//

Cubital tunnel decompression- In-situ distal to proximal release of the ulnar nerve

Learn the Cubital tunnel decompression: In-situ distal to proximal release of the ulnar nerve surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Cubital tunnel decompression: In-situ distal to proximal release of the ulnar nerve surgical procedure.
Ulnar nerve compression most commonly occurs where the nerve passes behind the medial epicondyle at the elbow, passing through the cubital tunnel and in between the two heads of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle (FCU) to enter the forearm. The nerve becomes compressed due to a combination of it being pulled against the bone when the elbow is flexed, and being squashed from its superficial side by the fascia, ligaments and fibrous bands that form a roof above the cubital tunnel along with arcades of blood vessels. Muscles that cross over the ulnar nerve can also compress it, such as the triceps (at the arcade of Struthers), FCU, and, when present, anconeus epitrochlearis (a muscle that passes from the medial epicondyle to the olecranon, found as part of the roof of the cubital tunnel in approximately 1 in 7 people- do not confuse this with the much bigger anconeus muscle, found on the lateral aspect of the elbow).
Symptoms from ulnar nerve compression may be felt in the ulnar side of the hand, the medial aspect of the elbow, or along the ulnar side of the forearm; holding the elbow flexed and in particular leaning on the inner aspect of a flexed elbow will bring on symptoms (which are often felt at night, when many people flex their elbows).
Unless the nerve is unstable (moves across the medial epidondyle to the front of the elbow with flexion above 90 degrees), decompression of the nerve where it lies by division of the structures that lie superficial to the nerve and compromise it will usually improve intermittent symptoms and prevent deterioration of permanent nerve loss in the hand and forearm (sensory loss in the little and ring fingers, atrophy of the intrinsic muscles of the hand with impairment of thumb grips and fine motor skills).
Most surgeons are trained to identify the nerve proximal to the elbow and trace its path down into the forearm, which involves an incision that extends both above and below the elbow; particularly in patients with fat arms, identifying the nerve proximal to the cubital tunnel can be surprisingly difficult! The nerve can be found reliably where it passes between the two heads of FCU and if the nerve is identified at this site, the proximal dissection and release can be safely and easily preformed without extending the skin incision proximal to the medial epicondyle, so minimising the risk of damage to the medial cutaneous forearm nerve branches that pass close to the medial epicondyle.
Endoscopic techniques have been described for cubital tunnel release, but these require specialist equipment and offer limited practical advantages over open techniques of cubital tunnel decompression other than utilising smaller incisions. With practice, surgeons can reduce the length of skin incision used for open decompressions as they and their surgical teams become familiar with the surgical anatomy and optimal positioning of retractors.
Dominic Power has described his technique for cubital tunnel decompression on Orthoracle, the indications for which and technique are similar in many respects to the procedure described here; important differences include the positioning of the arm to make the role of the first surgical assistant easier, the site and extent of the incision to avoid potential damage to cutaneous nerves, and the technique for proximal release.
Surgeons should be aware of the uncommon but encountered potential for compression of the ulnar nerve at the wrist where the ulnar nerve passes through Guyon’s canal. Tahseen Chaudhry has described his technique for a single incision combined carpal tunnel and Guyon’s canal release on Orthoracle and readers will also find of interest Dominic Powers revision technique:
Revision cubital tunnel release with submuscular transposition and application of Axoguard

INDICATIONS
Intermittent ulnar nerve symptoms that do not respond to provocation avoidance.
Permanent sensory or motor loss in an ulnar nerve distribution with neurophysiological confirmation of pressure on the ulnar nerve at the elbow.

SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Symptoms:
Pain, tingling or numbness in the ulnar side of the hand (invariably the little finger; often ring, sometimes middle fingers
Pain in the medial aspect of the elbow.
The above radiating along the ulnar side of the forearm.
Symptoms provoked by holding the elbow flexed and in particular leaning on the inner aspect of a flexed elbow.
Night waking with the above symptoms.
Numbness as above first thing in the morning.
Symptoms improved by straightening elbow.
Examination findings:
Sensory
Altered fine touch sensation in an ulnar nerve distribution (usually little and ulnar ring, although may involve middle; note that patients often don’t have an anatomically-characteristic watershed along the midline of a digit).
Dorso-ulnar hand (although often less involved than digits in practice)
Assess objectively
Static 2-point discrimination (innervation density)
Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing (sensory threshold)
Much more pragmatically, the Tens Test (Strauch et al (1997) Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 99:1074-1078)
Motor
Intrinsic muscles of hand
Adductor Pollicis (Ad Pol)- Froment’s sign (well explained in Cubital Tunnel Indications section)
1st dorsal interosseous (1stDIO)- combined 1stDIO and AdPol wasting causes the visible and palpable wasting of the muscles of the 1st web space (thumb to index finger)
Interossei- guttering on the dorsum between the metacarpals
Hypothenar eminence
Extrinsic muscles
Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) to little, ring +/- middle fingers
IMAGING

ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Different surgical procedures are used, including
Endoscopic decompression
Open in-situ decompression proximal-to-distal
Anterior ulnar nerve transposition
sub-cutaneous
sub-muscular
Medial epicondylectomy

NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Provocation avoidance
not holding the elbow bent for long periods
not leaning on the inner aspect of the elbow and proximal forearm
adapting desk spaces to prevent flexion and pressure
splinting the elbow straight when sleeping
Nerve gliding exercises
Attention to shoulder and scapular posture to prevent compromise at the thoracic outlet (the “double-crush phenomenon”)
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Presence of a clear reason to transpose the nerve
Ulnar nerve instability (either before or on completion of in-situ decompression)
Unhealthy cubital tunnel bed (e.g., osteophyte, synovial or ganglion encroachment)
Significant cubitus valgus
Medical contraindications to general or regional anaesthesia (consider local anaesthetic with adrenaline if symptoms justify the surgical risks)

Surgery is usually performed supine with the arm supported upon an arm table, although if local anaesthesia is used, the patient may be more comfortable lying supine without an arm table but with their hand resting on the operation table beside their head, from where the arm can be moved intraoperatively to optimise surgical lines of sight or for comfort. Some surgeons prefer their patients to lie prone, particularly if the patient has a stiff and/or painful shoulder, although this position makes support for the hand and arm more difficult to achieve. Local anaesthetic surgery can be undertaken without a tourniquet if adrenaline is used.

The shoulder externally rotates less with the arm adducted
The usual positioning of the hand table at and distal to the level of the shoulder places the arm with the shoulder in a position of abduction of about 50 degrees; for most patients, the arm will not easily externally rotate to allow the forearm to rest easily on the hand table. This means that the surgeon’s assistant needs to hold the arm rotated, and so cannot focus fully on retracting and optimising the surgeon’s view.
In the picture, the arm is being supported in maximal external rotation without forcing the forearm back. If surgery were to be performed with the arm in this position, the shoulder would need to be pushed into external rotation to orientate the medial aspect of the elbow for the surgeon and the forearm would need to be supported on a pad, potentially with a pad or bolster behind the elbow to assist positioning; unfortunately the elbow has a tendency to slip, which is frustrating and potentially dangerous.

Putting the arm table level with the head lets the arm lie naturally. Unless the shoulder is stiff, abduction of the shoulder to and above 90 degrees will usually allow the arm to rest easily on the hand table, which allows the assistant to focus fully on the operation.
If surgery is performed under local anaesthetic, then the patient may find it more comfortable to rest the hand behind or above their head. Aside from the obvious advantage of avoiding the potential complications and recovery periods of general anaesthesia or regional anaesthesia, the patient can move the elbow as instructed, which helps when assessing nerve and medial head of triceps stability.

The path of the ulnar nerve is palpated and marked, behind and below the medial epicondyle and distally into the forearm in between the two heads of FCUEven in muscular or obese patients, the ulnar nerve can usually be felt behind and below the medial epicondyle. Usually, with careful palpation, the nerve can also be felt where it passes distally into the forearm in between the two heads of FCU, the humeral head arising from the medial epicondyle and the ulnar head from the subcutaneous border of the olecranon.

