
Learn the First MTP Fusion: Revision of malunion using Synthes MTP fusion plate surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the First MTP Fusion: Revision of malunion using Synthes MTP fusion plate surgical procedure.
The operation of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion (1st MTPJ fusion) is the time honoured ‘”gold standard” operation for arthritic conditions of the 1st MTPJ. It offers predictable, low risk good to excellent outcomes and pain relief when successful. The success rates for this operation are high both in enabling function and offering pain relief in up to 95% of patients with hallux rigidus which has failed other treatment such as injection and dorsal cheilectomy .
Non union is rare in well performed primary fusions but they occur due to either biological or mechanical reasons. Mechanical reasons include poor fixation due to implant choice or poor bone quality or patients who do not comply with protected weight bearing post operative protocols and overload the uniting bone. Biological reasons include smokers, patients on drugs such as high dose steroids and anti-inflammatory drugs or patients who suffer early deep infection.
Non-union can present with fibrous tissue bridging the non union, the so called “stable fibrous non union”, and these are relatively asymptomatic especially in a low demand patient such as a rheumatoid arthritis patient. However some non unions are of the atrophic variety and in the presence of insecure or loose/broken metalwork can be very painful needing further fusion especially with worsening deformity and transfer pain in the sole of the foot over the lesser metatarsals.
The indications for revision fusion are in the main either non-union( which is a recognised complication occurring in 5-10% of patients) or malunion, leading to mechanical pain from the lesser toes which are called upon to substitute for the de-functioned hallux.
The technique detailed in this operation is using the Synthes MTP fusion plate, a Dorsal Locking Plate. This plate provides a very strong construct and allows comfortable walking early in the post op period. The Synthes locking plates are low profile, with variable angle locking holes & screws. This allows the screws to be positioned well and avoid any underlying metal work (often found in revision cases). The plate profile is curved for strength and also to fit the anatomy well. The plates come in 3 different angles of dorsiflexion at the MTP joint, 0, 5 & 10 degrees and in 3 different lengths. I most often use the middle length plate (42mm) in 0 degrees of dorsiflexion.
Readers will also find of interest the following OrthOracle techniques:
First MTP fusion (hallux rigidus): Dorsal approach with Synthes MTP fusion plate
First MTP Fusion :Coughlin reamer preparation and Orthosolutions Cannulated 4mm screws.
First MTP Fusion (using Stryker Anchorage MTP arthrodesis plate )for Hallux Varus .
First MTP Fusion: Revision of failed Kellers using DocPrice plate and vascularised allograft.
First MTP Fusion-Crossed screws technique.
Bone block first MTP fusion using the Wright Ortholoc plate

INDICATIONS
The operation of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion (1st MTPJ fusion) is the time honoured ‘”gold standard” operation for arthritic conditions of the 1st MTPJ. It offers predictable, low risk good to excellent outcomes and pain relief when successful. The success rates for this operation are high both in enabling function and offering pain relief in up to 95% of patients with hallux rigidus which has failed other treatment such as injection and dorsal cheilectomy . The common methods of fusion are to use reamers to create a ball and socket arrangement of the metatarsal head and the proximal phalanx and to use either crossed partially threaded compression screws or a compression plate to fix the fusion.
These methods require modification in a revision setting as the ball and socket creation is often impossible to achieve particularly with the lack of a spherical profile to the metatarsal head to engage the reamers. Straight cuts to freshen the non union interface are often required. There is often significant shortening of the metatarsal length and this might occasionally require a sculpted iliac crest tricortical bone graft to distract and restore the length and thereby avoiding the consequence of transfer metatarsalgia.
The aims of primary fusion must include thorough debridement of cartilage and preparation of the joint surfaces, appropriate use of secure and stable metalwork amongst others. Careful apposition of bleeding surfaces, appropriate compression, careful soft tissue handling and accurate positioning of the fusion in the sagittal coronal and rotational planes is essential to get the desired optimal result.
Malposition of the toe leads to significant difficulties: in particular greater dorsiflexion than the recommended 10 degrees to the floor as well as fusing the toe ‘too straight’ without the desired 10-15 degrees of valgus is poorly tolerated. Increased MTP dorsiflexion can have a significant adverse effect on the interphalangeal joint of the toe which then would need to work in hyperflexion to reach the floor to toe off. Moreover the straight position of the toe throws significant biomechanical stress on the interphalangeal joint particularly with footwear and can lead to early arthritic change. Thus the positioning of the toe in 1st MTP fusion is pivotal to achieve a satisfactory result as well as in protecting the interphalangeal joint. In patients with altered or diminished protective sensation such as in peripheral neuropathy associated with diabetes, mal-positioning of the toe either due to technical errors in the primary setting or the evolution of deformity due to non-union or malunion can be catastrophic with the initiation of infection including deep infection and a threat to the viability of the foot and the patient.
