
Learn the Extensor tenolysis and intrinsic release of the hand surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Extensor tenolysis and intrinsic release of the hand surgical procedure.
Adhesions of the extensor tendons can occur following operations or trauma. One of the common causes of extensor tendon adhesions is a fracture fixation of the metacarpal or proximal phalanx. When this occurs in the context of a crush injury hand often there can be scarring of the intrinsic muscles of the hand. This results in a combination of extrinsic and intrinsic tightness.
To understand the pathology of this condition and to recognise it one needs to understand the anatomy of extensor tendons and instrinsic muscles. The extensor mechanism of the fingers are made up of EDC tendons, EIP and EDM which arise in the forearm. At the MCP joint level they form the extensor hood and continue into the fingers as central slip and lateral bands. The intrinsic muscles, namely the lumbricals and interossei arise in the hand and are attached to the lateral bands. Therefore if there is scarring of the long extensor tendons or the instrinsic muscles patient looses the flexion of the fingers as the lateral bands are not able to move. To differentiate the two, one uses the Bunnell’s Instrinsic tightness test. In this test the PIP joint passive movements are checked with MCP joint in flexion and hyperextension. When there is tightness of the extrinsic muscles, the PIP joint flexion is improved when the MCP joint is hyperextended and the reverse is true with intrinsic tightness. This is because with MCP joint hyperextension the long extensors are relaxed and the intrinsics are stretched.
Though both lumbricals and interossei are involved in the scarring following a crush injury, it is the lumbrical which usually causes the loss of flexion. Lumbricals originate from FDP tendons and are four in number. The radial two are supplied by median nerve and the ulnar two by ulnar nerve. Lumbricals flex the MCP joints and extend the IP joints.
The patient in the case series sustained a crush injury to is left hand in an industrial press. He had closed fractures of four metacarpals and three proximal phalanges. They were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. After six months of hand therapy the plate and screws were removed and extensor tenolysis performed. However after six months it was noted that over the middle finger he had reduced flexion and on examination intrinsic tightness test was positive. A revision tenolysis was performed along with intrinsic release.

INDICATIONS
The indication for performing an extensor tenolysis and intrinsic release is a patient who has loss of flexion from scarring of the extensor tendons and intrinsic muscles. Usually this is following a previous closed injury and a fracture fixation of the metacarpals. Please note that while adhesions of the extensor tendons is a common occurrence following fracture fixation, adhesions of the intrinsic muscles is a rare occurrence and only happens with heavy crush injuries where there has been damage to the lumbricals and interossei.
Intrinsic release can also be used in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis with intrinsic tightness.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients present with limitation of flexion of the affected finger(s). In Rheumatoid arthritis, they may present with a swan-neck deformity.
On examination, both active and passive mobilisation of the finger is limited.
Bunnell’s intrinsic tightness test is the basis for making the diagnosis which is made through clinical examination.
IMAGING
Ultrasound scan is useful in demonstrating the scarring of the lumbricals and/or interossei. When the patient has had a previous trauma, X-Rays should be done to make sure that the fractures have healed.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
There are no alternate surgical options.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
A trial of conservative treatment is always done before performing a tenolysis. This is through hand therapy for at least four to six months When the patient is reassessed if it is felt that the loss of flexion is from adhesions of the tendons, then a decision to do an extensor tenolysis is made.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
A non-compliant patient is a relative contraindication as the success of this procedure is dependent on post-operative hand therapy.

The operation can be performed under a brachial block or general anaesthetic. An upper arm tourniquet is used. The arm is prepped, draped and positioned on the hand table. A single dose of intravenous antibiotic is used as one anticipates opening the MCP joint as part of the tenolysis.

The arm is elevated in a sling and patient is discharged home with analgesics. No plaster or splint is used. Hand therapy is started on the following day if possible. The dressings are reduced and active and passive mobilisation is done as tolerated. Hand therapy is continued on an outpatient basis.
Hand therapy exercises consist of active and passive movements of the finger both at MCP and interphalangeal joints. Patients are advised to continue these exercises at home. Hand therapy is continued for six weeks.
Sutures are removed after two weeks.
Patient is advised to do scar massage and to continue mobilisation.
Patient can do routine household activities after two weeks. They are allowed to drive once the sutures are removed but in most cases the pain and lack of movements prevent it till at least four weeks.In four to six weeks, patient should be able to resume normal activities. This patient had near normal flexion of his finger after six weeks.

1.Schneider LH1.Tenolysis and capsulectomy after hand fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jun;(327):72-8.
There are well established operative procedures for salvage of function after fracture healing. When hand therapy measures have not achieved a satisfactory range of motion, it is reasonable to remove any hardware, if present, and lyse tendon adhesions that prevent tendon gliding. The exact cause of restricted motion and the location of adhesions are not always predictable preoperatively, so the surgeon should anticipate additional procedures such as dorsal/palmar capsulectomies in combination with extensor and/or flexor tenolysis. The use of local anesthesia for direct patient input during the procedure offers great advantages. In an ideal situation there should be a demonstrable functional need in a compliant patient with a well healed fracture and workable articular surfaces. Competent hand therapy should be available postoperatively.
2. Creighton JJ Jr1, Steichen JB.Complications in phalangeal and metacarpal fracture management. Results of extensor tenolysis. Hand Clin. 1994 Feb;10(1):111-6.
Extensor tendon adherence and joint contracture after phalangeal and metacarpal fracture are common complications that affect finger motion and hand function. The results obtained by extensor tenolysis and dorsal capsulotomy are discussed in this article. Surgical outcome was evaluated as it related to extensor tenolysis and capsulotomy relative to the final total active motion, total passive motion, and active extensor lag. This information will be useful in discussing the expected results of surgery with the patient and in guiding postoperative rehabilitation.
3. Elfenbein DH1, Rettig ME.The digital extensor mechanism of the hand. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2000;59(4):183-8.
In summary, there is a complex interplay between the extrinsic and intrinsic components of the digital extensor mechanism. Numerous examples of dynamic anatomy and pathology of the extensor mechanism in common clinical settings have been described. Treatment principles have been outlined. This review should provide the orthopaedic surgeon with a framework for management of common hand problem
Reference
- orthoracle.com
























