
Learn the Exploration of radial nerve and lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm and DCP implant removal surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Exploration of radial nerve and lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm and DCP implant removal surgical procedure.
Any surgical procedure puts peripheral nerves at risk of injury. This may occur during the surgical approach, or by retractors and other instrumentation used during the procedure. Nerves may become entrapped or tethered around implants or in the surgical scar.
Patients typically present with signs and symptoms of nerve injury. Involvement of a sensory nerve, as in the following case, may be associated with pain, parasthaesia and reduced sensation. Left untreated, signs of chronicity may develop with central sensitisation and upregulation of pain pathways including psychological sequelae.
Early diagnosis and appropriate intervention in these patients can be rewarding.
The following technique describes my approach to the diagnosis and surgical management of a patient who was referred following injuries to the radial nerve and lateral cutaneous nerve of forearm during open reduction and internal fixation of the radius and ulna.
The decision about whether to proceed to surgical exploration should be made by a surgeon with experience in treating peripheral nerve disorders. It is largely based upon the history and clinical findings but may be aided by neurophysiology, radiology and physiotherapy. The use of targeted peripheral nerve blocks can be invaluable.
When exploring peripheral nerves in such a scenario, the peripheral nerve surgeon should be prepared for all eventualities, including the potential need to excise and graft a neuroma and in the use of adjuncts including nerve allograft and nerve wraps.
Readers will also find of interest the following published techniques on OrthOracle, which explain some of the additional techniques referred to in this section.
These include:
1. The use of a nerve wrap
2. The use of processed nerve allograft
3. Reconstruction with autologous nerve graft

INDICATIONS
The presence of parasthaesia and numbness within the distribution of a sensory nerve suggest injury to that nerve which may or may not recover spontaneously. The presence of a Tinels sign, neuropathic pain and autonomic disturbance are suggestive of axonal degeneration and may indicate rupture of the nerve.
A static Tinels sign suggests neuroma in continuity or a frank rupture of the nerve but may also represent localised compression or tether in scar.
A failure of progression to recovery within an expected timeframe, (often marked by an advancing Tinels sign) or deterioration under observation are indications to explore the nerve.
Previous surgery to the area, as opposed to a closed injury, increases the suspicion of a sharp injury that may have divided the nerve.
The presence of nerve tether pain (neurostenalgic pain) suggests adherence of the injured nerve to scar or implants and exploration and neurolysis can be rewarding.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Sensation within the distribution of the injured nerves is carefully mapped out. A VAS scale can be used to quantify sensation. The quality of the sensation is important to note.
The presence of a Tinels sign helps to locate the site of injury. A further strong Tinels sign distal to this suggests axonal regeneration and, depending upon timing of course, may herald some recovery.
In this case the presence of severe exacerbation of nerve pain during wrist flexion and extension suggested nerve tether around the metal implants.
The presence of allodynia in this case suggested some central sensitisation, but other features of this phenomenon were absent. Key features to look for include:
Central sensitisation – an increased responsiveness of nociceptive neurons in the central nervous system to subthreshold stimuli.
Allodynia – pain due to a stimulus that does not normally provoke pain.
Hyperpathia – painful syndrome characterised by an abnormally painful reaction to a stimulus, often a repetitive stimulus.
Hyperalgesia – an increased sensitivity to stimulation
Dysasthaesia – an abnormal, unpleasant sensation which may be spontaneous or evoked.
A validated pain questionnaire is useful baseline measure and can be referred to and repeated when assessing post operative recovery. We use our own modification of the McGill pain score. This allows the treating clinician to evaluate subtle changes in pain that may be difficult to detect. It also allows our research team to evaluate treatment efficacy.
IMAGING
Plain x-rays demonstrated the presence of a volar, LC-DCP plate in the distal radial shaft.
The nerves were not imaged in this case as the decision to explore was made early. However an ultrasound scan can sometimes be useful to demonstrate continuity of nerve branches or to localise areas of nerve tether within scar or around implants.
In a sensory nerve injury, neurophysiology can be invaluable in confirming injury to a specific nerve trunk and its location along the course of the nerve.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Upon exploring the nerve a number of alternative surgical strategies exist. These depend upon the pre-operative clinical findings and the intra-operative picture.
Following neurolysis the nerves may be wrapped in a nerve wrap such as the Axoguard porcine submucosal extracellular matrix wrap (described elsewhere on Orthoracle).
A neuroma in continuity my require formal excision and autograft reconstruction. For short gaps in a sensory nerve an Axogen AVANCE, processed nerve allograft should be considered. In a patient with central sensitisation the use of autograft risks creating a second site of nerve pain and the AVANCE allograft may have a useful role in such patients.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Hand therapy includes a number of desensitisation strategies for reducing neuropathic pain and improving nerve gliding through the scarred area. The use of pharmocological treatment of neuropathic pain and input from a pain specialist can be helpful.
Repeating the examination at intervals is important as it will shed further light on any potential ongoing recovery that may be too slow to have been picked up by the patient.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The presence of active infection is a contraindication to exploration.
A fracture non-union under the plate may necessitate leaving the plate in situ, delaying the procedure until union (if feasible) or seeking an alternative means of stabilisation. This must be discussed with the referring orthopaedic surgeon beforehand.

The patient is positioned supine with the arm on an arm table.
We perform this procedure under an regional anaesthetic technique using a brachial plexus block.
A single dose of antibiotics is given.
The WHO checklist is completed.
An upper arm tourniquet is inflated.
Bipolar and monopolar diathermy are made available.
The tray should have a pair of Mixter forceps, nerve sloops, a pair of Debakeys forceps and a pair of Jamiesons scissors.
We routinely use nerve stimulation if operating upon motor nerves but clearly this is not required for this particular case.
A microscope and micro-instruments should be available if needed.
Local thromboprophylaxis protocols are followed.

Post operatively the patient is allowed to go home if pain is well controlled.
The arm is kept in a Bradford sling for the next 48-72 hours.
Oral analgesia is prescribed.
The patient returns to a dressing clinic in 5-7 days for a wound check and some hand therapy to commence some early nerve gliding exercises.
Desensitisation techniques aimed at the dysaesthetic area should be continued.
At 2-3 weeks scar massage and desensitisation is commenced
The patient is reviewed thereafter in the outpatient nerve clinic at 6 weeks post surgery.
A further pain score is taken at this stage.

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Apr;33(2):152-4. doi: 10.1177/1753193407087892.
Neurolysis of the distal superficial radial nerve for dysaesthesia due to nerve tethering.
Calfee RP1, Shin SS, Weiss AP.
This study demonstrated moderate symptomatic improvement in patients with dysaesthesia following injury to the superficial radial nerve. The authors highlight difficulties correlating outcomes to intraoperative findings. The results are difficult to predict and not always satisfactory.
Iatrogenic Injuries of the Palmar Branch of the Median Nerve Following Volar Plate Fixation of the Distal Radius.
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2017 Sep;22(3):343-349.
Samson D, Power DM.
This is one of a number of studies that highlight the vulnerability of cutaneous nerves during standard orthopaedic approaches to fixation.
Iatrogenic nerve injuries in orthopaedics
Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research; 2019 3(1):9-14
Soh J, Hill J, Power DM
An excellent review of iatrogenic nerve injuries in orthopaedics with a particular emphasis on examination and predicting outcome.
Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2013 Aug;39(4):327-37. doi: 10.1007/s00068-013-0283-5. Epub 2013 Apr 12.Vos DI1, Verhofstad MH2.
This review demonstrates a wide disparity in practice for implant removal after orthopaedic surgery.
Reference
- orthoracle.com








































