
Learn the Saphenous neurectomy and application of the Polyganics Neurocap surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Saphenous neurectomy and application of the Polyganics Neurocap surgical procedure.
The geniculate branches of the saphenous nerve are at risk of injury during surgery to the knee. The branches cross obliquely from medial to lateral and may be injured through transection, direct blunt trauma, traction or tether in scar. Injury to the geniculate branches is associated with numbness in the anterior knee, pain at the site of injury and sometimes allodynia. A Tinel’s sign is positive with pain elicited by tapping at the site of suspected nerve injury. Injury to these nerve branches may be a cause of unexplained pain after knee surgery and can be confirmed when the pain resolves after an ultrasound guided block to the saphenous nerve.
Surgical exposure of the nerve may be required for patients with persistent pain and altered sensation that is resistant to physical therapy strategies. Neurolysis of intact branches may improve nerve glide and reduce pain. However the surgeon must be prepared for identifying an end neuroma from transection injury to one or more of the infrageniculate nerve branches and in such cases the treatment options include nerve graft or allograft reconstruction if the distal nerve stump can be identified. In cases where the distal stump is not available, a capping procedure can be performed after neuroma resection using the Polyganics Neurocap device. The Neurocap is a bioresorbable device manufactured from Polycaprolactone. It has a chamber to protect the nerve stump from the surrounding surgical bed to prevent scar tether and pain. Its absorption is complete by 18 months.
In cases of extensive scarring or multiple neuromata of the infra-geniculate branches a saphenous neurectomy may be performed, however the sensory loss that results involves the whole of the anteromedial leg below the knee and this functional loss and risk of marginal hypersensitivity must be balanced against the need to improve the local pain on the extensor aspect of the knee.

INDICATIONS:
The indication for surgery is a painful neuroma of the saphenous nerve or its branches resulting in numbness, altered sensation, hypersensitivity and pain in the anterior knee and the anteromedial lower leg and medial ankle. The saphenous nerve arises as a terminal branch of the femoral nerve in the sub sartorial canal and enters the lower leg between the sartorius and gracilis muscles. There are usually two or more infrageniculate nerve branches that course anteromedially and cross the midline of the knee. These branches are susceptible to injury during surgery on the knee. The saphenous nerve trunk passes distally a hands breadth posterior to the medial patella border and lies anterior to the medial malleolus (2.5cm) in proximity to the long saphenous vein. The nerve is vulnerable to injury at this point during cut-down procedures for vascular access and during ankle fracture surgery when the normal anatomy is distorted by swelling and fracture displacement.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION:
Altered sensation and pain in the anterior knee and over the medial tibia with sensitivity of the skin and a positive Tinel’s sign when tapping gently over the saphenous nerve or its branches. Due to sensitivity the recommended method of assessment is to tap from a distal to proximal direction along the affected nerve, marking the point of maximum sensitivity.
IMAGING:
Ultrasound (US) imaging may be useful in identifying neuromas but when small they may be missed. The pressure of the probe can also be a challenge to successful US imaging as it may provoke pain. US can be used to mark small occult neuromas prior to surgery, however I find the Tinel’s sign and cutaneous marking with indelible ink to be a reliable method for intra-operative targetting.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT:
Neuromas can be excised and if the distal nerve stump is available then an autologous nerve graft or processed nerve allograft reconstruction can be attempted. Successful reinnervation may allow central cortical down regulation of the pain response and reduce the risk of marginal hypersensitivity.
Capping is not a new concept, however the previous caps were non bioresorbable and as such could pose a risk of ongoing mechanical irritation of the resected nerve end.
Proximal relocation and burying to muscle or bone are strategies that may be employed however the evidence base for any one technique being superior to another is not there. Relocation should ensure that there is no tether point or traction across a mobile joint. Relocation may require lengthening with a graft and using allograft is preferable to autologous graft in patients with neuropathic pain and sensitivity as it avoids the risk off donor site pain. Centro-centro anastomosis can bridge across between two proximal cut nerve stumps from resection of 2 neuromata in proximity.
Sometime a nerve branch is identified in scar and no significant neuroma is seen. In such cases neurolysis and perhaps wrapping with a barrier to prevent recurrence of scar can be employed.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT:
Medical management includes physical therapy, scar mobilisation, desensitisation, neuromodulation stimulation, TENS pain management, cryoneurolysis and pain management with oral and topical agents plus psychological support.
CONTRAINDICATIONS:
Surgery should be considered only when there is defined site of irritation, confirmation of pain improvement or resolution after temporary local anaesthetic blockade of the main feeding nerve trunk and patient compliance with a good understanding of the risks of exacerbation, transient improvement and complications. The nature of complex chronic pain management is that there can be peripheral and central pain drivers and treatment should attempt to address all possible causes for a successful outcome.

