
Learn the Ulnar head hemiresection with interposition and extensor reconstruction surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Ulnar head hemiresection with interposition and extensor reconstruction surgical procedure.
Patients with distal radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis, particularly but not exclusively due to systemic inflammatory arthritis, may develop painful dysfunction of their DRUJ, with well localised pain, restriction of forearm rotation and, potentially, extensor tendon dysfunction. The extensor tendons pass from the forearm into the dorsum of the hand in 6 different compartments, each containing different tendons.
On the radial side of the wrist, the 1st and 3rd dorsal compartments carry tendons to the thumb, and the 2nd dorsal compartment the tendons of the two radial wrist extensors. The finger extensors to all four fingers (extensor digitorum communis- EDC) pass in the 4th dorsal compartment on the dorsal aspect of the radius (along with the independent extensor to the index finger, extensor indicis proprius (EIP)). The independent extensor to the little finger, extensor digiti minimi (EDM) passes in the 5th dorsal compartment, which is found immediately overlying the longitudinal joint line of the DRUJ, and the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon is found in its own compartment (the 6th dorsal compartment), usually found in a groove on the dorso-ulnar aspect of the ulnar head.
Due to its position over the DRUJ joint line, the extensor digiti minimi (EDM) tendon is vulnerable to synovitis and tenosynovitis due to attrition from ulnar head osteophytes, on occasion proceeding to rupture. Tenosynovitis due to the DRUJ arthrosis may cause attenuation and sequential rupture of the tendons of EDC, a condition eponymously called Vaughan-Jackson syndrome. Classically tendon loss usually progresses sequentially from ulnar to radial (little-ring-middle-index). The earliest potential clinical sign, an inability to independently extend the little finger, may be masked by continuity of the EDC tendon to the little finger still enabling the little finger to be extended actively with the adjacent digits. Even after this EDC tendon has ruptured, the little finger may appear to actively extend due to connections between the EDC tendons in the hand, called junctura tendinae. Patients with DRUJ arthritis who are not ready to accept surgery should therefore be instructed to ensure that they can independently extend their little finger every month, seeking review if this becomes increasingly painful or difficult.
Depending on how many tendons have ruptured, different reconstructive options exist through a combination of “buddying” tendon stumps together into functional units with an appropriate relative tension (little combined with ring or the middle combined with index) and transferring motor units (tendons from other muscles) onto the combined distal stumps in order to restore extension of the digits. This will improve function, but the surgery should be combined with steps to debride the DRUJ and “smooth-off” the ulnar head even if the joint function is good to minimise the risk of further tendon ruptures.
One key point with this technique is to be sparing with the resection of the ulnar head in order to minimise radio-ulnar convergence, but be sure to remove enough distally to eliminate ulno-carpal abutment; this technique produces good clinical results.

INDICATIONS
Reasons to consider ulnar head and DRUJ debridement include arthritis with local symptoms and pain not responding to conservative measures, stiffness with functional restrictions (NB remember to check the proximal radio-ulnar joint as another potential source for pathology that may restrict forearm rotation- the presence of isolated wrist pain and the absence of clinical irritability at the level of the elbow may be enough in patients with OA, but for those whose underlying problem is Rheumatoid, pre-operative imaging of the elbow should be obtained) and, in particular, associated extensor tendon dysfunction.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
There are certain key features to look for on examination, as follows:
Pain in the DRUJ with localised (longitudinal) joint line tenderness. Pain worsened by external radio-ulnar compression (rotation of the forearm causing pain that is worsened by the examiner gripping to compress the radius and ulna towards one another at the level of the junction of the central and middle thirds of the forearm). Tenosynovitic pain (a longitudinal forearm pain that is worse with resisted extensor activation, particularly of the little finger).
Stiffness of forearm rotation, remembering to check the proximal radio-ulnar joint as an alternate source of pathology (as noted above).
Confirm extensor tendon continuity or note any inability to extend the fingers. The fingers may be held flexed for one of several reasons:
the MCP joints may be diseased and subluxed (in which case the history will usually be of slow progression); depending upon the extent of MCP joint disease, passive correction may be possible.
the palmar capsule of the MCP joint may become impaled onto an osteophyte of the metacarpal neck; this usually happens as an acute event, and is associated with a painful loss of active and passive extension of the MCP joint, often with the digit slightly deviated towards the side where the capsule is caught.
the extensor tendons may not be held centrally over the metacarpal heads, and may sublux (usually to the ulnar side), and so not be able to extend the finger at the MCP joint. If the MCP joint can be passively corrected and so the extensor tendons return to their normal position, the patient may be able to hold the finger extended, but not actively extend from a position of MCP joint flexion.
the extensor tendons may have ruptured at the level of the wrist- this is usually due to DRUJ arthritis with secondary tenosynovitis and/or attrition over an ulnar head osteophyte. In rheumatoid patients, this is often referred to eponymously as Vaughan-Jackson syndrome.
the extensor muscles may have been denervated by posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) or radial nerve lesions. Synovial cysts from the elbow can track into the radial tunnel (between the two heads of supinator) and compress the PIN.
