
Learn the Talectomy and tibio-calcaneal fusion using Wright Ortholoc posterior TTC fusion plate surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Talectomy and tibio-calcaneal fusion using Wright Ortholoc posterior TTC fusion plate surgical procedure.
Pes planus is the deformity of the foot characterised by loss of the medial longitudinal arch with the foot under loading. More often than not, the hindfoot also lies in valgus deriving the term pes planovalgus. Secondary features of this deformity are that there may be a compensatory supination deformity of the midfoot and the Achilles tendon tightens and effectively becomes shorter in length.
There are multiple causes of pes planovalgus that can broadly be separated into congenital (eg tarsal coalition, hypermobility syndromes) and acquired groups. In adults, acquired pes planovalgus is most often seen with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction or with inflammatory arthopathies. Careful assessment of the patient’s symptoms and signs is necessary to guide the treatment options available for each individual patient.
Talectomy and tibiocalcaneal fusion is not a common procedure for pes planovalgus. Historically, it is more often associated with the management of fixed equinovarus deformities in childhood (eg arthrogryposis, post CTEV), Charcot arthropathy or post-traumatic deformity (invariably secondary to the loss of the talus). In this particular case, a 65 year old lady with rheumatoid arthritis presented with a stiff, painful flat foot. All footwear modifications had failed to relieve her symptoms.

INDICATIONS
The principle symptom that patients present with is pain. However, patients also complain of deformity and swelling which can be difficult to cater for in standard footwear. The indications for surgery are when non-operative measures have failed or been exhausted.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Pain is the foremost symptom. Quite often the pain is located along the medial hindfoot and radiating into the medial longitudinal arch. This pain may be from frank arthrosis of affected joints or from the load of weight bearing stressing abnormally aligned bony and soft tissue structures such as the posterior tibial tendon, spring ligament or plantar fascia. Not infrequently, the patient complains of pain located laterally in the hindfoot, especially along the fibula. This pain is due to the calcaneus impinging on the tip of the fibula. This chronic impingement can even be severe enough to cause a secondary stress fracture of the fibula. Besides the location of the pain, another features of the pain is that it is invariably aggravated by bearing weight and eased by rest. Relief may be provided by analgesics but is more likely to occur with supportive shoes and orthoses. In my experience, patients often volunteer that their foot has deformed or acknowledge this if you specifically ask them. It is important to take a detailed history exploring what footwear modifications have been tried to alleviate pain and control deformity as non-operative management forms a large part of any foot ankle surgeon’s practice.
There are other salient areas of the history that need to be explored. For example, in rheumatoid disease, it is important to know which other joints are effected by the disease including the upper limb as this has ramifications in the post-operative weight bearing regime. Equally, knowledge of the patient’s drug history is paramount as steroid use affects bone quality and may interfere with union. It is important to appropriately manage DMARDs in the peri-operative period. A full history of the patient’s social set-up at home is really important if you are considering significant hindfoot fusion surgery in any elderly patient but especially in the presence of systemic disease.
Examination should include alignment of the whole of both lower limbs and should include gait and standing assessments. A full neuromuscular examination is mandatory.
The soft tissue envelope needs to be inspected not only for previous surgical scars but also for the health and suppleness of the skin especially in the foot and ankle. The inspection should include the sole of the foot. Palpation often reveals tender areas, but it is the assessment of motion that is the key to decision making. As is always the case, in assessing deformity, it is important to determine flexibility and fixity of the foot. For me, this means starting with the ankle joint and assessing each joint in turn working proximally to distally looking for range of motion and reduction of the deformity. This is important because flexible planovalgus deformities can be managed with osteotomies and tendon transfers whereas fixed deformities require arthrodesis. Any tightness in the Achilles tendon does not affect the surgical approach as the tendon can be percutaneously released using a Hoke technique.
IMAGING
Plain radiographic imaging should be performed with the patient standing. The whole of the foot and ankle should be assessed when dealing with a planovalgus deformity. Usually this provides enough information especially in lesser deformities. However, if there is gross deformity or there is concern about the health of certain joint that cannot be determined from plain radiographic imaging, then a CT adds valuable information. In the following case, the deformity was so great that I felt I needed an even higher degree of imaging. In Sheffield, I am fortunate to have access to a 3D printing service which takes the CT images and can construct a 3D model of the foot to aid in my decision making (see operative technique).
In the case I am going to take you through, the patient had a severe, fixed planovalgus deformity with limited ankle dorsiflexion and stiff soft tissues over the lateral hindfoot. I was certain that any lateral approach would stretch with deformity correction and the 3D model allowed me to plan a medial approach and give me options about whether I needed to resect some or all of the talus in order to achieve a stable, plantigrade foot.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
In a fixed planovalgus foot deformity in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis, my usual operative plan would be to perform a triple fusion. In most cases, the deformity is not gross and this can be achieved with both a medial and lateral approach. Having corrected the deformity, it may also allow future total ankle replacement if the ankle becomes symptomatic. In this case, I did not know how easy it would be to mobilise the hindfoot to make it lie back under the tibial plafond but I was sure that the body of the talus needed excision in order to attempt to do so. Therefore, my initial operative plan was to cut the neck of the talus, resect the body of the talus and see if this was enough to correct the foot position. I intended to perform a tibio-calcaneal fusion and fuse the neck of the talus too the anterior aspect of the tibia.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
In flexible planovalgus deformities, orthoses in the form of insoles to restore the medial longitudinal arch can, and should be tried. Occasionally specifically designed ankle braces can also be worn to correct the deformity. In these instances, physiotherapy can also add to the management programme by attempting to strengthen the tibialis posterior tendon.
In fixed planovalgus deformities, orthoses accommodate for the deformity and try and prevent further joint motion. Frequently, this takes the form of an ankle-foot orthosis that is customised to the patient’s foot shape and allows either off-the-shelf or bespoke shoes to be worn over it.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Be very aware of the red, swollen and unstable planovalgus foot with little pain. This presentation should raise the suspicion of a neuropathic foot undergoing a Charcot process. The management of this condition is very different.
Open incisions to the ankle in the presence of diabetes, vascular disease or metabolic compromise from steroid treatment are relative contra-indications for surgical intervention. It may be safe practice to obtain a formal vascular assessment in cases of severe deformity planned for significant acute correction.
Lastly, an operation such as this needs the patient to be fully involved with their post-operative management. Therefore, it is important to gauge their level of compliance and also to be frank about the consequences of the procedure on their day to day living. It is also important for them to understand the possible complications of the procedure. I warn them that there foot will never be “perfect” and that they will, at best, feel better than they were before the surgery. They need to know that they may still require bespoke foot wear because resecting the talus mean that the foot adopts an abnormal shape. I warn about infection, nerve injury, continued pain, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and possible limb loss in such major reconstruction surgery.

