
Learn the Common peroneal nerve decompression, neurolysis and wrapping with the AxoGen AxoGuard nerve protector surgical technique with step by step instructions on OrthOracle. Our e-learning platform contains high resolution images and a certified CME of the Common peroneal nerve decompression, neurolysis and wrapping with the AxoGen AxoGuard nerve protector surgical procedure.
The common peroneal nerve is vulnerable to injury from direct trauma at the knee or from traction associated with knee dislocation. The presentation is with footdrop due to loss of the function in tibialis anterior and toe extensors supplied through the deep peroneal nerve. In addition there is loss of peroneal tendon function due to loss of the superficial peroneal nerve. There is sensory loss on the dorsum of the foot.
The decision to operate and decompress the nerve should be made by an experienced nerve surgeon after careful clinical examination, repeated examination if necessary and sometimes supportive imaging and neurophysiological assessments. Typically the decision can be made on the basis of the clinical assessment alone. A dense painful lesion with a positive Tinel’s sign at the peroneal tunnel, a deepening lesion with deterioration under observation, a non-recovering lesion or diagnostic uncertainty are all indications for exploration.
The surgeon should be prepared for the need for reconstruction in a complete lesion should a rupture or a severe attenuation lesion be identified at surgery. Additional procedures including allograft, autograft and distal motor nerve transfers are covered elsewhere. The AxoGuard nerve protector (AxoGen) is a layered porcine collagen extracellular matrix that can be used to wrap scarred nerves where there is epineurial damage and it rapidly revascularises and restores gliding around injured nerves and acts as a barrier to further scar formation that could impair neural regeneration or cause further deterioration due to nerve tether.
The case presented demonstrates the decision making in complex nerve trauma and describes the use of an AxGuard to protect a nerve following decompression at the site of injury.

INDICATIONS
The indications for exploration are a high energy injury with no recovery, neuropathic pain and a positive proximal Tinel’s sign. These factors make a rupture more likely and the surgeon should discuss reconstructive options with the patient including autologous nerve grafting, AVANCE processed nerve allograft and distal augmentation nerve transfers using FDL fascicle to tibialis anterior (tibial nerve to the deep peroneal nerve) and soleus fascicle to peroneus longus (tibial nerve to superficial peroneal nerve). If the nerve is in continuity in a scarred bed then a barrier to scar formation may provide a useful adjenct to simple decompression. The AxoGuard nerve protector is a porcine collagen membrane that revscularizes and provides a healthy gliding layer around injured nerves.
SYMPTOMS & EXAMINATION
The patient sustained a high energy sporting injury to the knee with a ligament injury 8 months previously and the peroneal nerve was non-functioning from the time of the injury. There was no sensory function in the common peroneal nerve and no motor recovery. Neurophysiology studies had demonstrated complete denervation with no reinnervation changes seen in the affected muscles. Clinical examination demonstrated a positive Tinel’s sign at the proximal peroneal tunnel. There was some neuropathic pain in the superficial peroneal territory.
IMAGING
Imaging of the nerve was not planned as it was decided that the nerve should be explored. Ultrasound can demonstrate a physical continuity of the nerve sheath but cannot predict axonal regeneration.
ALTERNATIVE OPERATIVE TREATMENT
The options are to explore the nerve and excise and graft using autologous graft or AVANCE processed nerve allograft. A distal nerve transfer may be performed in late presenting high grade lesions with long nerve gaps where the functional outcome from the nerve graft is usually poor. An alternative strategy is to delay surgery until it is clear that there has been no spontaneous recovery and undertake tendon transfers using tibialis posterior to anterior and FDL to EDL transfers at 12-18 months post injury.
NON-OPERATIVE MANAGEMENT
Non-operative management is expectant awaiting some spontaneous recovery. Trophic muscle stimulation may be employed to try and extend the potential window for successful innervation, however there is no strong evidence for this technique. The functional deficit from the foot drop may be treated using an ankle foot orthotic splint.
CONTRAINDICATIONS
The contra-indications to surgery at the knee include active infection and a poor soft tissue envelope. A relative contra-indication to use of a porcine collagen wrap may be islamic faith and the options should be discussed is detail with each patient.

Consent should include the option of nerve decompression, stimulation and reconstruction, nerve wrapping or distal transfer or combinations thereof depending on the findings.
Surgery is typically performed under general anaesthesia with no long acting neuromuscular paralysis to allow intra-operative nerve stimulation to be used to assess for continuity and recovery potential of the common peroneal nerve.
The patient is positioned in the lateral position with the operated side uppermost. This allows access to the peroneal tunnel and to the ipisilateral sural nerve, if harvest is needed for reversed sensory autograft reconstruction for a rupture or to reconstruct a gap following resection of a neuroma in continuity.
Basic instruments, a Mixter, sloops, a nerve stimulator, microinstruments, operating microscope, Tisseel fibrin glue +/- AVANCE processed nerve allograft should be available.
A thigh tourniquet is applied with padding.
The dependent leg should have a TED stocking and a pneumatic thromboembolic prevention device (Flotron).
Antibiotics are administered prior to tourniquet inflation in case a wrap or allograft is used.
A WHO checklist is completed prior to commencement of surgery.

The patient can fully weight bear but is advised to elevate the limb when at rest for 48 hours.
The dressing can be reduced at that stage and the occlusive wound dressing should be kept in place for 5-7 days.
The wound can be left open from 12 days and scar massage commenced with moisturiser from 3 weeks.
Functional assessment and propagation of a Tinel should be assessed at 6 weeks and 3 months.
EMG at 3 months can indicate whether there is any reinnervation following the neurolysis.
No recovery by 10 months from surgery should warrant consideration of tendon transfers at the 18 months post injury point.

Animal studies ave demonstrated excellent revascularisation after implantation with histology studies showing full incorporation and development of an epineural covering to damaged nerves and restoration of extra-epineural gliding surfaces.
Clinical case series in nerve injury are limited and it is difficult to standardise the extent of trauma. In revision surgery for nerve compression there are papers reporting favourable outcomes when using the protector as an adjunct to neurolysis.
I use an AxoGuard nerve protector when there is epineural loss, extensive scar and trauma to a nerve that may otherwise tether and cause neurostenalgia. I have re-explored one at a carpal tunnel in a revision surgery that required further exposure for a tenolysis and the AxoGuard had full revascularised with excelent nerve glide. There was less glide at the proximal and distal limits of the original AxoGuard where scar had resulted in localised tether points to the native epineurium.
Publications:
Papatheodorou LK, Williams BG, Sotereanos DG. Preliminary results of recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome treated with neurolysis and porcine extracellular matrix nerve wrap. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 May;40(5):987-92
12 patients were followed for a mean 41 months following revision cubital tunnel surgery. there were improvements in grip, sensation and pain following implantation if the AxoGuard protector. There were no complications.
George SC, Boyce DE. An evidence-based structured review to assess the results of common peroneal nerve repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Aug;134(2):302-311
The results of this non-systematic review suggest that the outcome for a graft of greater than 12cm is extremely poor and that for those of less than 6cm 64% have a useful functional recovery. Late reconstruction after 12 months results in poor outcome.
Reference
- orthoracle.com










































