
Learn the LARS ligament reconstruction stabilisation acromioclavicular joint surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the LARS ligament reconstruction stabilisation acromioclavicular joint surgical procedure.
The LARS ligament technique is one of many described to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligaments of the shoulder for a dislocated or subluxed acromioclavicular joint. This is an open technique passing the artificial ligament underneath the coracoid and securing it to the distal clavicle through drilled tunnels at 90 degrees to each other and secured using interference screws. The LARS ligament is made of PET (polyethylene terephthalate) and for ACJ come sin two sizes, LAC20 with strength 1000N and the LAC30 with strength 1500N. It can be used for repair and reconstruction of the acute AC joint dislocation or for stabilisation of the more chronic injury by providing a scaffold for natural tissue ingrowth. Like other sub-coracoid techniques it removes the need to drill holes into the coracoid process which are sometimes narrow and carry with them a risk of fracture. The fixation using interference screws is strong and reduces the risk of attritional wear notching the clavicle seen in some cases when an artificial ligament is looped around the clavicle.
Author : Mark Crowther FRCS (Tr & Orth)
Institution: The Avon Orthopaedic centre , Bristol, UK.
Clinicians should seek clarification on whether any implant demonstrated is licensed for use in their own country.
In the USA contact: fda.gov
In the UK contact: gov.uk
In the EU contact: ema.europa.e

INDICATIONS
The indication for reconstruction and stabilisation of an injured acromioclavicular(AC) joint is usually one of the variations of AC joint subluxation or dislocation. The absolute indications are very small in number and the relative indications for surgical treatment of such an injury can be debated long and hard by shoulder surgeons and traumatologists. The vast majority of injured acromioclavicular joints can be treated non-operatively with a conservative regime in the first instance. If however a patient is significantly disabled with pain and a mobile distal clavicle then surgical intervention can be considered but in my practice this would usually be as a delayed procedure rather than an acute operation. The majority of cases would be widely displaced dislocations, so called Grade 5 in the Rockwood classification with over 100% displacement of clavicle in relation to acromion. Further indications could be 100% displacement with a Grade 3 or posterior displacement through the trapezius muscle, the so called Grade 4 injury.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
The majority of the patients will have fallen from a height landing with a direct blow on to the point of their shoulder. They may hear a pop or a click and they present with pain over the top of the shoulder. There will also be swelling and perhaps bruising present and they may well be aware of a deformity which can be noticed early. Later presentation or at review several weeks down the line may reveal symptoms of pain around the back of the shoulder, indistinct neurological symptoms down the arm which can be described as a dragging or lame sensation. On clinical examination acutely both shoulders should be exposed to assess for symmetry. Inspecting from behind the patient it is important to look at the position of the scapula and scapula thoracic movement through range of motion which may be limited in the acutely painful phase. Integrity of the skin should be noted, as often if a patient has had a direct blow to the shoulder, the skin may be contused or there may be superficial abrasions. Such superficial damage to the skin may preclude early surgical intervention.
Careful neurological examination of the upper limb is important and findings should be documented carefully. Range of motion should be assessed. There may be obvious deformity at the acromioclavicular joint and even in the early stages following injury, relative stability or indeed mobility of the distal clavicle in relation to the acromion can be assessed. In the presence of obvious deformity it is important not to miss any occult injuries in the shoulder and it is important to ascertain that the glenohumeral joint is enlocated. Also assessment of the rotator cuff status should be performed. Often the acute injury can be treated conservatively with rest in a broad arm sling supporting the elbow, which in some cases can relatively reduce the acromion to the distal clavicle. Some authors have advocated a strapping over the top of the shoulder to reduce the lateral clavicle but often in the acute phase this is not well tolerated by patients. With suitable oral analgesia and application of ice packs to the injured shoulder, symptoms will settle over the first couple of weeks. Further clinical examination to reassess symptoms and clinical findings as documented should be repeated in the initial few weeks. Whilst some patients can tolerate conservative management and do extremely well without surgical intervention, delayed symptoms are often described as a generalised weakness in the shoulder girdle, difficulty loading the shoulder and hence lifting anything heavier than minor domestic articles with the unpleasant sensation of a highly mobile distal clavicle which exaggerates obvious deformity in the shoulder, particularly with cross body adduction of the effected arm.
IMAGING
Plain x-rays should always be performed and in my practice 3 views (AP, lateral and axillary views) are mandatory. X-rays are important to assess the overall displacement and hence severity of injury and can also pick up fractures around lateral clavicle or indeed around the scapula coracoid or acromial processes. Often plain x-rays are sufficient to aid decision making in the management of such injuries and can be performed as comparison studies with the opposite shoulder holding a weight in each arm to pull the shoulder down. This can exaggerate any injury to the superior suspensory apparatus around the acromioclavicular joint. Widening of the acromioclavicular joint or displacement of the distal clavicle then indicates damage to the coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments. If there is concern that there may be a fracture, then CT scan with 3D reconstructions is very useful. If an occult soft tissue injury is suspected, then a plain MRI scan is also indicated. Rarely is examination under anaesthetic or screening with image intensifier required.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
There have been numerous surgical techniques described for the treatment of a dislocated acromioclavicular joint. Historically a Bosworth screw between the distal clavicle and the coracoid process perhaps supplemented with transarticular K-wires was used but this often resulted in the screw breakage or wire migration. The Weaver-Dunn procedure released the coracoacromial ligament from the under surface of the acromion, leaving it attached to the coracoid and fixed into the end of the distal clavicle. This procedure could be supplemented with subcoracoid suture tapes. Techniques have also been described using autologous tendon grafts such as hamstrings or palmaris longus. Tendons would be passed beneath the coracoid and then wrapped around the distal clavicle reconstructing the coracoclavicular ligaments. Some surgeons have advocated the use of a hook plate with screw fixation to the lateral clavicle with the plate hook extension dipping beneath the acromion. This technique has been successful and is still used extensively in some units but does require the need for removal of the plate to avoid painful erosion of the acromion or even fracture in an unreliable patient with poor follow up compliance. More recently artificial ligaments have been developed and there has been several reports of success using the Surgilig, now known as Lock Down. This artificial ligament has looped ends, one being a soft and the other a hard. The ligament is passed beneath the coracoid and then the hard loop passed through the soft loop and pulled down to wrap around the coracoid. The hard loop is then passed behind the clavicle and fixed with a anterior to posterior screw, sometimes using a washer. Further techniques have been developed using heavy suture material between buttons passed through drill holes in both coracoid and clavicle, resulting in metal buttons sitting beneath the coracoid and on top of the clavicle. Arthrex tightrope is one example. In this technique, I describe use of the LARS (Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System). LARS ligaments (Corin, UK) have been developed since the early 1990’s. Such LARS ligaments have been used for reconstruction in numerous anatomical sites but particularly for ACL reconstruction in the knee. The LARS ligament is made from PET (polyethylene terephthalate) and this provides a scaffold for natural tissue ingrowth.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Broad arm sling immobilisation supporting the elbow, which can lift the acromion of the scapula to reduce the acromioclavicular joint is necessary for the first couple of weeks. The patient is allowed under arm hygiene and is encouraged to mobilise elbow, wrist and hand. Gentle glenohumeral joint pendular exercises are encouraged but elevation of the arm above shoulder height is limited for the first 4 weeks and usually too uncomfortable to be possible during this time. Application of cold ice packs can help for symptomatic relief, as well as regular oral analgesia or anti-inflammatory medication. Between 3 and 4 weeks following injury the sling can be removed and with time the injured shoulder tends to settle down and the distal clavicle can stabilise within scar tissue. Outpatient physiotherapy guidance is very useful to regain range of motion with assisted exercises initially. Once range of motion has returned to near normal, then strengthening exercises can be instigated. It is important to concentrate on scapulothoracic position and strengthening of the periscapular muscles, as well as overall shoulder movement.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
As with all surgical procedures, the patient’s general medical fitness should be assessed. They should be fully counselled as to the nature of surgery, the post-operative immobilisation and graduated rehabilitation process. A relative contraindication to surgical fixation with the LARS ligament would be inability to comply with a post-operative regime. Given the subcoracoid nature of the reconstruction, a fracture of the coracoid process would be a contraindication to this surgical intervention.

