
Learn the Lateral ankle ligament reconstruction surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Lateral ankle ligament reconstruction surgical procedure.
One should be clear of the difference between functional ankle instability, the joint feeling and behaving unstably though with competent mechanical restraints, and mechanical instability where these no longer fulfil their purpose. The former is far more common but the initial management of the post-traumatic unstable ankle is most commonly conservative, irrespective whether functional or mechanical. A successful outcome van be expected in most cases.
It should also be appreciated that some cases with demonstrable lateral ligamentous laxity during examination will be dynamically stable during function having undergone an appropriate course of muscle strengthening and proprioceptive rehabilitation. The indication for a ligament reconstruction is symptoms and a functional problem, and not an examination finding. Such patients rarely require operative management.
If rehabilitation and conservative management fail to stabilise the ankle then the main complaint referable to the ligaments will be one of instability and not pain. Patients with ankle pain as a prominent feature will probably also require an ankle arthroscopy to treat an intra-articular source of pain. It is important in such patients to be clear about the location of the pain. The ankle joint itself is only one possibility as pain can also come also from injury to the postero-medial structures and tendons or postero-lateral tendons after an ankle sprain and this may require additional management.
Patients with atraumatic onset lateral ligament instability are a separate subgroup, who may suffer either with more generalised ligament insufficiency or more rarely neurological issues and require different operative management of their instability than described in this technique.
Readers will also find the description of the Zimmer-Biomet Juggerknot used in a Brostrum ligament reconstruction useful to read at https://www.orthoracle.com/library/brostrom-lateral-ligament-reconstruction-using-juggerknot-suture-anchorzimmer-biomet/

INDICATIONS.
–Primary reconstruction for symptomatic lateral ankle instability which has failed conservative management
–Revision reconstruction in patients with good quality local (and general) soft tissues
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION.
Not all patients with lax lateral ligaments will be symptomatically unstable. Overall ankle stability is conferred by a combination of active muscle function and the static ligamentous stabilisers. If the muscle tone , power and co-ordination is good then despite lax ligaments on examination a patient may have no mechanical problem and therefore not require reconstruction.
Patients appropriate for this type of ligament reconstruction will have a history on an initially stable ankle which has deteriorated after one or many episodes of trauma. The instability may be to the extent that the patient has significant re-injuries or simply more minor episodes during which the ankle feels unstable. If severely unstable these symptoms may be during the activities of daily living or may be just during more vigorous or sporting activity.
Pain is normal after episodes of overt instability for a period of time. If pain occurs unrelated to these episodes (which is not uncommon) it usually indicates the presence of intercurrent pathology within the joint ,resulting also from trauma. Most often this is synovitis , arthrofibrosis or chondral/osteochondral pathology. This will require specific treatment during any surgery as any intra-articular pathology can also contribute to feelings of instability from the joint. The location of pain is also important to be clear on. In most cases it will be antero-lateral ankle , but specifically enquire about both true lateral/posterolateral pain as well as postero-medial pain. The former may indicate peroneal tendon pathology which may require injection for synovitis or repair of tears. In all cases of instability look for peroneal tendon subluxation as this will have similar symptoms and should be treated with a different operation. Occasionally it may be secondary to posterior ankle impingement. Postero-medial pain should certainly make one suspicious of posterior impingement which may require treatment or Tibilais posterior involvement. Anterior and posterior impingement provocation tests should also be performed. The mechanism of injury with a “sprain” is that the ankle is forced not only only into inversion but also plantar-flexion which is how posterior compression occurs which can result in posterior impingement developing.
On examination there may be ankle level swelling but this is not consistent. The tendons should be specifically examined for problems as noted above. The Anterior Talo-Fibular ligament restricts the ankles anterior translation in plantar-flexion (tested by the anterior drawer test) and stabilise the ankle in plantar flexion and inversion. The Calcaneo-Fibular ligament resists inversion with the ankle in dorsiflexion (tested by the Talar tilt test). Both should be examined though may appear stable if the patient has good resting muscle tone or there is pain during examination.
INVESTIGATIONS.
MRI: All patients require an MRI scan. This can be after conservative management of instability fails. If performed early or immediately after injury pathologies that will usually settle (such as bone oedema) will also be detected. The information yielded by MRI about the lateral ligaments will denote only that they have been injured (a fact normally gleaned from a well taken history) and gives no idea on the stability of the injured ligaments (irrespective of the MRI grading of injury). It is key to assessment of the injury never the less. An intercurrent osteochondral injury will need treatment and the posterior ankle and peroneal tendons should also be viewed.
On occasion rarer injuries may result from the weight-bearing and inversion (such as a lateral process fracture of the Talus) and are easiest spotted on MRI.
ULTRASOUND: Some patients require ultrasound.Intercurrent tendon pathology is sometimes better diagnosed with ultrasound and impingements can be treated under ultrasound guidance in advance of operation which may limit operative intervention simply to the ligament reconstruction (see section on posterior ankle decompression).
X-Ray: Image Intensifier screening is used on-table at the start of the operation to screen the ankle for cases which are symptomatically unstable but in whom ligament examination is normal or equivocal when the patient is awake. It is possible that the ankle ligaments may be mechanically stable but the joint functionally unstable (one cause of which is intra-articular pathology). These can also be performed with the patient awake of course.
NON-SURGICAL ALTERNATIVES.
–Physiotherapy: The first line of management for most cases should be a course of frequent and well supervised rehabilitation , concentrating on active proprioception and strengthening.
–Braces: There are a variety of devices with subtle individual advantages . They are an inconvenience for day to day usage and most often just worn for ” at risk” sporting activities
-Taping: A variety of taping materials and taping patterns around the ankle exist. These act by a combination of improving the proprioceptive feedback by cutaneous stimulation and providing a mechanical restraint.
SURGICAL ALTERNATIVES.
Allograft. Wright medical graft jacket for example.
Autograft. Hamstring free tendon graft can be used.
Neo-ligament. Various braided tapes are available, such as the Arthrex Internal brace or the Zimmer-Biomet JuggerKnot, detailed on Orthoracle at https://www.orthoracle.com/library/brostrom-lateral-ligament-reconstruction-using-juggerknot-suture-anchorzimmer-biomet/
Evans procedure:Non-anatomical ligament reconstruction, routing Peroneus Brevis direct through a Fibula bone tunnel.
Chrismann-Snook: Anatomical ligament reconstruction remaking the ATF and CF Ligaments with Peroneus Brevis
CONTRAINDICATIONS.
-Congenitally lax soft tissues: In patients with a high Beighton score (who usually with multiple instabilities of other joints ) a tendon transfer procedure or other form of graft will be required to stabilise the joint.
-Revision cases: In cases where insufficient quality tissue is present beneath the fat layer of the ankle
–Heavy demand, Heavy athletes: This is very relative and subjective as a contra-indication.
Instability of neurological origin: for example an unstable cavo-varus, which will be more appropriately stabilised with a triple fusion or double fusion.

