
Learn the Thoracic Outlet decompression/ supraclavicular first rib resection surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Thoracic Outlet decompression/ supraclavicular first rib resection surgical procedure.
The thoracic outlet lies at the apex of the thorax and is traversed by the subclavian vessels and brachial plexus as they enter the upper extremity. It can be divided, conceptually, into three spaces from proximal to distal: the scalene triangle, costo-clavicular space and sub-pectoral space (lying under pectoralis minor). Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is the result of compression of one or more of the neuromuscular structures at this site and is classified according to the structure being compressed as: neurogenic, arterial and venous. Neurogenic TOS remains by far the most common of these.
Clear consensus on diagnosis and treatment is still lacking. It is generally agreed that for most individuals with a diagnosis of neurogenic TOS the emphasis is on physiotherapy. Surgery is reserved for individuals who fail to respond to conservative measures. With careful patient selection surgery can be effective.

An understanding of the aetiology of TOS remains incomplete. The presence of cervical ribs was first described by Galen and historically, these extra ribs were the first recognised cause of TOS. These may be present in 0.5 to 1.0% of people. Additional ‘ribs’ vary from a small exostosis arising from the transverse process of the seventh cervical vertebra to a complete rib, which attaches anteriorly to the first rib and either can cause compression. However, the majority of individuals with cervical ribs are not symptomatic. Several other anomalies at the thoracic outlet have been implicated in TOS, in particular, variations in the anatomy of the scalene triangle. An intimate understanding of the anatomy of this space is of particular importance for surgeons performing surgery in this area. The triangle is formed by the anterior and middle scalene muscles and the upper border of the first rib and anomalies of the first rib and scalene muscles have been described. An overlapping of the insertions of the scalene muscles onto the first rib, such that the two muscles form a ‘U’ or ‘V’ shape sling which compresses the inferior plexus and artery. Accessory scalene muscles are described as are multiple types of fascial bands. Occasionally, an acquired space occupying lesion can lead to a compressive pathology e.g. Pancoast tumour, malunited clavicle fracture or fracture callous. However, the most common causes of compression probably arise as a result of secondary postural changes which can arise as a result of trauma but may also arise through obesity or changes in physical activity.
Neurogenic TOS is thought to arise as a combination of congenital anatomical predisposition and trauma. Poor posture of the neck, shoulders and upper back can be related to trauma. Injury incites a postural change resulting in secondary muscle imbalance which leads to pain, swelling and further abnormal posture. A negative cycle that promotes the syndrome results. If the poor posture is maintained scarring and fibrosis in muscle and peri-neural tissue becomes established and can lead to nerve compression.
Neurogenic TOS accounts for the majority of cases. Diagnosis is clinical and can be challenging with a lack of clear consensus on the condition. Symptoms are notoriously varied with differing degrees of neck, shoulder arm and hand symptoms and often no clear objective signs. Onset of symptoms often follows trauma, the so called ‘whiplash’ injury associated with road traffic accidents is a common inciting cause. Pain, parasthesia and colour changes with activity and arm elevation are usual but non-specific. It is important to distinguish alternative sources of symptoms, in particular, cervical spine disease and peripheral compressive neuropathies.
A number of clinical tests have been described to diagnose TOS, although none have particularly good specificity. Hyperabduction and abduction of the shoulder combined with external rotation (ABER) are frequently deployed as provocative manoeuvres. A decrease or loss of the radial pulse has been interpreted as a positive sign, but many non-symptomatic individuals may demonstrate similar pulse volume changes. Reproduction of symptoms in symptomatic individuals is probably a more useful indicator. In Adson’s test the patient’s neck is extended and turned to the affected side and in this position a deep breath is taken and held. Again, a loss of radial pulse is interpreted as a positive sign. Roos test uses the ABER position combined with opening and closing of the hands maintained for up to three-minutes. Replication of symptoms is a positive test. Tenderness over the first rib in the posterior triangle of the neck is a useful sign, it can demonstrate increased sensitivity over the plexus and be compared to the contralateral side. Similarly, a Tinel’s test can be performed in this area. Both palpation and percussion over the nerve may produce parasthesia distally and the cutaneous territory that that Tinel’s radiates to can give an indication as to the part of the plexus that is being compressed.
Plain radiographs satisfactorily show ossified cervical ribs and may show modelling deformities of the clavicle. The availability of high definition MRI scan has meant that it is possible to visualise anatomical anomalies such as non-ossified ribs, fibrous bands and accessory muscles. The sensitivity of such investigations is still not known. Additionally, TOS is a dynamic condition and the optimal protocol of dynamic imaging has yet to be defined. Currently, the mainstay of imaging is to rule out space occupying lesions and cervical spine disease. Arterial and venous TOS are more straightforward to diagnose with duplex ultrasound and/or angiography. Electrodiagnostic tests are valuable to rule out more peripheral sites of compression neuropathy (carpal tunnel and cubital tunnel syndrome). Sensory changes occasional will be seen in the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve in patients with inferior brachial plexopathy from compression but EMG & NCS are typically normal in patients with TOS.
Management of TOS is best established in a multidisciplinary setting. The majority of cases of neurogenic TOS are treated with appropriate physiotherapy. Therapy aims to restore proper muscle balance and posture. Only cases which fail to respond to a committed course of therapy for six-months are considered for surgical treatment. Surgical treatment involves the identification and resection of compressive elements, including cervical ribs, the scalene muscles, first rib and fibrous bands. Supraclavicular and transaxillary approaches to first rib excision have both been described.

