
Professional Guidelines Included
Learn the Femoral intramedullary nail: Synthes Expert Lateral Femoral Nail (LFN) for impending pathological fracture surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Femoral intramedullary nail: Synthes Expert Lateral Femoral Nail (LFN) for impending pathological fracture surgical procedure.
The Synthes Expert Lateral Femoral is a trochanteric entry proximal femoral nail. It can be used to treat fractures involving the femoral shaft using its standard locking options. It is a fairly versatile implant and can equally be used to treat fractures involving the femoral neck or sub-trochanteric region with its recon locking options.
Proposed advantages of this nail include an easier to access entry point (it is more lateral than the commoner entry point at the tip of the greater trochanter). This is also an advantage in the obese patient where it is difficult to obtain the correct trajectory for nail insertion. The lateral entry point is intended to avoid damage to the ascending branch of the lateral femoral circumflex artery, which if damaged may lead to avascular necrosis of the femoral head. The nail has a more anatomic radius of curvature compared to the Synthes Proximal Femoral Nail Alpha (PFNa). It also has multi-planar distal locking, with an option to insert a third locking bolt through an oblique hole, thus providing increased stability in distal third femoral fractures. Its end caps are also cannulated which makes them easier to insert.

INDICATIONS
Femoral nails are most commonly used for acute fractures of the femur.
They are also used to prophylactically prevent femoral fractures in patients with pathological bone disease i.e. bone that would fail under normal physiological loads. The femur is the third most common site of skeletal metastases after the spine and the pelvis, with the cancellous proximal femur being the area most commonly affected by metastases.
Femoral nails can also be used for deformity correction.
The case detailed was referred to the orthopaedic team complaining of left hip / thigh pain, which was worse on weight bearing and he had a pre-existing diagnosis of metastatic adrenal carcinoma. He was assessed by the orthopaedic team and his Mirel score was calculated, giving a probability of fracture of at least 33%. Surgery was therefore offered as a palliative pain relieving procedure.
Mirel’s scoring system for metastatic bone disease requires the assessment of the following 4 criteria, which are each scored from 1-3 points.
Site
upper limb (1)
lower limb (2)
peritrochanter (3)
Pain
mild (1)
moderate (2)
functional (3)
Lesion
blastic (1)
mixed (2)
lytic (3)
Size*
<1/3 (1)
1/3 – 2/3 (2)
>2/3 (3)
(*as seen on a plain x-ray from any view and assessed in relation to the width of the bone)
The maximum possible score is 12. If a lesion scores greater or equal to 9, then the probability of fracture is 33% and prophylactic fixation is recommended. If the score is less than or equal to 7, then the probability of fracture is 5% and it could be treated conservatively. A score of 8 gives a probability of fracture of 15%.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
In this case the patient complained of recent onset thigh pain at rest which was worse on walking. The lower limb examination was unremarkable.
With acute fractures the neuro-vascular status of the limb should always be assessed. The potential for compartment syndrome of the thigh should not be forgotten, especially in high energy femoral fractures. Depending upon the injury mechanism, fracture location and degree of fracture displacement, the sciatic nerve can also be at risk.
These fractures are can present as part of a multiply injured trauma patient and this will also dictate the nature of the primary examination. Pain is a significant feature of the acutely fractured femur and the early application of a stabilising splint or traction is required to control this aspect adequately in most cases (inferior to the lesser the trochanter). The splint should also be considered a part of haemorrhage control, as it will partially reduce the displacement and reduce the movement of the fracture ends, thus allowing a stable clot to form.
IMAGING
In this case, the patient had already been staged and metastatic disease was confirmed. This was not a “solitary metastasis” that could be considered for excision.
The lesion was staged “locally” with plain radiographs and an MRI of the whole femur to ascertain the extent of involvement. Skip lesions are defined as lesions within the same bone but not within the reactive zone of the main tumour. A satellite lesion is within the same bone and within the reactive zone of the main tumour. It is important to identify if there are any other tumours within the bone, so that any fixation can adequately support this additional area of weakened bone.
The patient underwent preoperative angiography of the tumour, to determine whether it had increased vascularity. Embolisation would have been performed had this been the case pre-operatively.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
An alternative surgical treatment would be excision and a proximal femoral replacement. However, as the lesion was not solitary or fractured, a prophylactic nailing was offered as this produces a lower surgical insult and a faster recovery.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Inadequately staged tumours should not be treated surgically until they have been staged both locally and distantly. It is also imperative that the tumour type is known. Whether dealing with either a primary bone tumour or solitary metastases, these cases should be discussed with a specialist bone tumour unit for consideration of excision and replacement. Reducing the disease load can have a significant impact on prognosis.
Tumours that commonly metastasise to bone include thyroid, lung, breast, renal and prostate. Bowel cancer should also not be forgotten. It more commonly will metastasise to the liver but due to its’ high prevalence, it is also frequently seen as a cause of bone metastases. Renal cancer needs special consideration, as this is often hypervascular and embolisation should be performed before undertaking any surgical procedures on bones thus effected. It is therefore a relative contraindication to intramedullary nailing because of the significant risk of massive intraoperative haemorrhage. An alternative is to leave the tumour undisturbed and perform an en bloc excision.
Mirels H. Metastatic Disease in long bones. A proposed Scoring System for diagnosing impending pathologic fracture. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1989: 249; 256-264

