
Learn the Osteochondral grafting of the talus (OATS procedure) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Osteochondral grafting of the talus (OATS procedure) surgical procedure.
Autologous osteochondral grafting of the Talus is normally reserved as a secondary procedure after a failed microfracture.
Though there is some evidence that the high grade lesions do less well with an arthroscopic debridement and microfracture this is a much smaller operation than open grafting and a number will settle with no more intervention required.
It is key that the Osteochondral grafts are placed as precisely (and flush) with the existing articular surface as possible which in most cases means a malleolar osteotomy will be required.
Secondary interventions are also on occasion required post grafting and a return to normal and full function is not likely for at least 6 months.

INDICATIONS.
-For “salvage” after failed primary debridement of an steochondral defect
-For recurrence of a defect after initial resolution.
-Some advocate this as a primary operation for more extensive defects (though their is no strong evidence on which to base this).
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION.
The predominant complaint is ankle level pain , felt deeply within the joint. In the majority of cases this will have started with a recalled single ,significant trauma, most often a severe “sprain”. On occasion the ankle will have been fractured and symptoms have failed to settle after union . It is also well recognised that in a minority of patients there has been no trauma prior to onset of the condition. The localising of pain with respect to the exact location of the defect poorly correlates with its anatomical location within the ankle joint. Pain is usually on weight-bearing activity and often felt most during impact and sporting activity rather than normal day to day activity.
A number of these cases will present with a history of recurrent instability as well as pain and the question is whether this is mechanical due to an inter-current ligament laxity or whether it is more of a functional issue and due to the osteochondral joint pathology. Whatever the MRI findings these only indicate whether the lateral ankle ligaments (in particular) have been injured and is not an indicator of their likely stability .This is determined by an examination (which may only be definitive under anesthetic at the time of operative treatment).
If post-traumatic in onset the other conditions which can be produced by the same injury should also be considered and questioned and examined for. The roll call of the commoner other pathologies includes peroneal tendon tears or subluxation, tibialis posterior injury ,posterior ankle impingement, lateral talar process fracture, 5th metatarsal base injuries , occult malleolar fractures, pure syndesmotic ankle injuries.
Early arthritis should be considered in the differential diagnosis (see MRI section below)
In the specific scenario of a micro-fractured ankle that has failed to settle in the expected time Osteochondral grafting is not immediately required. Activity should continue to be limited and the joint off-loaded. An intra-articular injection of steroid and local anaesthetic is appropriate anywhere after 12 weeks post-operatively and the use of serial , monthly MRI scans to monitor progressive reduction in bone oedema and defect healing. A secondary arthroscopy may be indicated in those defects in whom the MRI has significantly improved but in whom symptoms persist. The inference would be a diagnosis of recurrent synovitis, arthrofibrosis or possibly some delamination of the new chondral layer.
Examination of an ankle with an isolated defect is often unrewarding with even minimal ankle joint tenderness. The additional pathologies listed above should also be examined for.
INVESTIGATION.
MRI: MRI is the standard investigation for both post-traumatic as well as most un-diagnosed ankle pain. It can be difficult on occasion to be sure of the state of the underlying bone if very significant oedema is present and in particular whether cystic change exists. Nevertheless it gives enough detail to plan operative treatment and to inform the Surgeon about the depth and extent of debridement required.
The investigation is not 100% sensitive either for pure chondral injuries which may escape it entirely or show as very subtle and limited subchondral oedema. How to treat a purely chondral defect with no underling structural bone defect is not well evidenced. It is legitimate to simply debride the loose chondral tissue back to stable chondral surface without necessarily micro-fracturing. Treating as per an Osteochondral defect is also legitimate though in my experience many Chondral injuries settle with just careful debridement.
An Osteochondral defect with contained (or uncontained) bony debris and areas of subchondral cavitation and sclerosis will need micro-fracturing or grafting.
Limited cystic peri-articular change also can be seen in early ankle arthritis. In this case it will usually effect adjacent tibial and talar articular surfaces unlike a true Osteochondral defect which will effect just one side. This is almost invariably the talar side though the lesion can also occur on the tibial articular surface. Sometimes it is only at Arthroscopy that the distinction between early arthritis and a defect can be made. The latter will not benefit from a micro-fracture or grafting but may be appropriately treated with a debridement.
As listed above there are a number of other conditions which will produce ongoing pain after an ankle injury. An MRI will be the investigation of choice to diagnose many of these also.
CT SCAN: This is better for identifying definitively the amount of cystic bone loss associated with the injury than can be determined by MRI. It is not required though for this but can be used as an alternative to MRI and is of use when metallic artefact will degrade the MRI signal.
X-Ray: On occasion an Osteochondral defect will be revealed on plain X-ray but this will only detect substantial defects and provides inadequate visualisation of the pathology to be used as a screening tool for the injury.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT.
Arthroscopic debridement and micro-fracture of the defect.
Retrograde drilling/micro-fracture of the defect under CT guidance.
Allograft transplantation.
Carticel transplantation. Patients own cells harvested , grown in culture then re-implanted.
CONTRAINDICATIONS.
The usual ones of inadequate vascularity , infection and poor patient compliance. Smoking should also be included as should the presence of arthritis.

