
Learn the Open femoral fracture bone defect treated with the Precice Bone Transport Nail (Nuvasive) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Open femoral fracture bone defect treated with the Precice Bone Transport Nail (Nuvasive) surgical procedure.
Femoral lengthening with distraction osteogenesis has traditionally been performed with the aid of an external fixator. In the femur these types of devices are not well tolerated by patients when compared to the tibia, but the long term use of external fixators brings with it common challenges, whatever their anatomical location. These routine complications are pin site infections, soft tissue tethering causing joint stiffness and malalignment of the bone axis and also the risk that the regenerate or docking site may re-fracture in the early stages after frame removal.
To address these technical inevitabilities various alternate methods have been tried including lengthening over an intramedullary nail in combination with an external fixator, lengthening initially with an ex-fix followed by early conversion to either an intramedullary nail or a plate, or more recently telescopic intramedullary nails.
In this case I detail the Precice Bone Transport Nail being used to treat an open femoral fracture with bone loss. This patient sustained multiple injuries including an ipsilateral open femoral fracture with bone loss, a tibial shaft fracture and a vertical shear medial malleolus fracture. The femoral fracture was treated according to BOA guidelines for open fractures as a combined Consultant led Ortho-Plastic case. Initial management was debridement, washout, temporary spanning external fixation and application of a negative pressure dressing. At 48-72 hours the patient returned to theatre for a planned procedure to convert the external fixator to an intramedullary nail and definitive soft tissue cover with split thickness skin grafts. The femur was nailed out to length with a cement spacer and then tertiary reconstruction was planned once all wounds had healed and no signs or symptoms of infection were present.
The Precice system is one such telescopic nail and has been available in the UK since 2011 and uses an external, handheld device to control a magnetic telescopic nail mechanism. The Precice Bone Transport System is intended for limb lengthening, open and closed fracture fixation and treatment of pseudarthrosis, malunions, nonunions or bone transport of long bones.
The Precice system uses propriety magnetic technology that controls the nail device with precision rate control using an External Remote Controller (ERC). Each patient’s lengthening prescription is customised based on the surgeon’s lengthening protocol and can be performed in the comfort of the patient’s own home.
Readers will also find of interest the following associated OrthOracle techniques:
Femoral intramedullary nail: Synthes Expert Lateral Femoral Nail (LFN) for impending pathological fracture.
Infected femoral nail removal and debridement with Synthes Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA)
Fixation of a diaphyseal femoral fracture with a Depuy-Synthes Expert retrograde/antegrade femoral nail (RAFN)
Intertrochanteric neck of femur fracture treated with a proximal femoral nail (Synthes long TFNA)

INDICATIONS
The Precice Bone Transport System is intended for elective limb lengthening cases, open and closed fracture fixation and treatment of pseudarthrosis, malunions, nonunions or bone transport of long bones.
It is important to understand how to plan the location of the osteotomies required. These are best located in the metaphyseal/diaphyseal region where there is a good blood supply to the bone and a larger surface area to generate bone. This means that the osteotomy can either be proximal or distal within the femur or in cases with very large defects – bi-focal. The decision will be determined by the defect location, defect size, and surgical treatment strategy.
The safe amount of acute shortening in the femur is approximately 3-5 cm before there is a risk of neurovascular compromise, therefore defects bigger then this should not be managed in this way.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
In a trauma case to determine if infection is present, you must examine the patient to ensure all wounds are well healed and there are no clinical signs of infection e.g. localised warmth, redness, swelling, systemic fever. Blood tests should be obtained, and normal inflammatory markers sought (e.g. white cell count – WCC; C-reactive protein – CRP; erythrocyte sedimentation rate – ESR). If there is an ongoing suspicion for infection then further imaging may be indicated (see below).
Once satisfied that there is no infection, then the deformity needs to be assessed. Clinical examination will reveal if there is any leg length discrepancy or malalignment / malrotation. Coleman blocks can be used under the affected limb and increased until the patient reports that they feel balanced and the examiner feels the pelvis is level. Alternatively true and apparent leg length measurements can be performed but personally I find these unreliable.