Knowing where the nerve will be found helps when planning the incision. Feeling and marking the anticipated path of the nerve (N) allows for optimal placement of the initial surgical incision and potential extensions that may be needed in the event of the nerve not being found where expected, or being found to be unstable (in which case conversion to a transposition or medial epicondylectomy procedure may be required, necessitating proximal extension of the wound). Marking the position of the medial epicondyle (E) allows for accurate flap repositioning in the event that anterior transposition is required. The direction of the fibres of the two heads of FCU, humeral (FCUH) and ulnar (FCUU) have been drawn on for illustrative purposes.

Take care not to allow alcoholic skin prep. to get under the tourniquetFor surgery performed under general or regional anaesthesia, where control of the limb rests with the surgical team, preparation of the whole arm, starting with the hand, and initial covering of the arm with an appropriately-sized stockingette facilitates positioning of the arm. Alcohol-based skin preparation that soaks underneath the tourniquet can cause skin burns; while commercially-available barriers can be obtained to act as a “dam” to prevent skin prep. passing proximally under the tourniquet, if the hand is prepared first and care is taken when preparing the forearm, keeping it vertical and allowing the liquid to runoff while having an un-scrubbed team member apply initial manual blockade around the distal margin of the tourniquet, then inflating the tourniquet before completing preparation with a squeezed-out sponge up to the margin of the tourniquet, soaking of the padding wool can be avoided.

Mark the initial incision along with potential extensions that may be needed depending upon surgical findingsThe incision should pass over the palpated course of the ulnar nerve through the cubital tunnel and in between the two heads of FCU; the incision can stop at or just distal to a line passing between the medial epicondyle and the tip of the olecranon, although initially you may be more comfortable using a longer incision, curving proximally behind the medial epicondyle, and shortening the incision in subsequent cases as you become more confident with the proximal releases. In the picture, the dotted lines proximal and distal to the solid longitudinal line mark the extensions that may be required for exposure or to convert to a transposition. The transverse lines mark the initial limits of the incision; I find that a distal extension is more commonly required as there may be crossing branches of the medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm that require a longer distal incision to safely preserve the branches while allowing safe surgical exposure between the two heads of FCU, hence the solid incision line passing distally beyond the solid cross-lines. The dots adjacent to the incision line are to aid flap apposition on closure.

Incise the dermis down to the sub-cutaneous fat. Potential crossing branches of the medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm lie in the sub-cutaneous fat layer, the thickness of which varies considerably between individuals.
Initial sharp dissection, the direction of which would pass obliquely across the anticipated course of these cutaneous nerves and so increase the risk of nerve division, should stop once the dermis has been fully divided.

Spread using fine scissors down to muscle aponeurosis to identify cutaneous nerves. By spreading the jaws of the fine dissecting scissors in the anticipated line of passage of the cutaneous nerves, which is anterior/proximal to posterior/distal, significant branches can reliably be identified and so preserved, potentially requiring wound extension(s).

Cutaneous nerves can be preserved to minimise forearm numbness. Altered sensation along the medial border of the forearm towards and potentially as far as the wrist is a relatively common complaint following use of medial surgical approaches to the elbow. By identifying and preserving significantly-sized branches, the extent of sensory impairment can be minimised (both the area and the level of impairment).

Use your assistant to retract cutaneous nerves and clear the Flexor Carpi Ulnaris aponeurosis. Care should be taken to avoid forceful retraction of the nerve branches, to minimise the risk of cutaneous nerve impairment; this may require the skin incision to be extended to allow for adequate surgical “windows” to be created either side of the crossing nerve, allowing more limited retraction of the nerve both proximally and distally when performing the necessary exposure and release of the ulnar nerve deep to the crossing cutaneous nerves. The fascia overlying the two heads of FCU can be seen exposed deep to the sub-cutaneous fat layer; the fibrous tissues can be seen to pass in three directions, with fibres running obliquely in the line of the muscle fibres of both the humeral and the ulnar heads of FCU and, passing between the two fibrous elements, the third fibrous component passing across between the two heads of FCU (straight, or slightly curved apex-distal). It is this third element that forms the “roof” over the nerve, with muscle fibres sandwiched in between the aponeurosis and the ulnar nerve; the ulnar nerve will lie in the apex or “V” formed by the approximation of the two heads of FCU.

