
Professional Guidelines Included
Learn the Tibial shaft fracture: Fixation with a Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) circular external fixator (Smith and Nephew) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Tibial shaft fracture: Fixation with a Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) circular external fixator (Smith and Nephew) surgical procedure.
The TSF was designed by the Taylor brothers in 1994 and has become one of the most widely used external fixation systems. It utilises two rings that are connected by six diagonal struts. The frame can be connected to the bone with an almost limitless combination of half pins and fine wires that allow it to be used in a wide variety of conditions. In the acute trauma setting, advantages include minimal soft tissue disruption and early weightbearing. It is particularly useful in cases at risk of deep infection or where residual deformity may need correcting e.g. bone loss or planned deformity to allow for soft tissue cover.
The Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) is a modern hexapod external fixator that is able to correct six axes of deformity simultaneously using a virtual hinge (a hexapod is a six-legged structure). If you are unfamiliar with deformity correction, then the concept of six axes may need some explanation. We are used to thinking of structures in three dimensions with an x, y and z axis. However, rotation is possible around any of these axes, therefore six axes in total.
A deformity may be either an isolated angulation, translation, rotation in any plane; or length discrepancy; or a combination of them in more than one plane. For any deformity, it is important to identify the “Centre Of Rotation of Angulation (CORA)”. The CORA is the point around which a deformity can be corrected to resolve the deformity without incurring any translation. For example, with a tibial shaft malunion showing a valgus deformity in the coronal plane only (i.e. no sagittal or axial plane deformity), then to identify the CORA, the anatomic axis of both segments is drawn and where these lines intersect, this is the CORA. If an osteotomy is performed at this level and the deformity is corrected using an Ilizarov external fixator, then the hinges should be placed directly in line with the CORA (i.e. one in front and one behind and both should line up perfectly with the CORA when viewed in the coronal plane). When the deformity is corrected, the bone will become perfectly straight and the axes proximal and distal to the deformity will align with each other.
Now imagine you have the same deformity but there is also a rotational malalignment to the limb e.g. the foot is internally rotated. To correct the deformity using an Ilizarov construct, you would have to correct the valgus deformity first and then re-build the frame to correct the rotational deformity (or vice versa). This often requires another anaesthetic, as the Ilizarov frame will be destabilised in the process and this can be painful for the patient. With a hexapod fixator, both deformities can be corrected simultaneously by differentially altering the length of the six struts that connect the two rings of the fixator. There are therefore no hinges used in a hexapod system however, the software that calculates the “prescription / programme” for adjusting the struts uses a virtual hinge which is in fact the same as the CORA of the deformity.
For this patient’s fracture pattern, the majority of surgeons would probably use an intra-medullary nail. However, due to the patient sustaining a compartment syndrome, a fat embolism from an ipsilateral femoral fracture and then taking more than 2 weeks to recover from their other injuries, we felt a frame would be a safer option.
Readers will also find the following OrthOracle techniques of interest:
Minimally invasive distal tibial osteotomy and correction of deformity with the Taylor Spatial Frame
Tibial intramedullary nailing (suprapatella approach): Synthes Expert Tibial Nail.

INDICATIONS
Tibial fractures are the most common long bone fracture. Due to the subcutaneous nature of the tibia, they are often open injuries and require soft tissue reconstruction with a combined OrthoPlastic approach. This is emphasised in the British Orthopaedic Association Standard for Trauma (BOAST) for the management of “Open Fractures”.
Open fractures are classified using the Gustilo and Anderson system. It should be noted that a high energy mechanism of injury is immediately a grade III (regardless of the wound size). Also most tibial fractures in patients aged less than 60 years old are usually high energy injuries (unless the patient has a metabolic bone condition).
Grade I – wound less than 1cm
Grade II – wound greater than 1cm but without extensive soft tissue damage
Grade IIIa – periosteal stripping but can be closed primarily
Grade IIIb – same as IIIa but requires a flap to close the wound
Grade IIIc – same as IIIa but has an associated vascular injury
It is important to note, that the Gustilo and Anderson grade is only determined after the wound has been surgically debrided.
In acute fractures, the indications for when to use a frame are often surgeon specific. There are no absolute indications and usually a good case can be made for using other methods of fixation. I would choose to use a frame in preference to another implant in the following circumstances:
Intra-articular fractures with diaphyseal extension (often in combination with peri-articular screws)
Residual deformity (e.g. to allow soft tissue cover)
Bone loss
Segmental fractures not amenable to nailing
Peri-articular fractures where segment hold and control would be an issue (e.g. very low distal 1/3 fracture where a nail would have insufficient control)
Poor soft tissues where plating would be at a high risk of wound complications
Open injuries that are at high risk of deep infection or delayed / non-union
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Tibial fractures are very painful and often the leg is clinically deformed. This should be corrected immediately and splinted, as this relieves tension on the skin / soft tissues and is often much more comfortable for the patient. If the bone is protruding through the skin, then this should be reduced. The leg needs to be assessed for a posterior tibial and dorsalis pedis pulse. Also a peripheral nerve examination is required and the results should be carefully documented. Peripheral nerves to test include:
Saphenous (medial malleolus)
Deep peroneal (1st webspace)
Superficial peroneal (dorsum of the foot)
Sural (base of 5th metatarsal)
Medial and lateral plantar (medial and lateral sole of the foot)
Open fractures should only have gross contamination removed and a mini-washout in the emergency department is not indicated. Wounds should be photographed and covered with a saline soaked dressing and intravenous antibiotics should be administered immediately.
Compartment syndrome should always be considered and ruled out. Compartment syndrome is defined a rise in the osseo-fascial compartment pressure such that there is decreased perfusion of the compartment contents. The clinical symptom of an acute compartment syndrome is ‘disproportionate pain’ that is not relieved with analgesia. To test for a compartment syndrome, then the muscles within the respective compartment should be passively stretched. There are 4 compartments within the leg; anterior, lateral (peroneal), posterior and deep posterior. All four compartments will need to be assessed. For example, passively flexing the great toe will stretch the muscles in the anterior compartment (this stretches Extensor Hallucis Longus – EHL). While passively extending the great toe will stretch the muscles in the deep posterior compartment (this stretches Flexor Hallucis Longus – FHL). Compartment pressure monitoring is only indicated in the unconscious patient.
IMAGING
Plain x-rays in 2 orthogonal plains are essential (AP & Lateral) and CT scans are often indicated to rule out an intra-articular extension or associated injury (e.g. posterior malleolus fracture).
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Tibial fractures are often treated with an intra-medullary nail. These are a good option for the majority of tibial fractures and circular frames are usually reserved for more complex cases. Tibial nails however, are not suitable for all tibial fractures and can potentially precipitate a compartment syndrome in an acutely injured leg. They are also associated with anterior knee pain which can make them unsuitable in certain situations e.g. a young active carpet fitter, where occupational kneeling is unavoidable.
Plate osteosynthesis in the diaphyseal tibia has a higher incidence of developing a deep infection and they are also not strong enough to permit early weightbearing. For peri-articular fractures, plates however are more commonly used with good results.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Diaphyseal tibial fractures are often unstable and require surgical stabilisation. There are a small sub-group that have a transverse fracture pattern and usually an intact fibula. These can be managed non-operatively but do require close supervision, as deformity in the tibia can lead to long term complications such as arthritis of the ankle or knee. To truly immobilise a tibial shaft fracture, then an above knee cast should be used. However, this often leads to decreased patient mobility and knee stiffness. I prefer to use a Sarmiento cast which requires the patient to weightbear for the muscle contraction to stabilise the fracture. This I find is better tolerated by the patients. In all cases of non-operative management, an assessment of venous thrombo-embolism risk is essential and usually requires prophylactic treatment.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Circular frame treatment is not easy for patients to live with and requires a compliant patient that will engage actively with the management. They will need to keep the pin / wire sites clean to prevent a superficial infection which can occasionally progress to a deep infection. They will also need to weightbear on the injured limb to stimulate the bones to heal. If they don’t, then their time in the frame will be prolonged.
Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of One Thousand and Twenty-Five open fractures of long bones. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976; 58: 453-458.