GA or regional anaesthetic
Popliteal block & local infiltration adequate for post-op pain relief
Patient supine or slight lateral tilt
(consider set up initially for ankle arthroscopy )
Rolled-up sterile towels behind the operated calf to ease access to postero-lateral aspect of ankle
Thigh tourniquet & Flowtron applied to non-operated calf.
Peri-operative antibiotics and LMW Heparin , to continue 2-4 weeks whilst in cast.

4 weeks in short post-operative cast, non-weight bearing
The first 2 weeks of this in back-slab
Dressing change at 2 weeks.
By 4 weeks into a medio-lateral stabilised ankle brace and commence full weight bear as soon as able.
Physio to commence, working on in-line ankle range and strength , progressing to balance and proprioceptive rehabilitation, including peroneal strengthening.
My own recommendation is that no specific mobilisations ( active or passive) are used on the subtalar joint. Circumducting the ankle does risk over-stressing the repair at an early stage. Adequate Subtalar movement will be regained during functional rehabilitation phase.
A static bike from 5 weeks, Cross-training from 7-8weeks and light -jogging likely to commence sometime after 10 weeks.
Initial return to sport is likely to require an appropriate brace for the first month.

The modified Brostrom procedure for lateral ankle instability
Foot & Ankle 1993 .14:1-7
W G Hamilton F M Thompson S W Snow
In a cohort of half professional dancers and half other a “double-breasting” soft tissue procedure was performed , including a discreet advancement of the fascia over Extensor digitorum Brevis (Gould modification).
28 reconstructions with no failures and 26 excellent results , 1 good and 1 fair followed up at a mean of 64 months.
The indications were either symptomatic dysfunction despite rehabilitation or a grade 3 laxity (in other words some patients may have been mechanically stable).
Clinical outcome after anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle ligaments using the Duquennoy technique in chronic lateral instability of the ankle
J Bone Joint Surg 90-B.2008. 50-56.
S P Muijs , P D S Dijkstra, C F A Bos
An advancement/tightening procedure for the ATF and CF ligaments without division of the ligaments.
A clinical follow up at a mean of 13 years. 48% excellent results , good in 33% and fair in 19%. Both Talar tilt and anterior drawer test remained improved significantly in all and were not statistically different from the contralateral side.
Surgical versus functional treatment for acute ruptures of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in young men
J Bone Joint Surg 2010.92. 2367-74.
H Pihlajamaki et al
Acute grade 3 lateral ligament ruptures (confirmed on stress X-Rays) in young Finnish men were treated either with ligament repair ( 15 persons available for long term review) or functional rehabilitation and ankle brace(18 persons available for long term review). They were followed up at a mean of 14 years. All returned to previous activity levels and there was no difference noted upon stress testing the ligaments. Re-injury level however was significantly higher in the conservatively treated group.
The aetiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot
Journal Bone Joint Surg (Br)1965 47:678-685
Freeman
Only 40% of lax ankles are symptomatically unstable
Reference
- orthoracle.com















