
Learn the Open repair of subscapularis and biceps tenodesis, using Arthrex Bio-Swivelock anchors and TightRope button surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Open repair of subscapularis and biceps tenodesis, using Arthrex Bio-Swivelock anchors and TightRope button surgical procedure.
Rotator cuff tears are a relatively common cause of shoulder pain from the subacromial space. Supraspinatus, the elevator, is the most commonly effected tendon which then extends posteriorly into the adjoining infraspinatus, the external rotator. Subscapularis, the internal rotator anteriorly, is the least affected rotator cuff tendon. Rotator cuff disease that results in tears can be thought of as resulting from either intrinsic or extrinsic factors, or a combination of the two.
Intrinsic disease occurs due to a patient’s biological and genetic makeup, resulting in disorganisation of the collagen within the tendon, which degenerates and detaches from its bony footprint on the proximal humerus. Extrinsic causes are thought to be attritional wear from repetitive rotation and movement against a thickened coracoacromial ligament or subacromial bony spur. In the case of subscapularis anteriorly it may abrade against the underside of the coracoid process, resulting in rupture of the rotator cuff tendon attachment to the proximal humerus. Rotator cuff tears can also come about as a result of direct injury, with a fall or wrenching force to the joint or even a direct blow to the shoulder. This is the most common cause of a subscapularis avulsion tear when the shoulder is forced into external rotation whilst contracting to internally rotate.
Rotator cuff tears can be further categorised as either partial thickness or full thickness tears. The latter is a complete deficit of the tendon with detachment from the bone whereas the former describes fraying and scuffing of the upper (bursal) aspect or under (articular surface) aspect of the tendon. There may also be an element of intrinsic intra-substance change within the tendon structure which may only be apparent on cross-sectional imaging such as MRI scan.
Much has been published in the orthopaedic literature concerning the management of rotator cuff disease, and despite this its management is controversial with fervent supporters of both conservative and surgical treatment. Many shoulder surgeons though will advocate surgical repair of a torn or detached tendon once conservative measures have been proven to be unsuccessful. Exact surgical technique varies with surgeons’ preference, experience and ability and there is little evidence to suggest that the different described surgical techniques have widely different surgical outcomes.
The technique described here is the one I use for an isolated full thickness tear of subscapularis with dislocation of the long head of biceps tendon out of the bicipital groove and ‘cheese-wiring’ over the top and front of the subscapularis tendon.
I use the Arthrex shoulder repair instruments and implants during these cases. As with much of the Arthrex inventory the system has been designed to make operations easier, by engineers and surgeons collaborating to optimise the solution. The set of instruments “covers all bases” in terms of having something that helps in every situation and the range of implants allows flexibility between types and sizes of anchors and suture material. In this case I use the 4.75 and 5.5 BioSwivelock C anchors with FiberTape suture material and the Arthrex TightRope implant for the biceps tenodesis.
Readers will also find of interest the following related OrthOracle techniques:
Arthroscopic subacromial decompression
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using modified Arthrex suture-bridge technique
Arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair utilising Smith and Nephew Healicoils
Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with Arthrex Speedbridge

INDICATIONS
Indication for this surgical procedure is an acute full thickness avulsion tear of the subscapularis insertion from the lesser tuberosity of the proximal humerus and dislocation of the long head of biceps tendon from the bicipital groove. Such acute tears are traumatic in nature as the result of a shoulder injury.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients present with pain, dysfunction and weakness in their affected shoulder. There is likely to be a history of an injury such as a fall or wrenching to the shoulder resulting in pain and subsequent weakness. Patients usually describe pain at the front of the shoulder radiating to the mid upper arm region. They may feel pain lying on that side and exacerbations of the pain are typically felt during activities particularly lifting and using the arm above shoulder height, especially with repetition.
The shoulder should be closely inspected and compared to the opposite side looking for any signs of asymmetry in the belly of the biceps muscle but there is unlikely to be any discernible muscle wasting.