Non union is rare in well performed primary fusions but they occur due to either biological or mechanical reasons. Mechanical reasons include poor fixation due to implant choice or poor bone quality or patients who do not comply with protected weight bearing post operative protocols and overload the uniting bone. Biological reasons include smokers, patients on drugs such as high dose steroids and anti-inflammatory drugs or patients who suffer early deep infection.
Non-union can present with fibrous tissue bridging the non union, the so called “stable fibrous non union”, and these are relatively asymptomatic especially in a low demand patient such as a rheumatoid arthritis patient. However some non unions are of the atrophic variety and in the presence of insecure or loose/broken metalwork can be very painful needing further fusion especially with worsening deformity and transfer pain in the sole of the foot over the lesser metatarsals.
The indications for revision fusion are in the main either non-union( which is a recognised complication occurring in 5-10% of patients) or malunion, leading to mechanical pain from the lesser toes which are called upon to substitute for the de-functioned hallux.
The case presented here is a combination of both malunion and symptomatic partial bony union– year old male who underwent a primary fusion for osteoarthritis of the 1st MTP joint with ? deformity. He underwent a fusion procedure using a plate for osteosynthesis after conservative measures failed to resolve symptoms. However he continued to have increasing symptoms of pain and deformity which was emerging, raising the spectre of a non union. Radiographs and CT scan revealed a partial union with a dorsal bridge of bone. There was no evidence of infection. He was noted to have a dorsiflexion valgus deformity with a callosity in the sole of the foot. He was neurovascularly intact. Conservative treatment with orthoses failed to relieve his symptoms. after appropriate counselling he was consented for a revision fusion procedure.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Failures usually present as a painful partly mobile joint with breakage of metalwork, frank or subtle acute or chronic infection, occurrence or recurrence of deformity and their sequelae such as transfer lesions, ulceration, difficulty with footwear and worsening function. Often the pain is worse than pre-op as a result of the added ablation of the joint surfaces during the process of preparing the joint for fusion. Sometimes patients present with pain on mobilising in their interphalangeal joints which is usually due to incorrect positioning of the toe during the primary fusion.
Clinical examination must include the assessment of the neurovascular status of the limb to rule out conditions such as peripheral ischaemia and neuropathy. The examination must also focus on the cause of the failure of the primary operation. Assessment of the position of the toe during weightbearing and walking is very important in determining malunion or deformity occurrence following primary fusion.
The pathognomonic sign of non union is mobility at the fused joint most often associated with pain on movement and weightbearing. It is often seen that the patient offloads the medial ray as a result of pain and may occasionally have signs of transfer of weight to the adjacent metatarsals or the lateral border of the foot. Malposition in the coronal pain such as hallux valgus or varus can give rise to footwear problems which are almost insurmountable as the 1st MTP joint is stiff following fusion or attempted fusion and doesn’t have the ability to accommodate inside a shoe.
Callosities medially or over the metatarsal head on the plantar surface are indications of either coronal deformity or dorsiflexion deformity and subsequent attrition on the shoe or increased load bearing on the metatarsal head due to a dorsiflexed MTP joint trapping the metatarsal in a plantar declination position, thereby presenting an abnormally prominent metatarsal head to the floor. examination of foot wear is also important to assess abnormal wear, profile issues and appropriateness of such footwear in the presence of a fused 1st MTP joint
IMAGING
Plain radiographs of the foot in AP, Lateral and medial projections are a must. They not only help in diagnosis but also in planning treatment particularly with deformity. Unexplained pain in the fusion site must raise the suspicions of non union or infection and a CT scan is useful in assessing for these
Often MRI is not useful due to the presence of metalwork.
Rarely a CT SPECT or white cell labelled scan may be required to rule out infection.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Sometimes a non-union can be tackled by minimally invasive methods especially if metalwork is still unbroken. The use of bone marrow injection, biologic bone stimulation (BMP etc) and LIPUS bone stimulation (EXOGEN etc) can be tried. These are best reserved for high risk patients such as those with peripheral vascular disease.
