
Learn the High Tibial Osteotomy (Synthes Tomofix plate) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the High Tibial Osteotomy (Synthes Tomofix plate) surgical procedure.
This is a presentation of a medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy for isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis in a 52 year old man who works in heavy labour.
In such a case it would be undesirable to consider arthroplasty as a surgical solution to his arthritis. Due to his young age and heavy work he is likely to fail a knee replacement at a young age requiring revision surgery, most likely in his sixties. The result of primary knee replacements are good however patients undergoing revision surgery can expect poor function with low PROMs scores. He may well still be at work at the age he requires an arthroplasty.
Being in mind also that the knee has some healthy cartilage in the lateral compartment it would be shame not to “sweat the asset” of the knee and delay arthroplasty surgery for as long as possible. Osteotomy to offload the medial compartment has been shown to be an excellent procedure in these cases. By shifting the weight-bearing axis onto the lateral side of the knee excellent pain relief can be expected and can last for over 10 years. This can be achieved by essentially swinging the ankle laterally by opening a wedge in the medial tibia or closing a wedge in the lateral tibia. This is a description of the opening osteotomy.
The presentation describes a biplanar osteotomy, so called as the opening is created in two planes. The opening osteotomy runs across the tibia from medial to lateral at a level proximal to the pes anserinus. The second osteotomy runs up behind the tibial tubercle. The advantage of this technique is that the anterior osteotomy controls sagittal and rotational displacement.

Indications:
Isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis – this procedure is particularly suited to young adults with symptomatic osteoarthritis. These are the patients in whom it is wise to delay arthroplasty for as long as possible. A group particularly suited are young males who work in heavy labour, e.g. the building trade.
Osteotomy is often used in combination with cartilage regeneration procedures such as autologous cartilage transplantation if the patient is in varus.
Symptoms & Assessment:
The patient complains of medial sided knee pain at rest and especially on weight-bearing. Anterior knee pain, including on stair climbing and lateral pain should be absent. The decision of surgical intervention should be reserved for those patients who have failed conservative measures such as analgesia, physiotherapy, off-loading braces and insoles to offload the medial compartment.
Examination reveals a patient with medial sided tenderness. Ideally, for a good result from a high tibial osteotomy, any varus deformity should be largely correctable and any fixed flexion deformity should be less than 10%. It is possible to correct large deformities (>12 degrees) however careful planning is required and the surgeon may wish to consider a combined femoral and high tibial osteotomy.
Investigations:
Weight-bearing x-rays – including long-leg alignment views are vital to assess the appropriateness and the required correction angle. Techniques to plan the osteotomy are well described in publications from the AO group.
MRI – can be of benefit to assess the other compartments of the knee (lateral and patello-femoral) and the integrity of the ligaments
Arthroscopy – some surgeons prefer to confirm the status of the articular cartilage in the other compartments with an arthroscopy either staged or immediately prior to the osteotomy. Modern MRI is improving our ability to visualise articular cartilage and my preference is, if possible, to avoid any surgery in the knee joint with a view to the future as any eventual TKR is likely to have a better result in the “virgin” knee. I also question whether the findings of an arthroscopy, unless there is a big discrepancy between MRI findings and arthroscopy are going to change the plan in a young active male with highly symptomatic medial compartment OA.
Aims:
The aim of the procedure is to shift the weightbearing axis from the degenerate medial compartment to a more lateral position, thereby “sweating the asset” of the knee in terms of articular cartilage. I aim for the correction to intersect the lateral downslope of the lateral tibial eminence.
Contraindications:
Smoking
Active infection
Widespread osteoarthritis (lateral and patello-femoral compartment)
Fixed flexion deformity >10% is a relative contra-indication bearing in mind that altering the sagittal slope of the osteotomy can improve a small fixed flexion deformity
Very large fixed varus deformity
Osteoporosis / osteopenia
Alternative treatment options:
Physiotherapy
Analgesia to control symptoms
Off-loading knee brace
Shoe orthoses to realign the leg on weightbearing
Arthroplasty