Now expose the nerve where it enters the forearmFeel the path of the ulnar nerve passing between the two heads of FCU to ensure that the aponeurosis is divided directly above the nerve, making exposure of the nerve when subsequently separating the two heads of FCU easier and quicker.

Incise the aponeurosis longitudinally along the interval between the muscle fibres of the two heads of FCU, passing distally through the transversely-orientated / curved fibres, without incising the underlying muscle fibres. Do not worry about the proximal limit of the release at this stage; the incision through the aponeurosis is to enable identification and distal release of the ulnar nerve at this point in the operation.

Use the fine scissors to separate the muscle heads exposing the ulnar nerve. By placing the curved fine dissecting scissors between the converging muscle fibres of the humeral and the ulnar heads of FCU with the tips of the scissors pointing up out of the wound (i.e., away from the underlying nerve), then gently separating the blades, the two heads of FCU will be separated, exposing the underlying ulnar nerve surrounded by the peri-neural fat. (A single residual strand of the transverse fibrous aponeurosis can be seen in the picture,which was divided soon after; this is not of any relevance!)

Expose the nerve between the two heads of FCU and release any crossing fibrous bands first working distally. Separate the tissues superficial to the nerve, identifying and controlling / dividing any crossing fibrous or vascular elements. There is no need to dissect deep to the nerve unless there is a clear area of circumferential peri-neural fibrosis, which is uncommon in a primary procedure unless there has been significant previous local trauma. By leaving the deep tissues undisturbed, damage to the neural blood supply can be minimised, as is the risk of rendering the nerve unstable through the dissection.

Take care not to damage motor branches passing to innervate FCU. These motor nerve branches can be identified and preserved with careful surgical technique. In the picture, a motor division can be seen passing distally between the separated jaws of the dissecting scissors, passing just anterior to (above) the tips of the forceps.

Confirm adequate distal release between the two heads of FCU has been achieved . There is often a fibrous arch at the distal end of the confluence between the two heads of FCU; in clinical practice, I find this site often corresponds with the site of maximal pre-operative neural irritability to percussion along the path of the ulnar nerve (Tinel’s sign). Having carefully divided any fibrous arches, confirm that the passage of the nerve into the forearm is not compromised by gently passing an instrument superficial to the nerve (such as a McDonald’s dissector, as used in the picture).

Now release the nerve from under the fibrous arch at the proximal end of Osborne’s ligamentHaving completed the distal release, attention can be turned to the proximal passage of the ulnar nerve. Remembering and retracting the previously identified cutaneous nerves, the tissues superficial to the ulnar nerve are mobilised and divided to expose and simultaneously decompress the ulnar nerve. In the picture, the separated jaws of the fine dissecting scissors can be seen defining a crossing fibrous sheet with bands of condensations of fibrous tissues; these form Osborne’s ligament which forms the roof of the cubital tunnel, which will have been partially divided at its distal limit in the preceding steps of the operation.

Ensure the fibrous band as been freed from the nerve and any vessels controlled before dividing it. By carefully and incrementally passing the closed tips of the dissecting scissors into the plane between Osborne’s ligament and the underlying ulnar nerve, gently opening the jaws to break down any adhesions, but being careful to withdraw the scissors with the jaws still opened (to minimise the risk of accidental damage to the ulnar nerve), a clear plane can be developed to isolate the ligament prior to division of the ligament itself. Commonly there will be crossing vessels, particularly along the proximal limit of the ligament; these vessels need to be carefully controlled prior to division, using fine bipolar diathermy forceps , lifting the ligament and vessels up and away from the nerve before deploying the diathermy, and using repeated very short pulses of the diathermy to minimise the risk of accidental thermal injury to the ulnar nerve.