Examination should ascertain whether the patient has maintained a full range of motion and also strength with formal testing of rotator cuff. With a dislocated long head of biceps tendon all shoulder movements are irritable. Suspicion of a subscapularis tear should be raised by increased passive external rotation of the affected shoulder with the elbow by the side in neutral compared to the opposite side. Additional examination information is then sought by formal assessment of the subscapularis by testing power of internal rotation as the palm of the hand is pulled into the abdomen and chest the so called hug or bear-hug tests. Also the well described belly push test should be performed. This is positive for a subscapularis deficiency if with the palms of the hands flat against the abdomen the patient is unable to push the elbow of the affected side forwards. The final classic test of subscapularis function is the lift-off test described by Gerber. The affected shoulder is internally rotated so that the dorsum of hand rests against the small of the back at the level of the lumbar spine. The lift-off test is positive for a subscapularis injury if the patient is unable to lift the hand backwards away from the small of the back. In the acutely injured shoulder this test is difficult to perform accurately as pain often prohibits getting the hand around to the back.
Formal assessment of the long head of biceps is also notoriously difficult and even more so in the acute setting. Palpation over the front of the shoulder in the region of the bicipital groove may reveal tenderness. Resistance of pronation and supination of the forearm with the elbow flexed at 90 degrees may reproduce pain over the front of the shoulder as may resistance of elevation of the arm with the elbow fully extended. As always in examining the shoulder careful assessment of any neurological deficit should be ascertained.
IMAGING
In patients with a painful and weak shoulder it is mandatory to obtain plain x-ray films. I always request 3 views with an anteroposterior (AP) view of the glenohumeral joint, a lateral outlet view to show the morphology of the acromion and an axillary view with shoot through of the axilla. X-rays will give an idea as to whether there is a bony injury such as a fracture, subacromial spur, on the axillary view ascertain whether there is an os acromiale and give an indication from all 3 views as to whether there is any arthritis of the glenohumeral or acromioclavicular joints.
If there is clinical suspicion of a rotator cuff tear then further imaging is indicated. This can be performed either in the form of an ultrasound scan performed by the surgeon themselves or by a sonographer or radiologist. Ultrasound scanning is user dependent and relies on interpretation of the dynamic images. The alternative is to consider an MRI scan which is the gold standard and will give excellent images of the shoulder anatomy and confirm whether or not there is a rotator cuff tear and the position of the long head of biceps tendon.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
There are many described techniques for repairing rotator cuff tears, either as an open operation or mini open surgery as well as numerous arthroscopic techniques which have developed over the last 20-30 years. Most of the techniques involve direct repair of the tendon to the bone, either using interosseous or transosseous suture techniques or more recently using bone anchors which are widely available on the market. Knots can be tied in the suture materials attached to the anchors or knotless techniques, such as described in this case, can be used.
Likewise there are numerous ways of tenodesing the long head of biceps tendon. This can be a soft tissue suturing, use of bone anchors, interference fixation of the tendon into a drill hole or intramedullary passage of the tendon with an extra-medullary fixation technique.
The principle is that in a normal shoulder the long head of biceps tendon runs smoothly in the bicipital groove between the lesser and greater tuberosities of the proximal humerus covered by the intertubercular ligament up into the glenohumeral joint to insert with the superior glenoid labrum at the supraglenoid tubercle. If the tendon is damaged or indeed dislocates from the groove due to disruption of the intertubercular ligament, the options are to simply cut the tendon, biceps tenotomy, at it’s insertion in the glenohumeral joint and leave it to retract down the arm or to reattach it into the humerus.
Reattachment or tenodesis can be performed at any level, within the bicipital groove or distal to it above or below the level of the pectoralis major tendon insertion on the lateral ridge of the bicipital groove of the humerus. The aim of tenodesis is to maintain the working length and hence function of the tendon and the redundant section of proximal tendon is excised. It also aims to maintain the cosmetic appearance of the biceps muscle as tenotomy results in sagging of the biceps muscle belly which bunches up with contraction producing the well described ‘Popeye’ sign.