A Galeazzi test is used to determine which segment of the leg the shortening is in. This is performed on the examination couch with the patient supine and the pelvis level. The patient is asked to flex the hips so that the knees are flexed to 90 degrees. Both feet should be flat against the examination couch and the medial malleoli of both limbs should be next to one another (this assumes that there is no adduction or abduction deformity of the limb). It can also be useful to place the examiner’s hand behind the patients’ heels to ensure they are both level with each other. By inspecting the knees perpendicular to the limbs, the examiner can determine whether they are level on both the anterior and superior aspect (my preference is to inspect from the same side as the suspected deformity). If they are not level on the anterior aspect, this indicates shortening proximal to the knee (e.g. femur, hip or hemipelvis). If they are not level on the superior aspect, this indicates the shortening is below the knee i.e. in the tibia or hindfoot. If shortening is suspected proximal to the Greater Trochanter, then the Bryant’s triangle test is used to compare each side.
All joints should be assessed to determine their range of motion and if there is any deficit, this should be first addressed with physiotherapy prior to undertaking any further surgery.
In the prone position, the hip rotation is checked to see if there is either any restriction or malrotation of the femur. The thigh-foot angle is also checked to ensure that there is no tibial torsion that could be contributing to any malrotation of the limb.
Finally a careful neurovascular assessment is performed and all findings documented clearly.
IMAGING
Initial imaging will be with plain radiographs and in this case will reveal a bone defect with a cement spacer. These however are not scaled images so are unsuitable to be used for surgical planning.
If there is any concern that infection may be present, then either a White Cell labelled SPECT CT or White Cell labelled isotope bone scan should be obtained. An MRI scan may not answer the question as the interference from the in situ intramedullary nail could make the images non-diagnostic. Once satisfied that you have an infection free bed, surgical planning can continue.
Weightbearing long leg alignment views should be obtained in both the coronal and sagittal plane. These should be scaled images so that accurate measurements can be taken. An alternative to weightbearing alignment films is to use a CT tomogram (scanogram) however, this may not reveal any deformity that becomes apparent on loading e.g. articular or peri-articular deformity. CT scans are very good for assessing the rotational profile of the bone however, there is a normal variation between limbs in the same patient, so contralateral measurements are helpful but not an absolute true value.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Surgical treatment is both wide and varied. Options to consider for a mid-diaphyseal defect include:
Acute shortening and lengthen with a nail
Acute shortening and lengthen with a frame
Acute shortening and lengthen with a nail and frame (“nail and rail technique”)
Maintain length and bone transport with a frame
Maintain length and bone transport with a nail
Maintain length and bone transport with a frame with early conversion to a nail
Maintain length and use a Masquelet technique to address the defect. A Masquelet technique uses a cement spacer to create a pseudomembrane between the bone ends. Once formed and it’s an infection free bed, then the cement spacer is removed and replaced with bone graft. This technique has been reported in mean bone defects of 6.32cm (range 2-25cm) and is also a viable treatment method.
Wozasek G.E., Zak L. (2014) Acute Shortening and then Lengthening. In: Rozbruch S., Hamdy R. (eds) Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Surgery Case Atlas. Springer, Cham. pp 1-9.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Non-operative management is a viable option however, the defect cannot be left with just a cement spacer because eventually the in situ intramedullary nail will undergo fatigue failure. If non-operative management were to be pursued (e.g. in the context of deep infection) then the nail should be exchanged, the femur shortened (and ideally compressed to encourage union). The patient would have a short leg gait pattern but this could be accommodated with an orthosis. If the femur unites and infection recurs, then the implants can be removed and the bone debrided and the infection treated accordingly.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The main contraindication is deep infection. This must be eradicated first before any treatment is directed at the bone defect.
Other contraindications include: too narrow medullary canal; abnormal shape bone/pre-existing deformity; defect > 100mm, non-compliant patient; peripheral vascular disease; smoking.
Meng M, Papakostidis C, Xinbao W, Giannoudis PV. Mixed results with the Masquelet technique: A fact or a myth? Injury 2020. Feb 51 (2): 132-135.

For the conversion of the in situ intramedullary nail to a Precice Bone Transport Nail, then the setup is perhaps one of the most important steps of the operation. Further details will be provided within the operation section.
The patient will require a general anaesthetic as the duration of the procedure will be over 2 hours. I also like my patients to receive peripheral nerve blocks and feel that they won’t prevent the diagnosis of compartment syndrome should it develop.
Intravenous antibiotics are required and my preference is for them to be given prior to the skin incision. I do not take deep tissue samples for Microscopy, Culture and Sensitivity (MC&S) assessment. If I’m concerned about possible infection, then I wouldn’t be undertaking his procedure.
