
Learn the Open modified Latarjet coracoid bone block transfer anterior shoulder stabilisation surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Open modified Latarjet coracoid bone block transfer anterior shoulder stabilisation surgical procedure.
Described here is my surgical technique for the open modified Latarjet coracoid bone block transfer anterior stabilisation of the shoulder. This operation was originally described by the Frenchman Latarjet in the 1960s for the treatment of shoulder instability. Some surgeons around the world use this as their primary operation for patients with recurrent shoulder instability regardless of whether there is bone loss or not. The majority will use it only in patients with anterior glenoid bone loss identified on the preoperative imaging or as a revision procedure for failed soft tissue repair stabilisation. I have described it, and perform it, in a form modified from the original because there have been a number of well established improvements made over the years to the original technique.
The principle behind the operation is to replace the anterior glenoid bone lost, due to recurrent trauma from the humeral head during dislocations, with bone. Whilst this can be achieved by using autograft such as free iliac crest bone graft or allograft (techniques have been described using distal tibial plafond from fresh frozen cadaveric donor) but this technique uses the native coracoid process, keeping its conjoint tendon attached.
Once the decision has been made to use the technique for either primary or revision surgery then an anterior deltopectoral approach is used. Once the coracoid bone graft is harvested it is rotated through a split in subscapularis and fixed onto the prepared anterior glenoid with two partially threaded cancellous screws. This technique describes repair of the capsulolabral soft tissues to the native glenoid on the inside of the graft.
The modified technique described here uses the congruent arc Latarjet procedure, in which the curvature of the undersurface of the coracoid which matches neatly to the concavity of the glenoid socket. The cut bony surface on the medial aspect of the coracoid is created by detaching pectoralis minor with a slither of bone. This cut bony surface is then rotated to be seated onto the prepared bony surface of the anterior glenoid. This differs from the traditional or classic Latarjet technique where the entire coracoid process is harvested and then the undersurface is decorticated to be placed flat onto the glenoid surface. This technique then allowed repair of the capsular labral structures to a stump of the coracoid acromion ligament left on the lateral edge of the coracoid autograft.
In recent years arthroscopic variations of this operation have been described. These arthroscopic techniques however often ignore the repair of the soft tissues of the capsular labral complex. There is also no doubt that even for the most experienced arthroscopist this is significantly complex and challenging surgery .
All Latarjet techniques utilise the conjoint tendon attached to the tip of the coracoid to act as a sling, thus reproducing the function of the damaged anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament. As the repaired shoulder rotates into abduction and external rotation the position of the conjoint tendon tightens with a tenodesis effect to further prevent anterior translation of the proximal humerus over the glenoid.
The technique I describe here, I believe is safe, reproducible and gives really very good results of stabilising a shoulder. There have been several publications highlighting potential risks and complications of the Latarjet stabilisation technique but I believe that the technique described here when used regularly and carefully is at low risk of producing such complications.

INDICATIONS
The indications for using a bone block grafting procedure such as the modified Laterjet technique described here is essentially for bone loss anterior shoulder instability. This will typically be a patient who has lost bone from the anterior glenoid either as a primary single injury glenoid rim fracture or repeated injuries accumulating damage to the glenoid rim resulting in recurrent anterior dislocations of their shoulder. Such a patient will be identified from their history and examination findings as well as getting confirmation from imaging with x-rays and scans and to confirm that there is loss of bone reducing the arc of curvature of the glenoid socket of the shoulder joint.
There is almost certain to be bone loss from the humeral side of the joint in the form of an impaction fracture of the softer bone at the posterior aspect of the humeral head, the so-called Hill-Sachs lesion. A combination of bone loss from both sides of the joint, the glenoid and the humeral head, will significantly reduce the arc of curvature and hence put the patient at risk of an anterior dislocation as the humeral head rotates and translates across the glenoid. The Hill-Sachs lesion engages with the anterior edge of the glenoid and falls off the front of the deficient socket.
