
Learn the Achilles tendon rupture: Integra Achillon percutaneous repair surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Achilles tendon rupture: Integra Achillon percutaneous repair surgical procedure.
Operative repair of the acutely ruptured Achilles tendon allows controlled apposition of the tendon ends and restoration of the normal length of the triceps surae musculo-tendinous unit.
This may be the preferred method of treatment in active patients and in those patients where the gap between the tendon ends does not close sufficiently with the ankle placed into maximal plantar-flexion (as assessed on a pre-operative ultrasound scan).
The Integra Achillon limited open repair technique permits direct visualisation and apposition of the ruptured Achilles tendon ends whilst limiting the extent of the soft tissue dissection. It has the benefit of using a much smaller incision than conventional open repair techniques which probably provides advantage with respect to superficial wound complications. It also has the benefit of being one of the systems with the longest track-record for minimally invasive Achilles repair.
The published results using the Integra Achillon emphasise the need for careful execution of technique and in particular placement of the Achillon jig between the discreetly dissected layers of the fascia cruris and paratenon to minimise the chance of Sural nerve injury. The key papers to be read are: Limited open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures: a technique with a new instrument and findings of a prospective multicenter study. Assal M et al. JBJS (Am) 2002; 84: 161-70, Early, active rehabilitation following mini-open repair of Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective study. Calder JD, Saxby TS. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 857-9 and Outcome following use of the Achillon jig for the repair of acutely ruptured Achilles tendons. Davies H, Agrawal Y, Blundell C, Davies MB. Injury 2017; 48: 781-3.

INDICATIONS
Acute rupture of the Achilles tendon: With confirmation of the diagnosis on an ultrasound scan, the gap between the tendon ends can be assessed to see if the tendon ends can be apposed. If with the foot in full plantarflexion, a gap of greater than 10mm exists between the tendon ends, then in my practice, this warrants surgical repair. The definition of acute is debatable but it is possible to use the Achillon technique to achieve tendon end apposition in patients with mobile tendon segments up to 3 weeks from injury.
The Achillon technique can be used in proximal Achilles tendon ruptures (less than or equal to 10cm from the calcaneal insertion.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
The classic patient is a male between the ages of 25 and 55 years who is involved in a lunging movement whilst taking part in sports. The symptoms are of an acute pain in the back of the heel and the patient often believes he has been struck from behind by another player. The patient is seldom able to complete the sporting activity and notices an abnormal posture within the foot and ankle with accompanying swelling and usually (though not always) bruising.
Examination is best performed with the patient either kneeling on a chair supporting themselves on the chair back or with the patient lying prone on a couch with their knees bent to 90 degrees. Inspection reveals a swollen distal portion of the leg and the characteristic difference in foot position between the injured and uninjured limbs owing to the effect of gravity on the foot position. The normal limb shows the foot rests in a position of plantarflexion whilst the injured limb rests with the foot often appearing to be plantigrade or even in dorsiflexion at the ankle. Inspection also reveals any evidence of previous surgical scars which may influence choice of treatment.
Squeezing the muscle bellies of the gastro-soleus should invoke the foot to plantarflex indicating an intact Achilles on the normal limb. Repeating this manoeuvre on the injured side reveals no foot movement.
IMAGING
Ultrasound is the investigation of choice. It allows assessment of the tendon quality (revealing underlying tendinopathy), the site of the rupture (the distance from the insertion on the calcaneus) and whether or not the tendon ends can be apposed. Determination of the site of rupture is helpful because ruptures proximal to the myotendinous junction do not require operative intervention.
Plain radiography is indicated if the suspected site of the rupture lies close to the calcaneal insertion as management of a bony avulsion of the Achilles insertion is a separate entity.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
Standard open repair techniques have more of a role in managing delayed diagnosis of Achilles rupture. Delayed presentation of more than 6 weeks may mean that the open repair technique will involve additional adjunct procedures such as transfer of the tendon of FHL to the posterior calcaneus or techniques of advancing the proximal Achilles tendon stump using V-Y plasty or turn-down techniques.
Percutaneous operative repair techniques: Several techniques have been described with no particular technique gaining widespread use.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Recent studies in the literature support the treatment of closed acute Achilles tendon ruptures with apposable tendon ends in a weight bearing walker boot. The boots either have adjustable hinges at the ankle to vary the degree of equinus or, more commonly, removable wedges can be applied within the boot to adjust the foot position.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The absolute contraindication for surgical repair of an Achilles rupture is in patients with poor lower limb vascularity. Patients with underlying neuropathy and diabetes should also be preferentially managed non-operatively. Any patient taking medications that compromise the immune response to trauma (steroids, DMARDS etc) should avoid surgical repair.
Patients who are very swollen or in whom the tendon ends are not readily palpable can still be treated using the Achillon device but I would suggest that the position of the distal extent of the proximal Achilles stump is determined on ultrasound and the skin marked before proceeding to surgery.