The patient has a thorough pre-operative assessment with a diagnostic nerve block. US guided blockade of the saphenous nerve gave VAS pain score reduction from 90 to 0. The patient was consented for surgery and the areas of presumed neuroma marked at the sites of maximum Tinel’s sign. Under general anaesthetic the patient is positioned supine on the operating table. A thigh tourniquet is applied where possible and helps maintain a bloodless field to help visualisation of small nerve branches. If a proximal sectioning of the saphenous nerve is planned, the tourniquet may impede access to the saphenous nerve as it exits the sub sartorial canal of Hunter and passes across the medial knee.
Loupe magnification is needed for the surgical exposure to help in identifying the small nerve branches and neuromata.
Basic instruments plus deep self-retaining Norfolk and Norwich retractors (x2), a Travers retractor and a west retractor are needed for exposure. To mobilise, tag and retract nerve branches a 90 degree mixter forceps and surgical rubber sloops are useful.
Neurocaps (Polyganics BV) in a variety of diameters (1.5-4.5mm) are required so that a peripheral branch or a main trunk can be treated dependent on the findings at surgery. The caps are sutured into place with fine monofilament non-absorbable sutures and micro-instruments. 8’0 nylon is recommended for larger nerve diameters with 6’0 prolene for securing the cap (without tether) to deep tissue planes to prevent superficial migration in the wound.
An operating microscope is available for neuroma resection, grafting or capping.
A nerve catheter for post-operative pain management and an infusion pump are useful in peri-operative pain management.

In patients with severe neuropathic pain, I place an indwelling nerve catheter at the time of surgery. This is a fine tube catheter that is positioned at the proximal nerve exposure and it can be used to intermittently bolus the deep surgical bed. In such cases the patient remains an inpatient for 1-2 days post-operatively with a background infusion to prevent fibrin clot formation at the catheter tip.
In less severe pain cases, like demonstrated here, I use a large volume local anaesthetic field block with 0.25% Bupivocaine for post-operative pain relief. I recommend simple oral analgesic medication and continuation of the patient’s normal analgesia and neuromodulatory regimen until the operated site has settled at 3 months. Graduated reduction and withdrawal of medications can then be commenced.
I recommend that the bulky dressings are left in situ for one week after which a reduction of dressings and change to the occlusive dressing is undertaken.
The patient is encouraged to mobilise the knee within the constraints of the bandage for the first week and then to increase to a functional range after dressing reduction as tolerated by pain and subject to swelling.
A TED stocking is used on the non-operated limb for 6 weeks from surgery top reduce the risk of thromboembolic complications.
Subcutaneous heparin is only administered post-operatively for high risk patients.
Clips are removed at 2 weeks and the patient is encouraged to leave the wound open and commence desensitisation scar massage.
The area of denervation should be recorded and this can be monitored in the post-operative visit at 3 and 6 months with a VAS pain score.
Neuroma recurrence at the site of capping should be monitored for 2 years from surgery.

NeuroCap results
The patient should have a visual analogue score monitored pre-operatively, after the diagnostic block and at intervals of 3,6,12 and 24 months post-operatively. The outcome of neuroma surgery is variable. Careful pre-operative patient assessment and selection is key to good results.
References:
Van Der Avoort DJJC, Hovius SER, Selles RW, Van Neck JW, Coert JH. The incidence of symptomatic neuroma in amputation and neurorrhaphy patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2013;66(10):1330-1334
Stokvis A, van der Avoort D-JJC, van Neck JW, Hovius SER, Coert JH. Surgical management of neuroma pain: a prospective follow-up study. Pain. 2010;151(3):862-869
Lewin-Kowalik J, Marcol W, Kotulska K, Mandera M, Klimczak A. Prevention and management of painful neuroma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2006;46(2):62-67; discussion 67-68
Watson J, Gonzalez M, Romero A, Kerns J. Neuromas of the hand and upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am. 2010;35(3):499-510
Elliot D, Sierakowski A. The surgical management of painful nerves of the upper limb: a unit perspective. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011;36(9):760-770
Reference
- orthoracle.com



















































