Inability to repair the subscapularis may require a tendon transfer which classically requires a section of the pectoralis major.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
There is never an absolute indication for surgical intervention in a patient with a rotator cuff tear but a subscapularis deficient shoulder does not function well and predisposes instability and degenerate changes. Non-operative management involves rest with suitable tablet analgesia or anti-inflammatory medication. Injection of steroid and local anaesthetic could be considered in combination with a course of physiotherapy to guide rehabilitation exercises to regain range of motion and then strengthening of shoulder function. In the presence of a small rotator cuff tear such management can be successful. In some patients symptoms improve or disappear with suitable rest, time and rehabilitation such that they can regain function acceptable to their demands and requirements for daily activities. A dislocated long head of biceps tendon will not be rectified with non-operative treatment.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The patient’s general medical health and comorbidities must be taken into consideration. Medical comorbidities are a relative contraindication and a multi-disciplinary approach to pre-operative workup and management with medical and anaesthetic colleagues is essential. The patient must be able to co-operate with the immediate and prolonged perioperative management and rehabilitation to optimise their outcome.

The procedure is performed with the patient supine on the operating table under general anaesthetic supplemented by an interscalene brachial plexus nerve block (performed by the anaesthetist under ultrasound guidance). The head of the table is elevated slightly by approximately 30 degrees.
Flowtron intermittent calf compression is used as mechanical thromboembolic prophylaxis, chemical prophylaxis is not used for shoulder procedures lasting less than 90 minutes. For open shoulder surgery we administer a single dose of intravenous Ceftriaxone as prophylactic antibiotics.
Starting with the hand the whole upper limb to the shoulder to the base of the neck and across the axilla and chest wall is prepared with Chlorhexidine. The hand and forearm is covered with a cloth stockinette then wrapped with a crepe bandage. The shoulder girdle in then squared off with adhesive drapes.

It is essential that the post op notes are checked to ensure appropriate rehabilitation particularly noting degree of external rotation possible to avoid excessive tension on the subscapularis repair.
General Points
Do not push through pain – remember pain inhibits rotator cuff control
Do not sacrifice quality of movement for ROM
Remember the pathophysiology of the repaired tendon is probably degenerative and needs to be considered when progressing rehabilitation
Immobilisation – Patient to wear sling for 4-6 weeks, it can be removed to perform exercises as instructed by physiotherapist
0-6 weeks: Pendular exercises, elbow, wrist and hand. Encourage optimal scapula-thoracic position
6-12 weeks: Gradually wean out of sling – light activities only (weight of a cup of tea within the field of vision, short lever); Active assisted exercises gradually increasing ROM – consider short lever, supine and closed kinetic chain; (Anterior deltoid rehab principles); No long lever open chain exercises until 12 weeks
12 + weeks: Isometric Exercises through available range
16 + weeks: Resisted through range strengthening

Repair of Tears of the Subscapularis.
Edwards BT, Walch G, Sirveaux F, Mole D, Nove-Josserand L, Boulahia A, Neyton L, Szabo I, Lindgren B
JBJS Am April 2005 Volume 87 Issue 4 pp 725-730
84 shoulders that had undergone open subscapularis repair are reviewed, 57 traumatic 27 degenerative cases. 54 had dislocation or subluxation of the long head of biceps tendon and 10 had rupture of LHB. 48 underwent concomitant biceps tenodesis, 13 tenotomy. Constant scores increased from 55 preop to 80 postop with 75 patients satisfied or very satisfied with the result. Tenodesis or tenotomy of biceps at the time of subscapularis repair was associated with improved subjective and objective results independant of the preoperative condition of the biceps tendon. Conclusions: Repair of isolated subscapularis tears yields acceptable improvement in shoulder function in selected patients. Additionally, the results of the study support routine tenodesis or tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon at the time of subscapularis repair.
The Biomechanical Evaluation of Four Fixation Techniques for Proximal Biceps Tenodesis.
Mazzocca AD, Bicos J, Santangelo S, Romeo AA, Arciero RA
Arthroscopy Nov 2005 Volume 21 Issue 11 pp 1296-1306
Fresh frozen cadaveric assessment of cyclic displacement and ultimate failure strength of 4 tenodesis fixation methods: the open subpectoral bone tunnel (SBT), arthroscopic suture anchor (SA), open subpectoral interference screw (SIS) and arthroscopic interference screw (AIS). SBT group showed statistically significant greater displacement than other tenodesis methods. There were no statistically significant differences in ultimate failure strength between any of the methods.
