
Learn the Repair of Pectoralis major muscle using Arthrex Pec Buttons surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Repair of Pectoralis major muscle using Arthrex Pec Buttons surgical procedure.
The pectoralis major muscle is a fan shaped muscle the sits on the anterior aspect of the chest wall. It arises from the anterior surface of the sternal half of the clavicle, the anterior half of the sternum to the costal cartilages of the first six ribs and the aponeurosis of the external oblique muscle. As the muscle fibres converge towards its insertion on the proximal humerus, they form two distinctive insertions. The clavicular head fibres run obliquely inferiorly and laterally and inserts superficially. The sternal head fibres run more horizontally, whereas the inferior fibres run obliquely superiorly and laterally. The more inferior fibres tend to twist up and insert deeper and more superiorly on the proximal humerus. The fibres end up in a flat tendon around 5cm in diameter and insert into the lateral lip of the bicipital groove of the humerus.
The main muscle actions of pectoralis major include flexion, adduction, internal rotation and extension (from a flexed position) of the humerus. It also acts as a dynamic stabiliser of the shoulder.
Pectoralis major ruptures occur when there is an excessive tension acting on a maximally eccentrically contracted muscle, such as during a bench press. Pectoralis major ruptures can either occur as a tendinous avulsion (most common), or rupture at the musculotendinous junction or within the muscle substance itself.
Ruptures of pectoralis major are rare but largely effect athletic populations, particularly weight-lifters. It predominantly affects males due to larger tendon to muscle ratio, greater elasticity and less energetic injuries occurring in males. This can result in weakness, pain and cramping.
A very useful implant for the fixation of these rare injuries, and my preference, is using the Arthrex Large Pec Button Kit. This consists of a 3.7mm drill pin, 3 large Pec buttons with inserters, 2mm Fibretape x3 and number 5 Fibrewire x3. I prefer to use a Krakow stitch using the Fibretape in the ruptured pectoralis major tendon as it has better pullout characteristics due to the larger surface area of the tape. Two or three Pec buttons provide a robust fixation spread over a large area and restore the anatomy of the insertion of pectoralis major.

INDICATIONS
Although the muscle is not essential for normal daily shoulder function, it is important for strenuous activity.
Indications for surgery includes patients who have a significant demand for their shoulder function, or wish to return to sporting or manual activities.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
Patients classically present with a history of sudden severe pain in the arm and shoulder at the time of injury, with or without a snapping sensation with resisted adduction and internal rotation. Patients complain of painful limitation of motion and weakness.
The patient may present with localised swelling and ecchymosis.
Clinical examination may reveal loss or a palpable defect of the anterior axillary fold. This can be accentuated by asking the patient to tense the pectoralis muscle in the prayer position. There may be associated weakness on adduction and internal rotation.
IMAGING
Plain AP and axillary or scapular Y lateral radiographs of the shoulder joint are required to exclude any fractures in the context of trauma. However, diagnosis of pectoralis major injuries are largely clinical, and x-ray findings tend to be normal.
To confirm the diagnosis, an ultrasound scan or MRI performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist should be sought. However, as these injuries are uncommon, the quality of the report is dependent on the experience of the operator.
A ultrasound is a dynamic test and may confirm the diagnosis more easily. Again, this is operator dependent. It may also be easier and quicker to arrange. Tears are identified by uneven echogenicity and muscle thinning.
An MRI will give more detail as the imaging can show where the rupture has occurred. It can assess the grade of injury, site, and the level of retraction in experienced hands. However, it may take longer to arrange.
CLASSIFICATION
Tietjen originally classified pectoralis major tears according to the severity (I – contusion or muscle strain, II – partial tear, III – complete tear) and location of the tear (IIIA – complete tear of the muscle origin, IIIB – complete tear of the muscle belly, IIIC – complete tear of the musculotendinous junction, IIID – complete tear at the tendinous insertion). This was modified by Bak to include IIIE – bony avulsion from insertion, and IIIF – complete tear of muscle tendon substance.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
The method of fixation is largely dependent on location of injury, timing of presentation and surgeon preference.
Location of injury
Different methods of surgical fixation have been described in the literature depending on the location of injury. For the most common ruptures at the insertion, the common techniques include transosseous sutures, suture anchor fixation or cortical button techniques (uni or bi-cortical).
Overall, there seems to be little biomechanical advantage from one technique over the other (Sherman et al.)
For ruptures at the musculotendinous junction, direct suture repairs have been described if there is sufficient viable tissue.
Gupton M, Johnson JE. Surgical Treatment of Pectoralis Major Muscle Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019 Feb 7;7(2):2325967118824551. doi: 10.1177/2325967118824551. eCollection 2019 Feb.
Timing of presentation
Acute injuries have been arbitrarily defined as occurring in less than 8 weeks. Those presenting acutely are more likely to undergo primary repair.
If presentation is delayed, there may be concerns regarding the level of retraction, adhesions and mobility of the muscle which ultimately, affects the reducibility of the muscle tendon to its insertion point. If not repairable primarily, an autograft or allograft may be used to bridge the gap. Grafts including semitendinosus/gracilis tendon, Achilles tendon, tensor fascia lata, patella tendon and semitendinosus tendon techniques have been described to bridge the gap.
As these remain rare injuries, the body of evidence remains small. However, the literature suggests that there is no significant difference in outcome between acute and chronic repairs.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
As mentioned before, an intact pectoralis major muscle is not essential for everyday function. Therefore, patients may opt for non-operative management if they do not wish to undergo the risks of surgery, or if they are of low demand.
Conservative management is recommended for proximal tears and some partial tears, tears in the muscle or tear at the musculotendinous junction.
Non-operative management involves initial sling immobilisation, rest and analgesics. This is usually followed by early shoulder mobilisation and stretching exercises, followed by strengthening exercises at 6-8 weeks.
Conservative management of complete tears result in a cosmetic defect and a significant deficit in strength. Bak et al. showed that 88% of surgically managed pectoralis major repairs resulted in an excellent to good outcome vs. 27% in the conservatively managed group.
OUTCOMES
Bak graded the outcomes of pectoralis major repairs as:
Excellent – Pain-free, full range of motion, no cosmetic complaints, symmetrical manual adduction strength or <10% isokinetic strength loss, return to previous activities without restrictions
Good – Slight functional impairment with slight restrictions in movement or strength, no cosmetic complaints, symmetrical manual adduction strength or a <20% isokinetic deficit
Fair – Impairment of function affecting return to the desired activity, due to pain or weakness on activity, or unsatisfactory cosmetic result
Poor – Significant complications occurred, pain or restricted range of motion, or significant cosmetic complaints from scarring or inadequate repair
CONTRAINDICATIONS
Although there are no absolute contraindications, there would be significant reservations in patients with potentially complicating medical conditions, in the elderly age group and in cases where there are compromised soft tissues from trauma, or in a previous radiotherapy field.

