
Learn the Tibial fracture non-union correction using Taylor Spatial Frame (Smith and Nephew) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Tibial fracture non-union correction using Taylor Spatial Frame (Smith and Nephew) surgical procedure.
Tibial non-union occurs in approximately 5% of fractures although rates are higher following open fractures with an incidence of up to 40% in Gustilo-Anderson 3B open tibial fractures.
There is no agreed radiological definition of non-union although the RUST system (Radiological Union Score of Tibia) can be used as a guide. AP and lateral x-rays are assessed with each of the four visible cortices given a score from 1-3 (1- no callus, 2- bridging callus, 3- bridging callus fracture not visible) with a score of 10 or more representing radiological union. An often quoted definition of non-union is a fracture that has not healed by 9 months or has shown no progression of healing on X-rays taken 3 months apart. However many open fractures take over 9 months to heal and often fractures that are slow to heal need nothing more than time to achieve union. A pragmatic (although subjective) definition of non-union therefore is an absence of healing radiologically with ongoing symptoms where union is not anticipated without further intervention.
Non-union can be classified in a number of ways. The commonest is to divide them into hypertrophic, oligotrophic or atrophic. In hypertrophic non-union there is callus formation but persistence of the fracture and the primary issue is considered to be mechanical with inadequate stability. In atrophic non-union there is minimal callus formation and the underlying issue is biological (non-viable bone ends, poor vascularity). Oligotrophic non-unions sit between the two extremes with a mixture of biological and mechanical causes. Non-unions with infection or bone loss are separate entities.
Non-union can be due to a multitude of factors and the management is tailored to addressing those factors. Patient factors include medical conditions such as vascular disease and diabetes with poor control or complications. Smoking is a well recognised cause of complications after fracture fixation with an increased time to union and significantly increased risk of non-union. Endocrine abnormalities, such as hypothyroidism may contribute to non-union and vitamin D deficiency is a common finding in those with non-union although it is uncertain if this is causative and whether correction of vitamin D improves healing. A number of drugs are considered to impair bone healing including steroids. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAID’s) have long been blamed for impairing bone healing however there is a lack of good quality evidence demonstrating that NSAID use causes non-union (rather than patients with non-union taking NSAID’s because their leg hurts).
In addition to patient factors a number of factors relating to the fracture and its treatment may contribute to the development of non-union. These can be thought of in terms of 4 S’s.
Sterile. Is there an underlying infection relating either to the original injury (eg open fracture) or its subsequent treatment?. Fracture related infection is a common cause of non-union and even fractures assumed to be aseptic may be found to be infected following intra-operative sampling at the time of non-union surgery.
Straight. Has the limb been adequately aligned?. Restoring the mechanical alignment of lower limb fractures is essential to restore the biomechnical environment and normalise the forces acting across the bone to facilitate healing.
Stable. Fixation with incorrect stability is probably the commonest cause of non-union. Most often this relates to inadequate stability at the fracture site producing a hypertrophic non-union but non-union can also be caused by fixation producing a mechanical environment that is too stiff, this normally occurs when locked plates are used with too many screws and a gap at the fracture site- the construct is so stiff that micro-movement is abolished and an atrophic non-union results. The relationship of the bone healing unit and mechanical strain is eloquently outlined in the BJJ article by Elliott et al, in essence for bone formation and fracture union the strain at the fracture site must reduce with time in accordance with Perren’s strain theory (bone forms when strain is <2%).
Stimulate. In some fractures the bone healing unit has ‘switched off’ and needs stimulating to restart either with bone graft or other stimulation techniques.
Ring fixators are used in tibial non-unions for a variety of indications. They can be used simply to add stability to a hypertrophic non-union, as distraction in a frame is a reliable way of reducing strain at the fracture site and achieving union. They are particularly useful in cases where infection is confirmed or suspected, the small foot print of the frame avoids having metalwork in an infected field. Intercurrent deformity can be addressed with ring fixators allowing a gradual deformity correction which avoids placing undue stress on soft tissues and particularly when acute correction may stretch nerves too rapidly and cause a nerve injury.
