
Learn the Hip Arthroscopy – set up and access to central compartment surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Hip Arthroscopy – set up and access to central compartment surgical procedure.
Hip arthroscopy now is performed ever more frequently though historically was considered technically difficult with limited indications.
Over recent years equipment and techniques have greatly improved. Furthermore, understanding of pre-arthritic intra articular conditions of the hip that can be assessed and treated by hip arthroscopy have been refined. This understanding has developed in parallel with improved imaging techniques such as high resolution MRI.
The hip joint can be divided into the central compartment (femoral head, acetabulum) and the peripheral compartment (intra capsular neck of femur). The boundary between the two is the acetabular labrum. The central compartment is accessed to deride or repair the acetabular labrum, articular cartilage of the acetabulum or femoral head and the ligamentum teres. The commonest reasons to access the peripheral compartment are to address cam deformities of the femoral neck or to retrieve loose bodies.

INDICATIONS
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI)
acetabular rim impingement deformities
acetabular labral lesions
articular cartilage lesions
femoral impingement deformities
Isolated intra-articular abnormalities (in the absence of structural hip disease). These disorders are commonly the result of major trauma, minor trauma or overuse and can include:
labral tears
chondral flaps
ligamentum teres tears
loose bodies
synovitis
Benign intra-articular neoplasms (synovial chondromatosis and PVNS)
Periarticular soft tissue procedures (psoas lengthening, IT band release, abductor repair)
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients present with pain felt in the groin or hip which is related to movement or activity. This may be accompanied by locking or catching. Symptoms are worse with long periods of sitting, standing or walking. Pivoting on the affected hip can give pain. The pain can be constant and limit sporting activities.
On examination the patient may have a limp. The rotational alignment of the lower limbs requires assessment. The patient may have some anterior tenderness in the groin. There will be pain in deep flexion and on internal rotation. They will have a painful FADIR (impingement test). FABER’s test may reproduce anterior groin pain. Anterior hip structures may also be tight and irritable on examination.
INVESTIGATIONS
An AP Pelvis radiograph is mandatory.Visible signs of osteoarthritis (joint space narrowing, sclerosis, osteophytes) are a contra indication for hip arthroscopy. The majority of young patients with intra articular pathology will have pre disposing boney anatomy. The most common pathological findings are cam/pincer lesions or hip dysplasia. A lateral radiograph of the hip such as a Dunn view can also be taken since many cam lesions are anterior on the femoral neck.
A high resolution non-contrast MRI of the hip on at least a 3T scanner should be performed. Where this is not available MRI arthrography can be considered or when contraindicated, CT arthrography as an alternative.
When lower limb or acetabular versional mal-alignment is suspected CT assessment of this should also be performed.
If a diagnosis of intra articular pathology is not clear a diagnostic injection of long acting local anaesthetic (0.25% marcaine) and steroid (40mg depomedrone) is appropriate. This needs to be performed under image intensifier control and addition of dye is helpful to confirm correct location of injection. If the injection is performed awake the response can be judged immediately.
OPERATIVE ALTERNATIVES
Open surgical dislocation has been well described (Ganz) for femoro acetabular impingement, labral debridement and removal of pincer lesions.
A combined approach (central compartment arthroscopy plus mini anterior approach to peripheral compartment) has also been recommended.
Ultimately any cam lesion needs to be removed in its entirety. A well performed open osteoplasty will have superior results to a poorly performed arthroscopic procedure.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (Tonnis 2 or 3)
MRI evidence of osteoarthritis (femoral and acetabular chondral loss, acetabular osteoarthritic cysts)
Developmental dysplasia of the hip (CEA <20, AI>15)
Severe prior SUFE (SCFE)
Perthes
Severe acetabular retroversion
Inaccessible hip joint due to obesity

Patient is under general anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthetic or lumbar plexus block helps to reduce muscle tone and makes distraction of the hip easier. Alternatively muscle relaxants will accomplish the same aim.
Whilst hip arthroscopy can be performed in the lateral position, the commonest approach is to have the patient in the supine position. Several purpose designed hip distractors are available but it is possible to use a standard fracture table. The critical feature is that a sizeable well padded perineal post should be available (at least 9cm). This ensures that the the distraction force is lateralised so that it is applied along the axis of the femoral neck. Equally as important, the padded post reduces the risk of damage to the perineum. Traction times should be kept as short as possible and never exceed 2 hours.

The post operative protocol will depend upon what surgery has been performed. The initial priority is to regain passive range of movement. Stiffness is a significant risk and a good range of movement should be established prior to discharge from hospital. Many patients will be suitable for day case or over night hospital admission.
Simple surgery (labral debridement, removal of loose bodies) should aim for return to full weight bearing as soon as possible. Crutches are generally required for 1-2 weeks because of pain.
Labral repair, osteoplasty of femoral neck, micrfracture requires protected weight bearing for 4-6 weeks.

Initially hip arthroscopy was performed by a limited number of surgeons. Many procedures were diagnostic. Labral tears were identified but the underlying pathoanatomy was not fully understood.
Ten year results of surgery are now being published and would suggest that for conditions such as FAI statistically significant gains are achieved and maintained providing indications are strictly adhered to.
However, there are very few prospective randomised trials to prove the efficacy of hip arthroscopy. In the past 5 years such trials have commenced but results are not yet published.
One of the main concerns is that indications have not been formalised and a wide variety of pathologies are included in most studies. There has been a significant increase in interest in hip arthroscopy. It has ben suggested that there is a steep learning curve for this type of surgery and it is not clear whether the results achieved by a small group of highly skilled and high volume surgeons can be replicated on a mass scale. The advent of Non Arthritic Hip Registries will be crucial in determining accurate outcomes.
References
Menge TJ, Briggs JK, Dornan GJ et al. Survivorship and outcomes 10 years following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: labral debridement compared with labral repair. J Bone Joint Surg 2017; 99:
997–1004.
Nwachukwu BU, Rebolledo BJ, McCormick F et al. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of femoroacteabular impingement: a systematic review of medium to long term outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):1062-8.
Redmond JM et al. What factors predict conversion to THA after arthroscopy? Clin Orthop Relat Res , 2017.
Grammatopoulos G, Davies OLI, El-Bakoury A et al. A traffic light grading system of hip dysplasia to predict the success of arthroscopic hip surgery. Am J Sports Med 2017.
Nakano N, Khanduja V. Complications in hip arthroscopy. Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal.. 2016 Jul-Sep; 6(3): 402-409.
Reference
- orthoracle.com



































