
Professional Guidelines Included
Learn the Tibial intramedullary nailing (suprapatella approach): Synthes Expert Tibial Nail surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Tibial intramedullary nailing (suprapatella approach): Synthes Expert Tibial Nail surgical procedure.
There are various ways to manage tibial fractures in general and compound tibial fractures in particular. Where the local expertise exists the council of perfection involves collaborative management by Orthopaedic surgeons and their Plastic surgical colleagues. Open fractures should be managed according to the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) & British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) Audit Standards for Trauma [BOAST – Open Fractures; December 2017].
We present the case of an isolated open tibial diaphyseal fracture that has been stabilised with an Expert Tibial Nail. In a combined Ortho-Plastic approach, the wound is debrided and washed out prior to making a partial medial fasciotomy incision. Through this separate incision, the bone ends are delivered, debrided, washed out and the wounds then closed primarily. The fracture is held and reduced with the Staffordshire Orthopaedic Reduction Machine (STORM – designed and distributed by Metaphysis) and then a suprapatella tibial nailing is performed.
A recent meta-analysis [Wang et al 2018] suggested that potential advantages of the suprapatella approach for tibial nailing might include shorter fluoroscopy time, reduced knee pain and improved knee recovery as well as more accurate fracture reduction compared to the more common approaches.
The Expert Tibial Nail from Depuy Synthes is a titanium alloy nail which has advanced proximal and distal locking options that assist in the control and stabilisation of difficult fracture patterns. This allows either very proximal or very distal fractures to be controlled. Distally there is also a screw angle specifically for Tillaux type fracture fragments. Proximally there are also cancellous locking bolts that give enhanced bone purchase in this region. The insertion of an end cap locks the most proximal locking bolt and converts the nail / proximal locking bolt into a fixed angle construct. Depuy expert nails are available as both solid and cannulated nails. Importantly the ball tipped guide wire will pass through the nail, so that it doesn’t have to be exchanged after reaming and prior to nail insertion. For suprapatella nailing the same nails are used which means no additional implants are required (though there is a different insertion handle and instrumentation tray).

INDICATIONS
Open fractures should be managed according to the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) & British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) Audit Standards for Trauma [BOAST – Open Fractures; December 2017]. Debridement should be performed using fasciotomy lines for wound extension where possible and under the combined care of an orthopaedic and plastic surgeon. Highly contaminated wounds (agricultural, aquatic, sewage) should be debrided immediately. Solitary high energy open fractures should be surgically debrided within 12 hours of injury and low energy open fractures within 24 hours of injury.
Tibial fractures should be assessed for length, alignment and rotation. According to Trafton, up to 15mm of shortening can be tolerated. Varus-valgus alignment should be less than 5 degrees and antero-posterior alignment less than 10 degrees. Rotation should also be less than 10 degrees, particularly internal rotation, as the inwardly turned foot can catch on the contralateral limb.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Initially wounds should only be handled to remove gross contamination and then photographed, prior to covering with a saline soaked gauze. We no longer perform “mini-washouts” in the emergency department. Antibiotics should be given within 1 hour of the injury.
Both open and closed injuries should have a full peripheral nerve and pulse examination. Examination should be clearly documented with specific mention of each peripheral nerve and pulse tested. It is not adequate to document “neuro-vascularly intact”. All assessors should be aware of the possibility of developing compartment syndrome and look to exclude it. The leg has 4 compartments; deep posterior, superficial posterior, anterior and lateral. If pain seems disproportionate and is exacerbated by passively stretching the compartment contents, then there should be a low threshold for performing fasciotomies (Medial incision; deep and superficial posterior compartments. Lateral incision; anterior and lateral compartments).
IMAGING
Plain radiographs in two orthogonal planes are the universal standard however, a significant proportion of distal third tibial fractures will have an additional ankle posterior malleolus injury, which may require surgical stabilisation. It is my routine practice to obtain a CT scan of the ankle in distal third tibial fractures, and a CT of the knee in proximal third fractures to exclude any involvement of the tibial plateau.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Diaphyseal tibial fractures in adults are rarely treated with plates due to the higher incidence of infection. The tibia is subcutaneous and the skin and soft tissues over a diaphyseal fracture are often insufficient and can breakdown.
Tibial fractures can also be treated with either an external fixator / circular frame. These have a much broader range of fracture patterns that they can used in however, the patient must be counselled on the daily participation that is required in the management of their injury.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
All tibial fractures could be treated with either traction or a cast however, the risks of malalignment are high and the ankle joint is susceptible to developing post-traumatic osteoarthritis. It is very difficult for a cast to prevent 5 degrees of varus-valgus malalignment and it is also difficult for patients to mobilise nonweightbearing in a cast. Once the fracture becomes ‘sticky’ and the alignment is maintained, then a full weightbearing Sarmiento cast is well tolerated by patients but only certain fracture patterns are amenable to this treatment e.g. stable transverse configuration.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
In extensive soft tissue injuries, if the wound cannot be adequately closed / covered, then the risks of deep infection are significant. In these cases, an external fixator is preferable.
Any history of previous deep infection should be avoided and not treated with an intramedullary nail.
The diameter of the medullary cavity should always be assessed prior to considering intramedullary nailing, as the smallest diameter Expert Tibial Nail is 8mm.
Open growth plates are a relative contraindication depending on the patient’s age and their skeletal maturity.
A previous malunion will be difficult to nail and may need a corrective osteotomy.

