
Learn the Four Corner carpal Fusion using Medartis plate and scaphoid excision surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Four Corner carpal Fusion using Medartis plate and scaphoid excision surgical procedure.
This is a detailed step by step instruction through a Four Corner fusion and scaphoid excision using a dorsal low profile titanium plate from MedartisTM.
This is a salvage operation usually undertaken when the scaphoid fossa is damaged and arthritic most commonly from a Scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC ) stage 2 and above or Scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) stage 2 and above. Rarely it can also be undertaken in the acute setting with complex carpal injuries and dislocations.
Following a period of 6-8 weeks in plaster cast and the rehabilitation it is expected the patient will achieve 30-50% of their normal range of movement. The operation has a non-union rate of around 10%

Indications
Articular damage to the mid-carpal or radio-scaphoid joint or mid-carpal instability causing pain with preservation of the Radio-lunate articulation.
Failure of non-operative treatment.
Causes would include : post traumatic arthritis, Scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) grade 2-3, Scapho-lunate advanced collapse (SLAC) grade 2-3, failed scaphoid non-union surgery, failed partial wrist fusion (e.g. Capitolunate fusion), post traumatic mid carpal instability failing non-operative treatment especially in the hyperlaxity patients.
Symptoms
The symptoms experienced will depend on the underlying pathology however in the main the operation is undertaken for pain or dysfunction due to instability.
Patients with degenerative change in the scaphoid fossa or mid-carpal joint will complain of pain on movement and loading and occasionally pain at rest in more severe cases. Patients with instability often complain of a painful clunk or a reluctance to use the hand for loading tasks due to its unreliability or pain when they experience the clunking.
The patient’s job and hobbies often play a major role in their symptoms and therefore discussing these details and realistic expectations of the post-operative outcomes are essential in treatment selection.
Examination
For the arthritic patient (SLAC, SNAC etc.) the patients often already have a reduced range of movement and complain of pain during active and passive movement especially at the end of range and into radial deviation. Palpation over the affected joint can be painful due to synovitis.
A Kirk-Waston test is often painful as this will shear the scaphoid in its fossa and irritate both the Radio-scaphoid joint and Scapho-trapezium-trapezoid (STT) joint.
It is useful during the examination to try to elicit which joint (radiocarpal or midcarpal or both) the patient’s movement is coming from as often pre-operatively there has already been a loss of movement at the arthritic joint and therefore the post-operative range of movement is likely to be 30-50% of the normal movement not the pre-operative range.
For instability cases a Kirk-Watson test may be positive if SLAC is the pathology although it is often just painful with no clunking. There may be a positive mid-carpal clunk (Lichtman test) in the hyperlaxity patient or those with Luno-triquetral or volar extrinsic ligament injuries. A positive Reagan test or Kleinman Shuck test may also be positive with underlying Luno-triquetral injuries.
It may be difficult to elicit a positive result in some of these tests if pain is a major issue and the patient’s wrist is not relaxed during the examination.
Investigations
Investigations include plain PA and lateral radiographs which can reveal which joints are arthritic and also the type of lunate (type 1 or 2) which is useful to know during the surgery.
A CT scan can be useful and on occasion in SLAC wrists the scaphoid fossa appears falsely normal on plain radiograph and on a CT the scaphoid can be seen sitting on the dorsal lip of the radius confirming the diagnosis. An MRI may be useful to review the intercarpal ligaments if considering other surgical options however they are often unreliable in assessing luno-triquetral and volar extrinsic ligament chronic injuries.
For the mid-carpal instability, hyperlaxity patients with no arthritis, a diagnostic arthroscopy may be the only way to determine if there are any other ligament injuries which could be managed without a major fusion operations.
Non-operative Management
Non-operative management for arthritis includes, analgesia, activity modification, wrist splinting, physiotherapy with wrist strengthening and occasionally steroid injections for temporary pain relief.
For instability patients with no ligament injury the key is to strengthen the wrist not only as a potential curative therapy but it is essential to optimise the wrist strength before any surgery for best outcomes.
For these instability patients a wrist splint which applies Pisiform pressure to support the ulnar carpus can also be useful.
Alternative operative Management
For this operation numerous fixation methods can be used including plates, memory staples, headless screws or simple wires. This operation uses the MedartisTM APTUS Four Corner Fusion plate.
The alternative operation to a four corner fusion will depend upon the underlying pathology.
Scaphoid fossa arthritis – e.g. Trauma, SLAC stage 2 (where proximal capitate preserved) – Wrist Denervation, Proximal Row carpectomy, limited wrist fusion (capito-lunate with scaphoid excision, radio-scapholunate with distal scaphoid exicision), arthroplasty.
Mid-carpal arthritis – e.g. Trauma, SLAC stage 3 and SNAC grade 2 + 3 – Wrist Denervation, limited wrist fusion (capito-lunate with scaphoid excision), arthroplasty. (SNAC stage 2 can also undergo a PRC where proximal capitate is preserved).
Midcarpal instability with no arthritis – ligament stabilisations (e.g. ECRB transfer through capitate and triquetrum) other partial wrist fusions (capito-lunate).
Contraindications
Lunate fossa arthritis is the main contraindication. If other surgical options such as PRC are possible then smoking or major skin conditions such as poorly controlled eczema or psoriasis over the incision site would be relative contraindications in four corner fusion surgery.

