
Learn the Tibio-Talo-Calcaneal (TTC/Double )fusion using Integra Advansys Plate surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Tibio-Talo-Calcaneal (TTC/Double )fusion using Integra Advansys Plate surgical procedure.
The most common reason for performing a double-fusion is in concurrent ankle and subtalar arthritis in the symptomatic patient. Consideration should also be given to the technique in cases of revision of fusion surgery to the ankle or subtalar joint, and also avascular necrosis of the talus. Arthritic change is however not a pre-requisite for this type of surgery. As a final option for an unstable ankle and hindfoot in the neurological patient it has significant merit also in the absence of degenerative change.
There are various techniques available surgically for performing a double fusion, these being to use large fragment screws in isolation, to fuse using an intra-medullary nail, an external frame or alternatively a plate designed for the purpose.
The techniques of joint preparation and correction of deformity will be broadly the same irrespective of the exact method chosen for fixation.
The INTEGRA Advansys TTC plate is designed for lateral application through a trans-fibular across the ankle & subtalar joints. As such both access and implantation are straightforward. These plates are sided and come in 4 lengths and 2 widths (of the Calcaneal limb). As such they are able to accommodate an appropriate variety of adult foot & ankle sizes. The INTEGRA TTC plate is of robust dimensions but also can be contoured if required (for example to accommodate heel valgus). The Integra screws have excellent thread purchase on bone and their innovative design (with a non-threaded head) allows them to pull the plate to the bone after which they can be locked into place with a threaded grub screw. Compression is achieved both by using an external clamp, anchored temporarily proximal to the top of the plate, as well as with a proximally placed compressive hole in the plate.
In my experience given the plate is applying compression laterally a medially placed large fragment screw across the ankle is usually required to counteract the significant medial tensile force that results.
Readers will also find of interest the following OrthOracle techniques:
Ankle and Subtalar (Double) Fusion using OrthoSolutions Oxbridge nail
TTC (double fusion) using 4WEB custom talar replacement and Oxbridge nail (OrthoSolutions)
Tibio-Talo-Calcaneal (TTC/Double )fusion using Zimmer Ankle Fix plus plate.
Tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC/Double ) fusion with Wright Valor nail.

INDICATIONS:
Combined severe Ankle & Subtalar osteoarthritis.
Revision Ankle Fusion: In the presence of isolated Ankle arthritis that has failed to unite argument can be made for increasing the rigidity of the construct used for the second operation and fusing both ankle and subtalar articulations. It is also a useful way of stabilising adequately across larger areas of bony loss sometimes encountered in revision surgery .
Severe Arthritis of one of the “double” joints with milder arthritis of the other: This indication is more of a balancing act. The functional outcome after an isolated single fusion is likely to be less restricted than after a double fusion. It is however well recognised that a subsequent secondary fusion will have a lower chance of success than if both are included in the primary operation.
Ankle & Hindfoot deformity in the neurological patient: This may present as an unstable and poorly controllable flexible deformity or a stiff and arthritic fixed deformity.
Avascular necrosis of the Talus: Depending on the extent of disease ,and in particular with involvement of the subtalar joint ,a double fusion should be considered.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION:
Most patients with severe ankle & subtalar arthritis localise the pain well to the joints involed. Very much as with arthritis elsewhere symptoms tend to progress from start up pain which eases off through to progressively more disabling and continual weight bearing pain and on occasion progresses as far as pain at night or at rest. A less common symptom which can co-exist with pain is that of ankle and hindfoot instability. Neurological conditions will have a typical presentation with weakness and instability with or without sensory disturbance.
On examination swelling and tenderness localised to the ankle and hindfoot is common. Range of movement is often reduced and may be uncomfortable. Any deformity should be noted. The key issues with deformity are A:Whether it is passively correctable and B.:Being sure of its anatomical location(s). The former is easily clinically determined .The latter can be more difficult to be sure of and CT may be indicated for this.
Beware of the potential for an associated fixed midfoot equinus which will leave the mid/forefoot in a plantar flexed position once the ankle is fused in neutral if it is ignored. If dealing with isolated ankle equinus often enough laxity is created in the soft tissue envelope by the bone preparation to allow correction of the equinus through the fusion.
In neurological cases the 1st ray may be disproportionately plantar-flexed and may require a dorsiflexing osteotomy in isolation . The foot must be in functional and plantar-grade position at the end of the double fusion and on occasion this may require extension of the fusion into the taol-navicular and Calcaneo-cuboid joints .
The rest of the lower limbs alignment should not be forgotten. In general correction of deformity should start proximally and proceed distally. A varus and arthritic knee should be corrected and replaced before the ankle is fused .
A vascular examination must be made and if abnormal dealt with appropriately.
INVESTIGATION:
Plain X-Ray: This is the initial imaging for most patients with ankle and subtalar arthritis of any degree. Though the ankle is relatively well visualised (and the films should be taken weight-bearing) the subtalar and midfoot joints aren’t so well shown , in particular in the presence of associated deformity through the area.
CT scan. This is better in defining how much significant arthritic change exists and where it is than MRI . It is also easier to differentiate the level of deformity from a CT than an MRI . There are cases where significant cystic change exists and will require bone grafting.Its location and extent is again best defined with CT. On occasion the use of structural bone graft to reconstruct deformity may be required .The amount may go beyond what can be harvested from the excised Fibula and planning the requirement for femoral head allograft is a call that is often easier to make from a CT scan.
MRI scan: An MRI is more sensitive for early degenerative change than CT but will be degraded by any internal fixation . It can be more difficult to be objective about the severity of more advanced arthritic change as bone oedema ( a reversible phenomenon which can be present in non-arthritic periarticular bone) complicates the MRI images. A CT lacks this sensitivity.
ALTERNATE OPERATIVE TREATMENT:
Before commencing a double fusion it is wise always to have a back-up plan and an alternate form of fixation available which one is used to.
Alternate forms of fixation are intramedullary nailing , a combination of large fragment screws ,compressive plates designed for the operation (or more generic condylar blade plates) or external fixation with Hybrid or circular ring fixators.
An ankle replacement and subtalar fusion is also an entirely valid alternative in appropriately selected arthritic patients.

