
Learn the Hybrid tendon transfer and nerve transfer reconstruction of high radial nerve palsy surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Hybrid tendon transfer and nerve transfer reconstruction of high radial nerve palsy surgical procedure.
Delayed presentation or failed reconstruction of a radial nerve injury results in a persistent wrist drop with paralysed digital extensors. Salvage options include a standard set of high radial tendon transfers, median to radial nerve transfers of or a combination of the two reconstructive modalities. The benefit of tendon transfer reconstruction for wrist extension is early recovery and improved digital function due to the tenodesis effect. The challenge with tendon transfers for digital extension is the loss of some end range wrist flexion due to the restriction conferred by the tendon crossing the wrist and the loss of finger independence at the MCPJ due to the composite action of the extensor tendon transfer reconstruction to all fingers. Some independence is achievable at the PIPJ and DIPJ with the activation of the hand intrinsic muscles through median and ulnar nerve innervation preservation.
There is emerging interest in the use of nerve transfers to achieve better function, however the technique is technically challenging, has a 6-12 month delay until useful function is restored and the nerve transfer should be performed by 6-9 months from injury otherwise irreversible collapse of the intra-muscular neural plexus ensues. A hybrid reconstruction can be offered using a combination of pronator teres (PT) tendon transfer to the wrist and median to posterior interosseus nerve transfers using fascicles from FCR and PL in the proximal forearm. The approach to the proximal median nerve requires release of the PT superficial (humeral) head and so the hybrid technique involves formal elevation of the PT insertion to the radius in the identical way a traditional tendon transfer would be performed. This facilitates exposure of the median nerve and its motor branches in the forearm.

INDICATIONS
High complete radial nerve palsy that has had no recovery and is too late for primary nerve reconstruction to result in useful function. Typically this would be greater than 6 months from injury with exploration identifying the injury at the spiral groove. At theis level reconstruction may provide BR and ECRL recovery but ECRB is uncertain and PIN function unlikely to recover.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
There is a wrist drop and no active extension of the fingers at the MCPJs and no retropulsion and extension of the thumb. Sensation is absent in the superficial radial nerve territory. There may be a Tinel’s sign at the site of injury and nothing distally. This indicates a high grade axonopathy with no evidence of neural regeneration and the likely surgical findings will be a rupture or a neuroma in continuity.
IMAGING
Imaging is seldom useful. The grade of nerve injury cannot be confirmed by ultrasound. Newer probes and MRI neurography sequences may help in identifying fascicle continuity in the future (distinguish a grade 1/2/3 Sunderlland from a 4/5 Sunderland) but the resolution is currently insufficient to make a diagnosis without surgical exploration. Low grade injuries can be watched but non-progressive low grades or high grades should be explored to define the injury segment.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Reconstruction can be affected with a standard set of high radial tendon transfers. Typically PT to ECRB, FCR to EDC and PL to EPL would function well for most patients. The recovery time is short and the splint time limited to 6 weeks. Independence of finger extension at the MCPJ is not possible due to the mass effect of the tendon transfer. There is usually a loss of dome wrist flexion due to the FCR to EDC routed dorsally. The reconstruction can be performed with just nerve transfers. FDS branches can be transferred to the motor branch to ECRB. The nerve transfer option takes 6-9 months for reinnervation and 12-18 months for useful function. There is no need for splintage but this is a big time investment for patients. A hybrid technique as proposed here has splintage of the tendon transfer for 6 weeks and then useful tenodesis action allowing passive digit extension with active wrist flexion due to tightening of the extensor tendons. This will function well and assist in relearning the nerve transfer when it starts to work from 6 months.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Patients can be provided with wrist splints plus gloves and possibly an glove with a passive extension assist mechanism. This should only be recommended if the diagnosis of radial palsy is early, clinically it looks like a low grade (neurapraxia or Sunderland 2-3 axonopathy) and recovery is anticipated.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Patients should consent to the procedure and be aware of alternative treatment options. The hybrid tendon – nerve transfer is not well-reported in the literature and the results of tendon transfers alone are very good. There must be a perceived functional benefit from finger MCPJ extension independence to justify this approach and the additional time required for functional restoration.

The patient has a general anaesthetic without paralysis or a regional anaesthetic block at the axillary level without distal top up which could prevent the necessary stimulation needed to confirm anatomy and proceed with the nerve transfer. This case was combined with a radial nerve exposure under general anaesthesia without a tourniquet and the nerve gap was reconstructed with AVANCE processed nerve allograft plus an autologous sensory nerve graft to the branch to brachioradialis. The grafts are presented elsewhere on OrthOracle for brevity. This case study will concentrate on the hybrid PT to ECRL tendon transfer and the FCR/PL nerve branch transfer to the PIN.
The WHO checklist is completed.
A pneumatic tourniquet is useful for the exposure f the proximal median nerve and its branches because the area is vascular and any bleeding may compromise the view of the fine nerve ranches and risk inadvertent injury.
A lead hand is useful to control the forearm rotation during mobilisation of the P~T (pronation) and dissection of the nerve branches (supination).
Basic hand instruments, tendon instruments including weavers, microsurgery instruments, fibrin glue and an operating microscope are all required for this procedure.
The patient is positioned supine with an arm board under the arm to be operated.

