
Professional Guidelines Included
Learn the Infected femoral nail removal and debridement with Synthes Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Infected femoral nail removal and debridement with Synthes Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA) surgical procedure.
Fracture related infection (FRI) has a spectrum of presentations ranging from early and obvious infection after fracture fixation to delayed presentations with infected non-union of fractures. Its incidence is reported as being between 1-30% of fractures and is more common following open injuries. FRI has various potential aspects to its presentation and management, including bone infection, soft tissue injury, fractures in varying states of healing and metalwork with biofilm. There is currently a lack of high quality evidence to guide practice in this area and there have been a number of recent consensus papers and a BOAST guideline in an attempt to define best practice.
Diagnostic criteria considered to confirm FRI include a sinus, fistula or wound breakdown over bone or implant, purulent discharge or pus found during surgery, phenotypically indistinguishable pathogens from 2 deep samples or histopathological staining for bacteria or fungi. Criteria suggestive of FRI include clinical signs of local inflammation (pain, swelling, redness, temperature), radiological signs (lysis, implant loosening, sequestration, periosteal bone formation), elevated blood markers (WBC, CRP, ESR) or a pathogenic organism grown from a single deep tissue sample.
RIA is made by Synthes, as the name suggests it simultaneously reams, aspirates and irrigates the intramedullary canal as it is passed.
It can be used simply to harvest autologous bone graft for reconstruction cases however it also allows simultaneous reaming of infected material with irrigation as the reamer passes and collection of the reamings to remove and sample infected tissues in infected cases. RIA is not routinely used for primary nailing of fractures as there is an advantage to autografting the fracture site with reamings rather than removing them.

INDICATIONS
When infection presents soon after fracture fixation then deep samples should be taken and as assessment of stability made. If the fracture is stable then antibiotic suppression until fracture union with delayed removal of metalwork is an option. Delayed infections with established bone lysis or necrosis should be managed with debridement and deep tissue sampling followed by removal of all metalwork. Bone loss is managed with eradication of dead space either with antibiotic loaded PMMA cement or bone substitutes loaded with antibiotic (such as cerement G, stimulan or Osteoset T as below). Bone substitutes whilst convenient and able to deliver high local doses of antibiotics do tend to produce persistent wound leakage in the post-operative period which can confuse the clinical picture in patients with concerns regarding ongoing infection. Segmental defects can be managed with acute shortening where possible or bone transport with ring fixators for larger defects. If the fracture remains unstable or there is segmental bone loss then further stabilisation will be required, often with external fixation such as a ring fixator. Soft tissue defects should be managed with local or free flap coverage to bring healthy, vascularised, soft tissues into the defect. Post-operatively patients are started on broad spectrum antibiotics with a switch to targeted antibiotics once sensitivities are known. All patients should be managed via an MDT comprising radiologists, microbiologists, orthopaedic and plastic surgeons.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
FRI may present acutely with signs and symptoms of inflammation in the affected limb, this may be associated with persistent wound discharge or delayed wound healing. More chronic cases often present with an established sinus over the fracture or implant, in these cases there may be an established non-union of the fracture. Assessment of a patient with suspected FRI includes taking a detailed history of the injury including details of any open wounds at the time of injury, onset and duration of symptoms, any systemic symptoms and details of previous operations and antibiotic therapy. It is important to know the patients medical background (eg diabetes, possible immunosuppression), current medications and smoking history.
IMAGING & INVESTIGATIONS
Initial investigations will include baseline bloods (FBC, ESR, CRP) and X-rays.
Imaging should be compared with previous images for signs of progression of bone healing, progressive lysis around the implant, sequestra and periosteal new bone formation. In many cases a diagnosis of infection will be obvious (eg sinus over fracture with frank pus) and further imaging may not be indicated. Adjuvant imaging may include MRI (good for assessing soft tissue collections and oedema in bone but degraded by metal implants, good sensitivity but poor specificity for diagnosis of bone infection), CT (good for assessing bone union, cortical involvement in infection and sequestra) and SPECT-CT (combines technetium bone scan with CT to improve localisation with improved accuracy for diagnosis of infection and particularly useful in the presence of metal implants).
FRI can be classified according to Willnegger and Roth into early (<2 weeks- virulent organism, immature biofilm), delayed (3-10 weeks, maturing biofilm, possible bone invasion) and late (>10 weeks, mature biofilm, bone necrosis and lysis). Osteomyelitis itself is has been classified by Cierny and Mader into 4 groups, medullary (such as after IM nailing), superficial (such as beneath a plate), localised and diffuse (with segmental involvement). In addition to classifying the anatomy of the infection they also divided the host into 3 groups. Type A hosts have no compromising factors, type B hosts have either systemic or local compromise (or both) and in type C hosts the treatment is worse for the patient than the disease.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
In patients presenting with acute infection before fracture union the options are generally to either suppresss the infection (after debridement and tissue sampling) until fracture union and then remove the metalwork or, if the fracture is unstable, to revise the fixation in either one or two stages. Single stage revision fixation would often involve revising to a ring fixator although the use of antibiotic coated intramedullary nails is also an option. Two stage reconstruction involves temporary stabilisation with external fixation until the infection is controlled and then revising to internal fixation.
Patients with more chronic infections with or without fracture union generally have 3 options. In patients not fit for revision surgery or who do not want surgery then targeted antibiotics to suppress infective flare-ups may be an option (as guided by the bone infection MDT). In the majority of patients limb salvage surgery is offered, as outlined above this involves debridement of infected soft tissue and bone with deep tissue sampling, management of bone and soft tissue dead space (antibiotic loaded carriers, local or free flap coverage) and stabilisation of the bone if needed followed by a prolonged course of targeted antibiotics. The third option in lower limb infected non-unions is amputation particularly in cases below the knee where prosthetic rehabilitation will give the patient good functional recovery.