The following equipment is needed – in addition to a large basic orthopaedic set.
Laminar spreaders and a range of large threaded guide wires
Power saw / drill/reamer (all large)
Image Intensifier.
Facilities to apply a post-operative cast.
The patient is placed in a supine position, supported by props with the operated limb neutral (toes vertical which usually requires a sandbag or two on the operated side).
Check that the foot and lower leg are clear of any xray opaque part of the table.
Position the patient well uop the table if possible, so that the foot is not at the end of the table (this means if you accidently drop a unique instrument it will be fall within the sterile field on the table – not onto the floor)
A tourniquet is applied.
Elevate the foot by resting the calf on a large sterile bolster of rolled up towels .This helps control rotation of the leg, allows good access to the heel, and stops the heel from being pushed forward relative to the tibia, which may occur if the weight of the leg rests on the heel.
Antibiotics should be administered prior to inflating the tourniquet.

2 weeks in back-slab
Dressing changes at 1 & 2 weeks
Complete cast between weeks 2 to 6 & non-weight bearing.
Check X-ray at 6 week stage . Usually may commence light weight bear and progress to 50% body weight by 12 weeks. Dependant upon age , bone quality and co-morbidities this will usually be possible in a post-operative boot .
Further X-ray at 12 weeks . Satisfactory progression is judged by both radiographic progression as well as a patients comfort upon limited weight-bearing.
Generally a further 6 weeks is required at this stage in a post-operative boot.The progression from partial to full weight -bearing is made during this period.
A further X-ray is performed at 18 weeks to confirm union and if symptoms are in keeping with this the patient may move onto a stiff-soled hiking boot for a further 4 weeks , then normal shoes.
X-rays taken are AP & lateral views. One is looking for visible evidence of progressive bone union . If this is equivocal and the patient symptomatic then anytime from 3 months a CT may be indicated to better assess progression of union. There is no harm in the early use of adjuncts such as an Exogen bone stimulator or regressing the patients weight bearing status if union is slow. Before this though enquire about smoking ,non-steroidal use and deviation from the agreed weight-bearing protocol. One should always be clear about the location of any post-operative pain. With all large metallic implants stress is concentrated at their interface (s) with bone. This can rarely contribute to la stress response (or even fracture) in particular at the proximal end of the plate . In this eventuality weight bearing must be drastically reduced and a long post-operative boot returned to for a 6 week minimum.
No heavy manual type activity allowed for 5-6 months post operation.
Ultimately , normal shoe wear may be returned to and activities as able. Following double fusion surgery however patients are more likely to require a shoe with a sole that approaches a traditional through-rocker , or require such a modification to a normal pair of shoes.

Reference
- orthoracle.com





































