The procedure can be performed under either a general anaesthetic or a general anaesthetic and regional block combination. If using a regional block, then both the femoral and sciatic / popliteal nerves will need to be anaesthetised. The femoral nerve block will give cover to the anterior knee and the saphenous nerve distribution around the medial malleolus. The sciatic / popliteal nerve block will help with the pain from the fracture reduction / reaming.
A systematic review of regional anaesthesia and patient controlled analgesia and compartment syndrome in orthopaedic surgical procedures found that 75% of papers published after 2009 concluded that regional anaesthesia does not put patients at an increased risk of a delayed diagnosis of compartment syndrome. [Driscoll et al 2016]
I don’t worry about the possibility of ‘masking’ a compartment syndrome, as I feel the pain from a compartment syndrome will exceed the analgesia / anaesthesia offered by the block. I do however, pre-select my cases, so patients with hyper-acute injuries that are operated on within hours of injury or have high risk mechanisms such as crush injuries, are ones where I would cautiously use a block. If however, I have performed fasciotomies, then I’d prefer them to receive a block before being woken up, as the compartments have been released and the pain from the released compartment syndrome / surgical wounds will be high.
There are many ways that a patient can be positioned for a tibial nail. These include:
Supine for a semi-extended / suprapatella approach
Supine with a bolster or radiolucent triangle for an infra-patella approach
Supine in a figure of 4 position for an infra-patella approach
Supine on the fracture traction table
I’ve used all of the above and find that my preferred positioning is for a suprapatella approach. The radiolucent triangle works well but it’s difficult to maintain the fracture reduction. The figure of 4 position relies on having a very good assistant, as they are relied upon to maintain the reduction and prevent eccentric reaming. It’s also possible to induce varus malalignment. The fracture traction table is good for maintaining the reduction but the table sometimes obstructs the radiographers and in low distal third fractures, the boot / foot plate is difficult to prep around. This can be resolved with a calcaneal wire / Denham pin but in these cases, I’d default to suprapatella and use the Staffordshire Orthopaedic Reduction Machine (STORM).
Tourniquet – I never use a tourniquet because of the risk of thermal necrosis to the bone and overlying soft tissues. I want the circulating blood to help cool the bone and dissipate any heat generated from reaming or nail insertion.

Having completed the procedure, the wounds / injury can be classified according to the Gustilo and Anderson classification (JBJS Am 1976):
Low energy wounds:
I – wound less than 1cm
II – wound greater than 1cm
High energy wounds:
IIIa – adequate soft tissue cover
IIIb – periosteal stripping of the bone / extensive soft tissue injury
IIIc – vascular injury requiring repair
The patient is observed for compartment syndrome.
They are mobilised full weightbearing (FWB).
They do not require thrombo-prophylaxis, unless they have any personal risk factors.
The wounds are reviewed at 10-14 days and any sutures are removed.
An x-ray is obtained at 2 weeks and 6 weeks post-operative.

In a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing intramedullary nailing versus plating for extra-articular distal tibial metaphyseal fractures [Xue et al 2014]. They found that intramedullary nailing may be preferential to plating with lower risks of infection; 5% (19/369) nailing versus 11% (35/326) plating. However, intramedullary nailing showed a higher malunion rate; 15%(68/443) nailing versus 6% (22/399) plating.
Driscoll E, Maleki A, Jahromi L et al. Regional anesthesia or patient-controlled analgesia and compartment syndrome in orthopedic surgical procedures: a systematic review. Local and regional anesthesia (2016) 9:65-81.
Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am (1976) 58;4:453-458.
Wang C, Chen E, Ye C et al. Suprapatellar versus infrapatellar approach for tibia intramedullary nailing: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg (2018) 51:133-139.
Xue XH, Yan SG, Cai XZ et al. Intramedullary nailing versus plating for extra-articular distal tibial metaphyseal fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury (2014) 45:667-676.
Reference
- orthoracle.com













































