Several techniques have been described by orthopaedic surgeons and radiologists to try and quantify the amount of bone loss using techniques with computer software for CT scans. More recently authors have discussed the phenomenon of whether the bone lesion is “on track” or “off track” also giving an indication as to whether this is significant bone loss. There has been plenty published material about the reasons for failure of soft tissue stabilisation and the predominant feature has been the unrecognised bone loss from either side of the joint. We know that there are significant risk factors from sporting activities in particular. Collision sports, such as rugby and American football or high impact activities such as surfing or mixed martial arts put the patient at significant risk of initial bone loss but also failure of soft tissue stabilisation. In my practice I tend not to use techniques assessing whether a bone lesion is on or off track but I take care in ascertaining an accurate history including the patients sporting activities and future desires. Examination techniques are less helpful in decision making concerning bony surgery for instability but if there is any indication of a bone loss on the scans and x-rays then I will consider this procedure as a primary operation. If a patient presents to me having had further dislocations following previous soft tissue stabilisation, either arthroscopic or open surgery, then irrespective of whether there is significant bone loss on their imaging, I feel that this procedure provides reliable and reproducible stability that I use it for almost all revision anterior stabilisation surgery.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
A patient will present with a history of anterior instability which may or may not be recurrent. It is important to ascertain from them the circumstances of their first time dislocation and how much force was required. Usually such a situation is resolved either with a spontaneous or the patient’s self-reduction of the dislocation or the intervention of medical staff, either outside hospital or within an emergency department. Once a dislocated shoulder has been reduced and clinical examination and plain radiographs confirm such, then the patient can be treated with sling immobilisation, simple analgesia and physiotherapy rehabilitation. I believe an indication of bony damage is significant pain following reduction of the primary dislocation.
A patient with recurrent instability will describe significant apprehension and worries about their shoulder on a daily basis. They may describe the sensation of the shoulder slipping or pain and apprehension in certain positions. Classically for anterior instability this would be with reaching high laterally or backwards and placing their shoulder into abduction and external rotation.
Examining such a patient may reveal a full range of motion but they may demonstrate discomfort or visible and palpable apprehension placing the arm in a position of risk. It is important to assess range of motion and strength of the rotator cuff muscles comparing with the opposite shoulder. Assessment of general hyperlaxity is important using criteria such as a Beighton’s score for generalised soft tissue and ligamental laxity. The neurological status of the upper limb should be examined and documented carefully. In particular it is important to assess the function of the axillary nerve, testing the sensation in the regimental badge patch area on the lateral deltoid and also assessing by palpation the contraction of deltoid muscle with active abduction of the elbow away from the trunk.
Anterior apprehension tests should be performed classically with assessment of the abduction and external rotation in the supine patient and then repeating this with a so-called relocation test by placing a hand across the front of the shoulder and actively reducing the humeral head into the glenoid during abduction and external rotation. The patient is usually highly apprehensive if this hand is then gently released and this manifests with patient’s concern as well as active contraction of shoulder musculature.
Assessment should also be made as to whether there is any posterior instability in the shoulder. This can be more difficult clinically but by loading the posterior structures of the shoulder with active resistance of elevation of the arm in the cross body abducted position which reproduces symptoms and posterior apprehension of a feeling that the shoulder may fall out backwards.
IMAGING
In any patient with shoulder instability plain radiographs are essential. There may or may not be availability of x-rays confirming dislocation at the time of either primary or subsequent recurrent dislocations. As always with shoulder plain x-rays, 3 views should ideally be obtained with an anterior posterior (AP) image, as well as lateral and axial/modified axillary views. Such imaging may be normal but clinicians should look for the posterior indentation of a Hill-Sachs impaction on the humeral head and assess whether there is any bone fragment in the region of the anterior glenoid. This may be small and subtle or in some cases maybe a bigger glenoid rim fracture.
The use of ultrasound imaging in instability is not indicated as cross-sectional scans are much more useful.
CT scanning is useful to look at bony architecture and this can be enhanced with intra-articular injection of radio-contrast which will further delineate any significant bone loss. Transverse cross-sections of the glenoid are useful as well as saggital images across the face of the glenoid.
