
Learn the Extensor tendon repair in zone 4 (hand) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Extensor tendon repair in zone 4 (hand) surgical procedure.
Extensor tendon injuries in the hand are commonly encountered by hand surgeons and have a peak incidence in working males between 20-29 years of age. Historically static splinting of these injuries was often advocated, but with plentiful evidence that surgical repair improves outcomes an understanding of the complex anatomy of the extensor tendon system is essential for their appropriate management.
From the perspective of extensor tendon injury and repair eight distinct zones are recognised, running from distal phalanx to the forearm. Repairing an extensor tendon injury without a good understanding of the the nuances of each individual zone of injury can result in an extensor lag, stiffness, or failure of the repair, all of which can have significant implications in a working population.
In contrast to flexor tendon injuries, the surgical management of extensor tendon injuries is not limited by the restrictions imposed by the fibro-osseous tunnel of the flexor system.
As with flexor tendon injuries though, the mechanism tends to be sharp lacerations for the most part. Attritional rupture secondary to degenerative and inflammatory conditions are a different category of injury whose management is not considered in this section. Least commonly avulsion type injuries can occur and may require repair also.
Surgical repair of extensor injuries are marked by certain unique challenges such as the thin flat nature of the distal extensor tendons which require alternatives to standard core suture techniques. In this section repair of a simple partial extensor tendon injury over the proximal phalanx (zone 4) will be demonstrated. Alongside this the important considerations of other extensor zones will be discussed.
As with all tendon injuries, the post-operative rehabilitation regime is of critical importance to ensure the best possible result is obtained.
Readers will also find the following OrthOracle techniques of interest:
Bony Mallet finger injury repair( Synthes Hook plate)
Extensor tendon repair in Zone 5 of the hand
Sagittal band reconstruction (Middle finger)
Transposition flap in the hand
Flexor tendon: Zone 2 repair
Flexor tendon reconstruction: First stage using silicone spacer
Flexor tendon reconstruction: Second stage.
Flexor tendon repair: Reattachment of Flexor digitorum profundus using mini-mitek bone anchor.

INDICATIONS
Laceration of an extensor tendon either within the digit or more proximally, involving at least 50% of the tendon width (see below). Lacerations of under 50% are often repaired upon exploration according to the surgeons individual preference.
Fractures, vascular or nerve injury with associated tendon laceration.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
A complete history and examination are important and the mechanism of injury needs to be carefully established. This includes any other injuries to the bones, joints or any associated sensory loss.
All skin lacerations must be examined and may require exploration.
Composite injuries are common in hand surgery and require a low threshold of suspicion for fractures or ligamentous injury.
Each finger should be examined in turn looking for active extension as well as extension against resistance. The latter may result in pain or weakness in partial injuries.
Finger extension occurs through the extrinsic extensor tendons but beyond the level of the MCP joint there is an interplay between the extrinsic and intrinsic systems.
Careful examination reveals the level of injury and the relevant components of the extensor system that may be damaged.
If a loss of integrity of the central slip is suspected, this can be confirmed clinically using Elson’s test which is best performed under a local anaesthetic block.
The examiner flexes the (proximal interphalangeal joint) PIPJ 90 degrees over the edge of a table top and asks the patient to extend the PIP against resistance. During this manoeuvre the distal interphalangeal joint should remain free and supple whilst the PIPJ extends. Any hyperextension at the DIPJ suggests that the lateral bands are being recruited, calling the integrity of the central slip into doubt.
The tenodesis test is a useful method to evaluate the integrity of the tendons. It relies upon the resting tension within the flexor and extensor tendon systems. Passive flexion and extension of the wrist will cause the digits to flex and extend in a characteristic cascade. Loss of continuity in an extensor tendon for example, will cause the affected digit to remain in a flexed position upon wrist extension when compared to a neighbouring digit.
The extensor tendons have been categorised into zones of injury that aids in planning treatment, which varies somewhat between zones.
Zone 1 – Over the DIPJ ( a mallet type injury) – These injuries have been described in a separate section on orthoracle and are often managed non-operatively.
Zone 2 – Middle phalanx – These are often open lacerations.
Zone 3 – PIPJ – Central slip injuries that if untreated results in a Boutonniere deformity
Zone 4 – Proximal phalanx – Usually result from lacerations but are often incomplete due to the broad nature of the tendon at this level.
Zone 5 – Metacarpo-phalangeal joint (MCPJ) – These are often fight bite type injuries with a breach into the MCPJ and consequent septic arthritis. A laceration of one of the sagittal bands can lead to extensor subluxation.
Zone 6 – Metacarpals – Intact junctura may mask an injury at this level, but more proximal injuries can result in tendon retraction.
Zone 7 – Under the extensor retinaculum
Zone 8 – Distal forearm – Usually resulting from open forearm trauma but occasionally a closed rupture following a hyperextension injury of the fingers.
The local factors in each injury should be considered when planning management.
Non-operative treatment is commonly successfully used for closed zone 1 and 3 injuries.
Lacerations involving zones 2, 4 and 5 are usually open and therefore managed operatively. However lacerations involving less than 50% of the tendon width may be managed without tendon repair but those greater than 50% ought to undergo surgical repair.
Conservative management of these partial lacerations involves 3-6 weeks of immobilisation in extension followed by therapy led mobilisation.
In practice these open injuries routinely require wound debridement and exploration and therefore undergo repair.
Repair is performed at the earliest opportunity and ideally within a week of injury.
Emergency surgical treatment is warranted if the vascularity to the digit is also compromised. Otherwise tendon repair can be performed within a few days of the injury. The upper limit for delayed primary repair is not clearly known. Most surgeons would attempt a primary repair up to two weeks In the digits the tendon ends are unlikely to retract but proximal to the juncturae tendinae the proximal end tends to retract and delay can then make apposition of tendon ends harder to achieve.
Avulsion or degloving injuries of the dorsal hand may involve loss of tendon and skin. Such injuries often require more complex reconstruction.
IMAGING
Plain X-rays are useful to rule out associated fracture, or if a retained foreign body such as glass is suspected.
Imaging of the tendon itself using high resolution ultrasound is not routinely required unless there is doubt about the diagnosis such as in a delayed presentation or a partial injury.
MRI is rarely used but can give very detailed images of all components of the tendon system. However ultrasound remains superior in looking for partial injuries where the dynamic nature of the testing allows more accurate diagnosis.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
In delayed presentation with a retracted tendon or scarred bed, a tendon reconstruction may be indicated.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
These include local or systemic contraindications to any surgery.
Contraindications include certain mutilating hand injuries and those with skin loss of the tendon injury as well as injuries in the presence of a grossly contaminated wound.
Anaesthetic considerations are important. However extensor tendon repair can be carried out under regional block or local nerve block.

