-ray. GCTs usually have little or no discernible matrix calcification and little new bone formation or periosteal reaction. They are typically located within the metaphysis and are one of the few lesions to involve the epiphysis, abutting the subchondral plate. CT gives an accurate estimation of cortical bone involvement, and MRI demonstrates ow signal on T1 and intermediate to high signal on T2 sequences with areas of heterogeneity.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
The management options for patients with GCTB fall into four categories. The first and least invasive option is intralesional curettage, with or without adjuvant therapy and internal fixation; second, wide resection of the affected bone with or without reconstruction; third & fourth options are to postpone surgery and commence denosumab therapy and thereafter perform intralesional curettage or en-bloc resection and reconstruction, respectively.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody to RANK ligand recommended as the first option in inoperable or metastatic GCTB. Denosumab has also been used pre-operatively to downstage tumours with large soft tissue extension to allow for less morbid surgery. The role of denosumab for conventional limb GCTB is yet to be defined (https://clinicalsarcomaresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13569-016-0056-0). The response of the tumour can be dramatic but the side-effect profile can result in significant morbidity, including hypocalcaemia, osteonecrosis of the jaw and atypical stress fractures (https://clinicalsarcomaresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13569-016-0056-0). However, the cumulative and long term incidence of these toxicities remains to be accurately reported.
Other non-operative interventions include radiotherapy and bisphosphonates and embolisation for inoperable tumours.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
To surgery include spinal, sacral and pelvic tumours when the morbidity of surgical resection outweighs the risk of long-term medical (denosumab) therapy.


VTE prophylaxis: LMWH for four weeks and anti-thrombotic stockings for six weeks
3 doses of post-op intravenous antibiotics (flucloxacillin)
Check X-rays AP lateral pre-discharge
Toe touch weight bearing left side for six weeks
Full flexion extension permitted after removal of the triple-panel splint and wool & crepe bandaging at 36-48 hours
Drain removal when output is <80ml/24 hours
Home when safe
GP to remove clips in two weeks
X-rays on arrival to outpatient clinic in six weeks when progressive weight bearing can be started

The decision on the type of surgical treatment to undertake in a patient with GCTB depends on a variety of factors including the Campanacci staging at diagnosis, articular involvement and anatomical location.
In the majority of stage 1 and 2 lesions, extended intralesional curettage with a detailed debridement of the lesional wall will be effective. Recurrence rates vary depending on the use of adjuvant treatments at the time of curettage (including phenol, bone cement,liquid nitrogen) but a commonly accepted rate of local recurrence is in the order of 15%. We have preferred less invasive surgery in most patients due to (young) age and the desire to preserve the native bone, joint and function.
The use of cement to fill the cavity halves the risk of local recurrence and consequently reduces the risk of revision surgery to a total joint arthroplasty in the long-term (https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/0301-620x.93b12.27663).
However, our experience suggests that the risk of recurrence and subsequent failure of intralesional curettage surgery is very high in patients with Campanacci stage 3 tumours. this view is supported by recent literature from van der Heijden et al. (van der Heijden L, Dijkstra PD, Campanacci DA, Gibbons CL, van de Sande MA. Giant cell tumor with pathologic fracture: should we curette or resect? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Mar;471(3):820-9) , and Cheng DD et al. (Cheng DD, Hu T, Zhang HZ, Huang J, Yang QC. Factors Affecting the Recurrence of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone After Surgery: A Clinicopathological Study of 80 Cases from a Single Center. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36(5):1961-70.), who reported comparable rates of local recurrence in this group of patients.
Downstaging of Campanacci 3 GCTB with neoadjuvant denosumab is thought to reduce the risk of local recurrence following local excision: Rutkowski et al. analysed this effect in 115 patients in whom 89 had surgery after neoadjuvant denosumab. 39 had excision and 50 had intralesional curettage with rates of recurrence of 7.7% vs 32% respectively (https://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/s10434-015-4634-9).
Reference
- orthoracle.com


