I tend to use MR arthrography as standard imaging because this gives me the most information concerning not only the bone but the soft tissue structures. In any patient with shoulder instability it is important to exclude a significant rotator cuff tear. The use of intra-articular contrast is important given that subtle intra-articular lesions of the glenohumeral joint may not be picked up in the stationary supine shoulder as positioned in the MRI scanner. Given that the glenohumeral joint has a negative intra-articular pressure then soft tissues collapse down into a normal anatomical state and the best way to identify intra-articular damage is to relatively to distend the joint with radio-contrast injected into the glenohumeral joint prior to the MRI scan.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
There are a variety of techniques which can be used for the same clinical problems. Over the years the Latarjet procedure described here has been modified. Original descriptions were also called the Bristow or Bristow-Latarjet procedure. This would classically have taken the tip of the coracoid process fixed to the anterior glenoid with a single screw. Whilst this was successful in reducing recurrent dislocations, the patient would often still have apprehension. Here the bone graft may rotate around a single screw and possibly never fully unite, although the sling effect of the conjoint tendon prevented further dislocations. The classic Latarjet procedure takes the coracoid as bone graft but decorticates the undersurface and places the bone flat on the anterior glenoid.
As described here, I use the congruent arc modification whereby the coracoid graft with the cut bony surface from detachment of pectoralis minor tendon medially is placed against the anterior glenoid utilising the concave undersurface of the coracoid which matches the concavity of the articular face of the glenoid. As some authors believe that this non-anatomical procedure is bettered by using free bone graft procedure through a similar approach. Classically autologous iliac crest bone graft can be used or techniques have been described using fresh frozen allograft, in particular the distal tibial plafond has a similar curvature to the anterior glenoid and can be fashioned to provide a good bone graft.
Alternative bone grafting techniques are also described such as the J-graft. In cases where there is a large anterior glenoid bone fragment, such cases should be considered more as a glenoid rim fracture. On occasions in acute injuries a large such fragment fracture can be fixed acutely using screws with an open technique or arthroscopically assisted.
Arthroscopic Latarjet procedures are now widely described and in common use but this is a technically challenging procedure and has a significant learning curve. Techniques have also been described using arthroscopy to place free autologous bone grafts or allograft bone blocks and even blocks of bone substitute. In my practice if there is significantly large bone fragment from the anterior glenoid that I feel is not going to be sufficiently reconstructed using autologous coracoid then I will use autologous iliac crest which can be harvested and fashioned to fit the glenoid defect.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
As with all instability if the patient finds that they can cope by rehabilitating the shoulder with the physiotherapy guidance, concentrating on improving range of motion and strength and appreciating positions of risk of their arm and shoulder then such management alone is entirely reasonable avoiding the need for surgery. Patients may have worked out the positions of risk and activities that give them most apprehension of their shoulder but they can always be advised further. It is important to explain to such patients that they should be extremely careful entering water for leisure pursuits. I always warn them to never go into water alone and always make sure that there are people in attendance with them who understand that they have a potentially unstable shoulder as shoulder dislocation in open water is potentially life-threatening.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
As with any orthopaedic surgical technique the patient has to be medically fit enough to consider surgery under general anaesthetic and also have the capabilities to comply with post-operative treatment regimes. Specific to the Latarjet procedure it is important to assess the pre-operative imaging for the state of the coracoid process given that this is the local autologous bone graft. If there is evidence of a coracoid fracture or the process is developmentally thin or small, then this may not achieve the desired outcome and consideration should be given to alternative bone graft techniques as previously described.

I perform this operation as a day case procedure and to help post-operative analgesia, my anaesthetist uses an interscalene nerve block. This is generally performed while the patient is awake prior to the general anaesthetic. The patient is given intravenous antibiotics and during the operation has Flowtron intermittent calf compression to help prevent thromboembolic disease. A warming blanket is applied to the patient for the duration of the operation. Placed supine on the operating table, I elevate the head end of the table approximately 20-30 degrees. I attach a narrow moveable arm-board to the operating side of the table. After ensuring the patient’s head and neck are protected and secure, I perform an examination of the shoulder under anaesthetic to confirm my clinical suspicions and the radiological imaging findings of anterior instability. Occasionally a social wash with soap and water is required and sometimes the front of the shoulder requires shaving. I prepare the patient’s hand and entire arm and shoulder girdle with a chlorhexidine solution. Adhesive drapes are used to cover the patient’s head at the base of the neck and to protect the anaesthetic tubing. I use a cloth stockinette rolled up the arm above the elbow and then apply the rest of the drapes, keeping the arm free with good access to the front of the shoulder.

