
Learn the Ulnar shortening osteotomy using the RECOS locking plate surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Ulnar shortening osteotomy using the RECOS locking plate surgical procedure.
An ulnar shortening osteotomy is a common procedure in wrist surgery and was originally described by Milch in 1941 for the treatment of an ulnar positive variance following a distal radius malunion. Painless load transmission through the wrist is dependent upon the alignment of the radius with the ulna. Studies have shown that a length alteration in the ulna of 2.5mm has dramatic implication on load transmission across the wrist.
Ulnar impaction syndrome is a process affecting the ulnocarpal joint with some evidence that overloading through the distal ulna is the cause. Ulnar positive variance is known to be a risk factor as it increases loads through the ulnocarpal joint.
Ulnar impaction syndrome can be congenital, developmental or degenerative, or may occur following trauma. Post traumatic impaction commonly results from a distal radius fracture or less commonly after premature radial epiphyseal closure.
Although any amount of ulnar shortening may rebalance and improve wrist loading, between 2-3 mm is recommended by most authors. This should result in an 80% reduction in load transmission through the ulno-carpal articulation.
Currently ulnar shortening is performed for a variety of indications and although these may demand different degrees of shortening, the same techniques and instruments may be used to ensure a high degree of precision and control.
Recent years have seen a number of manufacturers introduce specialised instrumentation and customised plates. In this section I describe one technique of ulnar shortening using the RECOS (KLS Martin Group, Germany) locking reconstruction system for ulnar shortening.
This is a pre-contoured titanium plate with drill sleeves and colour coded screws.
An adjustable jig allows the surgeon to perform a predetermined degree of shortening whilst two sliding holes allow compression across the osteotomy followed by lag screw placement and rigid fixation.
The RECOS plate requires a very limited number of instruments and it is consequently one of the simpler procedures to follow, in comparison to a number of alternative implants.

INDICATIONS
Painless load transmission through the wrist is dependent upon the alignment of the radius with the ulna. Studies have shown that a length alteration in the ulna of 2.5mm has dramatic implication on load transmission across the wrist.
Ulnar impaction syndrome is a degenerative process affecting the ulnocarpal joint with some evidence that overloading through the distal ulna is the cause. Ulnar positive variance is known to be a risk factor as it increases loads through the ulnocarpal joint.
Primary ulnar impaction syndrome may be congenital, developmental or degenerative.
Post traumatic impaction is also well recognised and commonly results from a distal radius fracture or less commonly after premature radial epiphyseal closure.
Although any amount of ulnar shortening may rebalance and improve wrist loading, between 2-3 mm is recommended by most authors. This should result in an 80% reduction in load transmission through the ulno-carpal articulation.
It is important to exclude other causes of ulnar sided wrist pain such as a triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tear or distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) arthritis.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
The patient in this case was a 40 year old woman who presented with longstanding ulnar sided wrist pain. Presenting symptoms were consistent with ulnar impaction syndrome, also known as ulnocarpal abutment. This which was later confirmed on examination and imaging. Symptoms had recently been exacerbated by wrist trauma and failed to settle with non-operative treatment over the course of a year.
The patient initially presented with ulnar sided wrist pain. This was localisable to the ulnocarpal articulation and exacerbated by ulnar deviation of the wrist. Activities involving ulnar deviation or a pronated grip reproduced ulnar sided pain.
Clinical examination also revealed localised swelling, tenderness over the volar and dorsal aspects of the ulnar head and triquetrum. Performing a pisiform boost (a volar pressure over the pisiform causing elevation of the ulnar side of the carpus) whilst depressing the head of the ulna exacerbated pain.
IMAGING
Standard x-rays of the wrist will demonstrate arthritic change involving the carpus or DRUJ.
The PA view will also allow measurement of ulnar variance. A pronated grip view is advocated by some surgeons as this may demonstrate a dynamic increase in ulnar variance.
An MRI scan may add some useful information about the integrity of the TFCC and the condition of the articular cartilages at the radio-carpal joints and the DRUJ.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
The main alternative operative treatment for the patient is a partial distal ulnar resection, also known as the wafer procedure. This involves excision of the distal 2-4mm of the distal dome of the ulnar head. One potential advantage of this procedure is that it may be performed arthroscopically. It also avoids the potential problems of ulnar shortening osteotomy such as hardware irritation, secondary surgery to remove the plate (65%) and non-union (0-11%). However although long term results are satisfactory, there is a long initial recovery time.
A diagnostic wrist arthroscopy prior to ulnar shortening may be useful. As well as confirming the presence of degenerative change at the ulnocarpal joint, it also excludes other sources of wrist pain such as a TFCC tear or DRUJ degeneration
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
All patients should undergo a period of non-operative management before proceeding to surgery. Activity modification to avoid exacerbating symptoms through repeated loading, as well as a course of non steroidal anti-inflammatories may be helpful. Wrist splinting may also help offload the ulno-carpal articulation. If these measures fail to resolve symptoms, a corticosteroid injection may be useful.
The current patient failed to respond to these measures and therefore an ulnar shortening osteotomy was offered.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
One must ensure that other causes of ulnar sided wrist pain have been excluded, and the presence of DRUJ arthritis is important. The morphology of the DRUJ must also be taken into consideration although this is not a contraindication. Shortening of 2-3mm have generally been found to be well tolerated by the DRUJ even though cadaveric studies have found that joint loading pressures may be increased. A DRUJ with reverse inclination is especially prone to developing problems after ulnar shortening with point loading at the proximal edge of the notch.

