
Learn the Fusion of the syndesmosis for isolated distal tibio-fibular arthritis surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Fusion of the syndesmosis for isolated distal tibio-fibular arthritis surgical procedure.
The distal tibiofibular syndesmosis is a unique syndesmotic joint powerfully bound by a variety of ligaments to maintain the integrity of the ankle mortise. The distal anatomy of the two bones are created in such a way that the medial surface of the distal fibula fits into a groove on the lateral surface of the distal tibia called the incisura fibularis which offers the bony stability to this joint. The anterior part of this joint is stabilised by the Anterior Inferior Distal tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), the posterior aspect by the Posterior Inferior Distal Tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and the transverse tibiofibular ligament. Directly between the contiguous surfaces of the tibia and fibula is the interosseous ligament which extends throughout the leg offering origins and beds for a number of muscular and neurovascular structures. The PITFL is by far the strongest ligament in this complex and is the least likely to be ruptured. Once ruptured however the PITFL is most likely to be associated with severe rotational or dislocating injuries of the ankle and associated ankle instability.
The anterior part of the distal tibio-fibular joint is covered by cartilage for a small part behind which lies the syndesmotic recess and a fat pad. There is a small amount of movement afforded by this joint which includes about 2-3 degrees of external rotation of the fibula relative to the tibia. This occurs with widening of the syndesmosis by about 1 mm in maximal dorsiflexion of the ankle to allow the broadest part of the talar dome excursion through the mortise. This is possible due to the a small amount of isometric stretching of the ligaments and is essential for normal ankle movement. The function of the mortise is mainly to stabilise the ankle, keeping the talus congruous with its articulating osseous partners in all normal “physiological” positions by resisting rotational, translational and angular forces.
Thus the syndesmosis is a pivotal structure in maintaining the anatomy and physiological function of the ankle. The syndesmotic ligaments are injured in rotational and translational injuries of the ankle. Approximately 10% of ankle sprains are associated with syndesmotic injury and symptoms from this so called ‘high ankle sprain’ can persist for several months after injury. Sadly this can often be missed and has significant consequences for the future of the ankle.
The syndesmosis is disrupted often in conjunction with the medial deltoid ligament in over 50% of supination external rotation and almost all pronation external rotation/abduction injuries. Such disruption allows more than the required physiological shift of the talus within the ankle. 1 mm of talar shift decreases tibiotalar contact area by about 40 % and significantly increases the contact pressures at the articular surfaces which can lead to early onset arthrosis.
Occasionally osseous trauma to the bones of the syndesmosis can render the syndesmosis incongruous and eventual arthritic and can present as syndesmotic pain which is often as disabling as more extensive ankle arthritis.
In this particular case a middle aged female patient suffered a fracture of the tibia at the junction of the middle and lower thirds with an intact fibula. This was a short spiral fracture and was treated by closed intramedullary nailing with dynamic proximal and static distal locking with 2 locking screws from medial to lateral. It was noted that these screws were long and broached the cortex of the syndesmotic surface of the medial aspect of the lateral malleolus. This chronic abutting on the syndesmotic fibular surface appears to have caused injury to the surface with ongoing painful symptoms long after the tibial fracture was deemed to be healed and the distal screws removed. A CT SPECT confirmed the site of activity as within the distal syndesmosis and selective injection into the syndesmosis gave excellent but temporary relief of pain. It was then decided to undertake an in situ fusion of the syndesmosis after confirming that the incisura and the fibula were congruous and there was no significant loss of bone. Bone graft was used along with 2 partially threaded cancellous screws to fuse the joint. The patient felt immediate relief of pain even whilst in plaster and after removal was asymptomatic