The patient is best positioned fully prone with the use of a thigh tourniquet. An adhesive drape excludes the tourniquet from contact with the preparation agent. The foot should be placed on pillows and is often best hanging free over the end of the operating table.
Routine use of a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics is recommended.

The below the knee complete cast is kept in place for 2 weeks after surgery during which time the patient is not able to bear weight through the cast. This allows the wound to settle. At two weeks, the cast is removed and the wound inspected and, if need be, re-dressed with a dry adhesive dressing.
The patient is then transferred to a walking boot with three heel wedges inserted. They are permitted to walk on the boot and instructed to remove one wedge per week so that at the 6 week review, they will have been plantigrade in the walker boot for one week. At the 6 week review, the boot is removed and the patient is referred for physiotherapy and supplied with a heel lift for their shoes. Physiotherapy requirements vary from patient to patient and most will make sufficient progress such that discharge from the fracture clinic can occur at week 12 post-op. Patients are encouraged to make gentle return to sporting activities after their discharge from the fracture clinic. Physiotherapy usually continues until patients achieve an active single stance heel raise which usually occurs by week 20. One key tenet of the rehabilitation protocol is for the patient to avoid forced dorsiflexion exercise within the first 3 months of surgical repair.
Note that my practice is to provide 6 weeks of oral thromboprophylaxis (Rivaroxaban) in the post-op period because of the higher risk of thrombi-embolic events occurring with these injuries.

There are three papers specifically assessing the results of the Achillon technique. The first is a paper by the developer of the technique, Dr M Assal, detailing the initial cadaveric study and a prospective clinical series. The second documents an independent series of Achilles ruptures treated with the Achillon jig and describing the use of a transverse incision. The third paper, independent of the jig designers, documents a longer term follow-up of a larger series also using the transverse incision.
Key papers comparing non-operative management vs operative management have been quoted elsewhere in this atlas by Mr Mark Herron when dealing with the standard open repair technique.
Limited open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures: a technique with a new instrument and findings of a prospective multicenter study. Assal M et al. JBJS (Am) 2002; 84: 161-70.
A cadaveric study was performed using the jig to ascertain the vulnerability of the sural nerve to injury from the suture needles. Following this, a large number of patients were prospectively treated in a multi-centre study. With a decent follow-up rate beyond two years, patients were seen to recover excellent functional scores. There were no documented infections nor sural nerve injuries but re-rupture was noted.
Early, active rehabilitation following mini-open repair of Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective study. Calder JD, Saxby TS. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 857-9.
A good-sized cohort of patients were prospectively followed up for 12 months after having had the Achillon jig to repair their acute tendon rupture. This paper described the use of the technique through a transverse skin incision. All scored well with recognised scoring systems. Within the cohort, one had a superficial wound infection and two had sural nerve neurapraxias. There were no documented re-ruptures.
Outcome following use of the Achillon jig for the repair of acutely ruptured Achilles tendons. Davies H, Agrawal Y, Blundell C, Davies MB. Injury 2017; 48: 781-3.
A large series of patients were retrospectively assessed with a case note review and postal scoring. The technique was practised in one institution by a mixture of general trauma surgeons and dedicated foot and ankle surgeons. With over 2 years of follow-up there was a wider range of functional outcome scores than in the previous studies. The study details possible complications of thrombi-embolic disease, superficial and deep wound infections and sural nerve injuries. The study emphasises the need to be vigilant for discrete, separate layers of the fascia cruris and paratenon as the jig can still injure the sural nerve if inserted between the paratenon and the fascia cruris.
Reference
- orthoracle.com
