A general or regional anaesthetic technique may be used. Intravenous antibiotics are administered at induction. An upper arm tourniquet is inflated ensuring a bloodless field.
The patient is positioned supine with the arm abducted on an arm table. Intra-operative fluoroscopy is a useful adjunct to ensure correct metalwork placement and screw length and also enables radiographic confirmation of the amount of shortening.

The patient is usually discharged home on the day of surgery. A wound check is performed at 2 weeks and any suture knots can be trimmed at this point.
The wrist is immobilised in the plaster slab for two weeks initially. Following this a removable splint is placed restricting wrist motion for a further four weeks.
Repeat x-rays are taken at 6 weeks and loading of the wrist is limited until evidence of union across the osteotomy site is seen.
At this point the patient is allowed to drive. Heavy lifting should be avoided for the first three months.
In cases of delayed union a further 6 week period of immobilisation is recommended followed by repeat x-rays.

The results of ulnar shortening osteotomy are widely reported as satisfactory with an overall 88% of patients achieving good or excellent function and pain relief.
As mentioned above, hardware irritation requiring removal is a common problem. Delayed union is also a concern and non-union is also reported.
The importance of DRUJ morphology has been looked at by numerous authors. A recent study showed poorer grip strength and DASH scores in patients with oblique DRUJ configurations following ulnar shortening osteotomy, but no degenerative change over the minimum 5 year follow up period.
Long-Term Outcome of Step-Cut Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome.
Papatheodorou LK, Baratz ME, Bougioukli S, Ruby T, Weiser RW, Sotereanos DG.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Nov 2;98(21):1814-1820.
Ulnar Shortening Versus Distal Radius Corrective Osteotomy in the Management of Ulnar Impaction After Distal Radius Malunion.
Aibinder WR, Izadpanah A, Elhassan BT.
Hand (N Y). 2018 Mar;13(2):194-201. doi: 10.1177/1558944716685831. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
Does Distal Radio-ulnar Joint Configuration Affect Postoperative Functional Results after Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy?
Gilbert F, Jakubietz RG, Meffert RH, Jakubietz MG.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Apr 13;6(4):e1760. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001760. eCollection 2018 Apr.
Ulna-Shortening Osteotomy: Outcome and Repercussion of the Distal Radioulnar Joint Osteoarthritis.
de Runz A, Pauchard N, Sorin T, Dap F, Dautel G.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan;137(1):175-84. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001870.
Ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar-sided wrist pain.
Tatebe M, Nishizuka T, Hirata H, Nakamura R.
J Wrist Surg. 2014 May;3(2):77-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1372516.
Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: Ulnar Shortening vs. Arthroscopic Wafer Procedure.
Smet LD, Vandenberghe L, Degreef I.
J Wrist Surg. 2014 May;3(2):98-100. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1375966.
Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy: Are Complications Under Reported?
Chan SK, Singh T, Pinder R, Tan S, Craigen MA.
J Hand Microsurg. 2015 Dec;7(2):276-82. doi: 10.1007/s12593-015-0201-7. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
Reference
- orthoracle.com




