General anaesthesia is required in most cases. I would be cautious about a spinal anaesthetic if there is a risk of developing a compartment syndrome. A regional block could be used in addition to the general anaesthetic but will require careful post-operative monitoring for the development of a compartment syndrome (as the block may mask the amount of pain that the patient experiences).
Intravenous antibiotics are administered at induction.
The patient is positioned supine and my preference is to use a radiolucent carbon fibre table extension. This allows fluoroscopic images to be taken at any angle without any objects obscuring the view. Also the table is completely flat with no gaps, which often a ring can fall into.
A sandbag is placed under the ipsilateral hip / greater trochanter to internally rotate the leg and place the knee in a patella forward position.
A tourniquet is not required.

Patients often experience a lot of pain in the immediate post-operative period. This is usually because the muscles have contracted and the reduction has stretched them back to their original position. I therefore like the majority of my patients to have a regional block, unless the limb is at risk of developing a compartment syndrome.
The leg should be elevated for the first 24 hours, as the pin and wire sites often bleed a little. It also helps with any post-operative swelling.
Post-op antibiotics are not required, unless it was an acute open injury and they are indicated according to a local protocol.
The patient should be reviewed by a frames specialist nurse and shown how to perform pin site care.
The patient should also be mobilised full weight bearing with expert guidance from physiotherapists.
Departmental ‘reference x-rays’ are requested to check the overall reduction and alignment and if necessary a programme / prescription can be calculated.
Our unit’s protocol for pin site care:
The frame and leg should be kept clean and dry.
Weekly we recommend changing the pin site dressing unless it is heavily soiled or the wire / pin is infected.
Bathing or prolonged soaking of the limb are not recommended.
After showering, with clean hands, the leg is patted dry.
The wire / pin is cleaned with alcoholic chlorhexidine.
A foam dressing is applied (e.g. Allevyn) and held in place with the clip / bung.

In a level 1 trauma centre, that treated a consecutive series of 52 patients with 57 fractures (25 femoral, 32 tibial) they reported a 91% union rate at an average of 29 weeks. 86% of the injuries were open and all patients had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15.
Sala F, Ebatrawy Y, Thabet AM, Zayed M, Capitani D. Taylor Spatial Frame Fixation in patients with multiple traumatic injuries: study of 57 long-bone fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2013; 27: 442-450.
Nho et al. describe a noteworthy technique that should be considered in complex cases with significant soft tissue defects. They describe temporary intentional shortening and bony deformation so that the soft tissues can be closed and thus averting the need for a complex soft tissue reconstruction. Once the soft tissues have healed, a deformity correction programme is run to restore the limb to its’ original length and alignment.
Nho SJ, Helfet DL, Rozbruch SR. Temporary intentional leg shortening and deformation to facilitate wound closure using the Ilizarov / Taylor Spatial Frame. J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20(6): 419-424.
Trafton proposed the following as acceptable deformity parameters for tibial shaft fractures:
Shortening less 15mm
Coronal plane (AP view) angulation less than 5 degrees (varus / valgus)
Sagittal plane (Lateral view) angulation less than 10 degrees (apex anterior / posterior)
Axial plane rotation less than 10 degrees
Trafton PG. Closed unstable fractures of the tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988. May (230); 58-67.
Reference
- orthoracle.com













































