
Learn the Internal Fixation of Olecranon fracture using Synthes LCP Olecranon plate surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Internal Fixation of Olecranon fracture using Synthes LCP Olecranon plate surgical procedure.
Olecranon fractures comprise around 10% of all fractures around the elbow. They have a bimodal distribution and usually occur as high energy injuries in the young, and low energy falls in the elderly.
These can occur as a direct blow, resulting in comminuted fractures, or indirectly, as a fall onto an outstretched hand, resulting in transverse or oblique fractures.
The position of the elbow can influence the pattern of injury. Radial head and coronoid fractures have been shown to occur in laboratory testing at flexion of less than 80 degrees, olecranon fractures at 90 degrees of flexion and distal humeral fractures at greater than 110 degrees (Amis AA, Miller JH. The mechanism of elbow fractures: an investigation using impact tests in vitro. Injury 1995;26:163–8).
Anatomically it is worth remembering that the olecranon, with the coronoid process, form the greater sigmoid notch and form the ulno-humeral articulation that acts as a primary stabilisers of the elbow (along with the medial and lateral collateral ligament). The olecranon receives the insertion of the triceps, as well as the anconeus on the lateral side.
For displaced fractures of the olecranon, surgical fixation is recommended unless the patient is functionally of low demand or medically at high risk undergoing general anaesthetic. The method of fixation is essentially determined by the fracture pattern. My preference is in most cases either for olecranon plating or tension band fixation. Tension band fixation is the commonest method of internal fixation used for non-comminuted olecranon fractures. The principles of tension band fixation involve converting the tension force on the dorsal aspect of the fracture into a dynamic compressive force at the articular surface. However, there are caveats if using the tension band principle as to when it may not be appropriate for fixation as follows:
1 – Comminution. If there is comminution, there is not enough inherent stability and the fixation is at risk of biomechanical failure as the tension forces are unable to be transferred into a compressive force.
2 – Obliquity of the fracture. The more oblique the fracture, the more the acting forces deviate from the line of action. This introduces a flexion moment and again, is theoretically less robust.
3 – Fractures distal to the centre of rotation to the elbow joint. Fractures that occur distal to the centre of rotation, again introduce a flexion moment to the fracture and can affect stability, and therefore risk failure.
4 – Associated fractures. Coronoid fractures, radial head fractures and Monteggia type fractures can increase instability in the elbow that a tension band fixation is not designed to neutralise.
If all these factors are satisfied, tension band fixation is a good option. If all the criteria are not satisfied, it does not exclude tension band fixation as a fixation method. It requires, like all surgery, weighing up the pros and cons of the fixation method.
In my own practice, if these criteria are not satisfied, I opt for pre-contoured Synthes anatomic locking plates. The design of the plate allows more screw options particularly with regard to hold in the proximal fragment, which can be small and multi-fragmentary in some cases. I believe that these plates also offer superior fixation as a result of the fixed-angle construct. This is especially the case if there is concern regarding bone quality in terms of osteoporosis and osteopaenia.
Author : Mr Samuel Chan FRCS (Tr & Orth)
Institution :The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham ,UK.
Clinicians should seek clarification on whether any implant demonstrated is licensed for use in their own country.
In the USA contact: fda.gov
In the UK contact: gov.uk
In the EU contact: ema.europa.e