Surgery is usually preformed as a day case. Patient is discharged with a sling including body belt, waterproof dressing, oral analgesia and physiotherapy instructions for early mobilisation.
Wound should be checked and the end of the absorbable sutures trimmed at 2 weeks. Postoperative xrays (ideally 3 views AP, lateral and modified axillary) should be performed at 3-4 weeks as the sling is weaned.
Further set of 3 view Xrays should be performed at 4 months postop to ensure position of screws and graft maintained and with good clinical progress graft healing can be confirmed.
Physiotherapy regimen for Anterior Stabilisation (bony procedure) – The aims of rehabilitation are to protect the repair in the early stages and to maximise function.
General Points
Do not push through pain – remember pain inhibits rotator cuff control
Do not sacrifice quality of movement for ROM
Do not overstretch into combined abd/ER Immobilisation
Patient to wear sling with waistband for 3 weeks 24 hours a day, only removing for physiotherapy exercises
At 3 weeks, gradually wean out of sling but to continue wearing at night for a further 3 weeks
Total sling usage – 6 weeks Post operative
0-6 weeks: Pendular exercises; Active assisted – ER to neutral only (handshake position); Active assisted – elevation as comfort allows– consider use of table slides or walk backs
At 3 weeks: Gradually wean out of sling – light activities only (weight of a cup of tea within the field of vision, short lever)
From 6 weeks: Increase range of ER –gradually increase elevation as comfort and ER allows. Progress active assisted through to active. Isometric rotator cuff in available range
8 weeks: Resisted work through available range
12 weeks: Sports Specific Rehabilitation – for throwing, important to regain ROM into abd/ER, but needs dynamic control into this range (including eccentric control)
Functional Milestones:
CV fitness including running & static bike – Depending on patient can be from 0 weeks within sling
Cycling (Road non competitive) – 8-12 weeks
Swimming – 12 weeks +
Racquet Sports/ Golf – 12 weeks+
Contact Sport e.g. rugby, football, mountain biking, hockey, climbing – 4-6 months

Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder.
J Alliance, D Goutallier, C Glorion. JBJS 80A June 1998: 841-852
95 shoulders between 1969-1983
58 reviewed mean follow up 14.3 yrs (10-23)
No redislocations, 6 apprehension
88% good/excellent; 9% fair; 3% poor
Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill Sachs lesion. SS Burkhart & JF de Beer. Arthroscopy. 2000 October;16(7):677-694
Two surgeons with identical technique of Arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors
Identification of the bare spot for arthroscopic quantification of glenoid bone loss.
194 cases of arthroscopic Bankart repairs for traumatic anterior instability – 101 contact athletes (96 rugby players)
Average follow-up: 27 mo. (14-79 mo.)
Recurrent postoperative instability: 21 cases (11%) – 14 of these 21 had bony defect; 3 “engaging Hill- Sachs” and 11 “inverted pear” Bankarts
The group with no bone defects (173): 7 recurrences (4 percent)
The group with bone defects (21): 14 recurrences (67 percent)
Contact athletes without bone defects: 6.5% recurrence
Contact athletes with bone defects : 89% recurrence
Reasons for failure after surgical repair of anterior shoulder instability. M Tauber, H Resch, R Forstner, M Raffl, J Schauer. JSES. 2004 May/June:279-285
41 pts presenting with failure after surgical stabilisation
35 arthroscopic, 6 open Bankart repairs
56% defect in anterior bony glenoid rim
One hundred and eighteen Bristow-Latarjet repairs for recurrent anterior dislocation of the shoulder prospectively followed for fifteen years: study 1 – clinical results. L Hovelius, B Sandstrom, K Sundgren, M Saebo. JSES Sept/Oct 2004: 509-516
1980-2001: 15 year follow up (14.3-20.8)
8 surgeons (97 cases, 9, 6 surgeons x(1-3))
At 2yrs: 1 redislocated, 98% satisifed
At 15 yrs: 1 revision, 1 pt 1 dislocation, 1 pt 3 episodes 3 yrs postop nil since
76% very satisfied, 22% satisfied, 1 don’t know, 1 dissatisfied
Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. P Boileau, M Villalba, J-Y Hery, F Balg, P Ahrens, L Neyton. JBJS 88A; Aug 2006: 1755-1763
91 pts, age 26+/-5, 71 male, 79 sports, 40 risky
Mean FU 36months – 15% recurrence
Risk: bone defect glenoid or humerus (p=0.01); hyperlaxity inferiorly (p=0.03) anteriorly (p=0.01)
Glenoid loss and inferior hyperlaxity 75% recurrence (p<0.001)
Do the traditional and modified Latarjet techniques produce equivalent reconstruction stability and strength? J Giles, G Puskas, M Welsh, J Johnson, G Athwal. Am J Sports Med. 2012. Vol 40 Issue 12 pp 2801-2807
The Congruent-Arc results in significantly poorer fixation stability as compared with the Classic technique but did more closely reproduce intact joint contact, which may yield more favorable long-term outcomes.