It must also be confirmed beyond reasonable doubt that there is no infection or large gap at the fusion site as the above measures are likely to fail. It must be noted that the above measures have no significant evidence base in terms of success in the context of failure of a fusion (as opposed to
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
A stable minimally symptomatic non-union or malunion or patients with low demand can be treated with appropriate adjustments to foot wear including shoes with deeper toe-boxes, medial arch supports to offload a painful callosity, and a Morton extension of an insole to rigidise the medial ray and hallux.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
These include high risk patients such as peripheral vascular disease, frank or open infection which would need treatment of the infection before further fusion ( two stage procedures), patients who are non compliant, smokers, patients on high doses of anti-inflammatory or steroid medication and immuno-modulating medication as the operation is doomed to fail in these groups.

The system of fixation used for this procedure is the Synthes MTP Dorsal Locking Plate . It has unique features including a a very strong construct and allows comfortable walking early in the post op period, variable angle locking, low profile, a tactile compression feature using wires and a compression clamp, the ability to fix whilst compression is being maintained by the clamp and the plate being region specific. The plate profile is curved for strength and also to fit the anatomy well as they are side specific and pre-contoured. The plates come in 3 different angles – 0, 5 & 10 degrees of dorsiflexion and in 3 different lengths. The middle length plate (42mm) in 0 degrees is most often used although for revision cases like this the longer plate is desirable.
This operation is done under regional or general anaesthesia with an ankle or above knee tourniquet. After the consent form is checked and the WHO checklist procedural formalities completed, the patient is placed supine on the table with a sand bag under the ipsilateral buttock to maintain the position of toes pointing upwards. Antibiotics (Teicoplanin and Gentamycin) are administered intravenously prior to inflation of the tourniquet.

The patient can be discahrged the same day if the neurovascular status is satisfactory and pain control achieved.
The patient can be allowed to fully weight-bear immediately in a post operative shoe or heel bearing shoe for a period of 6 weeks unless there are concerns about the strength of the fusion construct.
Routine DVT prophylaxis is not required as the patient is ambulant immediately.
Strict elevation must be followed for 2 weeks at least and probably longer in revision surgery (with leg elevated to heart height for 45mins every hour and through the night).
Crutches likely to be required for 2-4 weeks or until patient is able to walk safely without them
2 Week Clinic review: Check wound and removal of all dressings and sutures. If the wound is slow to heal (or breaks down) swab for microbiology , ensure patient is non-smoking and also complying with post-operative advice. Continue with regular (daily or more frequently as required) dressing changes. Consider oral antibiotic therapy if sepsis is suspected.
6 Week Review: The wound should be nicely healed. All patients are still swollen and painful but this should follow a reducing trend each week. If still significant pain consider using a post-operative boot instead of the standard post operative shoe. Loose fitting rigid shoes can now be used but function will still be very reduced to a 5-10 minute walk. Check X-Rays to confirm position and early bony union although few show signs of union yet.
Patients may use a static bike & swim from 5-6 weeks , Cross-train from 6-7 weeks and re-start light jogging on treadmill from 10 weeks at soonest under normal circumstances

Hallux rigidus. Grading and long term results of operative treatment
J Bone Joint Surg 2003.85-A(11): 2072-88
Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS
Hallux rigidus. Grading and long term results of operative treatment
J Bone Joint Surg 2003.85-A(11): 2072-88
Coughlin MJ, Shurnas PS
Outcome of fusion and debridement surgery reported as well as a classification system which has been fairly widely adopted since. The grading runs from 0 to 4 and is based on clinical and radiographic features as well as range of dorsiflexion at the MTP joint (versus the normal side or in absolute terms).
Non-union after arthrodesis of the first Metatarsal-phalangeal joint: A systematic review
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011; 50(6): 710-13.
T S Roukis
37 papers reviewed, which included as a minimum 12 months follow up, at least 30 patients and modern internal fixation techniques. This resulted in 2,818 cases being considered. Almost 50% of cases were for Hallux Valgus, just over 30% for Hallux rigidus and approximately 10% both for Rheumatoid Forefoot and as a revision procedure. Non-union overall was at 5.4% with one third only of those being symptomatic.
Incidence and outcome of revision surgery after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: Multicenter study of 158 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res
2018 Dec;104(8):1221-1226.
Gael Gaudin et al
190 revision procedures reviewed between jan2014-December 2015. 14 % non union, 8% malunion, 54% hardware related pain, and the rest were lesser toe issues and metatarsalgia. Interestingly removal of hardware in non-union cases where hardware pain was the main issue led to better results than re-doing the arthrodesis.
Reference
- orthoracle.com











































