Remember to perform the tenodesis test as this will give you a good indication as to whether or not the tendons are in-continuity. This clinical test uses the effect of wrist motion on the relative tensions in the extrinsic flexor and extensor tendons to the fingers to provide an indication of the integrity of the tendons. When the muscles are relaxed, palmar flexion of the wrist will reduce tension in the finger flexors and increase tension in the finger extensors, so causing the digits to extend; the opposite happens when the wrist is dorsiflexed. If a tendon has ruptured, the balance between the flexors and extensors will be lost, and so the normal cascade of the digits (the normal pattern of increasing flexion of digits from the index to the small finger) will be lost. (You can try this on your own hand to see the effect in action.)
In practice, I look at the resting posture of the hand, trying to passively correct the MCP joints and, if correction is possible, see if the digits can be held straightened by the patient. If fingers fall down, I then undertake the tenodesis test with passive wrist motion into palmar and dorsi-flexion causing motion of the fingers with digits whose extensor tendons have ruptured remaining more flexed than would be expected; however, this can only be performed if condition of the wrist allows which, in patients with inflammatory arthritis, may not be the case. If the none of the fingers can be actively extended or held in active extension after passive correction, it is important to use the tenodesis test to rule out neuromuscular cause as if the tendons are in-continuity, there should be passive digit motion seen with wrist palmar and dorsiflexion. (Clinically, you should also check whether other muscles innervated by the PIN units are working, such as extensor pollicis longus).
If the digits cannot be actively extended, but can be passively corrected and held in an extended position actively, look for extensor mechanism subluxation (the tendons “dropping off” the heads of the metacarpals, usually in an ulnar direction) when the digits are flexed as this may explain inability to actively extend the digits; if the fingers are significantly ulnar-deviated, the patient may not be able to actively hold a passively extended digit straight due to the joint deformity in combination with tendon subluxation.
If the digits cannot be passively extended, examine and image the hand rule out MCP joint-level problems such as MCP joint subluxation.
IMAGING
Plain film imaging to confirm presence of arthritis, remembering to image the elbow as well if forearm rotation is limited actively and passively.
Ultrasound scan to assess synovitis, tenosynovitis and tendon integrity.
MRI of the elbow may have a role if it is suspected that a patient with inflammatory arthritis may have a synovial cyst arising from the elbow and compressing the PIN in the radial tunnel through supinator.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Ulnar head excision (Darrach’s procedure): excision arthroplasty of the DRUJ by removing the ulnar head known as Darrach’s procedure. This is a relatively straight-forward procedure to perform, but can be complicated by mechanical problems, in which case salvage is difficult.
Removal of the ulnar head causes radio-ulnar convergence (the radius and ulna moving closer together than normal, as the ulnar head is no longer present to hold the bones apart, particularly when gripping firmly).
There may be instability of the radius at the new ulnar stump (the radius clicking to the palmar and dorsal aspect of the ulnar stump- remember that while people (and learning resources) commonly refer to ulnar head instability with considering the DRUJ, the ulna is in fact the fixed axis about which the radius rotates, so theunstable bone is, in fact, the radius).
There is concern that removing the ulnar head may contribute to ulnar translation of the carpus.
Sauve-Kapandji (DRUJ fusion with distal ulnar segmental excision): this procedure uses fusion of the ulnar head to the radius to maintain bony support of the ulnar side of the wrist), enabling forearm rotation by excising a segment from the ulnar neck. However, this will not address any ligamentous contribution to ulnar carpal drift. Additionally, as the ulnar neck is resected to allow rotation, this will mean that the stump of the ulna will necessarily be relatively proximal on the radius which, given the risk of instability between the radius and the ulnar stump increases with more proximal ulnar neck cuts, increases the risk of convergence and instability.
Hemiresection interposition: Bowers (1985) described a hemi-resection of the ulnar head primarily to address problems arising following radial fracture malunion. He interposed an ulnar-based retinaculo-capsular flap into the resected joint line. The procedure is said to require an intact / competent / reconstructable triangular fibrocartilaginous complex (TFCC) to be successful. The ulnar-based flap of the composite DRUJ capsule and extensor retinaculum that is interposed into the joint after resection is thought to potentially draw the ECU tendon further dorsal and so to help with stability of the resected distal ulna. Bowers also described sometimes using tendon interposition as an anchovy into the resected joint line (as some have used following trapeziectomy).
Ulnar head replacement: (hemiarthroplasty or total constrained). Implants exist, but clinical experience is relatively limited. The ulnar head articulates with the radius, and provides structural stability, although soft-tissue reconstruction is unreliable and so instability is a potential concern. Nonetheless, implantation of an ulnar head replacement into the unstable stump of the ulna to address instability following a Darrach or Sauve-Kapandji procedure.
A constrained implant is available to address an unstable DRUJ, particularly after failed ulnar head resection (the Scheker prosthesis), but I am concerned about the long-term implications of inserting a constrained implant into a joint that normally has multiplanar motion.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Unless there are compelling reasons not to operate, in my opinion non-surgical management is inappropriate in the presence of tendon rupturing, if only to protect the remaining tendons.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
As with many musculoskeletal procedures, inserting foreign material is inappropriate in the presence of active infection, and carries an increased risk if there has been a previous infection in the DRUJ.
