
Learn the Flexor tendon reconstruction: First stage using silicone spacer surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Flexor tendon reconstruction: First stage using silicone spacer surgical procedure.
There are a number of clinical scenarios where primary tendon repair is not a feasible option and some form of graft reconstruction is required. This may be performed as a single or a two stage procedure.
Here I demonstrate the first stage of a two stage flexor tendon reconstruction.
It was in 1963 that Basset and Carrol first described the use of silicone implants in tendon reconstruction and later Hunter (1971) described the two staged technique for flexor tendon reconstruction.
In summary the process involves using passive silicone tendon implants at the first procedure to re-establish a suitable biological environment for subsequent placement of tendon grafts.
Readers will also find the following OrthOracle techniques of use:
Zone 2 digital flexor tendon repair
Flexor tendon reconstruction: Second stage.
Reattachment of Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon using mini-mitek bone anchor.

INDICATIONS:
Flexor tendons require a pristine gliding environment for optimum function. Whenever the fibro-osseous sheath is felt to be hostile to immediate placement of a tendon graft the two stage technique may be employed to restore a more suitable gliding sheath for eventual graft placement. The process depends upon a pseudosheath forming around the implant and it is the smooth inner surface of the psudosheath that will provide the smooth gliding surface required by the tendon graft.
The two stage reconstruction technique may be employed in severe trauma, such as crush injuries, complex fractures, soft tissue destruction but also in cases of significant scarring of the flexor sheath or destruction of the pulley system.
The Boyes pre-operative injury classification system may be used to guide reconstructive options.
Grade 1—minimum scar, supple joints, no trophic changes
Grade 2—scar-limiting gliding of graft
Grade 3—joint involvement with loss of passive motion
Grade 4—multiple digit involvement with tendon injury
Grade 5—devastating injury with salvage procedures required.
Grades 2-5 necessitate a two stage reconstruction over a single stage procedure.
Sometimes the final decision about reconstructive strategy can only be made once the intra-operative dissection has been performed and therefore all possible options need to be discussed with the patient beforehand.
In the current case 53 year old typist sustained a volar knife laceration over the PIPJ crease of the dominant small finger resulting in a complete division of FDP. She presented five weeks after the injury with a transverse scar and a lack of DIPJ flexion.
The various management strategies were discussed with the patient and she requested exploration and attempted repair, in the knowledge that this may not be feasible at this late stage. She was therefore also consented for single stage and two stage flexor tendon reconstruction.
SYMPTOMS & ASSESSMENT:
The finger was held in extension with absent FDP function confirmed on passive tenodesis. There was an area of tenderness in the palm, just proximal to the A1 pulley. The patient was also getting some sensory disturbance in the small finger where the FDP stump was causing some tether around the digital nerves to the fourth webspace.
The FDS was present but function was compromised by joint stiffness.
INVESTIGATION:
No further investigations were ordered. An ultrasound scan can occasionally be useful to if there is diagnostic doubt and to identify the proximal FDP stump. In Leddy-Packer type 3 FDP avulsion injuries a plain film may show an avulsed bone fragment.
OPERATIVE ALTERNATIVES:
It is important to have a frank discussion with the patient about the complexity of the problem and the prolonged rehabilitation time as well as the potential for an eventual outcome that may yet be compromised by stiffness, pain or a deficit in range of motion. A DIP joint arthrodesis remains a sensible alternative that must be considered.
NON-OPERATIVE ALTERNATIVES:
Non-operative management with an initial period of splints and activity modification should be weighed in the balance.
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
Patients with poor neurological or vascular function are unsuitable. Patients who have a history of poor compliance or those without the capacity to participate in a complex rehabilitation process may not be suitable candidates either. Finally patients with minimal functional demands may not benefit from a two-stage reconstruction.

Prior to commencing any surgery there may be an opportunity to commence a period of hand therapy aimed at improving passive range of movement and reducing swelling and softening scar tissue as much as possible.
When planning a two stage reconstruction one must check for the presence of a palmaris longus tendon using the standard tests described elsewhere. The tendon is a useful donor but may be absent in 13% of the population.
The procedure is carried out under regional anaesthesia or general anaesthesia. The source of tendon graft clearly has a direct bearing upon this decision.
The hand is placed on an arm table, an upper arm tourniquet is applied and inflated. A lead hand is used to position the digits. A surgical assistant is very helpful. Bipolar cautery is used.
A selection of silicone trials and rods should be available.

The patient is allowed to return home with oral analgesia on the same day, with elevation in a Bradford sling.
The wound is checked in clinic in 5 -7 days and passive motion commenced under the guidance of a hand therapist. This should ensure that the digit remains without contracture whilst the pseudosheath forms.
The pseudosheath will take about 3 months to mature, and the second stage can then be embarked upon.

In the following study from 2002, Coyle et al looked at their results of 35 two staged flexor tendon reconstructions using the the finger to palm technique described here. They report 69% good to excellent results.
Poor prognostic factors that were highlighted included, a delay of more than 1 year since injury, or more than 6 months between stage 1 and 2. A higher injury severity also correlated with poorer outcomes.
J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Jul;27(4):581-5.
Wehbe et al reported results in 150 fingers in 136 patients. Results reached a plateau at three months following grafting and a flexion contracture was the commonest complication. There was a 14% rupture rate.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jun;68(5):752-63.
Wehbe et al reported results in 150 fingers in 136 patients. Results reached a plateau at three months following grafting and a flexion contracture was the commonest complication. There was a 14% rupture rate.
Reference
- orthoracle.com



















