
Learn the Implantation of peripheral nerve stimulator(Stimrouter neuromodulation system) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Implantation of peripheral nerve stimulator(Stimrouter neuromodulation system) surgical procedure.
The use of electrical stimulation for chronic pain has a long history. In the modern era its use spans several decades but it is only over the last 10-12 years, that an evidence base for its use in chronic pain has emerged.
Chronic neuropathic pain remains a huge source of disability and psychological distress and its treatment is difficult and unpredictable.
There are numerous hypothesised mechanisms of action for peripheral nerve stimulators in chronic nerve pain.
The most popular theory is the gate-control theory, which suggest that gates within the dorsal horn laminae in the spinal cord modulate painful and non-painful stimuli via a competitive mechanism. Painful stimuli are carried via small diameter fibres and non-painful stimuli are carried via larger diameter fibres. Flooding the system with non-painful stimuli via the large diameter fibres, closes the gate to the small fibre pathways and reduces the pain signals via these pathways.
Other mechanisms proposed include:
– Stimulation induced blockade of cell membrane conduction, preventing propagation of painful stimuli
– Long-term potentiation of dorsal horn neurones causing decreased excitability and depletion of amino acids such as glutamate and aspartate, which are excitatory amino acids and increased release of inhibitory transmitters such as GABA.
It remains clear that chronic pain is a complex interaction between nerve injury and repair mechanisms, in conjunction with secondary adaptive biological changes, as well as psychological and social factors.
Peripheral nerve stimulation should be seen as one additional technique available to physicians and surgeons treating chronic neuropathic pain. It is important that it is used in the context of a wider appreciation of the causes of pain ensuring that reversible causes are sought and addressed first. Furthermore simpler means of addressing chronic pain must be explored initially as these are successful in many patients.
In general, peripheral nerve stimulation is an option to be considered when a patient’s symptoms have resisted conventional treatment, such as physiotherapy, analgesia, peripheral nerve blockage, desensitisation therapy, exploration, decompression or surgical repair of damaged or entrapped peripheral nerves.
It is important that all chronic pain patients undergo a formal psychological assessment, in order that any psychological contributors are identified and addressed beforehand.
In this section of OrthOracle a peripheral nerve stimulator is implanted into a radial nerve within the arm, to treat chronic unrelenting neuropathic pain carried within fibres of the radial nerve. Onset of pain followed surgery for a malignant tumour in the cervical spine and brachial plexus, which required sacrifice of several routes and injury to others. The pain proved resistant to standard analgesia and neuropathic pain agents and other options were not available.
The peripheral nerve stimulator implanted was the Stimrouter neuromodulation system supplied in the UK by P-14 Systems.
It can be implanted via a percutaneous method or an open surgical method. It is the open surgical technique that is described in this section.
The device includes a low-profile rechargeable external pulse transmitter and a wireless, handheld patient programmer.
Patients apply the external pulse transmitter to the skin in alignment with the implantable lead which sits under the skin. This is done intermittently for minutes or hours at a time and often provides lasting relief for prolonged periods in between stimulation sessions. It is designed to be a long term treatment option.
Readers will also find the following OrthOracle surgical techniques of interest:
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) for neuroma treatment following above knee amputation
Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) of Superficial Radial Nerve using Axogen Avance processed nerve allograft