GA or regional anaesthesia
Femoral & sciatic blocks for post-operative pain relief
Laminar flow , peri-operative antibiotics , 2-4 weeks of post operative LMW Heparin
Thigh tourniquet and Flowtron on contra-lateral calf
Ankle positioned into neutral using sandbags & side supports
Large , rolled up sterile towels behind the ankle to improve access for cuts.

2 weeks in back-slab
dressing changes at 1 & 2 weeks
Complete cast between weeks 2 to 6 & non-weight bear
Check X-ray at 6 week stage .
Into long post-operative boot and gradual increase in weight-bearing at this stage.
Start ankle & subtalar range and non-weight bearing strengthening program.
Once patient comfortable full weight-bearing in boot commence balance and proprioception program out of boot with physio.
May be comfortable enough to make transition into stiff soled walking boot by 9-10 weeks.
Bike & pool work weeks 12-18
Cross-training weeks 18-24
Light treadmill jog by week 24 earliest.
If equivocal improvement patient will require sequential MRI scans and may need further activity modification. On occasion local/steroid injection is required post surgery if synovitis occurs . A failure to respond to injection (with improving/fully settled MRI scan) may indicate some delamination of the chondral surface or the presence of arthro-fibrosis both of which are likely to require a theraputic arthroscopy if they fail to settle.

Outcome of osteochondral autograft transplantation for type-V cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus.
J Bone Joint surg.2006.88-B:614-619.
P.E.Scranton jr , C.C.Frey , K.S.Feder.
50 patients retrospectively reviewed at a mean of 36 months 90% with good or excellent outcome.
20% did however require a subsequent arthroscopy for ongoing symptoms and 4% needed fusion(both with degenerate ankles at the time of grafting).
A malleolar osteotomy only required in 26 of the 50 patients (10 lateral and 14 medial did not need one). 64% had undergone one previous operation and 22% had at least two operations.
Early results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in the talus.
J Bone Joint surg.2005.87-B:179-183.
J.Whittaker , G.Smith , N.Makwana, S.Roberts , P.E.Harrison , P.Laing ,J.B.Richardson.
10 patients with a mean 23 month follow up. 6 of these had already had surgical treatment, one with bone grafting.
9 pleased /extremely pleased & 1 unchanged.
9 patients re-scoped at average of 12 months and biopsied (defects healed in all and histology revealing mainly fibrocartilage with some hyaline cartilage. At 12 months ongoing minor knee symptoms in 7.
Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus.
J Bone Joint Surg.2003.85-B:989-993.
D.E.Robinson , I.G.Winson , W.J.Harries ,A.J.Kelly.
65 patients retrospectively reviewed who had undergone debridement and micro-fracture operation arthroscopically. Post op protocol allowed partial weight bearing for the initial 6 weeks.
51 were graded good or fair at a mean follow up of 3.5 years. Worse outcome noted in medial and also cystic lesions.
Osteochondral lesions of the Talus:A revised classification
Foot & Ankle Intl 1999. 20(2):789
Hepple S, Winson I , Glew D.
A useful MRI modification of the original Berndt & Harty plain X-Ray classification , now much adopted. Stage 1:articular cartilage damage 2a:cartilage damage with bone fracture & oedema 2b: cartilage damage with bone fracture & no oedema3:detached and undisplaced fragment 4: detached and displaced fragment 5:Subchondral cystic change.
Osteochondral defects of the Talus treated with autologous bone grafting.
J Bone Joint Surg (Br)2004;86-B:521-526
Kolker D, Murray M, Wilson M.
13 patients underwent curetting and grafting with autogenous cortico-cancellous graft .4 patients had already undergone previous micro-fracture surgery. Non-weight borne for 12 weeks post operatively.
4 patients required subsequent ankle fusion due to ongoing pain and the development of ankle arthritis (one after osteochondral grafting), 3 required osteochondral grafting due to ongoing pain .
7 patients were improved and required no further surgery , 5 with mild to moderate pain .
Engineering custom-designed Osteochondral tissue grafts
Trends Biotechnol 2008. 26(4):181-189.
Grayson WL et al
An excellent full text review of the tissue engineering side of manufacturing products for these defects
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2771165/
Reference
- orthoracle.com


