The procedure is performed under general anaesthetic.
The patient is set up on a shoulder table inclined at around 45 degrees. It is important to check that the head and neck are secure in the head clamps.
A pre-surgical scrub of the shoulder and axilla may be performed prior to routine skin preparation. Flowtron intermittent calf compression may be used to reduce the risk of thromboembolic disease. Intravenous antibiotics are administered by the anaesthetist.
The whole of the shoulder, arm and hand of is prepared with chlorhexidine spirit and draped to allow adequate exposure for the deltopectoral approach. Of particular note, draping should be up to the midline on the chest wall to maximise access to the pectoralis major muscle to aid retrieval of the retracted tendon.
The operative arm is placed in a stockinette and set up in the Arthrex TRIMANO Limb Positioner as this allows optimal positioning of the upper limb during the procedure.

<3 Weeks
Polysling
Elbow, wrist, hand and finger exercises
Closed chain exercises as tolerated
Passive/active assisted ROM in safe zone as tolerated
Avoid forcing/stretching exercises
Scapula setting exercises
3-6 Weeks
Gentle isometric exercises in neutral as pain allows
Wean off sling
Progress to open chain exercises in safe zone
Avoid forcing/stretching exercises
>6 Weeks
Progress to open chain exercises in all ranges as tolerated
Progressive resistance exercises
Avoid hyperextending in bench press
Avoid high weights with low reps and warm up slowly
>3 Months
Return to contact sports

Conservative vs. operative management of pectoralis major tendon tears.
Hanna CM, Glenny AB, Stanley SN, Caughey MA. Pectoralis major tears: comparison of surgical and conservative treatment. Br J Sports Med. 2001 Jun;35(3):202-6.
Hanna et al. reported a series of 22 pectoralis major tears, comparing operative management with conservative management. Peak torque returned to 99% in the operative group compared to 56% in the conservatively managed group. This was independent of time to surgery.
Bak K, Cameron EA, Henderson IJ. Rupture of the pectoralis major: a meta-analysis of 112 cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;8(2):113-9.
A meta-analysis of 112 cases of pectoralis major rupture, showed that patients who undergo surgical repair had less pain, a higher rate of pre-injury strength and return to activities, than patients managed conservatively.
Outcome of pectoralis major repair.
Cordasco FA, Mahony GT, Tsouris N, Degen RM. Pectoralis major tendon tears: functional outcomes and return to sport in a consecutive series of 40 athletes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Mar;26(3):458-463. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Sep 30.
Cordasco et al. reported high patient satisfaction scores, with patients returning to preinjury level of activities at an average of 5.5 months postoperatively. Of these, around 25% described mild or moderate difficulty with sport participation.
Ten patients (25%) reported concerns about the cosmetic appearance of their surgical scar or mild chest asymmetry.
Isokinetic evaluation of adduction strength revealed an average decrease of ≤9.9% compared with the contralateral side.
Despite excellent patient satisfaction and functional outcomes, application of the Bak criteria revealed 37% excellent, 26% good, and 37% fair outcomes, with the majority of patients in the fair group reporting cosmetic concerns related to their incision or mild chest asymmetry (54%).
With cosmesis removed, 46% of patients scored excellent, 37% good, and only 17% fair.
Method of repair
Sherman SL, Lin EC, Verma NN, Mather RC, Gregory JM, Dishkin J, Harwood DP, Wang VM, Shewman EF, Cole BJ, Romeo AA. Biomechanical analysis of the pectoralis major tendon and comparison of techniques for tendo-osseous repair. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Aug;40(8):1887-94. doi: 10.1177/0363546512452849. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
Sherman et al. performed biomechanical testing on cadaveric specimens including cyclical loading and load to failure protocols. They showed that there was no difference between transosseous repair, suture anchors, and unicortical button repair.
A meta-analysis of 112 cases of pectoralis major rupture, showed that patients who undergo surgical repair had less pain, a higher rate of pre-injury strength and return to activities, than patients managed conservatively.
Reference
- orthoracle.com












































