The limb is elevated and analgesics are prescribed.
The arm should be monitored for bleeding and swelling and the patient can be discharged when comfortable. Using regional blocks and performing surgery on a single limb rather than autologous nerve grafting from the sural nerve under general aaesthesia may allow earlier patient discharge.
The wound should be reviewed at 2 weeks and the clips removed.
A below elbow thermoplastic splint is then applied for 4 weeks more.
At the 4 week post-operative point a hand therapist can assess the patient and commence isometric contraction of the transferred tendon with the wrist supported in extension.
Exercises progress with introduction of active extension with gravity eliminated through mid rotation positioning of the forearm.
Anti gravity motion is commenced as the patient progresses from 6-12 weeks post-operatively.
The nerve transfer will take 3-6 months to reinnervate and the patient should be taught composite wrist flexion finger extension tenodesis type activity with guided motor imagery to assist in rehabilitation of the nerve transfer.
The Birmingham nerve transfer rehabilitation protocol has 6 stages.
The earliest sign of reinnervation is deep muscle tenderness on squeezing the recipient muscle. This is followed 6 weeks later by visible contractions. At this stage strengthening is necessary before exercises to imporve cortical plasticity and finally functional training.

There are many factors that affect the outcome from a peripheral nerve reconstruction including severity of the injury, delay to reconstruction, adequacy of debridement, method of reconstruction, tension in the reconstruction, distance of the denervated targets from the injury site and patient factors including age and co-morbidities.
The gold standard for reconstruction of a critical nerve gap is reversed autologous sensory nerve graft. The sural nerve is typically harvested for a main nerve trunk with a gap of 5cm or more due to the need for 3-5 cables (a total of 25cm of nerve). The sural nerve has little donor site morbidity but necessitates general anaesthesia. There are sall risks of painful neuroma at the proximal donor harvest site plus risks or DVT, PE and donor site infection. The balance of risk and benefit should be weighed for each patient.
There is an abundance of data on AVANCE allograft utilisation and safety from medical publications and from the RANGER registry study in the USA. The efficacy data is strong for digital nerves and the numbers of sensory nerves and mixed motor-sensory nerves are smaller currently. Comparative data from autologous versus allograft reconstruction is limited. As such my practice is to use allograft in cases of pure sensory nerve reconstruction in otherwise sensitised individuals (neuroma reconstruction) where there is a significant risk of donor site sensitisation; in cases where there is another viable motor reconstruction (distal motor nerve transfer) and reconstruction is for pain, sensory recovery and no-critical motor recovery; in cases where there is insufficient autologous nerve available; in cases where recovery is unlikely but the prime objective is pain management; contraindications to general anaesthesia or lower limb surgery; failed primary autologous graft reconstruction and in cases where patients choose this technique.
NICE, the national institute for health and care excellence in the UK have issued guidance on the use of processed nerve allograft in nerve repair: NICE Interventional Procedure Guidance: 597 (www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg597).Enhanced governance arrangements and audit of outcomes is recommended for use outside sensory digital nerve in the hand. A summary of the guidance and the published literature is provided below.
AVANCE processed nerve allograft is provided frozen in a number of sizes and the appropriate graft can be selected after debridement and defining the nerve gap.
This patient had the radial nerve gap reconstructed with AVANCE processed nerve allograft and autologous graft from the posterior cutaneous nerve of the forearm.
The late presentation, large gap and older patient make successful distal recovery unlikely and so a hybrid tendon and nerve transfer distal reconstruction was adopted. The nerve transfer to the digits allows independent MCPJ extension and the PT to ECRL provides useful early functional wrist extension which can assist a tendodesis digit extension action with wrist flexion.
Nerve transfers may be used for wrist extension with FDS branch transfer to the nerve to ECRB. The procedure is rarely performed because of the early robust results of tendon transfer and the technical challenge of undertaking a nerve transfer which does not fall in the repertoire of many hand surgeons.
References for median to radial nerve transfers:
Mackinnon SE, Roque B, Tung TH. Median to radial nerve transfer for treatment of radial nerve palsy. Case report. 2007 Sep;107(3):666-71
Ray WZ, Mackinnon SE. Clinical Outcomes following median to radial nerve transfers. J Hand Surg Am. 2011;36(2):201-208
Reference
- orthoracle.com


















































