Pre-operative preparations and Equipment
The operation can be performed under general or regional anaesthetic. As the duration of surgery is around 2 hours, a sterile Esmarch is used once the skin marking are completed to reduce tourniquet time and access to a sterile forearm tourniquet may useful if the patient under regional anaesthetic starts to struggle with tourniquet pain. Tourniquet is set to 250mmHg
Distal radius bone graft is used for this procedure which is ample in volume and has low additional morbidity and possible under a regional/axillary block due to its location.
Equipment – Fine bone nibblers, a sharp curved periosteal elevator, Medartis TM APTUS 4 corner fusion plate and set (k-wires on the set), image intensifier, plaster cast. NOTE: You may also need additional equipment to remove previous metalwork i.e. scaphoid screws.
A single dose of antibiotics are given pre-operatively.

As this is a painful operation it is paramount to advise the patient that it is very painful, advise strict elevation in a sling provided and provide opiate analgesia.
We provide paracetamol, codeine and oral morphine with an antiemetic (cyclizine) and laxative (senna). Anti-inflammatory medications are not used for the first 2 weeks.
Patients are sent home the same day and return to clinic for a wound review and cast change within the week.
At this point the wrist is still swollen and will need reviewing again in another week for conversion to a full cast and possible trimming of suture ends.
If the fingers are stiff at this point a hand therapy review with the new cast in place is advised.
The cast is then continued for another 4 weeks to make a total of 6 weeks in cast.
If the patient is unreliable and very keen to go back to a manual labouring heavy job continue the cast for a further 2 weeks, making a total of 8 weeks.
Once the cast is discontinued X-ray PA and lateral and if all is as expected then start hand therapy for wrist movement.
If there are concerns over union then splinting and a CT scan is advised.
It is expected that patients will regain 30 degrees extension and 30 degrees flexion. There is a 10% non-union rate and a number of patients complain of mild ulna sided wrist pain on ulna deviation.
It will usually take patients 8-10 weeks to return to light work and 4-6 months to return to heavy work.

Four corner fusion using a multidirectional angular stable locking plate.
World J Orthop. 2016 Aug 18;7(8):501-6. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i8.501. eCollection 2016 Aug 18.
Chaudhry T1, Spiteri M1, Power D1, Brewster M1.
Abstract
AIM:
To review the results of our experience with the Medartis Aptus plating system for four corner arthrodesis of the wrist, which uses a combination of compression screws and variable angle locking screws.
METHODS:
We reviewed the results of 17 procedures in 16 patients that underwent scaphoid excision and four corner fusion using the Medartis Aptus system between May 2010 and June 2014. The primary outcome measure was radiographic and clinical union.
RESULTS:
The mean clinical follow up time was 20.6 mo. The mean union time was 6 mo. Two non-unions required revision procedures. The mean disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score taken after union was 36. The mean final grip strength was 27 kg. The mean final range of movement was 30° flexion and 31° of extension. All patients had a restored scapholunate angle on postoperative radiographs. There were no incidences of dorsal impingement.
CONCLUSION:
Overall our experience with the Aptus plating system shows comparable results to other methods of fixation for four corner fusion, in the short to medium term.
Proximal row carpectomy vs four corner fusion for scapholunate (Slac) or scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (Snac) wrists: a systematic review of outcomes.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2009 Apr;34(2):256-63. doi: 10.1177/1753193408100954.
Mulford JS1, Ceulemans LJ, Nam D, Axelrod TS.
In summary this review looked at 52 articles comparing 4CF and PRC for SNAC and SLAC.
They found that bot procedures gave similar pain relief, grip strength and subjective outcomes.
PRC may provide a better ROM and does not have complications such as non-union, metal work or dorsal impingement problems but does show a significantly higher frequency of arthritic changes in the remaining joints. This arthritis however is not necessarily symptomatic.
Reference
- orthoracle.com





