The surgery may be performed under general or regional anaesthesia.
More recently a local field blockade with local anaesthetic infiltration with adrenaline. This so called wide-awake technique avoids the use of a tourniquet and preserves active muscle activation permitting active testing of gliding prior to closure.
In this case a brachial plexus block and high arm tourniquet were used.
The patient was positioned supine with the arm placed on an arm table.
Intravenenous antibiotics were administered prior to tourniquet inflation.
Loupe magnification was use to allow adequate visualisation of all the relevant structures.
Biplor diathermy was used.

The patient is usually discharged home the same day with oral analgeisa. With regional anaesthetic it is worth warning the patient of a sudden surge in pain that may occur as the anaesthetic wears off. This can usually be anticipated as the sensation starts to return and can be prevented by early oral analgesics such as cocodamol 30/500.
The backslab and dressings are all taken down at the first post-operative clinic visit at 1 week post surgery.
The hand therapist can then see the patient for a custom made splint and an early active motion protocol.
At our unit the patient progresses through the following stages.
Week 1-2 – Early active movement with hook position within the splint and place and holds in full extension
Week 3-4 – Out of splint active motion including hook grips and wrist motion
Week 4-6 – Full fist and weaning from splint with some regular functional use such as feeding and dressing. Ongoing splint use overnight.
Week 6 onwards – Splint free use progressing to regular function such as opening doors.
Week 7-8 If the patient feels safe enough acativities duch as driving may be resumed. Further strengthening continues. Occasionally further therapy is required to overcome joint stiffness or tendon adhesions.

Results of primary extensor tendon repair of the hand with respect to the zone of injury.
Mehdinasab SA, Pipelzadeh MR, Sarrafan N.Arch Trauma Res. 2012 Fall;1(3):131-4.
This group stratified their results according to the zone of injury and found that a Kessler repair was adequate and that on the whole repairs in zones 3 and 5 fared better than in zones 2 and 4
Effects of direction of tendon lacerations on strength of tendon repairs.
Tan J, Wang B, Xu Y, Tang JB. J Hand Surg Am. 2003 Mar;28(2):237-42.
An interesting biomechanical study showing that the obliquity of the tendon laceration must be considered when placing the cross suture in a modified Kessler repair.
Results of primary reparing of hand extensor tendons injuries using surgical treatment.
Karabeg R, Arslanagic S, Jakirlic M, Dujso V, Obradovic G.
Med Arch. 2013;67(3):192-4. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2013.67.192-194.
Another series of results following extensor repairs demonstrating good to excellent results in 80%.
Reference
- orthoracle.com




