INDICATIONS
Surgical management is reserved for displaced and unstable fractures of the olecranon. The aim is to restore the extensor mechanism to optimise extension strength and function.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients usually present after sustaining a direct blow to the elbow or due to a fall onto an outstretched hand.
The patient may be unable to extend their elbow.
It is important to assess the soft tissues and carefully examine the skin to exclude an open fracture.
It is common to find significant bruising and swelling and it may be possible to palpate the fracture due to the subcutaneous nature of the olecranon. There can be associated soft tissue contusions and abrasions. There may be significant displacement and deformity and it is important to correct this rapidly to take the tension off the soft tissue and limit secondary damage of the soft tissue envelope.
A neurovascular assessment is important, with particular reference to the ulnar nerve, which can be compromised.
In high energy injuries, although uncommon, it is important to exclude a compartment syndrome.
IMAGING
Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow should be obtained.
Although olecranon fractures are usually isolated injuries, it is important to look for and exclude associated injuries including coronoid fractures, radial head fractures and Monteggia fracture dislocations. These associated injuries can affect the stability of the elbow.
If the fracture pattern is more complex, a CT scan with coronal and sagittal reconstructons is helpful for surgical planning.
Classifications
Numerous classification systems have been described and are largely based on the level of displacement, comminution and stability of the elbow, although none have gained widespread acceptance.
Colton Classification
(Colton CL. Fractures of the olecranon in adults: classification and management. Injury 1973;5(2):121–9)
• Type I: Undisplaced and stable (does not displace with elbow flexion)
• Type II:
A – avulsion
B – oblique/transverse
C – comminuted
D – fracture dislcation
Mayo Classification
(Morrey BF, JBJS 77A: 718-21, 1995)
Type 1 – Undisplaced fracture, simple or comminuted (12%)
Type 2 – Displaced fracture, simple or comminuted (82%)
Type 3 – Unstable (6%)
Other classifications include Schatzker and AO.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Tension band fixation
Tension band wire fixation is the commonest method of internal fixation used for non-comminuted olecranon fractures. The principles of tension band wiring involve converting the tension force on the dorsal aspect of the fracture into a dynamic compressive force at the articular surface.
The exclusion criteria for this technique have been described in the overview. Concerns regarding hardware prominence have led to techniques using suture material with good results.
Plate fixation
In the literature, types of plates have been used including one-third tubular, 3.5 mm contoured limited contact dynamic compression, 3.5 mm reconstruction, hook plates as well as pre-contoured anatomic locking plates. There is currently insufficient evidence to suggest that any type of plate fixation is superior to other forms of plate fixation.
In both cases, there is concern regarding hardware prominence due to the subcutaneous nature of the ulna. Metalwork may need to be removed once the bone has united if it is clinically symptomatic.
Intramedullary nailing
Intramedullary screws and nailing systems have been described in the literature, although is less common. Published results are good and comparable to alternative fixation methods.
Fragment excision and triceps advancement
This method is usually reserved for elderly patients with osteoporotic bone, extensive comminution
or a fragment too small for internal fixation. The triceps tendon is sutured to the anterior edge of the ulna to create a smooth sling for articulation.
Advantages of the technique include avoiding non-union and post-traumatic arthritis. Fragment excision can only be performed if the coronoid, medial collateral ligament, interosseous membrane and distal radio-ulnar joint are intact to prevent instability.
McKeever and Buck suggested that up to 80% of the trochlear notch could be excised without appreciably compromising elbow stability. Inhofe and Howard showed good or excellent outcomes in 11 of 12 cases treated with excision of up to 70% of the trochlear notch.
However, An et al. showed a reduction in elbow stability when over 50% of the trochlear notch was excised.
It is accepted that a reduction in triceps strength occurs.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Undisplaced and stable olecranon fractures can be treated non-operatively. Undisplaced fractures are generally defined as up to 2mm of displacement, although clinical correlation and assessment of the patient is required before a treatment plan can be recommended.
Patients can be immobilised in a backslab in 45–90 degrees of flexion for 2-3 weeks to allow the swelling and soft tissues to settle down before commencing physiotherapy.
However, in elderly patients of low functional demand, good functional outcomes can be achieved despite significant displacement. In a series of 13 patients treated non-operatively of mean age 81.8 years with >5 mm displacement, Veras Del Monte et al. found only one patient had a poor functional outcome.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Patients of low functional demand or medically unfit would be relative contra-indications. As part of informed consent, a discussion of outcomes of conservative and operative methods is essential for treatment planning.

The procedure is performed under general anaesthetic and can be supplemented with a nerve block performed by the anaesthetist. It is usually necessary to supplement this with local anaesthetic and adrenaline infiltrated to the operative field to optimise pain relief and to optimise the field of view.
The patient is placed in a lateral decubitus position with the affected arm uppermost. The position of the shoulder is checked to ensure it is in an appropriate and comfortable postion. The arm is placed in a short ulnar gutter support. Care is taken to ensure that chest wall is well protected from any clamps and metal equipment using gel pads and padding. The elbow can be manipulated during the procedure and can cause pressure areas if not appropriately protected. A surgical prescrub prior to routine skin preparation may be performed.
A high arm tourniquet is applied and secured to maintain a bloodless field during the procedure. The skin is prepared using Chlorohexidine solution starting at the hand, then onto the whole of the upper limb, up to and including the shoulder. Standard adhesive drapes are used. During this process, the upper limb is elevated and once complete, the tourniquet can be inflated.
Intermittent calf compression Flotron devices are used during surgery to reduce the risk of thromboembolic disease unless there are any contraindications. Intravenous antibiotics are administered by the anaesthetist.

As mentioned, the rehabillitation protocol depends on the stability of fixation, condition of the soft tissues and patient compliance.
If the fixation is satisfactory, the patient is not formally immobilised in plaster. A heavy wool and crepe bandage is applied with the elbow in 45-90 degress of flexion and supported in a sling.
The bandages are taken down at 5–7 days and passive and gentle active movements are commenced at this point.
Active movements against resistance should be avoided until there is evidence of bony healing at approximately 6–8 weeks.

Karlsson MK, Hasserius R, Karlsson C, Besjakov J, Josefsson PO. Fractures of the
olecranon: a 15–25 year follow up of 73 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;403:205–12
Karlsson et al. reviewed 73 cases, with 84% treated with internal fixation, showing 96% of patients had a good or excellent outcome at 15–25 years follow up. It was noted that degenerative change was found to be more common following olecranon fracture (50%), when compared to patient’s uninjured elbow(11%).
The main complication following internal fixation of olecranon fractures is hardware irritation.
This is mostly related to tension band wiring although has been reported with the use of plate fixation.
Loss of motion is commonly described after olecranon fracture fixation, particularly in extension. However, it is rarely functionally limiting.
Elbow motion outcomes are worse in cases with associated fractures of the radial head, capitellum, coronoid or Monteggia fracture-dislocations.
Hak DJ, Golladay GJ. Olecranon fractures: treatment options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2000;8:266–75.
Non-union is rare has been reported in 1% of cases.
The risk of iatrogenic neurovascular injury is present, particularly with anterior cortical penetration in tension band wiring. Structures at risk include the interior interosseous nerve, median nerve and ulnar artery, although it is noted that the wires would have to protrude beyond 10mm.
Prayson MJ, Iossi MF, Buchalter D, Vogt M, Towers J. Safe zone for anterior cortical perforation of the ulna during tension-band wire fixation: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17(1):121–5.
Reference
- orthoracle.com








