Care must be taken in balancing the consideration of initial fixation stability and joint contact for the Congruent-Arc and Classic Latarjet, as these factors have opposing implications for each of the two reconstructions’ outcomes.
The Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrence of anterior instability of the shoulder after operative repair. S Schmid, M Farshad, S Catanzaro, C Gerber. JBJS Am. 2012. 94 (11). e75.
retrospective case series of 49 consecutive cases
coracoid transfer as described by Latarjet can effectively restore anterior glenohumeral shoulder stability if previous operation(s) have failed to do so
if recurrence is associated with chronic pain, the pain is likely to persist and compromise the subjective outcome.
BESS/BOA Patient Care Pathways: Traumatic anterior shoulder instability. P Brownson, O Donaldson, M Fox, J Rees, A Rangan, A Jaggi, G Tytherleigh-Strong, J McBirnie, M Thomas, R Kulkarni. Shoulder & Elbow. 2015. Vol 7 (3) 214-226.
Current British best practice evidence based guidelines for the management of traumatic anterior shoulder instability.
Excellent clearly written document describing all aspects of traumatic anterior shoulder instability including the surgical recommendations for bone loss instability to use the Latarjet technique.
Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. E Hurley, S Jamal, Z Ali, C Montgomery, L Pauzenberger, H Mullett. J Shoulder & Elbow Surg. Feb 2019. 28 (2). e33-e39.
The Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability results in excellent functional outcomes at long-term and a high rate of return to sport among athletes.
However, varying rates of recurrence, residual pain, and progression of instability arthropathy are still of concern.
The Latarjet procedure for the treatment of recurrence of anterior instability of the shoulder after operative repair. S Schmid, M Farshad, S Catanzaro, C Gerber. JBJS Am. 2012. 94 (11). e75.
BESS/BOA Patient Care Pathways: Traumatic anterior shoulder instability. P Brownson, O Donaldson, M Fox, J Rees, A Rangan, A Jaggi, G Tytherleigh-Strong, J McBirnie, M Thomas, R Kulkarni. Shoulder & Elbow. 2015. Vol 7 (3) 214-226.
Current British best practice evidence based guidelines for the management of traumatic anterior shoulder instability.
Excellent clearly written document describing all aspects of traumatic anterior shoulder instability including the surgical recommendations for bone loss instability to use the Latarjet technique.
Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. E Hurley, S Jamal, Z Ali, C Montgomery, L Pauzenberger, H Mullett. J Shoulder & Elbow Surg. Feb 2019. 28 (2). e33-e39.
The Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability results in excellent functional outcomes at long-term and a high rate of return to sport among athletes.
However, varying rates of recurrence, residual pain, and progression of instability arthropathy are still of concern.
Reference
- orthoracle.com














































































































