Open Repair of Isolated Traumatic Subscapularis Tendon Tears.
Bartl C, Scheibel M, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P
Am J Sports Med Dec 2010 Volume 39 Issue 3 pp 490-496
Thirty consecutive patients with a traumatic isolated subscapularis tear. All patients underwent open tendon reconstruction with a suture anchor technique via a deltopectoral approach. Clinical assessment was done using the Constant score and specific subscapularis tests. Postoperative tendon integrity was assessed with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Sports activity, including competition level, sports discipline, and postoperative return to sports was evaluated. Average follow-up 46 months. Seven patients had a full-thickness tear of the upper third of the tendon, 11 patients a full-thickness tear of the upper two-thirds of the tendon, and 12 patients had a complete subscapularis tendon tear. The Constant score increased from 50 preoperatively to 80 postoperatively . Twenty-seven patients rated their postoperative result as excellent or good. Most positive preoperative lift-off and belly-press tests were reversed by surgery, with 20% persistent positive tests after surgery. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a structural intact repair at follow-up in 28 shoulders (93%). Seventy-five percent of athletes returned to their previous competition level. Conclusions: Early repair of isolated traumatic subscapularis tendon tears and associated biceps tendon lesions or HAGL lesions achieves good functional outcomes with a low rerupture rate and allows return to sports activity. Delay of surgery and higher degrees of preoperative fatty infiltration of the subscapularis muscle impair postoperative subscapularis function.
Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanics results.
Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR
JSES March 2011 Volume 20 Issue 2 pp 326-332
This review demonstrated a higher incidence of cosmetic deformity in patients treated with biceps tenotomy compared with tenodesis, with an associated lower load to tendon failure. However, there was no consensus in the literature regarding the use of tenotomy vs. tenodesis for LHB tendon lesions due to variable results and methodology of published studies. Individual patient factors and needs should guide surgeons on whether to use tenotomy or tenodesis. There is a great need for future studies with high levels of evidence, control, randomization, and power, with well-defined study variables, to compare biceps tenotomy and tenodesis for the treatment of LHB tendon lesions.
Outcomes of Arthroscopic and Open Surgical Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tendon Tears.
Mall NA, Chahal J, Heard WM, Bach BR, Bush-Joseph CA, Romeo AA, Verma NN
Arthroscopy Sept 2012 Volume 28 Issue 9 pp 1306-1314
Three arthroscopic repair studies and six open repair studies met the inclusion criteria and are reviewed. The mean patient age was 49years, and the mean time from injury to surgical repair was 11 months. Constant scores were consistent between groups, with a mean postoperative score of almost 90. Pain scores improved significantly after repair, with a mean of 13 (on a scale ranging from 0 to 15, with 15 being no pain) in the arthroscopic repair group and 11 in the open repair group. Concomitant procedures were common, with biceps tenodesis being the most common performed in 55% of shoulders, followed by biceps tenotomy and biceps recentering. Healing was reported in 90% to 95% of shoulders.
Pain is reduced and function restored with repair with excellent healing rates. The characteristic injury pattern suggested by a review of the literature is where such tears are full thickness yet involve a portion of the tendon in the craniocaudal dimension. Concomitant procedures are common and can affect the results, because biceps tenotomy and tenodesis have been shown to significantly improve pain as well.
Subpectoral biceps tenodesis using a novel anterior cortical button technique.
Javed S, Gheorghiu D, Walton M
Shoulder & Elbow October 2018 Volume 10 Issue 4 pp 292-295
Description of a novel technique, which provides an opportunity to obtain a robust cortical and intramedullary tenodesis, performed under direct vision without the risk of drilling the far cortex and therefore avoiding any potential for neurological injury. There is no cortical implant, which may lead to a diaphyseal stress riser and subsequent fracture risk.
This paper describes the technique used in this Orthoracle case albeit at a different anatomical site.
Reference
- orthoracle.com








































































































