
Learn the Open excision of acromioclavicular joint (Mumford procedure) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Open excision of acromioclavicular joint (Mumford procedure) surgical procedure.
This is a useful technique to be able to offer to patients with a acromioclavicular joint pain secondary to degenerative change. Isolated acromioclavicular joint pain is quite common and can vary in severity, from being either a minor inconvenience to interfering significantly with work, sport and leisure activities and in particular sleep.
The clavicle is one of the last bones to fully ossify in the human skeleton and almost as soon as it has done so there is propensity for it to degenerate at either the medial sternoclavicular joint or more commonly at the lateral acromioclavicular joint. The onset of pain in the acromioclavicular joint can be insidious or maybe as a result of minor trauma such as a grade 1 or a grade 2 sprain, which comes about as a fall directly on to the point of the shoulder or a direct blow to the acromioclavicular joint.
It has been documented that approximately 30% of the population have an intra-articular disc of soft tissue similar to a knee meniscal cartilage within the acromioclavicular joint. If this were to be damaged, then that can also be a cause of persistent pain and disability.
Once a diagnosis of acromioclavicular joint pain has been established then simple conservative measures should be recommended in the first instance. If non-operative measures have been exhausted and the patient has persistent pain, then consideration should be given to excision arthroplasty of the acromioclavicular joint with removal of the joint contents and resection of the distal clavicle articular facet. This is also known as the Mumford procedure after an early description published in 1941. The cavity then fills with scar tissue and generally the patient’s symptoms are greatly improved quite quickly. The open technique described here is relatively quick, straightforward and successful.

Indications
The indication for an open excision of the acromioclavicular joint and distal clavicle is primarily pain. The majority of such patients have degenerative arthritis within this joint but this is also a very common finding in patients who are asymptomatic. It is worth reflecting that the majority of patients over the age of 40 years old will have some radiographic evidence of degeneration of the acromioclavicular joint with joint space narrowing, sclerosis and cyst formation.
The treating surgeon therefore must be convinced that the acromioclavicular joint is the site of the patient’s symptoms and this is ascertained with careful history, examination and investigation as follows. As always conservative non-operative measures must have been exhausted prior to considering surgical intervention.
Symptoms & Examination
Symptoms
Patients classically present complaining of persistent shoulder pain aggravated by activities. Direct enquiry as to the patient’s occupation and sports and leisure activities is important in helping to understand their requirements and expectations. It should be ascertained as to whether there has been any specific injury to the shoulder resulting in the symptoms with which they present. They will describe pain at the top of the shoulder and may point directly to the distal clavicle and acromioclavicular joint. Activities above head height or across the midline of the body and particularly those requiring repetition are particularly painful. The patient will perhaps describe an increase in discomfort lying directly on that shoulder or loading the acromioclavicular joint in any way.
Examination
On clinical examination it is important to assess for symmetry compared to the opposite shoulder. There may be some hypertrophic changes with osteophyte formation at the distal clavicle or even on the superior aspect of the acromial facet of the ACJ. Palpation is important and almost certainly the patient will have pain on palpation over the acromioclavicular joint. Shoulder movements should be assessed with all movements compared with the opposite side. I routinely check passive and active movements of external rotation, forward elevation, abduction and lateral elevation and internal rotation. Assessment of rotator cuff strength should be performed and also assessment of whether the patient has signs of subacromial impingement. Assessing all these movements and clinical signs may well reproduce pain at the top of the shoulder around the acromioclavicular joint. The clinician should then move on to performing specific acromioclavicular joint provocation tests. These tests simply load the acromioclavicular joint and must reproduce the pain at the top of the shoulder to be positive. Such tests include the scarf test with reproduction of pain with simple horizonal adduction of the arm across the patient’s midline mimicking throwing a scarf over the opposite shoulder. This can be performed with the elbow straight. Once this has been performed the thumb can be turned to the floor with further pronation of the forearm and keeping the extended arm across the patient’s midline, then resisted elevation of the hand towards the ceiling can reproduce acromioclavicular joint pain. The is the so called O’Brien’s test for which the differential diagnosis is pathology from the long head of biceps tendon. Acromioclavicular joint pain is classically reproduced with high elevation, the so called high arc and this would be with patient’s elevating in the plane of the scapular, above the horizontal or shoulder height. I will often ask a patient to touch the opposite ear with their arm against the ipsilateral ear and this also should reproduce the pain from the acromioclavicular joint. The ACJ is further loaded with pushing the extended arm into internal rotation around the patient’s back. The final acromioclavicular joint test is distraction by grasping the fingers of each hand in front of the chest and pulling the shoulder blades together. This will further load the acromioclavicular joint and if this is the source, pain will be reproduced. It is important to assess whether there is any instability in the acromioclavicular joint or distal clavicle, as well as assessing the neurovascular status of the upper limb.
Investigation
3 view plain x-rays of the shoulder are highly recommended. I ask for a true anterior to posterior (AP) x-ray of the shoulder, as well as lateral outlet view of the subacromial space and an axillary view to further assess the articulation of the distal clavicle with the acromion and importantly to look at whether there is an os acromiale. Whilst varying degrees of degenerative change are commonly seen on plain radiographs, particularly in those patients over the age of 40, it maybe that the acromio-clavicular joint looks entirely normal. This maybe because pain is emanating from a soft tissue injury within the joint or around the capsule and in this case further imaging with ultrasound scan or MRI scan might be useful. CT scan can be useful in looking for occult fractures, not seen on plain radiographs. Ultrasound scanning is useful and this can be used to accurately guide the placement of an intra-articular injection of steroid and local anaesthetic as part of diagnostic and therapeutic treatment of the shoulder pain.
Alternative Operative Treatment
Whilst the technique described here is for open surgery, the alternative would be to perform the same procedure as an arthroscopic technique, often combined with subacromial decompression. Arthroscopically the acromioclavicular joint can be accessed from the inferior aspect via the subacromial space to remove the degenerate contents and resect both the articular facets of clavicle and acromion. In younger patients with isolated AC pain, some surgeons advocate isolated arthroscopy of the joint alone without breaching the subacromial space.
Non-Operative Management
Once diagnosis has been made of acromioclavicular joint pain then the patient should be counselled as to the pathophysiology. They will have almost certainly ascertained for themselves that certain activity modification is beneficial to their symptoms. Simple measures such as oral analgesic tablets or anti-inflammatory medications taken either as tablet or as a topical application of a gel or cream is very useful and should be tried for several weeks. Avoidance of aggravating activities and alteration of sleep position or sporting activities can also be tried but is often impractical.
Physiotherapy techniques can be useful but often the patient’s have a full range of motion and good strength and for isolated acromioclavicular joint pain our physiotherapy colleagues often feel they have little further to offer.
Steroid and local anaesthetic infiltration of the acromioclavicular joint is very useful, not only for therapeutic benefit but also confirming a diagnosis. Injection of local anaesthetic alone can be used for diagnostic purposes and this can be either performed as a blind technique using anatomical landmarks or with guidance from an ultrasound or a fluoroscopy machine. As the acromioclavicular joint is small of low volume, I will tend to use only a maximum 2mls of a mixture of 2% lignocaine and 40mg of steroid, usually depomedrone. If such a local and steroid anaesthetic injection is transiently beneficial then it can be discussed with the patient whether they would consider repeat injection. Often repeat injection does not have a cumulative benefit but if they were given several months of pain relief this maybe worthwhile. With all acromioclavicular joint injections, the patient must be counselled as to the small risk of infection and side effects such as skin blanching or fat necrosis. Skin blanching can be a very real problem for patient’s of pigmented darker skins but can also present as thinned skin with a noticeable dimple in caucasian patients.
Contraindications
The patient’s general medical state should be assessed as to whether they are fit enough to undergo general anaesthetic. Patients must be able to comply with a simply post-operative regime and understand that it may take several weeks for them to gain full benefit from surgical intervention. Be careful to assess the skin is in good condition overlying the surgical site prior to embarking on open surgery.