DRUJ instability without the potential for TFCC reconstruction is at least a relative contra-indication to ulnar head resection, given the potential for instability in any event. However, for low-demand patients, the limited resection involved with an ulnar head debridement usually means that surgery can be safely undertaken.

Usually, dorsal DRUJ and extensor tendon surgeries will be undertaken with the patient supine with their arm on a hand table. However, this patient had a simultaneous elbow replacement, hence the patient is in a lateral position; this made access for some of the images more difficult.
Surgery can be undertaken using general or regional anaesthesia, when a tourniquet can be used. However, as this patient was undergoing a simultaneous total elbow replacement, which was expected to exhaust the available safe tourniquet time, the forearm surgery was undertaken using the same infiltration as would be used for Wide Awake Local Anaesthetic No Tourniquet surgery (WALANT); this approach makes use of field infiltration of relatively large volumes of local anaesthetic pre-mixed with adrenaline, so that a bloodless field can be achieved despite not using a tourniquet. There is no reason why the procedure could not be undertaken using solely WALANT techniques, which would be safer for the patient and afford a quicker post-surgical discharge.
If a tourniquet is to be used, this could be applied either above or below the elbow; below elbow tourniquets are usually applied to a lower cuff pressure, and cause less ischaemic muscle pain.
If patients are going to remain awake, remember that many patients will have a systemic inflammatory arthropathy, and so may need particular care when positioning them to ensure their other joints do not become painful during the course of surgery, particularly their shoulder and elbow on the side that is being operated upon.
As with any tendon surgery, be sure that the limb is prepared to allow for any potential extension of the surgical field to locate the tendons proximally.

I modify the precise protocol according to the patient’s functional demands, skin condition and general tissue quality; while stronger tissues seem to be more likely to withstand earlier mobilisation, paradoxically the low functional demands and intolerance of patients with more sever inflammatory diseases often makes me happier to allow early conversion to a removable splint in these patients.
After surgery, I instruct patients to elevate the hand (using a sling is often harder than you might imagine if they have a sugar-tong splint, as the plaster will restrict elbow flexion) and mobilise the elbow (as far as possible within the confines of the splint) and shoulder to minimise stiffness. The extensor reconstruction will determine mobilisation of the digits; the tendon anastomosis will usually tolerate a controlled active mobilisation protocol (as for extensor tendon repairs), but if the reconstruction is for an isolated loss of EDM, I will allow earlier weaning if the patient understands and accepts the risks to the EDM reconstruction (i.e., if loaded, it may come adrift, although this may well not affect composite extension if their pre-operative function was good). I am more cautious if a tendon transfer was needed.
I arrange for conversion of the cast to a removable splint (again, a sugar-tong splint or removable equivalent cast) at or around 2 weeks, with wound check, and start weaning at between 2 and 6 weeks (depending upon the extensor reconstruction, as outlined above), with splint removal for skin care in all patients but motion resumption based upon the hand therapists’ assessment of the patient’s understanding of instructions (to be slow and progressive in regaining motion, being limited by pain) and the tissue quality.
From 6 weeks I allow all patients to discard the splint as they feel confident, converting those who the therapists are concerned about to a forearm-based extension splint for the tendon reconstruction.

Most patients are pleased with both the restoration of ability to extend their digits (loss of which can cause a surprising degree of functional impairment) and improvement in pain and restriction of DRUJ / forearm motion (although not all patients will have had intrusive prodromal symptoms from the DRUJ). The improvements are usually sustained, and it is unusual to see further problems with the tendons, or problems with symptomatic radio-ulnar convergence or DRUJ instability.
The papers below will give you further insights into the condition and the technique:
Bowers, WH (1985) J Hand Surg Am 10:169-178 “Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty: the hemiresection-interposition technique”.
This describes the results of the Bowers hemiresection-interposition arthroplasty technique in 38 patients followed for an average of 2.5 years, with painless forearm rotation over a stable arc from 84degrees pronation to 77 degrees supination restored in 85%, with mild pain and an arc of 70 degrees pronation, 75 degrees supination in the remaining 15%.
Bain, GI et al (1995) J Hand Surg Am 20944-950 “Matched hemiresection interposition arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint”
This independent series followed 49 patients for an average of 3 years, noting pain improvement in 35 and satisfaction in 41 (84%), with improvements in both supination and pronation ranges (to an average of 72 degrees in each direction), but with reported difficulties when turning large objects. The authors felt the need for pain relief to be the main indication for surgery as pain relief was the primary determinant of patient satisfaction.
Carr, AJ & Burge, PD (1992) J Hand Surg Br 17:694-696 “Rupture of extensor tendons due to osteoarthritis of the distal radio-ulnar joint”.
This reports extensor tendon ruptures in 12 patients with osteoarthritis, rather than inflammatory arthritis, 10 of whom did not have prodromal symptoms, and identifies the capsular perforation and contribution of attrition from the ulnar head osteophyte.
Reference
- orthoracle.com












