LARS ligament reconstruction of the dislocated acromioclavicular joint is performed under general anaesthetic and depending on the anaesthetist’s experience and preference, an interscalene nerve block can be performed. I prefer to perform surgery in the sitting position with the feet at the anaesthetic machine so that the surgeons have full access in front and behind the shoulder and this also allows safe positioning of the image intensifier for intra-operative x-ray screening. Intravenous antibiotics are administered by the anaesthetist and during surgery we use intermittent calf compression to reduce the risk of thromboembolic disease. Under anaesthetic the shoulder is further examined with a passive range of motion and assessment of the mobility of the distal clavicle and stability of the glenohumeral joint. It is advisable to perform a social wash prior to formal skin preparation. The bony anatomical landmarks are marked out with a skin marking pen. The skin preparation is started with the hand using Chlorhexidine solution. The whole arm is prepared so that it is freely mobile during surgery. The adhesive surgical drapes are applied as shown.

The vast majority of these operations are performed as a day case. Patients are allowed under arm hygiene and encouraged to mobilise their elbow wrist and hands. Sling is advised to be used for at least 3 weeks and then can be weaned off as comfort allows. Early post-operative physiotherapy should concentrate on posture and scapula setting. Active assisted forward elevation to 90 degrees and external rotation is allowed in the first 3 weeks as comfort dictates. Once the sling has been removed then exercises should progress from active assisted to full active range of motion as comfort allows. Check x-rays of the shoulder should be performed at 2 weeks when the wound is checked and again at 4 weeks when range of motion has started to increase and the sling has been discarded. Then gradually increase range of motion and start strengthening at approximately 8 weeks. Final x-rays at 4 months and return to full activities including sport at that stage if able.

LARS ligament for ACJ – surgical technique. Prof L. Funk www.shoulderdoc.co.uk/article/1208
LARS Ligament Reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint dislocations – a clinical study. Quin T, Nicolleti S, Fourie B, Funk L. www.shoulderdoc.co.uk/news/view/1341
Clinical and radiological results after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for Type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation using three different techniques. A retrospective study. Vascellari A, Schiavetti S, Battistella G, Rebuzzi E and Coletti N. Joints. 2015 Apr-Jun;3(2):54-61
Controversies relating to the management of acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Modi C, Beazley J, Zywiel M, Lawrence T, Veillette C. Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1595-1602
Treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation: a lack of evidence. Ceccarelli E, Alviti F, Miulli F, Padua R. J Orthopaedic Traumatol. 2008 Jun;9(2):105-8
Reference
- orthoracle.com

























