The Taylor Spatial frame (TSF) uses six adjustable struts across the working segment, in place of the traditional Ilizarov threaded rods, to create a hexapod. The hexapod is an engineering concept, the use of 6 adjustable struts allows deformity correction in any plane. This concept is based on the Stewart Gough platform and in combination with the software allows the frame to be programmed to simultaneously correct deformity in any plane via a ‘virtual hinge’. The TSF is thus a powerful tool for correcting complex deformities as well as sharing the advantages of traditional Ilizarov frames in the treatment of infected non-unions.
Readers will find the following OrthOracle techniques also of interest:
Tibial shaft fracture: Fixation with a Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) circular external fixator (Smith and Nephew)
Tibial intramedullary nailing (suprapatella approach): Synthes Expert Tibial Nail.
Distal tibial fracture managed with fixator assisted Synthes Expert tibial nail with supra-patella nail approach and blocking screw
Compartment fasciotomy and Hoffmann 3 spanning external fixator for open tibial fracture

INDICATIONS
Treatment is offered to patients with non-union associated with ongoing symptoms or with failing metalwork.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
A detailed history is essential and begins with gaining an understanding of the original injury and its treatment- was it an open fracture, were there any wound healing problems following index surgery or the need for antibiotics in the post-operative period (all raising the suspicion of an underlying infection). As well as gauging the present symptoms and their impact on function it is important to understand the progression of symptoms over time. Most patients with tibial non-union will present with pain and limited mobility and often there are significant limitations on work and activities of daily living. The history must also include details of medical problems which may contribute to the development of non-union, current medications and smoking history, which must also include use of cannabis, vaping or nicotine patches all of which may impair bone healing.
Examination starts with assessment of overall limb alignment with the patient standing and lying (this includes rotational alignment with the patient prone). Careful attention must be paid to the previous surgical incisions, presence of any sinuses, and the overall condition of the soft tissues as well as the neurovascular status of the limb.
IMAGING
Investigation of non-union begins with routine imaging which should be compared with imaging from the time of injury and over recent months to assess for any progression of union or attempt at healing.
Plain films will allow assessment of whether a hypertrophic non-union (callus is present on xrays with broad”elephants foot” bone ends’ seen on both sides of the fracture) or atrophic non-union (no callus present on xray with “rats tail” bone ends- thinned bone ends) is present. This helps to guide whether the underlying problem is mechanical (most cases) or biological. In addition I routinely perform blood tests for FBC, CRP,ESR (although normal markers do not exclude infection), thyroid function and vitamin D levels.
In many cases CT is a useful adjunct to plain xrays, this helps to determine if there is any attempt at healing (callus seen) and delineate the plain of the fracture non-union- multi-fragmentary fractures often resolve to a single plane non-union where the mechanical strain is concentrated as the rest of the fracture heals.
The possibility of infection must always be considered in any non-union, this may be obvious from the history and examination (wound healing problems, sinus with purulent discharge) but in equivocal cases nuclear scans such as SPECT-CT are useful adjuncts.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Broadly speaking patients with tibial non-union have 3 treatment options. The first is non-operative treatment and acceptance of ongoing symptoms. The second is limb salvage surgery, the nature of which is determined by the causes of the non-union (eg eradication of infection, realignment of the limb, augmentation of stability). The final option, particularly in those with severely infected non-unions and very poor function is amputation which in complex cases may be a more reliable way to restore function to the limb. Amputation should not be considered as a treatment failure but as a valid reconstructive operation in selected patients. In all cases where surgery is considered pre-operative optimisation is essential, this may involve referral to other specialties to manage co-morbidities such as diabetes, vascular disease or endocrine abnormalities and often involves the patient giving up smoking and nicotine.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Contraindications to surgery are type “C” hosts in whom the risks of treatment outweigh the benefits (treatment is worse than the disease), this includes those with significant frailty but also those with a history of substance abuse or those with non-reconstructable limbs due to significant co-morbidities such as severe vascular disease in whom limb salvage is unlikely to be successful.

