
Learn the Rotational proximal tibial Osteotomy surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Rotational proximal tibial Osteotomy surgical procedure.
Anterior knee pain and patella instability is a common orthopaedic problem. It is estimated that the overall incidence of primary patella dislocation in the population is approximately 5.8 per 100,000, with a 5-fold increase in incidence between the ages of 10 to 17 years. Furthermore, the likelihood of recurrent instability after a primary dislocation is significantly higher (OR= 6.6, P<0.001) in individuals with preceding patella-femoral joint (PFJ) symptoms7. Young active individuals are particularly prone to develop sequelae that impair function with some studies reporting that up to 55% of patients fail to return to sports activity after this injury2,4. It is therefore paramount that once the diagnosis of PFJ dysfunction is made the precise cause is established in order to deliver optimal treatment.
PFJ pain and instability is a multifactorial problem. In addition to the soft tissue constraints around the knee, the osseous architecture together with overall rotational limb alignment (femoral version (FV), tibial torsion (TT) and knee joint rotation angle (KJRA)) contributes to the normal workings of the joint.
Paediatric orthopaedists are more likely to deal with these issues than their orthopaedic colleagues who see only adults. However, many adolescents transition into adulthood without the benefit of detection and correction of their malalignment and resultant patellar instability. Significant torsional malalignment is more common than generally appreciated and very often missed, despite being easy to detect. The approach to adults with patellar instability rarely includes evaluation, let alone correction of rotational abnormalities. Instead, most orthopaedists choose to deal independently with the consequences of the malalignment, such as patellar instability, patella alta, shallow femoral sulcus, increased Q-angle, lateral patellar compression, and so forth. Many of the corrective procedures for these associated conditions have enjoyed popular acceptance with good short-term results. However, there is concern regarding the development of late symptoms and arthritis. Thus, in many cases, these other procedures may need to be performed in combination with torsional realignment procedures, or may even be avoided altogether by restoring normal mechanical alignment. Relative to the inconsistent results of tibial tubercle transfer, many surgeons have chosen to use only proximal soft tissue procedures. In our opinion, failure to correct significant limb malalignment and the resultant valgus vector (patella) may ultimately invite soft tissue fatigue and stretching, even with the most robust reconstructions
With relation to lower limb rotational alignment, deformities of increased femoral neck anteversion, torsional deformities of the femoral shaft and external tibial torsion increase the risk of PFJ instability. Though there have been a number of studies that have been published on the methodology of measuring lower limb alignment, few studies quote a normal range for the various rotational parameters in a control population. Those that do, appear to have a high data range and subsequent standard deviation in the values calculated, likely due to limited sample sizes. The values I generally use as normal are:
Femoral anteversion 15 degrees
Knee Joint Rotation 8 degrees
Tibial torsion 23 degrees

SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Clinically, a full assessment of the patellofemoral joint is carried out. Patients with rotational mal-alignment are usually in valgus however they can occasionally be in varus. Patients walk with a typical “knee-in” gate secondary to tibial torsion. Patella height is assessed and the patella tracking observed. A positive J sign and apprehension sign is commonly present. Patients with tibial torsion may present with an increased Q angle however, this is not always the case.
IMAGING
Standard AP, Lateral and Skyline x-rays are obtained routinely. When rotational malalignment is present the AP view of the knee will show a AP of the tibia and an oblique view of the femur. The lateral view is used to calculate Blackburn peel index.
The severity of the rotational deformity and its location if suspected should be confirmed with a rotational CT scan. The Tibial Tubercle Trochlea Groove distance (TTTG) is calculated on the CT scan as this has been should to be more accurate than MRI.
The femoral neck axis was measured using the described technique by Hernandez et al., in 1981 as the axis created by a line passing through the centre of the femoral head and midpoint of the femoral neck in a cross-sectional CT cut where the femoral head, isthmus of the femoral neck and superior border of the greater trochanter are evident10. The transmalleolar axis 11 was measured as the axis created by a line connecting the centres of medial and lateral malleoli. Both these measurements have been advocated as being reliable methods of measurement by Liodakis et al as they are associated with lower inter and intra-observer variability13. The dorsal condylar line of the proximal tibia was taken as the axis line just distal to the articular surface of the tibial plateau and proximal to the fibular head. 11 Finally the distal femur reference was taken as the dorsal condylar line as described by Jend H.
MRI is undertaken if there is concern over the cartilage surfaces and to rule out other pathologies.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
All patients undergo a minimum of 3 months physiotherapy prior to considering operative intervention. A significant number of individuals can compensate for their rotational abnormality with focused therapy to improve their core strength, hip external rotators and general lower limb strength.
INDICATIONS FOR SURGERY
-Anterior knee pain originating from the PFJ
-Patella instability
-Tibial torsion: The threshold for correction is not fully established. A number of authors quote different value which are largely based on clinical examination. Indications suggested are a foot thigh angle of >30 degrees alternatively and tibial torsion of greater than 35 degrees. My personal indication for surgery is a rotational difference of greater that 50 degrees between the distal femoral angle and the transmaleolar angle.

The equipment required for the procedure includes:
A sagital saw – dimensions 2omm wide, 70mm long and approximately 0.89mm thick.
A 4.5mm AO basic set
Step staples of 5 and 10mm offset (traditionally used for closing wedge tibial osteotomy)
Newclip osteotomy plate and set.
2 x 3mm Steinman pins
Sterile goniometer

Two doses of antibiotics are given post-operatively. Patients are allowed to partial weightbear for 6 weeks. Flexion is limited to 40 degrees for 4 weeks and 0-90 between 4-6 weeks. A formal check x-ray is performed prior to discharge. Further X-rays are undertaken at 6 weeks prior to commencement of weightbearing to ensure evidence of healing. Caution should be used in patients with staple fixation in patients with little sign of healing as medial subsidence can occur. This risk is minimised with the use of a fixed angle plate construct.

Probably the best study to date comparing the results of rotational osteotomy versus tibial tubercle osteotomy for patients with a foot thigh angle of greater that 30degrees is by Paulos et al. Despite low numbers of patients they determined that simultaneous correction of ligament imbalance, excessive tubercle-sulcus angle, and lower limb torsional deformity produced significantly better results than conventional proximal-distal realignment. Gait analysis revealed patients who underwent rotational correction had more symmetrical gait patterns, with less variability and less compensatory gait changes, than those patients undergoing tibial tubercle osteotomy in isolation.
References
Surgical Correction of Limb Malalignment for Instability of the Patella. A Comparison of 2 Techniques. L. Paulos, S.C. Swanson, G. J. Stoddard, SB Westinll . AJSM Vol. 37, No. 7, 2009
Server F, Miralles RC, Garcia E, Soler JM. Medial rotational tibial osteotomy for patellar instability secondary to lateral tibial torsion. Int Orthop. 1996;20(3):153-158.
Lee TQ, Morris G, Csintalan RP. The influence of tibial and femoral rotation on patellofemoral contact area and pressure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(11):686-693.
Meister K, James SL. Proximal tibial derotation osteotomy for anterior knee pain in the miserably malaligned extremity. Am J Orthop. 1995;24(2):149-155.
Proximal tibial derotation osteotomy for torsional tibial deformities generating patello-femoral disorders. Fouilleron N, Marchetti E, Autissier G, Gougeon F, Migaud H, Girard. J.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010 Nov;96(7):785-92.
Reference
- orthoracle.com





