The patient is positioned supine on the operating table and may benefit from a sandbag placed under the contralateral buttock so that the foot is positioned to allow comfortable medial access to the hindfoot (see operative photographs). In addition, the leg must be manoeuvrable to permit fluoroscopic evaluation. Fluoroscopy should be available with an image intensifier and a trained radiographer.
Appropriate antibiotics are administered and a thigh tourniquet and exclusion drape are applied. The limb is prepared with Chlorhexidine from toes to tourniquet.

The patient is placed in a below the knee back slab for the first two weeks after surgery. This is purely to rest the soft tissues after such major surgery. At two weeks, the wounds are inspected and re-dressed and a complete, lightweight below-the-knee cast is applied for a further four weeks. Weight bearing is not permitted for the first six weeks after surgery. Given the patient is elderly and compromised by rheumatoid arthritis, the best way of protecting the surgical site is to ask the patient to mobilise with a Zimmer frame that has arm gutters. In my practice, rivaroxaban is prescribed for this duration to prevent thrombo-embolic events even in the absence of studies to support its use. With the extent of surgery, any leaky wounds may necessitate ceasing thromboprophylaxis.
At six weeks, the patient can commence weight bearing in a walking cast. An off-the-shelf walker boot may not be well tolerated as it is designed to conform to a foot and ankle with a talus present!
At twelve weeks, the foot is assessed radiographically with standing views in three planes before abandoning further immobilisation.
Given that this is a fusion procedure, there is no indication for physiotherapy other than to aid with safety using crutches and regaining confidence in bearing weight using the walker boot.

Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis for the management of severe ankle and hindfoot deformities. MS Myerson, RG Alvarez, PWC Lam. Foot Ankle Int 2000; 21(8): 643-650.
This is the largest series of cases describing this surgical technique. It describes a heterogenous group of pathologies that underwent the procedure, including for pes planovalgus in inflammatory arthropathies. In this era, laterally-applied blade plates were used for fixation. Documented complications included stress fracturing at the proximal tip of the plate and non-union.
Tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis with posterior blade plate in diabetic neuroarthropathy. M Cinar, A Derincek, S Akpinar. Foot Ankle Int 2010; 31(6): 511-516.
This small case series demonstrated a 75% union rate with a posteriorly applied blade plate in the poor quality bone and soft tissues associated with diabetic neuroarthropathy.
Talectomy and tibiocalcaneal arthrodesis with intramedullary nail fixation for treatment of equinus deformity in adults. S Gursu, H Bahar, Y Camurcu et al. Foot Ankle Int 2015; 36(1); 46-50.
This contemporary paper has excellent fusion rates in the classic causes of fixed equinovarus deformities. They note no post-operative complications by not formally attempting to fuse the tibio-navicular interface.
Reference
- orthoracle.com







