For tibial non-union the patient is normally positioned supine, I prefer to use a radiolucent table which allows good quality imaging but also makes access for the image intensifier easier which facilitates the ‘flow’ of the case.
I generally do not use a tourniquet to avoid ischaemic insult to the limb but also to allow confirmation that all tissues have the capacity to bleed and are viable.
Antibiotics are given but in cases where infection is suspected these are withheld until bone samples have been taken and we follow our bone infection protocol of using vancomycin and meropenem which cover 98% of organisms implicated in fracture related infection.

Departmental xrays are taken to allow the TSF software to be programmed and the residual deformity corrected. This is done gradually over 1-2 weeks to avoid undue tension on the wound and soft tissues.
The pin site dressings are changed every 48 hours for the first week and following that the patient will change them every week, the leg and frame can be washed with simple soap in the shower (which is advisable if the patient wishes to avoid the wrath of the limb reconstruction nurses).
Once the deformity is corrected the patient can fully weight bear in the frame. VTE prophylaxis is continued until full weight bearing commences. Physio for knee and ankle motion starts immediately, full weight bearing begins once the deformity correction is completed.
In this instance post-operative antibiotics were continued as per our bone infection protocol (vancomycin and meropenem) until the intra-operative microbiology results were available (usually around 1 week for final results)- the samples were all negative and therefore given the negative pre-op imaging and no intra-operative findings suggestive of infection they were stopped.
In this case, our plan to convert to a nail was thwarted by delayed healing of the surgical wound and the orthoplastic MDT consensus was that converting the frame to internal fixation was too risky, given the patients high risk of wound healing problems or infection, and therefore the frame has remained as definitive treatment. I would generally advise that union would take between 6 and 12 months for a tibial non-union of this type.

D. S. Elliott, K. J. H. Newman, D. P. Forward, D. M. Hahn, B. Ollivere, K. Kojima, R. Handley, N. D. Rossiter, J. J. Wixted, R. M. Smith, C. G. Moran.
A unified theory of bone healing and nonunion BHN theory
The Bone & Joint JournalVol. 98-B, No. 7 Annotation. doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B7.36061
This is a consensus paper which applies basic principles of fracture healing to develop our understanding of non-union. In essence Perren’s strain theory suggests that as bone healing progresses the strain within the ‘Bone healing unit’ must reduce so that callus can change to bone. Non-union occurs when either the mechanical or biological environment is not favourable for bone formation- the authors suggest that most non-unions are due to mechanical issues and therefore the treatment should be focussed on addressing the mechanical factors in the bone healing unit.
Mark R Brinker 1 , Bryan D Hanus 2 , Milan Sen 3 , Daniel P O’Connor 4. The devastating effects of tibial nonunion on health-related quality of life. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 18;95(24):2170-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00803. PMID: 24352770 DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00803
This paper highlights the severe effect tibial non-union has on quality of life- which is worse than patients living with heart failure post-myocardial infarction and often involves young patients of working age. An essential read for all hospital managers.
S Robert Rozbruch 1 , Jacob S Pugsley, Austin T Fragomen, Svetlana Ilizarov. Repair of tibial nonunions and bone defects with the Taylor Spatial Frame. J Orthopaedic Trauma
. 2008 Feb;22(2):88-95. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162ab49.
This is a case series of 38 patients with tibial non-union managed with Taylor Spatial frames, 71% healed following index procedure and overall union was achieved in 95%. Infection was associated with a higher risk of treatment failure.
M. A. CATAGNI. ATLAS FOR THE INSERTION OF TRANSOSSEOUS WIRES AND HALF-PINS
ILIZAROV METHOD. Copyright 2003 Medi Surgical Video, Department of Medicalplastic srl, Via Mercadante, 15 – 20124 Milan – Italy
This invaluable resource not only gives a brief summary of the surgical principles of frame application but also provides detailed cross sectional diagrams outlining safe corridors for wire and half pin insertion in each limb.
Reference
- orthoracle.com

























