The patient is positioned on the traction table.
Two consultants should be present, as it will be a long case and may not strictly follow the surgical plan, so may need some higher order decision making.
A surgical plan should be clearly documented on the theatre white board, so that all members of the team can follow it.
The surgical plan was:
Removal of cement spacer
Lengthen femur – because pre-operatively we had found a 1cm deficit with no malalignment of malrotation.
Temporary stabilisation with a unicortical locking plate (to maintain length, rotation and alignment)
Removal of in situ femoral nail
Debridement of defect / squaring of the bone ends (to create parallel surfaces for docking)
Measurement of the femur to confirm it matches the pre-op planning and nail selection
Femoral canal intramedullary reaming
Corticotomy/osteotomy site identification (this can change depending on the nail size)
Perform the corticotomy/osteotomy
Insertion of the Precice Bone Transport Nail
Distal and proximal nail locking
Insertion of transport segment locking bolt
Testing the nail and insertion of subcutaneous locator stitch (used to show the patient where to place the external device when performing adjustments)
Wound washout, haemostasis, closure and dressings

Post-operative pain should be managed with blocks and a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) pump.
Bloods should be checked the following day to ensure that there hasn’t been a large drop in the haemoglobulin level and also that the renal function hasn’t been impaired.
The patient should be mobilised with physiotherapists and due to the nail diameter and maximum permitted weight allowance, the patient will be restricted to non-weightbearing (NWB). My preference however is to allow Foot Flat Feather WeightBearing (FFFWB), this allows the patient to put their foot on the floor but restricts the amount of load to that of a feather. This I feel prevents any equinus contractures of the calf and also prevents knee stiffness, as with NWB the patient would have to keep the knee slightly flexed in order to maintain ground clearance.
The sutures can be removed at 10-14 days (except the one of the ERC location).
The patient will be seen in clinic in 1 week to commence the transport programme and will have x-rays on arrival.

Calder PR, McKay JE, Timms AJ et al. Femoral lengthening using the Precice intramedullary limb-lengthening system. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B: 1168-1176.
In a study from the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (Stanmore, UK) they report the use of 100 Precice Lengthening Nails (both antegrade and retrograde). They treated defects ranging from 1.5cm to 8cm and calculated a mean healing index (HI) of 31.6 days/cm . The healing index is calculated by dividing the amount of time to union (in days) by the amount of lengthening (in cm). Overall they reported very good outcomes with only minor implant complications including a locking bolt migration and in one patient a deformed nail. No implants failed to lengthen and there were no deep infections. Three patients’ had delayed unions and five required surgical intervention for joint contracture.
Cosic F, Edwards E. Precice intramedullary nail in the treatment of adult leg length discrepancy. Injury 2020; 51: 1091-1096.
In a study by Cosic and Edwards they report the use of the Precice intramedullary lengthening nail for the treatment of limb length discrepancy. They reported 17 femoral lengthenings and four tibial lengthenings. Mean patient age was 36 years and 19 patients were male. Mean lengthening was 36 mm. All patients consolidated their regenerate bone however 6 patients had delayed healing and increasing age , number of prior operations and smoking were risk factors. Complications were reported in 4/21 patients: arterial injury to profunda femoris; anterior tibial compartment syndrome; delayed regenerate secondary to smoking and subsequent hypertrophic nonunion on cessation; one implant failure requiring exchange.
Hammouda AI, Jauregui JJ, Gesheff MG et al. Treatment of Post-Traumatic Femoral Discrepancy with Precice Magnetic-Powered Intramedullary Lengthening Nails. J Orthop Trauma 2017; 31(7): 369-374.
In a paper by Hammouda et al. they report on the outcomes of 17 femoral lengthenings using the Precice nail. Mean age 30 years. Mean consolidation index 32 days/cm. Three patients experienced complications: two premature consolidation (one elected for re-osteotomy, the other accepted being 1cm short of the target lengthening) and one neuropathy treated with nerve release. There were no implant failures.
The Precice nail mechanism appears to be reliable as there is only one reported failure out of 139 nails in these papers.
Reference
- orthoracle.com















































