The patient is placed in a beach-chair position, the head up posture helps to minimise venous engorgement. The head should be secured in a head-ring with the neck extended and head turned away from the operative side. A small sandbag is placed under the scapula to help extend the posterior triangle of the neck. The arm is left free to allow the shoulder to be abducted and rotated during the operation, this is necessary to assess for dynamic compression points in different positions of the shoulder. The arm is left free to allow different muscle groups to be examined during nerve stimulation.
Intra-operative nerve stimulation is utilised to aid nerve identification, so systemic muscle paralysing agents should ideally be avoided or alternatively a short acting agent is used at induction alone. Disposable nerve stimulators specifically designed for intra-operative use are commercially available. An alternative, which is preferred by the author, is to use the type of peripheral nerve stimulator utilised for nerve localisation during regional anaesthetic blockade. This style of stimulator allows for small currents to be applied precisely using the stimulator needle. The device is earthed to the patient via an ECG ‘dot’ and the lead is placed in an arthroscopy drape so that it can be included in the sterile filed. Loupe magnification and bipolar diathermy is advised.

Patients are observed in hospital overnight. The following day gentle mobilisation is started as pain allows, and formal physiotherapy is commenced 2 weeks after surgery.
The aim of post operative physiotherapy is to promote gliding of the neurovascular structures within the surgical bed to mitigate against the effects of post surgical fibrosis. This is in addition to the ongoing physiotherapy that patients with TOS will have been instructed in pre-operatively. Emphasis on restoration and maintenance of proper muscle balance and posture will have been instituted prior to surgery and it is key that this is continued post operatively.

Diagnosis and treatment of TOS is challenging. Patients have usually suffered from chronic symptoms and the diagnosis has often been previously overlooked. A multidisciplinary approach is essential with physiotherapy forming the cornerstone of assessment and treatment. Novak and Mackninnon, reported improvement in 25 out of 42 individuals with a minimum of 6 months of physiotherapy.
Surgery can be very effective when proper patient selection is emphasised and significant improvement in quality of life can be achieved. Chang et al used the Dissability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Short Form -12 instruments to assess quality of life as an outcome, following supraclavicular first rib excision for neurogenic and venous TOS and showed significant improvements.
Persistent symptoms following surgery are usually associated with incorrect diagnosis. Recurrent symptoms following surgery are not common but may be due to excessive scar formation. Atasoy, has reviewed over 700 surgical patients treated at a specialist hand surgery unit over a twenty year period, and emphasises the importance of post operative exercises starting on the first day after surgery.
References:
Novak, C.B., Collins, E.D. and Mackinnon, S.E., 1995. Outcome following conservative management of thoracic outlet syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery, 20(4), pp.542-548.
Chang, D.C., Rotellini-Coltvet, L.A., Mukherjee, D., De Leon, R. and Freischlag, J.A., 2009. Surgical intervention for thoracic outlet syndrome improves patient’s quality of life. Journal of vascular surgery, 49(3), pp.630-637.
Atasoy, E., 2010. A hand surgeon’s further experience with thoracic outlet compression syndrome. The Journal of hand surgery, 35(9), pp.1528-1538.
Reference
- orthoracle.com

