The procedure can be performed either under general or spinal anaesthesia.
The patient can be positioned supine on a traction table or the procedure can be performed ‘freehand’ in either a supine or lateral position on a radiolucent table.
My routine practice is to use a traction table with the contralateral leg flexed at the hip and knee (to relax the sciatic nerve), and abducted to allow the C-arm to obtain a true lateral of the operating hip. If this is not possible, then the ‘good / contralateral leg’ is scissored down (hip extended and abducted) and the leg to be operated is raised superiorly (hip flexed and adducted). This can however, sometimes displace a femoral neck fracture and the diaphysis subluxes posteriorly to the neck or introduces varus.

Routine post operative care includes:
Bloods – to check the haemoglobin and renal function (day 1 post op)
X-ray – when attending clinic at 2 weeks
Wound review / suture removal at 2 weeks in clinic
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis if indicated
Mobilisation status – full weight bearing with no restrictions. The only patients where I feel partial weight bearing is indicated, is in segmental / multi-fragmentary fractures that have no inherent stability from the fracture reduction and the implant would have to take all of the load. I do not feel non-weight bearing has any role, as the bone will remodel according to Wolff’s law and become osteopaenic and therefore weaker.

Lateral Femoral Nail (LFN) Results
I could only find one paper that reported the results for lateral femoral nails (LFN). It reports a prospective multi-centre study where 227 LFNs were inserted. One year follow up was available in 74% of cases. 89% of surgeons reported that the ease of identifying the entry site was excellent or good. Functional and radiological results after 12 months do not prove significant benefits over conventional antegrade femoral nails.
Rether JR, Hontzsch D. Femoral nailing using a helical nail shape (LFN). Oper Orthop Traumatol 2014: 26(5); 487-96 [German]
Current guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom
Recommendations:
Use a sliding hip screw in preference to an intramedullary nail for trochanteric fractures (AO classification: 31A1 and 31A2).
Use an intramedullary nail to treat patients with subtrochanteric fractures (AO classification: 31A3)
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Guideline CG124. The management of hip fractures in adults 2017.
Current guidance from the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons
Guidelines from the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons support the use of an intramedullary nail over a sliding hip screw to treat unstable trochanteric fractures (AO classification: 31A2 and 31A3), and give equal recommendation to both treatments for stable fractures (31A1).
American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Guidelines – Management of hip fractures in the elderly.
Results from the National Hip Fracture Database
In a paper by Whitehouse et al. that analysed data from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) using generalised linear models with incremental case-mix adjustment for patient, non-surgical and surgical characteristics and socioeconomic factors. They found that there is a 12.5% increase in the risk of 30-day mortality associated with the use of intramedullary nails compared with a sliding hip screw in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip (using either long or short nails). If this were proven to be causative, then one excess death would be caused by treating 112 patients with an intramedullary nail rather than a sliding hip screw.
Whitehouse MR, Berstock JR, Kelly MB et al. Higher 30-day mortality associated with the use of intramedullary nails compared with sliding hip screws for the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. Bone Joint J 2019: 101-B(1); 83-91.
Is there a difference between long or short femoral nails for hip fractures?
A systematic review performed in 2016 concluded that for trochanteric femur fractures, short nails have a low re-operation rate while significantly decreasing operative time and estimated blood loss, with the additional benefit of being cost effective. No significant difference between short and long nails were identified for either complications, hardware complications, non-union, or mortality.
Dunn J, Kusnezov N, Bader J et al. Long versus short cephalomedullary nail for trochanteric femur fractures (AO classification: 31A1, 31A2 and 31A3): a systematic review. J Orthopaed Traumatol 2016: 17; 361-367.
Fat embolism
Fat embolism is considered a common and potentially lethal complication of intramedullary nail treatment. In patients with isolated femoral shaft fractures, fat embolism occurs in 2-23%. The proportion is higher in patients with poly-trauma or bilateral femoral fractures, and when a femoral fracture is associated with an ipsilateral tibial fracture (incidence 13%). It is important to note that this complication is related not only to the fracture, but also to the timing of surgery.
Although cadaveric and animal model studies have demonstrated an increase in intramedullary pressure during intramedullary nailing, in patients with skeletal metastases with no fracture, the data regarding venting of the femur are inconclusive.
Kontakis G, Tossounidis T, Weiss K et al. Fat embolism: special situations. Bilateral femoral fractures and pathologic femoral fractures. Injury 2007: 37S; S19-S24.
Reference
- orthoracle.com



























