In the semi-sitting or beach chair position the patient is secured with their head on the head-ring of a shoulder specific table attachment. In the absence of implants for this operation intravenous antibiotics are not specifically required. Thromboembolic prophylaxis is provided with intermittent calf compression for the time of the procedure. The operated arm rests at the side of the patient and is held in place with a J-board. As it is not necessary to move the operated arm during the procedure then the shoulder alone can be painted with skin preparation and the shoulder ‘squared off’ with drapes.

This operation does not require immobilisation in a sling. Occasionally the patient has pain which requires a sling application simply for analgesia. Once the patient is awake and mobilised, they can be discharged home as a day case procedure. They are encouraged to mobilise elbow, wrist and hand and are allowed underarm hygiene. The adhesive dressing should be left in place until review at two weeks. Shoulder movements are allowed within the limits of comfort, limiting excessive movement above shoulder height or across the midline. Once the wound has been reviewed at two weeks and steri strips removed with trimming of the ends of the absorbable sutures, then physiotherapy rehabilitation can start to regain active full movement. Once full movement has been regained then strengthening exercises can begin at approximately four weeks.

Acromioclavicular dislocation. A new operative treatment.
EB Mumford. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1941;23(4):799-801
The author has ended up with his name attached to the excision arthroplasty operation widely used for arthritic conditions when actually his original description concerned dislocations
The treatment of complete dislocation of the outer end of the clavicle: A hitherto undescribed operation.
FB Gurd. Ann Surg 1941; 113:1094-1097
Osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint.
JN Worcester, DP Green. Clin Orthopaedic 1968;58:69-73
The degeneration of the acromioclavicular joint. Treatment by resection of the distal clavicle.
DW Grimes, RW Garner. Orthop Rev 1980;9:41-44
Early reports of success with excision arthroplasty
Lateral clavicular resection in painful acromioclavicular joint conditions.
J Sterup, HC Thyregod, JS Jensen. Adv Orthop Surg 1988:218-220
Arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint debridement and distal clavicle resection.
EL Flatow, LU Bigliani. Tech Orthop 1991;1:240-247
The advent of shoulder arthroscopy led to reports of the minimally invasive technique
Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: comparative results at six months and one year from a randomized prospective clinical trial.
BA Freedman, MA Javernick, FP O’Brien, AE Ross, WC Doukas. J Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. Volume 16, 4, July-Aug 2007:413-418
“Arthroscopic and open distal clavicle excisions both provide significant pain reduction at 1 year. Both are effective surgeries for the treatment of refractory acromioclavicular joint pain. The ability to diagnose and treat subtle concomitant shoulder pathology is a unique advantage of the arthroscopic approach”
Managing Acromio-Clavicular joint pain: a scoping review.
S Chaudary, L Bavan, N Rupani, K Mouyis, R Kulkarni, A Rangan, J Rees. Shoulder & Elbow 2018;10(1):4-14
Comprehensive review in British journal reporting the published literature on ACJ pain with interesting conclusions …
Reference
- orthoracle.com






