Having created planes above and below the fibrous band, divide it. As long as the ligament has been fully freed from the nerve, the dissecting scissors can be used to divide the ligament under direct vision; if there is any doubt about the presence of any persisting neural adhesions, using a fresh scalpel blade (No. 15) with care to align the blade parallel to the nerve and to keep the ligament tissue taut with gentle pressure on the scalpel blade against the tensioned fibrous tissues affording division of the ligament while allowing the nerve to “roll away” is a safer way to proceed; this is a technique best developed following observation of its use by repeated supervised practice.

Next develop a pocket superficial to the fascia proximally towards the shoulder along the path of the nerveYou can see in this picture the ulnar nerve passing proximally between the divided edges of Osborne’s ligament (the anterior edge being more clearly seen passing distally from the Langenbeck-type right angle retractor). You should also be able to recognise that the Langenbeck retractor is no longer being used with the blade passing vertically into the wound (to hold the cutaneous nerves at the proximal limit of the incision) but instead that the blade of the retractor has been passed into a pocket created by blunt dissection with the scissors between the fascia and the subcutaneous fat layer, the blade lying parallel and following the path of the underlying ulnar nerve (which is still deep to the intact proximal fascia) and the overlying fat and skin (along with the previously preserved cutaneous nerve branches). By pulling the handle of the retractor away from the arm, the skin and fat are lifted away from the fascia and the underlying ulnar nerve, creating a tunnel above the fascia that allows direct vision of the fascia proximal to the site of previous division of Osborne’s ligament.

Extend the elbow to look up the tunnel that you have created proximally. Straightening out the elbow allows the operating surgeon, now sitting towards the end of the hand table, to crouch and look up into the tunnel; careful positioning of the operating light to focus up the tunnel created by the Langenbeck retractor (the beam passing over the shoulder of the operating surgeon) allows the proximal release to be undertaken under direct vision despite the overlying skin remaining intact.

Develop a plane above and below the fascia proximally under direct vision to extend the tunnel proximally. The Langenbeck retractor blade should be fully seated proximally and pulled away from the patient to maximise the field of view. The fascia is released from the underlying ulnar nerve using the same careful technique described for freeing Osborne’s ligament in the previous steps.

Carefully divide the fascia under direct vision, controlling any crossing vessels that may be encountered. Sharp dissection working proximally from the free edge of the fascia with a fresh scalpel blade (carefully aligned to lie parallel with the nerve, as previously described) is useful, but the most proximal extent of the release is more easily performed using the opened jaws of the fine dissecting scissors as a blade. Having extended the proximal limit of tunnel superficial and deep to the fascia under direct vision using blunt dissection with the dissecting scissors, the opened jaws of the scissors are placed with the free edge of the fascia between the opened (and fixed) jaws of the scissors.

The proximal release can be completed using the opened jaws of a pair of long-handled scissors that have engaged the edge of the fascia under direct vision. It is important that you have freed the fascia from the nerve and the overlying fat to adequately define the fascia, and that the scissors are held opened and not closed, so that the scissors act as a blade with firm but controlled proximal pressure directed proximally to divide the fascia. By ensuring the jaws of the scissors are never closed, the risk of inadvertent nerve damage is minimised.

Confirm adequate proximal release using a McDonald’s dissector or equivalent curved instrument in the same way as previously used for the distal release.

Confirm that the ulnar nerve is stable behind the medial epicondyle through a full range of flexion under direct vision prior to wound closureAs long as you have not dissected the nerve from the floor of the cubital tunnel, the nerve is unlikely to have been made unstable by the release procedure. nonetheless, it is important to confirm and document that the nerve remains stable throughout a full range of motion; anterior subluxation is usually seen in the more extreme flexion range; if present, ulnar nerve instability should prompt consideration of formal anterior transposition of the nerve.

Confirm that any crossing cutaneous nerves remain in-continuty. The two cutaneous nerves identified at the outset of the procedure can be seen intact, lying vertically in the wound. The two edges of the divided Osborne’s ligament can be seen lying to the left of the cutaneous nerves.

Confirm haemostasis and then close the subcutaneous fat and the skin in two layers

As long as there have been no problems with exposure and that the ulnar nerve remains stable, the initial incision need not be extended.

