
Learn the Second stage revision total hip replacement to proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for infection using MUTARS proximal femoral endoprosthesis (Implantcast) surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Second stage revision total hip replacement to proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for infection using MUTARS proximal femoral endoprosthesis (Implantcast) surgical procedure.
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of prosthetic joint replacement, accounting for 13.8% of 15,923 of re-revision total hip arthroplasties performed in the UK in 2018, as detailed in the 16th annual National Joint registry report. More common indications for revision surgery include aseptic loosening (43.5%), pain (16.9%), instability (14.4%), osteolysis (14%), and other important but less common indications for re-revision include implant wear (12.6%) and periprosthetic fracture (10.1%). Both instability and infection are much more common indications for a second revision than first revision hip replacement, highlighting the increased risk of instability and infection following the first revision of a hip replacement compared to that of primary hip replacement
(https://reports.njrcentre.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2016th%20Annual%20Report%202019.pdf).
Surgical management involves identification of the infecting pathogens and optimisation of the host prior to major surgery, which may involve debridement and implant retention, or a single or two-staged revision procedure. Staged revision surgery remains the gold standard of care for multiply revised infected hip replacements. At the first stage the prosthetic components are explanted and the involved soft-tissues are radically debrided. The joint is temporarily stabilised with either an articulating cement spacer, as in this case, or non-articulating spacer for approximately three months. At the second stage, following repeat debridement, the joint is reconstructed.
To minimise the risk of PJI relapse I prefer a silver coated modular proximal femoral endoprosthesis with cemented medullary stems (MUTARS, Implantcast, Buxtehude, Germany). To minimise the risk of acetabular failure due to aseptic loosening I use a trabecular metal revision system (Trabecular Metal Acetabular Revision System, TMARS, Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, US) which allows the use of a full range of liners, augments, cages to address almost all acetabular defects. To minimise the risk of dislocation I have chosen a dual-mobility articulation in this case.
Readers will also find the following techniques of interest:
Revision Total Hip replacement: Stryker custom acetabulum and SERF Dual mobility Hip (De Puy)
Revision Total Hip replacement: Direct exchange Link MP revision stem for periprosthetic fracture
Total Hip replacement(2 stage revision): Combined intra-pelvic and extended trochanteric osteotomy approach
Total Hip replacement (revision): Direct exchange to Rimfit socket (Stryker) with ‘X-change’ Rim-Mesh (Stryker) and impaction bone grafting
I am grateful to Mr Mike Parry FRCS (Tr & Orth) for the images used in this technique.

INDICATIONS
Although contentious in the scientific literature, the indications for a two-stage revision in our centre include:
Patients with systemic manifestations of infection (sepsis)
Clinical signs of infection but no organism has been identified
Preoperative cultures identifying antibiotic-resistant and/or fungal organisms
Presence of a sinus tract
Inadequate or poor soft tissue coverage necessitating plastic surgery
In this case, the patient was transferred to our centre with a failed first stage revision with a periprosthetic fracture of the spacer.
Investigations:
Radiographs of the infected hip and femur are required including AP pelvis, plus long leg alignment view (AP both limbs: hip/knee/ankle). Revision of the implant requires a complete radiographic assessment of the limb in particular looking for extra-articular deformities and any distant occult bony pathologies.
Bloods tests should include FBC, U+Es, CRP, ESR and Albumin. Anaemia should be corrected pre-operatively with oral supplements, diabetic control and renal function optimised and dietary supplements are advocated pre and peri-operatively.
In all cases where peri-prosthetic joint infection is contemplated, aspiration to identify the causative organisms and sensitivities should be performed in theatre when not taking antibiotics. Our protocol involves alcoholic skin preparation, local anaesthetic infiltration to skin (e.g. 1% lignocaine 5ml), a single pass into joint with an appropriate needle, fluid aspirated and sent for culture in aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures bottles. Leucocyte esterase strip testing is also advocated (https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/pdf/10.1302/0301-620x.97b9.34910). The results are discussed in our regional Bone Infection Service MDT with Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Orthopaedic representation. Surgeons may additionally request pre-operative CT scans of the pelvis to assess bone stock and plan reconstruction or exclude pelvic discontinuity in more challenging acetabular reconstructions.
Operative Alternatives:
As mentioned earlier the ideal candidate for a single-stage revision would have known infecting organisms and sensitivities, which do not include multidrug resistant organisms, without soft-tissue compromise, a sinus or systemic sepsis. Indications for debridement and implant retention include the same ideal clinical scenario in PJI presenting within three weeks of onset of symptoms. However, we feel that in multiply revised hip and knee replacements necessitating endoprosthetic replacement as staged approach is preferable to maximise our chances of irradication, as failure may result in amputation.
Non-operative alternatives & Contraindications:
Antibiotic suppression may be contemplated in patients felt to be medically unfit and unsuitable for major revision surgery. This will still mandate aspiration for culture and sensitivity to guide selection of suitable antimicrobials.


Post-op distal neurovascular observations on high dependency unit.
VTE prophylaxis equals low molecular weight heparin for 28 days from 6 hours post-operatively plus thromboembolic stockings for 6 weeks and foot pumps until mobile in bed as an inpatient.
Empirical intravenous antibiotics until cultures from sample tissue and fluid unknown.
Remove the clips at 14 days.
Partial weight bearing for 6 weeks.
Outpatient department 6 week with x-rays on arrival: AP pelvis and left femur whole AP and lateral.
Dietary supplements.
Discussion on bone infection MDT next week.

Recent research by Wouthuyzen-Bakker et al. has highlighted that debridement and implant retention (DAIR) has proven to be a successful strategy for early acute infections, caution is advised when considering a DAIR in late acute infections caused by Staphylococcus species, underling the importance of a pre-operative microbiological diagnosis. (Wouthuyzen-Bakker et al. Lower Success Rate of Débridement and Implant Retention in Late Acute versus Early Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Caused by Staphylococcus spp. Results from a Matched Cohort Study, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2020 478;6:1348-1355 doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001171 https://journals.lww.com/clinorthop/Abstract/2020/06000/Lower_Success_Rate_of_D_bridement_and_Implant.32.aspx)
Proximal femoral replacements have shown an acceptable survivorship in non-oncologic revision hip arthroplasties for severe proximal femoral bone loss, with 95% five-year survival reported by De Martino et al. (De Martino, I., D’Apolito, R., Nocon, A.A. et al. Proximal femoral replacement in non-oncologic patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 43, 2227–2233 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4220-4). The same authors recommended constrained liners to prevent instability, which is an issue when a total hip arthroplasty is above a proximal femoral endoprosthesis. To combat this issue, we prefer when possible to minimise instability using dual mobility articulations as in this case, accepting that at the time of trialling, an on-table decision to use a fully constrained liner may be necessary. The Zimmer-Biomet trabecular metal acetabular system (TMARS) permits that on-table decision making and is supported by a range of liners, augments, buttresses and cages to address most defects.
The outcomes of endoprosthetic replacements for prosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee in the medium term was reported by Alvand et al. they reported high non infection complication rates of 28%, and that PJI eradication was more successful in the hip cohort. Overall eradication of infection was achieved in 83% of the hip revisions versus 59% of the knee revisions after mean 3.8 years (Alvand A, Grammatopoulos G, de Vos F, et al. Clinical Outcome of Massive Endoprostheses Used for Managing Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip and Knee. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):829-834. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.046).
Reference
- orthoracle.com































