The pre-operative planning for this operation is absolute vital. Long-leg alignment views are used to plan the required opening for the osteotomy. In this case the planning showed that an opening of 12 degrees is required.
It is common practice to use a long straight radio-opaque guide such as the diathermy lead to check the weightbearing axis intraoperatively (well demonstrated in Prof Snow’s OrthOracle presentation: Proximal Tibial Osteotomy Using A Newclip Plate.) However I feel in my hands that this is open to error due to limb rotation and lack of weightbearing on the operating table. I prefer to make the calculations on the pre-operative films and execute the planned correction.
Laminar airflow theatre
Pre-operative antibiotics
High thigh tourniquet
Image intensifier
Radiolucent operating table
Side support
Footplate and sandbag
Saw and saw-blades (narrow)
Medial tibial osteotomy plate

Immediate post-operative care concentrates on:
management of pain
management of swelling
observation of distal circulation, sensation and movement – compartment syndrome is a rare but reported complication
Anti-thrombosis prophylaxis in the form of mechanical and chemical agents is commenced. Note that the patient will have an altered weight-bearing status for 6 weeks.
Weightbearing status post-op is advisably:
4 weeks at 25% partial weight bearing to commence once the patient has good quads control and intact plantar sensation, using a ROM brace for support (unlocked, full range)
4 to 6 weeks post-op 50% partial week bearing to build up gradually
Full weight bearing from week 6 – the patient can discard the ROM brace
Physiotherapy can commence aiming for supervised full ROM. Post operative straight leg raising is allowed provided the fixation is good and bone quality is adequate.
Skin clips can be removed at 14 days.
Post-operative radiographs can be delayed to 6 weeks provided good intra-operative images were taken. Further x-rays are taken at 6 months and 1 year. If union is demonstrated at 1 year the surgeon can plan to remove the plate. It is my preference to remove the plate as these patients are likely to progress their arthritis and require arthroplasty albeit in many years to come. Therefore removing the plate at this stage means that the bone and soft tissue can recover in the intervening years.

Osteotomy surgery has been in practice for many years. The opening wedge tibial osteotomy really took hold in the 1990s as the implants improved. The advantage of the opening wedge over closing and domed osteotomy is the precision available to dial in the appropriate correction on the table. However the risk was that the implant needs to control excessive axial and torsional forces of the proximal tibia. The development of fixed angle titanium plate systems allowed excellent control even in openings in excess of 10 degrees. A comparative study by Agneskirchner JD et al (2006) Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 14(3):291-300 showed excellent biomechanical properties for the implant used in this case.
The expected delay of total arthroplasty surgery following osteotomy around the knee is in excess of 10 years. Furthermore the conversion of a failed osteotomy to a total knee replacement (TKR) can yield patient satisfaction scores similar to a primary TKR of a previously unoperated knee. This can help the decision making process for a surgeon faced with a young patient with unicompartmental osetoarthritis that has failed conservative treatment. As demonstrated originally by Pearse A J, Hooper G, Rothwell A, Frampton C Osteotomy and unicompartmental knee replacement converted to total knee replacement – data from the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Arthroplasty. 2012 Dec;27(10):1827-31 and supported in subsequent publications the patient reported outcome scores of total knee replacement following a failed osteotomy are higher than scores recorded after a failed unicompartmental knee replacement. The evidence would therefore suggest that as a TKR delaying tactic the HTO is preferable to UKR in the long-term.
Complications of the procedure described in the literature include:
infection – range reported 0.8-10% but the vast majority are superficial infections
DVT – range 2-5% clinically symptomatic DVT rate; the rate of PE is less widely reported but accepted to be rare
non-union / delayed union – in their series of 323 patients Martin et al reported an aseptic non-union rate of 3% and delayed union of 12%. Martin R, Birmingham TB, Willits K, Litchfield R, Lebel ME, Giffin JR. Adverse event rates and classifications in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2014 May;42(5):1118-26.
patellar baja – the opening wedge does risk altering the height of the patella however the stepped biplanar osteotomy gives the surgeon control over this. It is key to ensure that the distal tibia swings away from the knee rather than the proximal tibia being raised towards the knee, achieved by adequate MCL release. The literature would suggest that the alteration in patellar height is less in biplanar opening wege osteotomy than closing wedge osteotomy.
fracture – undisplaced lateral hinge fracture risk is common around 20% and requires no specific alteration of management. However a displaced (>2mm) lateral hinge fracture reported by Martin et al can occur in 3%. Tibial plateau fracture was reported by the same group in 3% of cases.
compartment syndrome is a rare but serious complication and most likely affects the anterior tibial compartment
neurovascular injury – damage to the common peroneal nerve is less common in HTO versus closing wedge osteotomy due to the altered approach. Popliteal vessels are at risk during osteotomy.
Reference
- orthoracle.com




