For this case we have placed the patient in a lateral position as this makes removal of an antegrade femoral nail easier. We are using a radiolucent table to facilitate access for the image intensifier. A TED stocking and flowtron boot are applied to the contralateral limb.
The patient will be given broad spectrum antibiotics intra-operatively once deep tissue samples for microbiology have been taken, in our unit we use vancomycin and meropenem. This will continue post-operatively until the microbiology results are back and we can switch to an antiobiotic targeted to the specific organism(s).

Broad spectrum antibiotics are continued until microbiology results and sensitivities are available (often 5-7 days) at which point the antibiotics are targetted to the relevant organism. In this case a sensitive staphylococcus aureus was grown from all 5 microbiology samples and histology showed a mixed acute and chronic inflammatory picture in keeping with infection. The patient was therefore discharged on a prolonged course of ciprofloxacin and rifampicin- polytherapy using antibiotics with good tissue penetration is preferred. In most cases a total of 6 weeks of antibiotics are given although in cases with atypical organsims a longer duration of antibiotic treatment maybe indicated.
In this case the fracture had healed and full weight bearing was permitted, enoxaparin was given for 7 days.
Initially patients are reviewed every few weeks to ensure the soft tissues heal as anticipated and there are no early signs of recurrent infection. In our unit following treatment of bone infection patients are reviewed regularly for 2 years to monitor, clinically and radiologically, for signs of recurrence. In cases of bone infection with non-union or bone loss regular follow up to monitor healing or manage bone defects in ring fixators is required. Patients in ring fixators are followed up in an MDT clinic involving specialist physiotherapists and nurses as well as the surgical team.

George Cierny 3rd, Jon T Mader, Johan J Penninck. A Clinical Staging System for Adult Osteomyelitis Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 Sep;(414):7-24. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000088564.81746.62.
Classic paper describing the anatomy of osteomyelitis and the host factors to consider it the management of bone infection. The surgical and medical management of each stage is discussed in detail.
George Cierny 3rd, Jon T Mader, Johan J Penninck. A Clinical Staging System for Adult Osteomyelitis Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 Sep;(414):7-24. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000088564.81746.62.
Classic paper describing the anatomy of osteomyelitis and the host factors to consider it the management of bone infection. The surgical and medical management of each stage is discussed in detail.
Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M2, McNally MA, Moriarty TF, McFadyen I, Scarborough M, Athanasou NA, Ochsner PE, Kuehl R, Raschke M, Borens O1, Xie Z, Velkes S, Hungerer S, Kates SL, Zalavras C, Giannoudis PV, Richards RG, Verhofstad MHJ Fracture-related infection: A consensus on definition from an international expert group. Injury. 2018 Mar;49(3):505-510. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.040. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
A consensus paper from a group of international experts that outlines criteria for confirmed and suspected infection after fracture fixation based on the clinical presentation, blood parameters, microbiology and histopathology.
Metsemakers WJ, Morgenstern M, Senneville E, Borens O, Govaert GAM, Onsea J, Depypere M, Richards RG, Trampuz A, Verhofstad MHJ, Kates SL, Raschke M, McNally MA, Obremskey WT; Fracture-Related Infection (FRI) group. General treatment principles for fracture-related infection: recommendations from an international expert group. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Oct 29. doi: 10.1007/s00402-019-03287-4.
Another consensus paper dealing with the treatment of fracture related infection including such aspects as host optimisation, MDT working, bone sampling, bone debridement and the management of soft tissue and bone defects.
OVIVA Trial Collaborators Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection N Engl J Med 2019 Jan 31;380(5):425-436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710926.
Multi centre RCT comparing prolonged intravenous antibiotics versus a switch to oral antibiotics at 7 days. The primary outcome was treatment failure at one year (ie recurrent infection). Overall this occurred in 14.6% in the intravenous group and 13.2% in the oral antibiotic group thus showing non-inferiority of an early switch to oral antibiotics. This supports a move away from prolonged intravenous therapy, the issue of local versus systemic antibiotics remains unresolved for now.
OVIVA Trial Collaborators Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection N Engl J Med 2019 Jan 31;380(5):425-436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1710926.
Multi centre RCT comparing prolonged intravenous antibiotics versus a switch to oral antibiotics at 7 days. The primary outcome was treatment failure at one year (ie recurrent infection). Overall this occurred in 14.6% in the intravenous group and 13.2% in the oral antibiotic group thus showing non-inferiority of an early switch to oral antibiotics. This supports a move away from prolonged intravenous therapy, the issue of local versus systemic antibiotics remains unresolved for now.
Reference
- orthoracle.com








