INDICATIONS
These include symptomatic arthrosis of the syndesmosis, post fracture deformity and arthritis of the joint, failed syndesmotic reconstruction with recurrent instability, as part of ankle fusion when syndesmotic pain and arthrosis form a significant component of pain and rarely as part of an ankle replacement procedure.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
The commonest complaint is of pain and is usually very specific to the syndesmotic region. Ballotment of the fibula against the tibia in an anteroposterior direction gives rise to pain as does dorsiflexion and external rotation to push apart the syndesmotic bones. Occasionally patients describe a functional instability pattern with twisting of the ankle in external rotation causing the ankle to give way due to sudden pain and reflex inhibition of musculature. Careful clinical examination is important to dichotomise the pain originating from the ankle joint proper, in particular anterolateral impingement pain which can mimic distal syndesmotic pain. Selective injection under fluoroscopy into the syndesmotic joint is almost diagnostic if it results in abolishing pain from the region.
IMAGING
The use of plain radiography is essential in identifying pathology especially if osseous and associated with arthrosis. Articular surface irregularity, sclerosis and cyst formation is pathognomonic in severe cases of arthritis and post traumatic deformation of the contours of the syndesmosis. Residual diastasis and the presence of fracture fragments in the syndesmosis is well defined using a standing ankle mortis anteroposterior view. Lateral standing views of the ankle will show up malunions of associated distal fibular fractures and will outline the position of fracture fragments in the vicinity.
If there is no metalwork present then an MRI will clearly demonstrate the presence of syndesmotic pathology such as arthritis as well as the integrity of ligaments. This is important to delineate pathology of the ligaments from pathology of the joints themselves as the treatment is radically different for the two.
In the presence of metalwork a CT scan will demonstrate the presence of incongruence, arthritis and malpositioning of the fibula into the incisura. In cases where the diagnosis is still in doubt an isotope bone scan or CT SPECT will accurately pinpoint the pathology to the syndesmosis and offer pathognomonic features.
Ankle arthrography is very rarely used but can show irregularities in the syndesmosis when die leaks into the syndesmotic recess and shows up contour anomalies in the syndesmosis.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Sometimes stabilisation of the syndesmosis can offer pain relief in early arthritis of the joint secondary to chronic instability. Arthroscopic debridement of the syndesmosis can also be very useful in controlling symptoms and can be used also to fuse the joint if the syndesmosis is easily accessible to the scope and instrumentation . This can be done particularly if the distal part of the syndesmosis is arthritic and there is concomitant instability allowing easy passage of shaving and cutting instruments.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Symptomatic therapy such as analgesia foot wear modification physiotherapy etc are rarely sufficient to control pain due to mechanical functioning of the ankle with syndesmotic arthritis. Occasionally taping of the ankle in the syndesmotic level can decrease movement of the fibula on the tibia thereby decreasing pain. This can be used as a diagnostic test to prove the syndesmosis as a pain generator. Injections into the syndesmosis can offer long term relief in some patients and form an essential role as diagnostic tools to pinpoint the origin of pain.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The presence of arthritis throughout the joint, severe chronic diastasis or shortened fibular malunion should not be treated with fusion unless the background pathology is treated with stabilisation and or fibular osteotomy etc. severe global arthritis in the syndesmosis is best treated with a interposition tricortical graft positioned higher in the syndesmosis to avoid the unfortunate complication of narrowing the ankle mortise thereby causing significant painful problems with stiffness and pain. This occurs as the maximum width of the talar dome is unable to excursion freely in the mortise. Other contraindications include peripheral vascular disease acute or chronic sepsis concomitant pathology in the ankle joint proper until after treatment of associated problems.

The patient is counselled on the nature of the operation and advised of the complications of the procedure including a high rate of non union and residual pain. Informed consent is then obtained for the fusion as well for the harvest of bone graft usually from the os calcis unless tricortical graft is required when it should be taken from the iliac crest.
The operation is done either with a general anaesthetic, a spinal or regional block. This patient opted for GA. Antibiotics are given at induction. An above knee tourniquet is used rather than an above ankle so that inadvertent compression or distortion of the syndesmosis does not occur due to the pressure and the fibula can sit comfortably and congruously in the incisura. It will also allow harvest of graft from the proximal tibia if required. the leg is prepped with Iodine and or Chlorhexidine. A sand bag to rotate the leg into 20 deg of internal rotation is necessary to gain access to the syndesmosis and also the lateral calcaneus for bone graft.

The limb is elevated on 2 pillows or a Braun’s frame. Ice packs are especially useful to reduce postoperative swelling and pain. Adequate analgesia and Dalteparin thromboprophylaxis is prescribed for as long as the limb is immobilised in plaster.
The plaster is completed in 24 to 48 hours and maintained for 6-10 weeks. I am conservative and cautious in immobilising these fusions for longer than others as they do suffer from a higher rate of non unions as compared to other fusions around the ankle. The patient is reviewed at 1 week for wound assessment and a plaster change. It is important at this stage to ensure that the ankle is is plantigrade in plaster. The patient is advised to be strictly non weight bearing for 6 weeks and then pending satisfactory radiographs at that time can either go into a weightbearing plaster or a pneumatic compression boot and allowed to weight bear. Physiotherapy may started at this stages providing radiographs show good fusion. At 3 months if there is still doubt about the quality of fusion then I would perform a CT scan before discarding the boot and starting unprotected weightbearing. Dalteparin is stopped when the patient is allowed to walk without a plaster.

Very little evidence is available for the functional results following fusion of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. There are several short case series which appear to suggest that patients reported significant pain relief and the the procedure was predictable in rendering a painful or unstable syndesmosis symptom free.
Pena and Coetzee (Foot and Ankle Clinics 2006 Mar;11(1):35-50, viii) have suggested arthrodoesis of the syndesmosis for chronic incongruence of the ankle due to disruption of the syndesmosis that have been present for at least 6 months. They have suggested that it was their perception that the final ankle functions was definitely not adequate to pursue an active athletic life. It has been suggested that such fusion may result in some restriction of dorsiflexion and may accelerate the process of ankle arthritis but there is no convincing evidence for the same.
Katznelson et al (Injury. 1983;15:170-172) reported the results of syndesmotic fusion in 5 patients, 4 of whom were asymptomatic with full range of ankle movement a year after surgery.
Tun Hing Lui (Arthrosc.Tech 2016 Apr; 5(2): e419–e424, J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54:953–957 ) described the technique of syndesmotic fusion using endoscopic technique but does not inform about the outcomes of such fusion. This has been deemed by the author of the publication as being technically demanding and suitable only for experienced arthroscopic foot and ankle surgeons!
It is thus the case that whilst it may render the syndesmosis painless, there may be sequelae such as stiffness and perhaps an acceleration of arthritic changes in the tibiotalar joint possibly due to the alteration of biomechanics and increased constraint of the articulation due to loss of fibular external rotation and altered kinematics of the ankle joint. However no evidence exists currently to either confirm or quantify such risks.
Reference
- orthoracle.com






























