Apply steristrips to support and detension the wound, then liberally infiltrate local anaesthetic with adrenaline being careful to include the line of the proximal release. While administration of the local anaesthetic and adrenaline to deeper planes can usefully be performed prior to closure, particularly at the proximal and distal ends of the surgical field, I prefer to infiltrate the skin after wound closure to allow for more accurate skin apposition.

Cover the wound with a waterproof adhesive dressing then apply a bulky bandage to the elbow. If an extension proximal to the elbow has been used, applying the anterior length of the adhesive dressing with the elbow extended and the posterior half with the elbow flexed will minimise any reduction in active post-operative movement of the elbow due to tension from the dressing. A bulky bandage (wool and crepe) will initially slow motion to help with post-operative discomfort by reminding the patient to minimise un-necessary use of the operated arm.

Aside from the usual observations during the recovery period following a musculoskeletal procedure performed under general anaesthetic, very few specific steps need to be taken prior to discharge. The ulnar nerve will often be blocked by the infiltration of local anaesthetic, so do not be surprised if there is altered sensation in an ulnar nerve distribution. Active elbow mobilisation should be encouraged within limits of comfort straight away, and the bulky dressing should be removed after 2-3 days, leaving the adhesive dressing intact. I recommend that scooping and lifting should be avoided for 4-6 weeks due to the potential for discomfort from the separated heads of FCU, but as no muscle repairs have been needed, there are no restrictions to activities other than to be pain-limited. Most patients only require regular oral analgesics for up to a few days, thereafter using them as required. The presence of throbbing or marked pain (i.e., pain not controlled by oral non-opioid analgesics and topical ice) should raise concern about potential complications (such as haematoma formation, un-recognised nerve injury, or early infection or complex regional pain syndrome) and so should prompt urgent clinical review.
Despite using absorbable sutures, I prefer the intra-dermal suture to be removed after 2-3 week where possible to avoid inflammatory spots arising where the suture enters and leaves the skin.
Unless there was permanent pre-operative neurological loss, most patients can be discharged once their pre-operative symptoms can be confirmed to be improved, which is usually after the first post-operative review at 2-3 weeks.
Pain or neurological deterioration that persists for more than 6 weeks after surgery should prompt consideration of investigation; pain suggestive of haematoma formation or nerve instability is best assessed with an ultrasound, and persisting neurological deterioration with nerve conduction studies. Treatments that may be appropriate would be determined by the investigation results and the clinical course of the patient.


Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome
Nabhan et al (2005)
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume) 30B: 5: 521-524
A randomised study comparing in-situ decompression against anterior sub-cutaneous transposition for neurophysiologically-confirmed ulnar nerve compression in the cubital tunnel, showing no statistically significant clinical outcome difference between the two technique groups, and no statistical difference in the degree of improvement in the neurophysiological investigations between the two techniques over the 9 month follow-up period. This paper confirms that in-situ decompression is a valid technique to use for primary ulnar nerve decompression surgery.

Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
Caliandro et al (2016)
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006839.pub4
A systematic review of 4 randomised studies comparing in-situ decompression against anterior transposition ( sub-cutaneous or sub-muscular) for ulnar nerve compression in the cubital tunnel, showing no statistically significant clinical outcome difference between the in-situ decompression and anterior transposition in the 3 included studies, and no difference in the degree of improvement in neurophysiological investigations between the two techniques in the 2 included papers. The rate of deep infection and superficial infection was greater in the transposition groups. This systematic review found that there is moderate-quality evidence that in-situ decompression is equally effective when compared to anterior transposition for idiopathic ulnar nerve compression with a lower risk of infection.

Patient-reported outcomes after in-situ cubital tunnel decompression: a report in 77 patients
Yeoman et al (2020)
Journal of Hand Surgery (British and European Volume) 45B: 1: 51-55
Prospective cohort study of QuickDASH-reported outcome of in-situ decompression at a mean of 17 months showing significant improvements in patient-reported scores, the degree of improvement correlating with patient satisfaction, and finding lower levels of satisfaction in patients with pre-operative weakness.The study confirms improvements with in-situ decompression, and that intervention before the onset of permanent motor loss if important.


Reference

  • orthoracle.com
Dark mode powered by Night Eye