Indications:
Peripheral nerve stimulation is indicated in several chronic pain conditions, including trigeminal neuropathic pain, cluster headache and chronic migraine disorders, post-herpatic neuropathic pain, CRPS (complex regional pain syndrome), isolated peripheral neuropathies that are resistant to other forms of treatment.
Peripheral nerve stimulation should be considered when conventional means of treating a patient’s peripheral nerve pain have proved unsuccessful. It is important that the patient is reviewed by a pain specialist, as well as a peripheral nerve surgeon, to exclude reversible causes of peripheral nerve pain. The patient must also have undergone a regime of therapy, which includes physiotherapy as well as nerve modulation therapy, which can be successful at desensitising pain within a peripheral nerve distribution.
Prior to considering peripheral nerve stimulation, correctable nerve pathologies such as a compressive nerve entrapment or an unidentified injury to a nerve or nerve tether within a scar bed should be excluded. These can be looked for by surgeons or a pain specialists experienced in treating these conditions and may involve careful clinical examination in conjunction with nerve conduction studies and imaging.
The following criteria must be met before selecting a patient for peripheral nerve stimulation:
1) Exclusion of reversible nerve pathologies such as an entrapment neuropathy.
2) Pain consistently experienced within an anatomical distribution of a single peripheral nerve, whilst allowing for a degree of central sensitisation, which may blur the boundaries to an extent.
3) A positive diagnostic peripheral nerve block confirming abolition of pain within the distribution of the nerve in question.
History and Examination:
The history will usually establish the timeline of events, evolution of pain and treatment tried to date.
Examination may reveal pain described by the patient as unrelenting burning, tingling or pressure pain. Neuropathic pain in particular has a classic description whereby the patient is unable to find relief with standard analgesia such as opiates and anti-inflammatory medication but may find some relief in standard neuropathic pain agents such as Gabapentin, Pregabalin, Amitriptyline or Duloxetine.
Examination of a peripheral nervous system may reveal sensory and motor loss within the distribution of the nerve. A Tinel’s point should be looked for which may indicate a compressive pathology or may allow localisation of an injury or a nerve tether. Such pathologies are potentially reversible. The patient’s pain may be felt in a cutaneous distribution and this should be carefully mapped out. This will often demonstrate the primary nerve trunk through which the painful stimuli are conducted. This may also reveal neighbouring areas that are more difficult to identify, which may relate to injury to other nearby nerves that have previously been unidentified. They may also relate to hypersensitivity in neighbouring nerve distributions, which is known to occur in longstanding neuropathic pain. Features of central sensitisation should be looked for, such as allodynia (pain in response to a stimulus that doesnot normally cause pain) and hyperalgesia (increased pain from a stimulus that usually provokes pain).
The patient must complete a regular pain score before an after each treatment and before and after any targeted nerve block.
I use a modified McGill score and a visual analogue score (VAS).
Alternative operative treatment:
Alternative treatments have been touched on above and include standard neuropathic pain agents that are prescribed in accordance with NICE guidance CG96 in the UK, which guides the appropriate dose increments and intervals of standard neuropathic agents; these include Gabapentin and Pregabalin.
Unrelenting neuropathic pain may be temporarily relieved by an ultrasound guided nerve block. The effects of this can be prolonged by the addition of some steroid and it can be worth offering patients a prolonged block as part of the work up for a peripheral nerve stimulator or to provide some transient relief. Where there is a compressive pathology or a neuroma, these should be treated medically or surgically, as described elsewhere on OrthOracle.
Contraindications:
The contraindications to peripheral nerve stimulation mainly relate to contraindications for surgery including localised infection or coagulopathy. Other contraindications are a failed diagnostic nerve block or significant psychiatric illness.

This particular procedure is performed under regional anaesthesia with a brachial plexus block. This produces a segmental nerve block proximal to the site of operation but continues to allows the surgeon to stimulate nerves intra-operatively for ease of identification and measurement of stimulation thresholds.
General anaesthetic is a suitable alternative and the two techniques may be used in combination to provide post-operative pain relief.
The patient is placed supine with the operated limb on an arm table.
No tourniquet was used in this case.
Bipolar diathermy was used.
Antibiotics were given at induction due to the use of an implant.
Loupe magnification is recommended when dissecting around nerves.
Standard thrombo-prophylactic policy was adhered to.

The patient is usually discharged home the same day with oral analgesia.
With regional anaesthetic it is worth warning the patient of a sudden surge in pain that may occur as the anaesthetic wears off. This can usually be anticipated as the sensation starts to return and can be prevented by early oral analgesics such as cocodamol 30/500.
The dressings are all taken down at the first post-operative clinic visit at 2 weeks post surgery.
If the wound is healing well without evidence of infection, an initial trial stimulation protocol can be commenced as described in the steps above.
There is often a sudden wave of relief as the device is first turned on at the appropriate level of stimulation but it is important to note that the response will change and further adjustments may be required to maintain relief.
The patient continues using the initial protocol for 4 weeks.
At 6 weeks post operation, the patient is reviewed and pain scores taken again for comparison.
Often further adjustments are needed at this stage to either the electrode position on the skin or the stimulation protocol.
The patient needs to only change the sticky gel electrodes periodically to ensure a good contact is maintained.
Over subsequent weeks and months the stimulator may be required at less frequent intervals to maintain adequate analgesia. It is intended to be a lifelong device although long term data are currently lacking.

A Systematic Literature Review of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Therapies for the Treatment of Pain
Timothy R Deer et al Pain Med 2020 Aug 1;21(8):1590-1603. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa030.
This systematic review gives a good overview of the current evidence in this field.
Long term data for the effectiveness of peripheral nerve stimulators in chronic pain are lacking at present.
Much of the published evidence supports its use in the treatment of intractable headache and pelvic disorders.
There is some Level II evidence, that peripheral nerve pain may be modestly improved by use of a peripheral nerve stimulator. Long term outcomes remain unknown.
1.Deer TR, Provenzano DA, Hanes M, et al. The Neurostimulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee (NACC) recommendations for infection prevention and management. Neuromodulation
2017;20(1):31–50.
Deer performed a double blind RCT of peripheral nerve stimulation and showed significant improvements in pain scores at three months compared to non-treated controls.
2. Paul Verrills 1, David Vivian, Bruce Mitchell, Adele Barnard Pain Med 2011 Sep;12(9):1395-405. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01201.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3. Peripheral nerve field stimulation for chronic pain: 100 cases and review of the literature
A prospective observational study showing 72% of patients reduced their analgesic use after implantation and a follow up time of 1-23 months. The study showed significant reductions in pain scores.
Reference
- orthoracle.com












































